Step into the world of power, loyalty, and luck.
I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse. With family, cannolis, and spins mean everything. Now, you want to get mixed up in the family business? Introducing The Godfather at ChampaCasino.com. Test your luck in the shadowy world of The Godfather slot. Someday, I will call upon you to do a service for me. Play The Godfather, now at ChampaCasino.com. Welcome to the family.
Coming to you live from Independence, Ohio. We change our life for the better in many different ways. Heard around the world every Monday through Friday. Casper Sanders is always years ahead of the rest of the media, telling you exactly what they're covering up.
This is what's right, what's left. I tune in every chance I get to hear exactly what's going on with the voice of the Christian resistance. Unabashedly cutting through the rhetoric by exposing the hard topics facing our society and world.
A lot of the other news medias don't pick up the news items like he does. And bring into light the enemies of freedom who are out to steal your rights, your children, and enslaving you. You really get the truth out. I can tune into your show and hear the unvarnished truth. Thank you. This is What's Right, What's Left with Pastor Ernie Sanders.
Good evening, and welcome to another edition of What's Right, What's Left on this 26th day of June, 2025. And tonight on our board, he's rambunctious and he's wild. They call him Style.
He's our producer. Hey, Style. Hey, good evening, Pastor. And here in the studio here, I have my, well, my classes here.
Okay, starting from right to right, we have Pastor Richard Lewis. Welcome, everyone. Glad to be here. And right in the center, we have Little Leaping Lizards, Lisa. Good evening, everyone. There you go. Leaping Lizards. And the other one, you heard that cackle?
No, that's not the Elder Barkley cackling. Okay. Good evening.
Jesus is Lord. All right, we have a lot to get to tonight. So why don't we get right to it? And we're going to pick it up where we left off. The title of the message this week was we have a new president, but the same righteous, awesome King.
And we're going to pick it up in 2 Corinthians, chapter 4, verses 1 through 7. And, you know, we were going through this all week long, starting out, looking at what this enemy that we're against here in this country. We have all kinds of articles right here, warning us of retaliation, warning us. I mean, I got article after article from people that they're referring to the sleeper cells that Iranian sleeper cells, they've just arrested 130 something Iranian terrorists that they caught, that they've been looking for. And but we've had sleeper cells in this country for a long, long time. And so here, where did it all start?
That's what we took a look at. So we started there in Genesis 16, where we saw the wars between the Muslims and the Arabs and the Jews, how it started. And of course, out of the Arabs came Islam. And then we took a look at communism, where communism started, and that actually started in the throne room of God. And if you read in Isaiah, Satan or Lucifer saying that he is going back to where he came from. Isaiah 14. Yeah.
Yeah. And so and we see this because if we take a look at communism, everything in communism, everything they hold to their entire platform is in a total opposition, just exactly the opposite of what God's word the Bible teaches. And this is what liberalism is today.
The the entire Democratic Party is in total opposition to the Word of God. So one time I was telling her, I was talking to a woman and I had a conversation and this was a woman that was close to me, too. And I didn't realize all this time that this lady was was so biblically literate. And so one day she said to me, she's older than I am.
And she kind of referred to me, you know, as like a little brother, whatever. And somebody older than us. Yeah. Oh, my goodness.
Yeah, there are actually a whole lot of people older than us, but none of them are alive. So but anyhow. And she's telling me how did she did. She does believe in God. And she believes that Jesus is the Lord, but she don't believe that there's a hell. She doesn't believe that there's a devil. I said, what did you say? And she said, God is strictly love. He would never make anything so evil as a devil. I said, so let me ask you this. Do you think Jesus is a liar?
Well, of course not. Well, he preached more in hell than he did in heaven. You know, the pope didn't think there was hell either.
OK, I bet he knows now. Yeah, but anyhow, so I took it to this passage of scripture. I says, you know, you you you are biblically illiterate. She says, well, you know, I have a King James Bible and I don't I just can't understand.
And she said, can you tell me why I can't understand it? I said, yeah, you know, I says the Bible itself tells you that. And that's where we start. So if you'll read verses Richard one through four.
