This broadcaster has 804 podcast archives available on-demand.
Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.
December 18, 2020 12:00 pm
Breaking news new text messages that were declassified. Show the PI Peter Strauch were investigating President before crossfire hurricane was even talk about that and more today on Jay Sekulow live live from Washington DC. Phone lines are questions right now: one 806 843-110-1800 68412, your host, secular now bogus crossfire hurricane investigation into Pres. Russia, which began on July 31, 2016 is been completely debunked. That's when we were told by the FBI when they testified under oath that it began which was July 1 31st 2016. During the Presidential election in the lead up to the Presidential election.
But now new text messages have been released, declassified, and the Senate has released these through chairman around Johnson of the Senate Homeland security committee and Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. They got these declassified messages that show the Peter Strauch was talking to Lisa page 3 days before this and all read it directly. There's three things I want to talk about Lisa one that's what that is blacked out to our open counterintelligence investigations relating to trumps Russia connections and three whether two things I bought frames were okay to think, but number two is on July 28 say we just opened.
He said our open counterintelligence investigations relating to trumps Russia connections, but these are the same folks who testified they were not investigating Trump in Russia until crossfire hurricane was officially opened on July 31 so is not just that these are three days apart that it's that he in this text message he's referring to an ongoing we don't know how far back it goes, but an ongoing investigation present trumps were done in July 2016.
Those were the dozen limited from camping after the email itself says our ongoing CI which is criminal counterintelligence investigation relating to trumps Russia much in connections. So again, the FBI caught again with misstatements about when this investigation started how it started, and the fact of the matter is, and I think we have to be clear on this date set this up. They put this in motion. They bring the Federal Bureau of investigation and the end result of that was a in my view, a complete fabrication to the American people forget three year investigation that garnered nothing and it was a hoax from the beginning and they all knew it it was to take out President from that they were successful in doing it during the election. During the that 2016 campaign but ask yourself this is the Federal Bureau of investigation.
They were up to no good. Very early on, let's write and they were doing this again you could say well it didn't affect present preparatory 16 because it was a counterintelligence not yet known but didn't affect present traffic 2020.
Well I think about what he had to go through his present was he want he had the entire FBI going after the special counsel was appointed to go after Muller really consult try to just sully his name. He had people like swallow well and others call your ill Russian agent on television.
People like Adam Schiff. Then there was impeachments because Russia got nowhere.
They still wanted to take him out. So they impeached him over phone call that 35 other people listen to it was a phone call Ukrainian Pres. was not private one-on-one and again it was failed. Impeachments but it took up the first three years of present trumps presidency he was fighting a special counsel based off of bogus rush investigation that we now know started even before they told us it started the is because the FBI Strauch were just kids on taking out drug and did an impeachment, a Muller that impeachment gets out of that and its covert basically everything we have hit and three Supreme Court case of what we were doing the impeachment trial that the requested so basically the entire four years of presidency different were dominated by this he was still able to accomplish so much, but again, imagine what it be like without these better imagine what 2020 billing that these bad actors and things hanging over the President will talk that we come back Jay Sekulow the American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom. Protecting those who are persecuted for their faith.
Uncovering corruption in the Washington bureaucracy fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress.
ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge for every dollar you donate $10 gift becomes 20 oh $50 gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ. The work we simply would not occur without your generous take part in our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms most important to you and your family. You forgive today online ACLJ only one.
A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.
And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists ramifications. 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the worship ministry and what Obama care means to the pro-life in many ways your membership is empowering the right to life mission life today online ACLJ/that's the problem. Some done by the Jay Sekulow band called hope for Jerusalem and it's available. I think now anywhere you get your music so you should look for that. It's not just the samples got a Christmas closet where doing a concert at the end of the month. In fact, when were done with radio today I'm going to shoot remotely. My drum section on one song and guitar section on another really good ones to the tune reminiscing by the Little River band and then a monkey step.
Actually, I'm not a steppingstone definitely kind of appropriate this time of our history. That's what that I back today. I called back to the topic. Yeah me again that that what we are focusing on today and not united know that we would be talking Peter Strauch again and let you know that they ended this late into December 2020. But now more text messages have been declassified and what they show. Just wanted_the significance that what you really caught up with the that the short time period dates but the words that he used was that Peter Strauch was texting Lisa page on July July 28, 2016. So before the election in 2016. There's three things he wants to talk to about one is, is that blacked out the second one which is the important one is are open counterintelligence investigations relating to trumps Russia connections, not the trunk campaigns not specific but I'm very general, any kind of trump Russia connections that why is this such a smoking gun why's it so important were talking about it today right away on radio well. These are people who testified that they were even beginning to investigate anything involving present trump in Russia until July 31. But in this text message sent on July 28.
