Duncan Scott, a former New Mexico state senator, shares the story behind the 'pointy hat bill', a satirical amendment he introduced to address the insanity defense plea, which unexpectedly passed through the legislative process. [... more]

The US government's involvement in Gaza, the role of USAID, and the implications of the Overton window strategy. Additionally, the discussion of treasonous Republicans in Texas and Florida, and the push for amnesty and gun control. [... more]

North Carolina's 2024 general election results saw the state side with former President Donald Trump, contributing to Republicans' potential control in the US House. The state also maintained a Republican majority in the General Assembly, with Republicans holding a veto-proof supermajority in the state Senate. However, they fell one seat short of a supermajority in the state House, which may impact their ability to pass legislation. [... more]

Duncan Scott, a former New Mexico state senator, shares the story behind his infamous 'pointy hat bill', a satirical amendment that aimed to address the overuse of the insanity defense plea in court. The bill, which required psychologists to wear a cone-shaped hat and a white beard while testifying, was accidentally passed by the Senate and became a humorous footnote in the legislative process. [... more]

Duncan Scott, a former New Mexico state senator, shares the story behind the infamous 'pointy hat bill', a satirical amendment he introduced to address the insanity defense plea, which unexpectedly passed and became a part of a licensing bill for psychologists. [... more]

The abortion movement has become more radical post Roe v. Wade, with extreme bills and laws being pushed through state legislatures, removing almost all limits on abortion. In Minnesota, a bill called the Protect Reproductive Options Act would legalize taxpayer-funded, on-demand abortion for all, and end protections for babies born alive, taxpayer-funded abortions, parental notification, and informed consent for women. [... more]

Duncan Scott, a former New Mexico state senator, shares the story behind the infamous pointy hat bill, a satirical attempt to address the insanity defense plea, which unexpectedly passed through the legislative process. [... more]

The U.S. Supreme Court's recent rulings on voter ID and redistricting have significant implications for North Carolina and federal elections. Dr. Andy Jackson, director of the Civitas Center for Public Integrity, discusses the potential impact on state and federal laws, and the ongoing litigation in North Carolina. [... more]

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) is launching a new sister organization, ACLJ Action, to take the fight to the states and engage in direct advocacy and lobbying. This new effort will focus on stopping the left's march towards socialism, countering China, protecting the unborn, and defending Israel and fighting anti-Semitism. [... more]

The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) is launching a new sister organization, ACLJ Action, to take the fight to the states and engage in aggressive advocacy. ACLJ Action will focus on stopping the left's march towards socialism, countering China, protecting the unborn, and defending Israel, among other issues. [... more]

The expansion of legalized gambling in North Carolina poses significant risks to vulnerable populations, including increased problem gambling and addiction. Attorney Chris Derek discusses the complexities of state and federal law regarding gambling, highlighting the dangers of sports betting and the need for caution in expanding gambling operations. [... more]

A state task force explores health care coverage, while economists debate the merits of free trade and its impact on the economy. Meanwhile, a discussion on originalism and its role in shaping the Supreme Court's decisions highlights the importance of understanding the Constitution's original intent. In North Carolina, the state legislature grapples with the balance of power between the governor and the General Assembly, setting the stage for a potentially contentious 2021. [... more]

The process of certifying the electoral vote is underway, with Vice President Pence at the center of a contentious debate over the role of state legislatures in deciding the outcome of the election. As Congress convenes in joint session, objections are expected to be raised, potentially leading to a lengthy debate and a pivotal moment in the certification process. [... more]

The Supreme Court is considering a case that could determine the outcome of the presidential election, with Texas arguing that four states conducted their elections unconstitutionally and the court could order a redo of the electoral college votes. [... more]

The Supreme Court is set to hear a landmark case, Texas v. Pennsylvania, which challenges the constitutionality of the selection of electors in four key states. The case argues that non-legislative actors, such as secretaries of state, overstepped their authority and diluted the votes of citizens in other states. The outcome of the case could have significant implications for the electoral process and the balance of power between state legislatures and executive branches. [... more]

The Supreme Court requires four states to respond to allegations that they conducted elections illegally, violating the Constitution and the Electors Clause. The states, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, must respond by Thursday at 3 p.m. to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and the motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. The case has significant implications for the outcome of the presidential election and the role of state legislatures in selecting electors. [... more]

A lawsuit filed by the state of Texas against four battleground states at the U.S. Supreme Court could determine the outcome of the presidential election. The lawsuit claims that the electors in these states were chosen in unconstitutional means, violating the Constitution's Electors Clause and the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court will decide whether to accept the case, which could have significant implications for the election's outcome. [... more]

Justice Alito orders a response from Pennsylvania in a case challenging election certification issues, citing concerns over the state's violation of the US Constitution. Congressman Mike Kelly's lawsuit argues that the state's changes to election laws were unconstitutional and that the state legislature's authority was usurped by the executive branch. [... more]

Election officials in several states, including Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin, are facing scrutiny over voting irregularities and potential voter fraud. The certification of election results is being questioned, and state legislatures are being called upon to intervene. The outcome of the presidential election hangs in the balance as lawsuits and court action unfold. [... more]