Sure. This is for a second Corinthians chapter four, verses one through four. Therefore, see, we have this ministry as we have received mercy. We faint not, but have renounced the hidden things of dishonor that walking in craftiness nor handling of the word of God deceitfully, but by manifestation of the truth.
Commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God. But if our gospel is hid, it is hid to them that are lost in whom the God of this world have blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine onto them. Now, I read this verse here and I had her read that. She read that verse and she said, I don't understand that yet.
Do you see this? I mean, she read this this verse here, verse four in whom the God of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not. And so when she said, I don't understand the scripture, I said, that's why you don't understand you're not saved. Yeah, exactly. Those that believe not those who believe not.
Yes. She says. I'm a good person.
I said, a lot of good people. I said, but you're not saved. And so you can't discern the scriptures unless you the Holy Spirit is living in you. And so I told her, you know, I took it to some other passages of scripture. And finally, she said the sinner's prayer. That's the word of her heart. Praise God. Since then, she's she's little by little. She's growing in the faith a little by little. Wonderful.
That's what we got to do. Well, when somebody says they they believe in Jesus, but they don't believe in hell or heaven, it's like, where did you what Jesus are you talking about? Are you talking about the Jesus of the Bible or some other Jesus? Well, you see, that's the thing, because there there are these other Jesus's out there for people who get the apostate church like we talked about them. In fact, maybe I should go over a little bit of what I talked about yesterday when I ended here yesterday.
I said. If my knowledge of God and scripture were to come from prosperity preachers or liberal apostate preachers and New Age perversions of the Bible, along with so-called Christian magazine like Christianity Today, believe me, Christianity Today is not Christianity at all. If that's where I got my information, here is what I would believe of God. God is nonjudgmental.
This is what the apostate church teaches, that God's none. And also, you know, Joel's in the prosperity church. Live the good life now.
Now is when you live the good life. So if you live the good life now, what what what is that when you get to heaven? Maybe they don't plan on getting to heaven, huh? It doesn't sound like it.
And from their beliefs, I wouldn't say they are going to. OK, so let me ask you a question. There's a hard one.
Ready? When it comes to sin, especially the sin of hypocrisy, especially the sin of pride, but the sin of sodomy, who is the most judgmental man that ever walked the face of the earth? Jesus. Jesus. Absolutely.
So you wouldn't call him nonjudgmental, right? Right. God is never, God is never intolerant of sin.
That's right. Like I say, the Bible says God is long suffering, but he's not what's lack where it comes to. No, God is very intolerant of sin. This is why there's a hell and all we have to go back. Remember, we take a look at some of the things how God dealt with his tolerance with sin. Do you remember that thing called the flood? Oh, yeah, we're eight billion people perished.
Don't sound like tolerance to me, right? What about Sodom and Gomorrah? Things didn't end well there, did it rain down brimstone?
Didn't. How many survivors? The eight souls, the ones on the ark.
It was Job and didn't sound like Job and his two daughters, actually. Yeah. Didn't sound like tolerance to me. If I were, I would say that God accepts us just as we are. He doesn't expect us to repent or change. What did Noah preach for 120 years? Repentance. What did John the Baptist come to preach in? Repentance. Prepared of the weight of the Lord. Yeah. Okay, when Jesus preached for the first time in his public ministry, what did he re-preach? Repentance. Yeah. Amen. So now, it sounds to me like, I know the Word of Faith Movement teaches that repentance is not necessary for salvation, okay? It's kind of like what Gloria Osteen said here, that God's only discipline is not to make us happy, healthy, and wealthy.
I thought he wanted us to get saved, right? Right. Yeah.
And, you know, go teach that in some of these other countries and see how far you would get. Yeah. You know, these people are dying for Christ in all these countries that are, they're persecuted. They're dying for Christ. These people are dying for Christ in all these countries that are, they're persecuted, and they're not healthy or wealthy or anything else. And if you're not healthy, does that mean you're not saved?
That's insane. Yes, it is. Totally contrary to what the Bible teaches.
Yeah. Well, you know, remember in the Old Testament, one of the teachings amongst the Pharisees was that if you were wealthy, it's because God loved you, okay? Remember, they had a lot of teachings that were not biblical. If a woman was barren, it was because she was a sinner, okay? God didn't like her if she was barren. He disproved that, right?
