FRI HR 2 120123

Selling your car to Carvana is as easy as... As easy as pie? Sure. All you have to do is enter your license plate or VIN. As easy as a stroll in the park.

Okay, then just answer a few questions and you'll get a real offer in seconds. As easy as singing. Why not? Schedule a pickup or drop-off and Carvana will pay you that amount right on the spot. As easy as playing guitar.

Actually, I find that kind of difficult. But selling your car to Carvana is as easy as... Can be. Visit Carvana.com or download the app to get an instant offer today. Stay tuned. The second hour is coming up next. WHKW W245CY, Cleveland, reminding you it's time to get back to church this Sunday. A service of Salem Media Group.

Donate and listen to the podcast at WRWL.org. Alright, we're back. And John, remember how they like to tell you... Remember how Bill Gates says, as long as it's planned, the people will accept it.

As long as you plan it and you let them know you're going to do it, they'll accept it. And in a way, he's right because they use the media to tell you what's coming. So it looks like the World Economic Forum is up to it again.

So go ahead and play that clip, Derek. Well, the World Economic Forum, yes, run by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum says that we will experience a massive cyber attack that will hit before the year 2025, which will lead to a massive collapse of the banking industry, infrastructure, and so much more. How do they know this?

It's unbelievable. Someone who's been following this very, very closely and it ties even more directly into the story that we've been covering here on the show about the CTI League files, the Michael Shellenberger released files about the cyber spying on Americans. We're going to get to that part of the story with independent journalist, Whitney Webb, who I'm thrilled to welcome back to the show.

Whitney, welcome back to Redacted. Hey, it's great to be here after a long absence. Thanks for having me back. Of course, we wouldn't miss the opportunity.

So thrilled to have you back here. So let's talk about this World Economic Forum idea that at the second in command at the World Economic Forum that we are going to see a massive cyber attack hitting before the year 2025. Pointing out, you know, in great detail, yeah, like this is going to happen, so you better be prepared for it.

Why are they saying this and who are they going to try to point the finger at? Right. So this was said at the WEF annual meeting earlier this year in January by the WEF managing director, Jeremy Jurgens. And Jurgens, as well as the WEF itself, has been involved in a series of simulations for several years now that I'm sure a lot of people in your audience are familiar with called Cyber Polygon, which has been directly affiliated with Russia's government, as well as some of Russia's biggest banks and some of the biggest commercial banks in the world. And also backed by a lot of U.S. federal agencies, which is ironic when you consider, you know, all about alleged Russian hacks over the years. They're very willing under the guise of the WEF to collaborate with the supposed hackers responsible for everything bad, you know, for several years ago.

So that's quite revealing. But aside from Cyber Polygon, there's a lot that the WEF seeks to accomplish as it relates to the cyber realm. And they've been collaborating in a lot of ways with these same big banks and also American intelligence agencies in unprecedented ways that has not really gotten any coverage over the past several years. And a lot of this is housed within a public-private partnership the WEF manages called the World Economic Forum Partnership Against Cybercrime. And this particular organization, back a few years ago, gamed out with the Carnegie Endowment, along with the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank. So some of the biggest central banks in the world, as well as some of the biggest commercial banks in the world, like Bank of America and JP Morgan, how essentially the U.S. financial system was due to be the victim of a massive cyber attack. And if you're familiar with how things have been going in the U.S. financial or banking system recently, things are not in a very good state at all. And regardless of if there would be or will be a cyber attack in the near future, the banking and financial system in the United States is in deep doo-doo, right? So if you're the big banks and the intelligence agencies, you want to avoid what happened after the 2008 economic crisis, where there was unprecedented anger at Wall Street, because the whole hope and change Obama psyop, essentially, is probably not going to work again. So how do you allow that collapse to happen?

Because it has to happen in such a way that the banks and the government are essentially blameless. Well, a cyber attack happen and you can literally blame any nation state or group for that hack. And we know this because of what WikiLeaks published right before Julian Assange was completely silenced and then later arrested and dragged out of the Ecuadorian embassy in London, Vault 7, which revealed things like the Umbridge program, among other things that U.S. intelligence and other intelligence agencies that are affiliated with this partnership against cyber crime have the ability to place the fingerprints of any nation state actor they wish, including Russia, China, Iran, and really North Korea. Any other group as well, not just nation states, put their fingerprints in a hack they actually commit themselves.

And this is very significant because this offers, you know, these intelligence agencies unprecedented ability to have to conduct false flag operations in the cyber realm. And this group specifically has a lot of solutions aside from, you know, things with the banking system that they cannot really justify implementing unless there is some sort of large cyber attack. So what is the partnership against cyber crime want? They're very open that they want a regulated Internet and they're essentially seeking a policy that was efforts were made to implement during the Obama administration in the U.S.

They called it a driver's it's for the Internet. So essentially what this public-private partnership at the WEF is pushing for is for every person's access to the Internet to be tied to a digital ID or a government issued ID, but presumably a digital ID just because of where government issued ID programs are all going essentially around the world. And the goal of that, of course, if your ID is linked to your Internet access, intelligence agencies know exactly what media you are consuming in terms of, you know, what you read and also what you post online. And that has been the goal for a very, very long time. So people aren't necessarily going to consent to that unless they are made to believe that anonymity and privacy online are dangerous. So how exactly can you convince people that that needs to happen?