He wants an update on the open investigation relating to trumps Russia connections so they were doing that deep trump Russia bogus investigation long before they ever told Congress they officially did so summing right there alone. They could be subject to problems because they may been under oath in those testimonies but the fact is we don't know yet how far back he goes, but certainly is more than three days.
It's probably out at least a month or longer before they ever opened an actual official investigation that would be tracked with a name like crossfire hurricane and they would tell people know some of these other aspects of these emails are also interesting, and another one that comes to Strauch.
He says I haven't seen it yet. Talk about something and but dealing with Russia than a blackout. Then you got one talk with blank follows emails this morning.
I think were fine want to keep this low-key and protect the career diplomat who met with Papadopoulos. This was the set up. George Papadopoulos realize what was going on here so the career diplomat that met with Papadopoulos. We really were told it was just some kind of undercover assistance I got from a British professor now finding out that they had.
Career diplomats involved. He also said I asked DCM to limit dissemination at state as much as possible, hopefully, mean 60 people instead of 120 10 with the problem with all this is, in my view fan is that any assignment. I know John terms invest in it will see what happens with an illness, what your Bible do with the with the barrel not appointed as special counsel on the pressure and the cows being so close in the Senate. If it ends up being controlled by Republicans. I don't think so easy to dismiss on what your sense UI should be easy to dismiss. There's an awful lot of smoke there. I would say there's fire there.
At this point Jamie look we already knew that the FBI had demonstrated an animus to Pres. trump. I think this is clear evidence they were trying to invoke input in motion a scheme to undermine him, not just the beginning. But from further back than we knew. Even to this point. Look Peter Strauch. This is a guy J people to have to remember I know we talked a lot about him.
He was not only the guide is signed and memo opening crossfire hurricane. He was also the guy that overruled the Washington field office closing crossfire rape razor which was a subset of that here. Here's the question that I general flip's of everybody currently Correct. Yeah, look at it as far as your question about Congress. This is what I think Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley are asking now. Jay wears Christopher a and all this I mean, look, we now know there is an investigation predating the one that they been briefed on they have every right to know how far back that reached into all it involved either. Who knows, there might be a whole lot of other people inside the campaign scope of this involved that were yet aware of, committing perjury… Played Trey Gaudi, former Congressman when he was a congressman at the hearing was held on July 12, 2018 and involve Peter Strauch prior to July 31, 2016.
How many witness interviews, did you conduct as part of the Russia trump campaign alleged collusion investigation done so non-before July 31 non-before July 31 nine, we've now got so that's perjury material affected by the when the investigation actually started. So you see what's happening here now Durham. If he gets to finish the task to bring this all to bring to head but Harry I look at this by looking obstruction which is no. 18 USC thousand one work here, obstruction of false statements maybe obstruction on this because they had an update. Congress was investigating.
How do I mean this is how to get around this map emails not websites, not his email. I'm not sure he can and I'm certain that he shouldn't J, I think it's important to keep in mind that the tentacles of the trump investigation began in 2015. Arguably, as a coverup of Hillary Clinton's complicity in using a private email server account and this was reported in 2015 by the New York Times and so some of the players who are now who were implicated a few will buy the FBI wrongly implicated that they were investigated by the FBI.
Beginning in 2015. So it's very very possible that this investigation of Pres. trump in the so-called Russia collusion narrative commenced in 2015 and so now we have newly declassified task text messages from Peter Strauch indicating that the FBI began its investigation of Pres. Donald Trump before the crossfire hurricane investigation was opened, so that's just one bit of information suggesting that the FBI not only was engaged in its own form of collusion, but then lied and this is my claim to cover it up Melissa Trey Gaudi.
This is when he is the chairman of the committee of the house is talking about this specifically. Let's play by 23 first then will get to buy 29. The FBI has represented to Congress that nothing from an investigative standpoint with respect to Russian collusion and the trump campaign began before July 31, 2016, there you go you heard Strauch say it. Your daddy confirm it again that that during the series. That nothing that they were doing anything until July 31. We now know they were lying in appears Strauch was lying to Congress because we have the text message.