Yes, many times. A woman named Sarah and that woman named Elizabeth and others, God used them in a mighty, mighty way, didn't He? And look at Solomon's mother.
Bathsheba, yeah. And so here now, God in His mercy, listen to this. Al Sharpton's here. This is Al Sharpton here.
God in His mercy allows for abortion, sodomy, pedophilia, pornography, bestiality, and divorce. I don't think so. No. No. Al Sharpton says that not only does the Bible condone abortion, okay, that it allows for it.
Al Sharpton said, he's right from the pit of hell. He's not a minister of God, is he? No. No. Those are works of the flesh and the Bible says you're not going to inherit the kingdom of God doing that stuff. None of these, huh?
No. Well, like you've said many times, these people are opposite of what the truth is. They're so opposite and no matter what you would say, they're going to be opposite of it. Obviously, even people pretend to be Bible believers and they're totally opposite of what the Bible teaches. Well, they embrace everything. You're talking about Isaiah chapter 5 when he talks about those that call good evil and evil good and bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter, that today liberalism is upside down, inside out and backwards.
Think about liberalism today. These are people that don't know what a woman is. These are people that put Tampax in boys' bathrooms. These are people that think the only reason, Richard, that you couldn't have a baby is you're beyond childbearing years, okay? I mean, this is what these people think.
They'll miss that part, right? See, men don't get pregnant, right? That's why we're men, right? But Democrats don't know these things and it's like, you know, if God made it that way, we're not going to tolerate.
We're going to do it our way, right? And if he says, you know, and then if he says marriage is only between a man and a woman, we'll change that. We'll take it, we'll defile, we'll soil that divine institution of marriage, huh? Well, they've been trying to redefine words from the Bible all the time.
Instead of going to the Bible for the definition, they make up or actually change things. What they call marriage, that's a Bible term, but that's what they call marriage, two men or two women is not marriage. So God gave us the first divine institution, that's marriage and a family, correct? Yeah.
Now when he gave us that, did he not, in Genesis one and two, did he not give us also the definition of marriage? Yes. One man, one woman, one lifetime in God, right? Yeah. Yes. Not complicated there, right?
In fact, what does God, the second shortest verse in scripture deals with divorce, doesn't it? Three words. Three words. Three words. Three words.
Three words. God hates divorce. Malachi chapter two, right? God hates divorce. Okay.
And so how do we know these things and why don't the Democrats know them? The answer is in First Corinthians chapter two. Let's go to First Corinthians chapter two. And let's start with verse six through verse 16. And so Randy, read verses six through 10 and Richard, you pick it up with 11 through 16. Okay. Okay. Albeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect, yet not the wisdom of this world nor of the princes of this world that come to not.
But we speak the wisdom of God and a mystery, even the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the world unto our glory, which none of the princes of this world knew, for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. Let's stop there. Let's stop there for a minute. Which none of the princes of this world, now that word princess today is the same word. It would be like legislators, legislators.
Okay. For had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of God, the Lord of glory, brother. But going back to it, when there were some cases where some of the princes out there, the legislators did understand who grace was. In fact, even the wife of Pontius Pilate, Warren Pontius, don't do it, correct? Yes.
What about Nicodemus? So there were those that did know, okay, and the people of authority that did understand. But I don't know. I don't know today.
I mean, look, I believe that if those, the Democrats in the Senate and the Congress, even if Christ was back today, remember when they had the Wall Street protests, when they had the Wall Street protests, when they camped outside of Wall Street, had the tents up there, they were carrying placards that said, when Christ returns, we'll crucify him again. Okay. Oh, wow. That's not smart, is it? No. And so I believe probably the Democratic Senate or House today, if Christ returned, I believe that they would say, let's crucify him again, I mean, because their God is the God of this world, right? Yeah.
Yeah. I mean, that's the reality, is that they're so full of hate with everything, it's ridiculous. I'm sorry, you can see it in them, because even Revelation tells you that after all of the seals, the bows, and the judgments, that they're going to be shaking their fists in essence at God. So that spirit is in them.