Well, you have some sort of event where anonymous hackers do something online that causes major disruption globally, and then the consent can be manufactured through fear and panic, as is often done, that anonymity and privacy needs to be eliminated, that we need to know exactly who is doing what online to prevent a calamity of that scale from ever happening again. And this is the exact solution that these guys have been cooking for a very long time. And the intelligence agencies involved are Israeli intelligence, British intelligence, and then the U.S. Secret Service, FBI and Department of Justice. And you have several of the biggest banks in the country like Bank of America involved directly with this group, as well as major U.S. tech companies like Microsoft and Amazon partnered with all of this.

And this is exactly what they're seeking. And they have all the tools to allow something like this to happen. And when you have the fact that some of these actors want a war where the U.S., for example, goes to war with Iran, among other things, and they have the ability to attribute, you know, cyber attacks of any scale to any entity at all.

And this is a big problem because when these alleged hacks take place, whether it's blamed on Russia, Iran or China, the headline will blame these countries. But if you actually read the article itself, they don't actually have the evidence to make that case. They say we believe it's this country or that it's a group affiliated with this country. And their reasoning ranges from, you know, they'll say things like we have medium probability that it's, you know, they're tied to Iran.

And, you know, all these, you know, phrases that show that they don't actually have evidence. And then there's an effort to manufacture consent potentially for military action based on all of this stuff. So it's definitely very alarming and people should be paying attention to it when you consider that you have the biggest banks involved, the biggest intelligence agencies and some of the biggest tech companies in the world. And another thing that this WEF group is seeking is for banks, banking regulators and intelligence agencies to essentially fuse their operations under the guise of cybersecurity. And the more you think about that, the more insane it is. I mean, it's just an insane policy.

Bringing it together under one umbrella. And of course, we even heard Nikki Haley, who's a, you know, certainly the neocons absolutely love Nikki Haley right now, pushing her big time. And she over the past couple of weeks has called for this lack of anonymity on the web, wants everyone to be registered as you're using the internet, right?

Yeah. And so have people, you know, media personalities like Jordan Peterson, for example, has pushed for the same end of anonymity online. You also have people like Elon Musk who bought Twitter, you know, why he was buying Twitter, saying that we have to verify all humans and essentially, you know, allegedly to control the bot issue on Twitter. But there's this broad push essentially everywhere you look from the power elite to end online anonymity. And people are obviously resisting that because it changes the nature of the internet and supercharges the surveillance capabilities already built into to a hugely significant degree. And it's a bigger problem when you consider that the Department of Justice specifically has a pre-crime program that they've been operating since the Trump administration called deep, where people have literally been arrested for things they've posted on social media.

Someone was even killed, I think, a few months ago for Facebook posts he made about Joe Biden and then was swatted and shot in the street in front of his house for posts he made on social media. Tying all of this to your government ID considering, you know, all of those factors as it relates to US law enforcement in the Department of Justice, which again is partnered with all of these things, is an extremely awful idea. And the fact that you have all these financial services entities involved at the same time there's this push for digital ID, not just for the internet, but to tie your digital ID to your banking through central bank digital currencies or heavily regulated stablecoins and deposit tokens. I mean, programmable money.

I mean, the implications here are huge. And there's obviously a lot of resistance from certain quarters of the US population and elsewhere against the digital ID push and the CBDC push. But have the internet go down for X amount of time because of some massive cyber attack and they bring it back and say, oh, well, we have to know who you are.

And now the only way to get online is to use our digital ID. You know, they're going to get the kind of fast, rapid onboarding and mass adoption that they are seeking for those programs. Wow. Now, you believe that this cyber attack is a false flag operation. Is it is it your concern that Israel would want the United States to attack Iran first, that they wouldn't be able to do this?

What is your reporting show on that side of it? So it's not really just my reporting, you know, it's reporting from mainstream media outlets and also things that Mossad directors have openly said in interviews is that for the past 20 years, they have Mossad has had almost unlimited funding and energy directed towards Iran regime change policy. And that a key component of that, according to former Mossad director Meir Dagan, among others, is getting the US to strike Iran first. And there's been a push for a long time from, you know, the neocon sectors within the United States to have the US preemptively strike Iran, among other things. And you had pushes coming from some of the biggest donors to the GOP, for example, Sheldon Adelson, when he was still alive, the biggest donor to the Republican Party and also to Trump, was also pushing for preemptive military action against Iran.