Instead, it shows that this investigation was already open as Harry said it could have been opened as far back as 2015.
We also let me remind people that the Russian Intel that was picked up that it was Hillary Clinton funneling this whole program and the Russians were worried that they really get blamed for the tax that they really get blamed for the server of Hillary Clinton and Hillary Clinton was gonna put forward all this trump Russia collusion they really blame for that and are Intel picked up the Russian Intel communications about that.
Look, this is a staggering abuse of power door. No two ways about it and I would say to staggering abuse of power that continues to be perpetuated today because look, Peter Strauch hasn't come forward and given this information, he was caught ending. This is information that was just put out today that Peter Strauch was not forthcoming about in Jordan, I think it also underscores. We talked about this previously but it underscores the opposition to Peter Strauch leading this investigation that existed at the FBI at the time. I mean major, major players, including counterintelligence director Bill priest that did not want Peter Strauch leading that investigation because he said look Peter Strauch's not around the chain of command and I collaborated with Andy McCabe outside of the chain of command in the past is not the right guy to do this, but Jordan why was Peter Strauch. Why was Antioquia McCabe okay with Peter putting Peter Strauch in charge Jordan because Andy McCabe was in on it to. Here is his office in which the insurance plan was talked about it. So that was exactly the guy he wanted to lead it because they had already chosen where they wanted to end up and now they were just trying to make the facts fitted. I don't think there's any other way to put a jar. Jordan this is a again I think it's something that has to continue having Durham is expanding. His team is been made into a special counsel to make it harder to remove him by the Biden team and I think at that. Also, with the street and over 50 seconds here, but there are shrinking majorities in the house for Democrats as we speak, which makes it tougher and tougher for them to get rid of gender thing about this Jordan 222 Democrats were elected but arty three had been tagged by the Biden administration that takes him down to 290 mean you need 218 to win the speakership gavel.
Think about that Jordan makes her there there down to just one person, a majority, and "the Senate is up for grabs.
Let's not forget important Georgia January 5 makes a lot harder to get rid terms lot expanding estate. So take your calls.
We come back River. We got matching towns right now the AC okay the month of December. Whatever you're able to donate email@example.com is doubled as a group of donors who will match all donations coming in December. Donate online ACLJ double only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life.
We've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission life will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ pro-life cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activists. The ramifications of Roe V Wade, 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the worship ministry and what Obama care means to the pro-life in many ways your membership is empowering the right to question your free copy of mission life today online ACLJ/the American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom. Protecting those for their faith. Uncovering corruption in the Washington bureaucracy fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress. ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful.
Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge for every dollar you donate $10 gift becomes 20 oh $50 gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ. The work we simply would not occur without your generous support in our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms most important to you beautiful gift today online ACLJ is stored in secure we are getting your photos to 164 31 and we have a company and now Vallejo: from Illinois online to allay a welcome to Jay Sekulow live your there might one day is likely that the trump administration has already sold evidence against peters truck company indictment, Littlejohn turns doing John terms the Lord is the Justice Department patient was appointed to look at all of these cases, the origins of prosperity, in which, by way now Strauch knowingly misrepresented the date upon which this investigation we were like when you answer Congress under oath with words like no and now we have messages that show you are lying to me right away, that's knows or moves you can take now to Granger has to prove that you got it go through that process, but I still think Peter suck to be in serious trouble. So again, Durham is increases team in the Democrat majority in the house shrinking like one vote looks like right now, one vote majority 282 maybe 2 to 219 and then the U.S. Senate is up for grabs. Remember, so that really will have a big part of whether Durham is able to continue to do his work as he expands his team that I know we got a major pro-life victory and at we write about ACLJ that we haven't had time to talk about it on air in its awesome story about the ACLJ's work and how it is led to even bigger legal action being taken because of course we handle the civil side of cases and now the Department of Justice is taking one of our civil cases, a life in the conscience clause and lots investigation at their own investigation and exit file lawsuit.