That's interesting. And I'm bringing that up, because that's exactly what goes on, is even all these plagues, all the wrath of God being poured out in the Revelation, and they're still shaking their fists to God. Yes.
Yeah. So today, now what he is saying, had they known, maybe in that day, had they known who he was, remember, they were looking for Messiah. Okay, go ahead, Randy, pick it up. But let's see, verse nine, but as it is written, I have not seen nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit, for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. So when he says, there as it is written, he's actually referring over to Isaiah 64, verse four, where Isaiah quoted, he's actually quoting Isaiah here. And as it is written, I had not seen, you know, I heard, I was listening to Bill Clinton, and when he was president, and he was speaking to a group of college graduates, I'm trying to remember where it was, it might have been, it was probably Harvard or Yale, but he was saying, he changed that up a little bit, he quoted this verse.
And he said, but it is written, I have not seen nor ear had not heard, neither have heard what has entered into, no, let me remember what he did then, he said, I had not seen nor ear not heard what we can do, okay, he put, he changed it, and I said, that's not exactly the way it's supposed to be said. And so anyhow, he says, but it is written that earth, I had not seen nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man the things which God had prepared for them that love him, and so, but even if you go back, you know, to verse seven, where it says, but we have, but we speak to wisdom of God, in a mystery, even hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world, what he's referring to there is that true wisdom was centered in Christ existed in the heart of God before the world actually began, okay. And so, go ahead and pick it up and with verse 11, Richard, sure, for what man knoweth the things of man save the spirit of man which is in him, even so the things of God knoweth no man but the spirit of God. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God, that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God, which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Ghost teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual, but the natural man receiveth not the things of the spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can they know them because they are spiritually discerned, but we that is spiritual, judges all things, yet he himself is judged of no man, for who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him, but we have the mind of Christ. Just very quick want to say, you know, how many times have I heard out there, the abortion mill, when I was out there preaching, these women come in, judge not lest you be judged, you're not supposed to judge, how many times have we heard neo-evangelicals tell us we're not to judge? The Bible says we're to judge everything, in fact if you go over to 1 Corinthians chapter 6, he says we're to judge angels, can't we judge the smaller matters? Well it tells us clearly we are to judge righteous judgment, and how do we find righteous judgment? In the book, chapter and verse. Absolutely, now he says that he that himself is judged of no man, well wait a minute, how could that be, the world seems to be judging us all the time, but the judgment doesn't carry any weight, does it?
No. It's counterfeit. Okay, for who hath known the mind of the Lord, that we may instruct him, but we have the mind of Christ. So, how do we have the mind of Christ? By having the Spirit in us.
The indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Amen. Yes.
We're going to have to play this little clip here, we got Rubio, Secretary Rubio, he's got something to say, so go ahead and get her done. You're saying there that the United States did not see intelligence that the Supreme Leader had ordered weaponization? That's irrelevant. I think that question being asked on the media, that's an irrelevant question. That is the key point in U.S. intelligence assessments, you know that. No it's not. Yes it was. No it's not. The political decision had not been made.
I know that better than you know that, and I know that's not the case. But I'm asking you whether the order was given. And the people who say that, it doesn't matter if the order was given, they have everything they need to build nuclear weapons, why would you bury things in a mountain, 300 feet under the ground, why would you bury, why do they have 60% enriched uranium, you don't need 60% enriched uranium, the only countries in the world that have uranium at 60% are countries that have nuclear weapons, because they can quickly make it 90. They have all the elements, they have, why do they have a space program, is Iran going to go to the moon? No. They're trying to build an ICBM.
No but that's a question of intent. And you know in the intelligence assessment that it was that Iran wanted to be a threshold state. How do you know what the intelligence assessment says? I'm talking about the public March assessment.
And that's why I was asking you if you know something more from March. That's also an inaccurate representation of it, that's not how intelligence is read, that's not how intelligence is used, here's what the whole world knows, forget about intelligence, what the IAEA knows, they are enriching uranium well beyond anything you need for a civil nuclear program. So why would you enrich uranium at 60% if you don't intend to one day use it to take it to 90 and build a weapon? Why are you developing ICBMs? Why do you have 8,000 short range missiles and 2 to 3,000 long, mid range missiles that you continue to develop?