Yeah, and they filed a civil action to stop and really redo the first sentence of the United States brings a civil action. Defendant University of Vermont Medical Center from punishing healthcare perfect personnel who follow their conscience and refuse to perform abortions going to read that to you again. This is followed by the United States Department of Justice, it's United States of America versus the University of Vermont Medical Center. It says United States brings this civil action to stop defendant University of Vermont Medical Center from punishing healthcare personnel who follow their conscience and refuse to perform abortions, the lawyer handling the case. Ferocity ACLJ is our senior counsel Frank Manion, Frank brought the initial challenges for Frank. Let's get some history here, the people know how this case developed and now the Butler justice involved. Big deal. The first time ever enacted of her commitments back in 1973, right after Roe V Wade that we've got the government to file a lawsuit alleging a violation of the church and church limited one of many conscience protections out there if you look at it on paper.
It's really the best, most directed covers the most procedures but we've never been able to get in and force it didn't matter whether it was a Republican administration or Democratic administration. We now have a lawsuit filed for the first time ever we represented nurse who worked in the operating surgical nurse at University of Vermont. She was on the list of religious objectors.
In other words, people who said I'm not to participate in any abortions of any kind because of my religious beliefs, knowing full well that she was on that list.
She was deceived by her employer. On one day in 2017 sent into a procedure that she was told was a noncontroversial DNC following a miscarriage. Once she got in the room and scrubbed it with me.
She really can't get out.
At that point she found out that it was a delectable portion of the six-month gestational age baby. She was horrified. She called out to her supervisor who could have just walked in the room and take her place that you know I'm on the object… I can't do that.
She said too bad you have to do it. The doctor in the room also knew she was an object during the reader with the words, please don't hate me for this. So talk about an outrageous horror story. She came to us. We investigated it. We interviewed witnesses.
In addition to our client and we referred this case without a formal complaint with the conscience and religious freedom division of the office of civil rights of HHS, a new agency or new sub agency within HHS that was created by the trump administration.
They investigated they spent a week in Vermont interviewing 15 or so other healthcare people attempted to rep to reach a settlement with University of Vermont. Apparently the University refuse and suggest two days ago they filed a lawsuit in US District Court, Vermont finally finally put some teeth in the church amendment. After all these years and we can be prouder that it's because of the ACLJ that we were able to do this is a monumental decision made by the Department of Justice HHS but I want to underscore something here. It started because the ACLJan Franks leadership filed a complaint a formal complaint to start the process going and if there's one thing the Constitution should clearly prefer protect Eric. That is the conscience rights of American citizens who oppose abortions and don't want to actually participate in the procedure, especially in this situation where they could have had someone else to absolutely so what we have here is an outrageous infringement of the religious conscience rights of a pro-life nurse who was effectively coerced into participating in an elective abortion. What we have, arguably, is a collusive conspiracy by the University to violate the first amendment rights of this pro-life nurse and it was outrageous because it was pre-meditated and it was intentional, at least in my view, and one of the things that we perhaps should think about is seeking to criminalize the behavior engaged in by the medical personnel at the University of Vermont because they knew that this pro-life nurse did have a right to object but they engaged in action to ensure that she violated her country so let me ask you this Frank had two minutes left here. What is the likely outcome of earthly category that the administration docket to stop it.
If there is in fact an administration looks likely what what happens in this case we don't know what assuming there is a great way whether they decide to just let this drop we've got a raise hell because their own investigation uncovered more than we know about you look at paragraph 50 of the complaint that the Department of Justice filed they found another 10 nurses went through similar ordeals and designers so they can't just come in early next year and say you know what nevermind something has to be done and I think we have to make enough noise to sort of embarrassed them into doing. Let's not forget to delete any recourse that we could take these nurses and following the recent well were looking into that right now J coming. There are timing issues and frankly the nurses prefer to do it this way because it were able to do it anonymously and got careers that we understand all that this should have been it right now absolutely free. Thanks for the update and quickly view on this. Which means we had to keep the Senate race all that more important is the least you can keep some congressional heat on the Department of Justice to rectify this wrong J. This was federal law, almost like almost 50 years. In no administration reinforcing to this when we we followed all the way from the regulatory and litigation, NJ. I agree with Frank.
This drop, it won't be the end of it for the ACLJ right so sweetly come back second half hour, and applicant to take her phone calls 100-684-3110 taken the side stroke matter which cannot be ignored.
Folks told Congress absolutely not.
He's actually double down the street in response to present still denying the way of tweets in the Texas ACLJVC LJ.org the American Center for Law and just as critical issues at home and abroad for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ matching challenge for every dollar you donate will be managed $10 gift becomes $20, $50 gift becomes 100 you can make a difference in the protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms to you and your family. Give a gift today online ACLJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow and let me reset the stage.