Why do you do all these things? They have everything they need for a nuclear weapon. They have the delivery mechanisms, they have the enrichment capability, they have the highly enriched uranium that is stored. That's all we need to see, especially in the hands of a regime that's already involved in terrorism and proxies and all kinds of things around, they are the source of all the instability in the Middle East.
No one's disputing that, I'm not doing that here. And they were censured at the IAEA for that enrichment and for violating their non-proliferation agreements. I was simply asking if we had intelligence that there was an order to weaponize, because you said weaponization ambitions, which implies they weren't doing it. Well, we have intelligence that they have everything they need to build a nuclear weapon, and that's more than enough. You heard her say, and no one's disputing, she disputed everything he said, and she said, well, but see, this is why Democrats have such bad reputations, right?
I mean, that girl came in there, and then she was going to have a battle of wits, and she came unarmed, didn't she? Unfortunately, yes. All right. Richard, we have a fellow named Tom, and Tom has had a stroke, and his sister, I know his sister, she's a lovely lady, she called and she said, please, please pray for my brother Tom. Tom's not saved. So you know what we have to pray for first, but before we pray for Tom with his stroke, all you folks out there listening, okay, remember, every one of you will need prayer.
Some of you need it right now, or you will need it. And here's what Scripture teaches, those who show mercy receive it. So Richard, would you lead them, the folks, all the folks out there, join with Richard in their prayer, first for Tom's salvation, and then for his physical, because he's got to get the first blessing you can receive is that of salvation, right?
Well, yes. And you know, sometimes illnesses come upon us to wake us up and draw us closer to Christ so that we know, we become more aware that we do need salvation and also this life is very short. And to think about it on the scale of eternity, it's just a blip on the scope. And so we need to turn to Christ, and the most important thing is to surrender yourself to Jesus Christ. Know who Jesus Christ is. He is the Son of God, He is the only begotten Son, walked a perfect life, came to this earth as through the Holy Spirit impregnating a virgin, walked a perfect life, and shed His blood on the cross, died, and the key is, and He rose on the third day. And if you truly believe that and are willing to turn from your sins, that's called repentance, and accept Him as Lord and Savior, you'll be saved. That's all it takes.
It's a very simple act. And for Tom here, this is Tom, we just pray that you would hear this gospel message and seek God's face and turn from your life and turn towards Jesus Christ and let Him be the ruler of your life. And we pray for the stroke situation, Lord. We pray that if it be your will, Lord, that you would restore Him to a normal portion of health, get Him through this disability of the stroke. And Tom, if you're able to listen to this or you're listening to that, please understand that if God moves His hand to restore you, He wants you to serve Him. And so turn to Him, that's the most important thing, because these bodies don't last forever no matter what we do. So please, Lord, please bless Tom and touch his heart, prick his heart for the gospel and touch him for the disability that he has. In Jesus Christ's name we pray.
All right, thank you, and I kind of touched on this yesterday. There was a woman who is the parliamentarian for the Senate, and Trump's got his big beautiful bill there. And this woman, her job is to decide which parts of this bill would make it eligible when they vote, because there's certain things in the legislation that have to be in a vote where you can vote and pass it with 51 votes, okay, and then it qualifies. This woman is trying to take everything that matters out of Trump's big beautiful bill and turn it down to where you have to have 60 votes, okay, to pass the bill.
So go ahead and play that clip, we talked about this yesterday. She's unknown to most Americans, and yet she's quietly wielding veto power over the MAGA agenda in the United States Congress. This is Kyle Becker, welcome to Explain America. Before we reveal who is this shadowy figure stopping Trump's biggest legislative victory in his tracks, like, comment, and share this video to spread the word, because most people have no idea what's really going on behind closed doors in DC, but now we do. Her name is Elizabeth McDonough. She is the Senate parliamentarian, and she's become the most powerful Democrat you've never heard of. Her official job is to advise the Senate on whether certain legislative provisions meet the rules for reconciliation, the fast track process that allows bills to pass with 50 votes instead of 60. But unofficially, she's become the defacto gatekeeper of what can and cannot be included in Donald Trump's one big beautiful bill. McDonough was appointed during the Obama years by Harry Reid, and now she's systematically dismantling the Trump movement's core legislative priorities behind closed doors with zero accountability to voters. She's ruled that key MAGA proposals like defunding sanctuary cities, gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and repealing EV mandates don't qualify under Senate budget rules. Her rationale, the provisions are incidental to spending. That interpretation gives her power to strip out almost any major policy, even if it saves billions of dollars.
She's not an elected official, she's a staff attorney, and her rulings are being decided as if she's a member of the Senate Senate leadership, and they're binding, but they're not binding. Border enforcement allowing states to act independently, blocked. Civil service reform to fire bureaucrats at will, stripped out. Trump's plan to dissolve rogue agencies, gone. Stopping the EV takeover of the federal fleet, not allowed. Letting workers return taxpayer money they don't use, too incidental. This isn't red tape, it's sabotage. Under the guise of the Byrd Rule, a rule designed to prevent dawn budget items from slipping into spending bills, McDonough is deciding which parts of Trump's second term agenda live or die. And Democrats love it. One Democrat Senator called her decisions a firewall against anti-worker policies.
So they know exactly what they're doing, and they're cheering it on. But here's the kicker, the parliamentarian can be overruled. Or fired. In 2001, Republicans fired the sitting parliamentarian who was opposing Bush tax cuts. Obama's judicial nominees were cleared after also getting rid of the Senate parliamentarian. And in 2021, Chuck Schumer threatened to fire as she blocked his immigration push. Yet today, under Republican control, her rulings are treated as gospel.
That's not procedure, that's surrender. So the next time someone tells you Trump's agenda can't move because of Senate rules, ask this, who's making the rules? And why is the GOP letting her call the shots? Elizabeth McDonough is not neutral. She's not elected. She's not above scrutiny. It's time to stop pretending that she is. This is Explain America. Please like, comment, and share.
Alrighty, we're back. We have a lot of good things out here, you know, and the Senate can fire her. And hope, we hope that there's somebody in that Senate grows a spine, right?
Yeah. I mean, we need a few of those men to grow a spine and fire her. But other good news out there, the Supreme Court ruled just today, in fact, that states can legally block the bloody, bloody, bloody abortion industry, giant planned predators. They go by the name Planned Parenthood.
Even their name is a lie. They've got nothing to do with parenthood, do they? No.
Okay. From getting Medicaid cash. This is very good news. And that's what's also in the big, beautiful bill is defunding federal funds of planned predators. This deals basically with states. In a stunning decision that assists the pro-life cause across America, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against abortion industry giant planned predators, the most wicked, evil, ungodly, creeping, crawler, purveyor of death that ever existed, killed more human beings than any army in the world, demanded that a state be ordered to consider it qualified provider and thus eligible for Medicaid program cash. The justices ruled six to three in Medina versus Planned Predators, South Atlantic, that the South Carolina is allowed to legally block the leading player in America's abortion industry from demanding payment through the Medicaid program. Ten years ago, Republican South Carolina Henry McMaster assigned governor, McMaster assigned an executive action telling the state's Department of Health that Human Services to take the abortion provider off of the state's Medicaid provider list. His explanation was that the funding to abortions, even if not directly for abortions, indirectly funded abortions and such public funding was banned by state law.
Well, you know, I'll tell you what, it's banned by God's Word, the Bible. He said that in a recent statement that causes about protecting the safety of life and preserving South Carolina's right to govern itself in a way that reflects the values of its people, Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the majority opinion of the court and was joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. I'm kind of, you know, I'm glad to Kavanaugh and Barrett and Roberts because you really can't trust them usually here. But these next three, these are, according to God's Word, the Bible, these are unclean women.
They're unclean. Kintenji Jackson, one of the three pro-death activists on the court wrote a dissent that would have insisted taxpayers in the state revert to paying their cash to the abortion colonists. It was joined by Sotomayor and Kagan.
These are three extremely wicked women, three extremely wicked women. McMaster said that South Carolina has made it clear that we value the right to life, therefore taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortion providers who are in direct opposition to their beliefs, just as I was in 2018. I am confident in our authority to terminate funding the planned predators and trust that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree. That's very good news. Any money you can take away from, by the way, planned predators have been falling on some hard times.