Peter Strauch testified to Congress back to the house. We have the Sanyo play to give her advice and I can hear you testified nothing was done about trump in Russia into the open crossfire hurricane into July 31 two testified to Trey, Gayatri Gotti was the chair take a listen prior to July 31, 2016. How many witness interviews, did you conduct as part of the Russia trump campaign alleged collusion investigation so non-before July 31, then it would get withdrawn because Trey Gotti said this statement in Peter Strauch didn't correct it. Take a listen. The FBI has represented to Congress that nothing from an investigative standpoint with respect to Russian collusion and the trump campaign began before July 31, 2016 and just yesterday new text messages declassified from Peter Strauch to Lisa page on July 28, 2016 three days before July 31. What's key is that he says are three things I want to talk to you about the number two is the important one.
Our open counterintelligence investigations relating to trumps Russian connections that were about to open it a few days, but they were Artie open. Now here's the thing present from tween about this. I would have to vice President trump and Peter Strauch applied to the present, just about a couple hours ago and said this is untrue. The investigation open July 31 doubt either. There's only one of these can be true, it's a text message because Peter struck From Peter Strauch time stamped date stamped time 20 to 2016, at 1349 which is 149 in the afternoon so three things I want to talk to about our open so is already open which we are going open CI investigation counterintelligence investigation relating to trumps Russian connections so open counterintelligence investigation relating to trumps Russian connections that is dated July 28 and it was talking past tense are open. Then he says now untrue. The investigation open July 31 so the mate he makes his false statement issue. Harry even clear things about Peter Strauch's capacious ability to impeach himself with his own testimony so basically a first year law student could tear apart Peter Strauch's testimony. You cannot start an investigation on July 31. And that's the commencement of it and then we have evidence from his own mouth essentially that he was engaged in an investigation on or before July 28 so he is fibbing on either one side or the other but I think his history suggest that he isn't trustworthy individual who had a preordained plan a preordained insurance policy aimed first at defeating Donald Trump and secondly, and impairing his presidency, and I think the evidence is clear is that when again this is just the fact that Peter Strauch there, gets involved in this discussion replies the President saying that this is untrue when we have a timestamp text message. Only Washington would someone be so bold what he could've just kept his mouth shut and at least develop, but instead now that he's gotta say you're a year telling lies again present trump even though present toget off of the timestamp text message sent from Peter Strauch to Lisa page about ongoing intelligence investigation before crossfire Jordan only in Washington and I would tell you I think even most people here would know that it's probably time to start talking outside this. I can't imagine Peter Strauch's attorney advising him to do anything but stop talking but you know what is its untrue is a pompous guy needs to be taken down. Ultimately, and I think that's probably why part of the reason) is expanding his team get that special counsel status will be back. Remember matching challenge the end of December. Double the impact of your donation ACLJ the American Center for Law and justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad. Whether it's defending religious freedom. Protecting those for their faith. Uncovering corruption in the Washington bureaucracy fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that.
We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help me way for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge for every dollar you donate $10 gift becomes 20 $50 gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ the work we simply would not occur without your generous take part in our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms most important to you today online ACLJ only one.
A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called mission will show you how you personally support the publication includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in the ministry and what Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is powering the right question free copy mission life today online ACLJ/Jay Sekulow Jordan secular.
We are to hear from closet 164 3110 also encouraged your Facebook audience continue to share this with your friends and family. Make sure you're signed up to get notifications on Facebook and on YouTube. Make sure if if you were watching on YouTube and do this without about a month and it's a totally different date audience. There, but it's live and that makes your subscribe, you click that subscribe but is very easy in the next to the subscribe button. There's a bell you click on the bell this this makes sense if you're watching on YouTube. You see, right there. I click of the bell you get notification so when we go live. You get the notification that the radio shows live.
There's ever breaking news that we have to come back to the every coat later in the day we come back alive again. You'll get those notifications as well on through YouTube, so we encourage you hit the subscribe button and make sure to click that bell as well. It's a growing new audience on YouTube that Facebook periscope rumble later in the day, it's not live yet, but later the day on rumble of course we we put out periscope, and on parlor as well. So all of the all and end because of the social media still firstname.lastname@example.org as well for those you like just to watch it go to see the chats in the comments going in and of course are likely the judge that either ended.
The majority of our audience that we think is listing on local radio stations or Sirius XM. Of course we we think about you every single day.