They've been shutting down a bunch of their killing centers recently. Good. Good. And that's very, very good. Mm-hmm. All right.
Go ahead, little Lisa. Well, this is a similar topic here. The Supreme Court has ruled several times in recent years that state governments cannot impose their religious ideology on business operators and require them to abide by and promote those beliefs. Those decisions came from the insistence of Colorado officials that business owners there promote the loot gross belligerent transgressing queers lifestyle choices or not to do business in the state. Several times, Colorado lost at the high court, including once when the state's officials were criticized for their open hostility to Christianity. But the message is getting through. As a judge hearing a case involving a New York photographer ordered to violate her Christian faith in order to do business there, has issued an injunction stopping the state's attack in its tracks.
All right. Very good. You know, Colorado is, you know, it's like on a fast track to the lake of fire. Those people there, the legislators in California have become more and more corrupt all the time, ungodly, you know, and trying to force perversion on Christians. That Colorado legislator has become perverted, has become corrupt, you know, and they're going to find out because they're standing in the shadow of a holy and a just God and shaking a rebellious fist at God.
And they're going to be, well, they're going to have a very, very, very sad awakening. Yes. All right. Do you have an article, Richard?
Sure. This is talking about the immigration says a newly released survey illustrates how just how poorly Americans view the Democrat Party job performance on immigration. Only 19 percent of all voters in swing districts across the U.S. approved the Democrats handling of immigration, according to the poll released Thursday. By way and win way to win and impact research, 77 percent of those likely voters disapprove of the party's handling on immigration, giving Democrats a 58 point net negative rate rating on the issue. Republicans are also underwater on immigration, but to the significantly smaller degree, according to the survey, the GOP has an 11 point negative job rating on the issue, with 43 percent approving and 54 disapproving on the handling of immigration.
And while Republican Republicans in Congress are underwater in double digits on immigration, they still they are still in significantly better shape than the Democrats in Congress who's polling the trust of immigration are worse by wide margins. The author continues the that's that's enough of that already. Very good. You got an article there. Yes. Treasonous. Whitcough blast Iran damage leak, says almost impossible to resurrect nuclear program.
It says U.S. special envoys to the Middle East. Steve Whitcough said Tuesday on Fox News, the Ingram angle, that it would be almost impossible for Iran to resurrect its nuclear weapons program at the sites the U.S. hit Saturday following the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear program sites in Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. Legacy media outlets reported that the hits did not destroy the core components of the program and likely only set it back months.
While asking Whitcough about the reports, Fox's Laura Ingram pressed the envoy for his assessment of the attack. So your conclusion tonight, saying what you've seen, is that Iran could not resume its nuclear enrichment program within a matter of months, Ingram asked. It's not even conceivable, Whitcough responded, the conversion, the conversion, destroying of the conversion facility, which not a lot of people are aware of, that stops the enrichment process in the beginning, and it's needed to finish the enrichment process.
Once you get to 90 percent, you now must metallize the material, shape it into a round ball, a round metallic ball. That round metallic ball goes into the bomb. Without conversion, you can't begin enrichment and you can't end enrichment in a successful weaponization.
That was taken out. President Donald Trump announced Saturday on Truth Social that the U.S. strike against three Iranian nuclear weapons sites had been very successful, adding the targets received a full payload of bombs. According to Whitcough, the above ground facilities in Natanz were completely destroyed by the U.S. bunker buster bombs, with Isfahan's below ground facility being eviscerated, before adding he had no doubt that Fordeaux's site was also obliterated.
Then on top of that, the nuclear reactors, again, as I said, two at Natanz and one in Fordeaux, all three of those had most, if not all, of the centrifuges damaged or destroyed in a way that it will be almost impossible for them to resurrect that program for, in my view, and many other experts' views who have seen the raw data Whitcough has added. And then on Tuesday, however, legacy media outlets such as Reuters, The New York Times, and CNN reported that sources familiar with the findings claimed the strikes had only caused minimal damage, allowing Iran to build a bomb in roughly three months if they decided to push their program. When asked about the leaks from Trump administration, Whitcough told Ingraham, there should be an investigation into who is responsible, calling the action treasonous. Lastly, it goes without saying that leaking that type of information, whatever the information, whatever side it comes out on, is outrageous. It's treasonous, so it ought to be investigated.
And whoever did it, whoever is responsible for it, should be held accountable, Whitcough said. Well, I don't understand that because what they're saying, first of all, they're denying that, they're saying, look, they were destroyed, they were completely wiped out. But then they're saying, well, whoever leaked the information that says that they weren't destroyed, okay, that they weren't totally damaged, that's treasonous.
Well, how could anyone have that information if that information didn't exist? Right now, what we saw, according to what Trump did, what they showed, I mean, they were on Fox News for an hour this morning or more on that, and here, they had it actually, they used the air shafts, you know, the air shafts, the air vents, and the air vents, the openings were only about, like, six feet by six feet. And what they did, the Iranians put a huge concrete cap, a huge cap over the air vents to cover it, you know. And so what happened, the first bomb, they showed it, you know, it was filmed, the first bomb hit that concrete cap and destroyed it, okay, obliterated it, obliterated it. And after that, five of those bunker busters went down, you know, that air shaft.
They were, you know, digital, however they do it, but they were, they went right down that air shaft, listen, nothing is going to survive that. Well, you know, this article kind of corresponds with what was just read, it says, it's talking about the pilots and all the media press that was saying that they didn't do what they were supposed to do. And the pilots are saying, hey, we did our job, President, and we were doing it. It says President Donald Trump says the pilots were, who bombed three nuclear sites in Iran Saturday, are devastated by negative news reports in American media. Speaking to a reporter Wednesday at NATO's summit at the Netherlands, Trump said, I got a call that the pilots and the people on the planes were devastated because they were trying to minimize the attack. And it says, President Trump says the pilots who flew the bombing mission in Iran were disappointed to hear the media were downplaying their success. Well, I can understand they're disappointed, but devastated, now look, come on, you don't expect the legacy media to tell the truth. What have they ever told the truth about? Right.
Okay. In fact, I would have been insulted if they had said something good. If they had said we did something good, then I'd have to reexamine that, because they never, ever get it right.
They never get it right. I mean, it's just, they are the opposition. Their job out there is one of obstructionists, like these judges. They want to obstruct the government, and you know, disrupt, Trump is doing a good job, and they want to bring, they hate America. They hate God, and they hate America, they hate freedom.
And these are people that go out in the woods and scream, you know? And if you destroy America, then where are you going to live, folks? I mean, you're going to live in a communist regime?
Is that what the plan is? That's so ignorant. They hate America, but they're enjoying all the pleasures of America. They're enjoying all the freedoms in America. And then all of a sudden you think, you think if you destroy it, that you still have those freedoms? Well, you know, again, yeah, here, and you talk about spoiled. You know, people out there, especially the Hollywood types and these entertainers, you know, they grew up with a silver spoon in their mouth, and unthankful, unthankful, ungodly.
And what do they, they think if they destroy it, they're going to still contain, retain what they have? That I am, with her name, Iman Omar, says she rates America as the very worst, 50 worst, the 50th worst, or among 50. We'll be back after this. We're going to count them. Be right back. Don't go away. Thank you for listening to What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian resistance. To support this ministry, head to WRWL.org. That's WRWL.org. Mail your donations to What's Right, What's Left Ministries, 14781 Sperry Road, Newberry, Ohio, 44065. If you missed part of tonight's program, you can check out the podcast at thewordcleveland.com, thewordcleveland.com.
Once again, thank you for listening and supporting What's Right, What's Left Ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned. Our second hour is coming up next.
Riley Herbst from 2311 Racing here, and you know what grinds my gears? Waiting for coffee. But instead of counting frappes and lattes, I fire up Chumba Casino. No apps, no fuss, just fun social casino games to pass the time. By the time my coffee's ready, I've already taken a few victory laps.
Next time you're stuck waiting, make it entertaining. Play for free at chumbacacino.com. Let's Chumba. Sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary. VGW Group. Voight-Wehr prohibited by law. 21 Plus. All conditions apply.