That's our biggest audience. They were talking to a we always try to make sure everything was showing on camera were able to explain to you and what were talking about today and now it's got even more to it. As Peter Strauch is telling resonated states his text message is our its untrue and likely set is only tooth only want one of these could be true either. There was no investigation about present trump or the truck campaign or tromp in general and Russia until crossfire Kate upper July 31 is what Peter Strunk testified to, or his text messages right I would say it's probably text message which is time stamped and references open, counter intelligence investigation relating to Trump's Russia connections.
I don't even know that you can really play with words with this would not Russia.
I been say that I differ that I keep reading the text you the text message itself. So rights is to Lisa page who is lawyer at the both of them. By the way the book by Mark what what a disappointment. That guy was. I have to just be clear what was it like absent. I guess for all of this so three things yet three things I want to talk to you about one are open, so this is dated 28 July.
That's three days before September 30 first, so it's already open are open.
What are open CI investigation. What is CI investigation counter intelligence investigation relating to.
So what does the investigation cover trumps Russian connections so fan when he went up there and testified across the street from your office right now. He made a false statement or either the emails a false statement. I'm pretty sure he lighted that instance.I'm with Jordan on this when he's talking to other FBI agents here about open investigation, why, why would he have been lying at that point, I think there would've been job ramifications there. I also you know like I think it could be redacted because of classified information that I actually want to know what he's talking about and point number one do I mean maybe that's information about an investigation we know about.
I don't really care to know what frames he bought to hang although who knows maybe he was in a frame. The documents he signed. Opening these investigations.
J he's not telling the possibly. Here's the bottom line. He's not telling the truth in at least one of these instances and I bet my.bottom dollar that is not telling the when he tells the President its untrue, which are here's the thing Peter Strauch told people to keep the investigations open when agents of the FBI were actually investigating the this was on the crossfire razor which was investigation of Mike Flynn. Told him just close it. There's nothing there we've interviewed the guy. Nothing happened absolutely soon. Peter Strauch I think is nefarious character and if we go back to the newly declassified packs for a moment, it indicates that the FBI again commenced an investigation of then candidate Donald Trump and his campaign long before.
I believe the crossfire hurricane investigation was opened that then led to an official investigation at which then led to the molar investigation and basically if you look at the molar investigation. The FBI investigation quote" pre-investigation. Basically it's all part and parcel of a false spurious charge with respect to the Russian collusion narrative and then if you look at Bob Muller's investigation. It's it's clear beyond doubt that the molar investigation proved that there was no basis probative basis for investigating President tromp, but there indeed was a probative basis for investigating Hillary Clinton as second the molar investigation. For instance perv that Bob Muller needs to had very swiftly to a rest home in Florida. And third, it proves something far more important that the FBI leadership has been corrupt and I'm talking about the top individuals for years if not for decades, and that is the quintessential problem, go to Suzanne face. Was she right in my courses. Once you abides in office dog is investigation disappear due to the new powers it will be Joe Biden does get into August. I here's the problem he's got a shrinking congressional majority in the house down to a one-vote majority takes to 18 they might have 219 the Democrats because he been pulling from the house. The actual breakdown between Republicans and Democrats. Once Biden's warning right now you better than a couple races like that are like Republicans are leaving by like six votes are 20 votes of those those will have to be settled, but where where would Bibiana mean they would barely beat to 218 right right so if those two races settle out as they are now Jordan and the Republicans win both of them. It would be 222 Democrats elected 213 Republicans but Jordan.
Three of those Democrats would be leaving for the Biden administration, assuming things proceed as they are now so that we drop it to 219 to 213 but your name and you you know this very well. Not every vote just requires a majority of the of the people who are there voting. Some of them require a literal majority of the house including the speakership so no matter how many people leave and how many vacancies there are. Speaker Pelosi has to get to 18 to be speaker the house, and if AOC and maybe one other person says not voting for her. But maybe they can't pick their own speaker, but they could certainly deny Nancy Pelosi from being speaker so it would get very interesting very fast. Not to mention Jordan there's a lot of reasons, members have to leave the house yet and there's also that also means you know, getting rid of John Durham, which the President would have the authority to do work for the department just as special counsel would be political very politically very risky with a divided government and divided country to then just terminate John Durham, who served both administrations I think would be politically very very risky as well. If they can do it no power to its whether he would exercise that power right. I think that what he's got his issue with is that specifically his issue is that he's got is that the special counsel designation and if there Republicans are able to win those two seats in Georgia, and the houses that narrow.
Basically you are looking at if you're Joe Biden you look at taken the oath January 20 couple years it's very likely that you're not going to have the house and you might not have the city, especially if Georgia Republicans Georgia conservatives and Georgians who just don't like the idea of a single party controlling every branch if if you don't like the idea of the Democrats control the Senate the house and the White House voting.
Then again, I think that did this. This puts Joe Biden kind that Barack Obama situation where two years in, you can't get much done so and and if you're on this limit of numbers by navigability much done the first two years there I talk you guys have trouble judicial bodies because nobody were filled by President tromp and the idea that again if if Mitch McConnell's there. The most extreme liberals are getting through the Republican Senate if if it's a Republican, said it was good page into the sea on life. I've a page all wondering on people really got all. So's process.
There's a process. This came through these released by Senators Ron Johnson, who chairs the Homeland security committee Chuck Grassley chairs the Senate Finance Committee declassified it, probably by the other day and I had declassified it so John Radcliffe so you get some of it is been a drip drip so that we see daily. If you go through a ton. If you see this page of this just like a a few days of justice text messages with Lisa page.
In the event will read line by line.
What's not redacted.
Not much is here to figure this stuff out. But I understand the frustration. This goes back 26 I just wouldn't recall that this is FBI has not been very forthcoming, even to Chris Ray. Which is why Mr. Ray is being kept by your body. We have a virtual tie between our Facebook live audience and are YouTube audience.
So let's see who pulls about so I will encourage a Facebook audience and the YouTube audience to share with your friends and subscribe in the bell appear on YouTube and of course following like on only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice is, is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn mission will show you how you personally. Publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later Planned Parenthood's role in your motion imagery and what Obama care means to the prone life in many ways your membership is empowering the right question free copy mission in life today online/American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad.
Whether it's defending religious freedom.
Protecting those persecuted for their faith covering corruption in Washington fighting to protect life in the courts and in Congress. ACLJ would not be able to do any of this without your support for that. We are grateful. Now there's an opportunity for you to help in the way for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ's matching challenge for every dollar you donate $10 gift becomes 20 $50 gift becomes 100. This is a critical time for the ACLJ.
The work we simply would not occur without your generous take our matching challenge make a difference in protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms most important to you today online okay literally neck and back on YouTube and Facebook every like like the state of Georgia election cycles so we will have machines haywire here so we encourage you to do what both of you on Facebook and YouTube share with your friends right now and hit the subscribe buttons to stay engaged on all this, as we… Be distracting.
By the way rumble same thing of course is watching us later in the day there ACLJ that are all the social media platforms and of course the vast audience of the radio audience will worry more radio broadcast, then all these other mediums combined were that we can use all yeah exactly, you know, this a great question to braid on YouTube and what it let Brandon know. I would also let the whole audience know to do a show next week where it with block that is time for a full hour with Ricker now. They still special visor for the ACLJ in foreign policy and national security on Intel and the threats facing America in 2021.
So really doing that for you and I think this will answer a lot of your questions rated but he asked specifically how does the scandal shape the future of US intelligence against American citizens and I think it's you know does it scare the FBI off from doing this and I'm not sure yet. We got to that point where I can say yes II think that the IRS we squeak week we got there and that was living to stop. We had to litigate it. So I takes more than just a 38-year-old lawyer being indicted by John Durham. It would take more than that to scare off the bureaucracy so no I don't think US Intel is been totally cleaned up. I think the truck team is.as best they can, by putting people like Rick Rundell who declassified lot information without unmasking. Remember I put in people like John Radcliffe of got this information out, but if people are behind bars or or you know, I don't think losing their jobs.
The writing a book for billion dollars is not to scare them away from doing think about that. What's going to scare away from doing it is having to spend all that million dollars in legal fees and and then not pay restitution but with her behind bars, but but that takes high-profile people and taking them down through the grand jury process during COBIT now potential shift administration but IBII think I think that's it. If Lisette happens that this could happen right away, get a look. I mean look at who Joe bides putting in place that it's the same crowd right so I mean it's it's the same group all over again. The Peter struck scrape that now we think is great. They think he did a service to the United States. I think Jim probably don't like because they view him as costing Hillary Clinton election but Peter struck is not viewed by the the elites up in Washington and as an enemy of the Constitution of probably the opposite day I made Lucky's out here still lying to us today through a text message out in the open to the President United States and in yet you don't hear a whole lot from the divine administration certainly are the left in Washington DC about that egregious abuse of power. Look, here's what I would say we give an awesome power to these individuals, people like Jim Comey, Peter Strock, Andy McCabe, with Jordan when they when it is abused in this way unless there is a pretty serious ramification for that abuse. There's no disincentive for future officials down the road to do it again and by the way, day in and some of these cases is that it would be future officials. It's the same officials I mean Joe Biden is bringing back some of their very same officials that were involved in this in the past so it is something we have to be concerned about moving forward. I think you know Harriet was thinking about this and I look at the kind of the reaction that you get with these kind of things I may think people that are conservatives that respect the Constitution understand that this guy really harm the Constitution and on the constitutional process and is still lying right now absolutely. So one of the things that this incident suggest is the global elites who looked down on individuals who live in what might be called flyover country. They don't really care about harming the rule of law harming the Constitution why because they are in hot pursuit of unlimited power and they believe they are entitled to direct the direction of the United States rather than elected officials. So many of these FBI officials.
They basically were driven by disdain first for the candidate and second for the election of Pres. Trump in 2016. They can't believe their own pace in terms of what actually happened and so they've done virtually everything they could to disparage Trump's candidacy and to impair his presidency and that is why you had a sequence of charges. So first you had crossfire hurricane. Actually, there was an investigation before that, then you have the special counsel then you had this so-called Ukrainian phone call and is Jordan correctly points out between 30 and 35 people were listening on this call, which allegedly compromised US security so all of this represents a fictional narrative designed to eliminate Pres. Trump from office, or, or, alternatively, prevent them from engaging in productive work for average working men and women in the country. I think evidently that was the plan receipt. We saw that unfold over the course of three years 1/2 years and were there from beginning of representing the present.
I wanted kind of why things up a little bit with that is known to the weekend here. Look a lot of people ask a lot of questions about where the but what's the status of the election. I think we gotta be clear on this. There are two past you have a situation like this one is the legal path. The other is a political path the legal plant that is not borne fruit with be realistic that I think she's me, Dolores tried to brought suits and they just were not successful, including at the Supreme Court. That leaves the political path was the political political bath of the state legislatures when they select the six states are those six take him to come in and undo the electors at this point.
That doesn't seem even remotely possible. Looking at just realistically what we have to do. I think of the ACL check is made to look forward. What is it that working a deal with with the new administration which is we Simpson happen now I'll tell you one thing I'm worried about not going fan on this really quickly got a great lawsuit filed by the United States government against the University of Vermont on the abortion issue. I could see that being pulled in 10 seconds. No question about it. I mean, it had been 50 years on the books with no prosecution. You think the Joe Biden's administration would be a one to buck that trend. I think the Trump administration been the only one to file it and I think it was deftly on the table.
The other thing J and in simultaneous without announcement.
They also disallowed $200 million for the state of California because they did not offer an insurance plan that was free of abortion that set out on risk to select. We look forward we gotta be prepared to fight these in on some of them J not all of them on some of them we can still win right folks.
I think this is what we have to understand is that we have to be ready to fight, and that again the debt that it whether it's the swallow while issuing a 44 is out on that already.
Whether it is the issues involving good lot like Frank was talking about earlier this great lawsuit by Department of Justice and putting pressure on DOJ not to build this walk away from that, dismiss that because of what was done in violation of US law to this nurse.
It wasn't about whether that abortion is legal or not is whether not this nurse could be forced to dissipated as a civil rights case against the University of New Hampshire Medical Center and the assumption of the buying team blood to drop that.
But, but put pressure and say that's absurd what he wanted in court, and now that that the University should be punished and not before schemata meets Job.
I really believe nurses should be forced. Is it as a Catholic. He believes in nurses should be forced to be perform abortions elective abortion. So again that's how you fight all of these issues we talk about that more next week as well on the broadcast associate stay with us next week as well. I support the work of ACL to weave a matching challenge right now double the impact of your donation ACLJ.org that's ACLJ.org next week at the American Center for Law and Justice were engaged in critical issues at home and abroad for limited time you can participate in the ACLJ matching challenge for every dollar you donate, it will be now $10 gift becomes $20, $50 gift becomes 100 can make a difference in the protecting the constitutional and religious freedoms most to you and your family. Give a gift today online ACLJ