You know, he isn't necessarily around anymore, but that type of policy idea has been floated for a very long time. And after the assassination of Qasem Soleimani, the IRGC general, who was very famous, there was rhetoric coming from Mike Pompeo when he was CIA director and also Trump that if Iran launched any sort of retaliation, including a cyber attack, they would respond with military action to Iran. So there has been a lot of fear mongering about exactly this. And of course, it's important to keep in mind that next year, the exact year when the WEF managing director has predicted this attack is going to take place, is an election year in the United States. And a lot of the same rhetoric about some imminent cyber attack, whether from Iran, Russia and or China, was being utilized to a significant degree in the 2020 election as well. And you actually had what I've argued is an Israeli intelligence front company, a cybersecurity company called Cyber Reason, was gaming out and conducting simulations with DHS and some of our top law enforcement and intelligence agencies, how hackers could disrupt the 2020 election, have the election canceled and martial law declared exactly what hackers would need to do for those conditions to be met. So there is a lot of stuff going on in the cyber realm that not enough people are paying attention to. And the most concerning thing about this, I would argue, besides the WEF warnings, is that you have a series of entities, many of which are tied to foreign intelligence, sitting on the most critical infrastructure systems in the United States, have access to those systems and other groups have given access to those systems to people that haven't even been vetted by our own government.

It's madness. And is that tied to the CTIL files, which Michael Shellenberger, journalist Michael Shellenberger... Alrighty, we are back. What do you have to say about all that, Big John McTernan?

Are you there, Michael? My head is spinning with it all. Some of it I agree 100%. Some of it I'm not sure of and some of it I disagree. But I'd have to take notes to go over that with you, everything that she... First of all, my objection to it is, yeah, they're going after Iran, but at the same time, Obama gave them, what was it, $60 billion?

Yeah, yeah. And Obama was, he had Iranian, that key advisor for him was an Iranian woman and the Muslims were coming, he brought them all into all levels of the government. And then Trump wasn't going to go to war. I mean, they might have wanted to go to war, the generals and all, but he wasn't going to go to war with Iran unless they provoked this. And then Biden, like the candy man, he's been giving $60 billion, $6 billion, $10 billion to Iran. And in the meantime, Iran is the leading terrorist, probably, country in the world and it wants to destabilize certain sections of Islam. It wants to take over Islam and it wants nuclear weapons with Israel. So when I listened to her, it was almost like Iran was this innocent, if I didn't know better, Iran is this innocent country that these big bullies are after. When Iran is extremely dangerous, I mean, Saudi Arabia is afraid of Iran.

Yeah, I know. I didn't quite get that, but basically what I got from her was that they're preparing this, you know, to go to war. You know, again, whenever these bureaucrats or these leaders from America give money to these other nations, they always get something back. And so he gave, Obama gave, what is it, I don't know how many billions of dollars.

$60 billion and plane loads of cash. Right, and so whenever that happens, they always get something back. Cash appears on an off-coast, in the Canaan Islands in some place account. Yeah, you're right. You're absolutely right. Obama went from being a senator on a senator's salary to buying, what is it, a $13 million house and being flush with cash with money.

That's the way it always works. It's total, total corruption, complete total. Now, behind this too, remember, within the collective, within the deep state, there's a lot of divisions within there too. And you've got the military industrial complex, people that want to go to war right away, that wanted to go after, involved in the military industrial complex. Look at Lindsey Graham, for example. He is a gigantic warmonger.

Everything that comes up, he's ready for war, no matter what it is. Right now, if you take a look at all of these people too, in the Ukraine, all of those that were involved, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, they all had their children, their sons involved. Mitt Romney, all of them were involved in the dark money. Oh, especially Joe, especially Biden.

Absolutely, especially Biden. Biden had his whole family involved in that. Pastor Ernie, when I was an agent, there were certain banks, not necessarily banks, but bank managers and branches that the mob would own.

A lot of it was the manager may have been deep in gambling debt, may be hooked on drugs, things like that. And they would wash their money through it because the manager would prevent notifying the government that a lot of cash was coming through their banks and certain accounts. What I see Iran is like one of those banks, Pastor Ernie, that the mob would own and control. That's what I read, not Iran, excuse me, the Ukraine. That's what I see the Ukraine. The Ukraine was like only was a nation for all of these. Money laundering, yeah.

I guess in Europe, too, like Europe to use them, but especially the United States, it was like a big, you could wash all the money you wanted through the Iranian banks and through these Iranian gas companies and all like with Biden there. So that's what that nation is. It's like the nation is owned by the United States corrupt politicians and they're using it as their playground. Exactly. I never did finish this article about the 200 FBI agents.

Let me just read this very quickly. Representative Higgins, well, let me jump down here. This is exactly what J6 political prisoner Jeffrey McKellip told the Gateway Pundit from his prison cell back in March of 23. Jeffrey is a decorated former Third Special Forces Group soldier and a U.S. government contractor.

Jeffrey McKellip is being held as a political prisoner after he served his country for 22 years. After his arrest in March 2021, Jeffrey delved into video footage and documented evidence from the January 6 protest. Jeffrey was able to identify numerous government informants and agitators in the massive Trump crowd that day.

After pulling together his evidence, he sent it to numerous contacts. That was when the FBI came into his prison cell and took his research. They then attempted to silence him and banned him from phone and mail privileges.

Now, we recently heard that Jeffrey was moved to a mental hospital. They really want to silence him. Sounds like the old Soviet Union, doesn't it? Yeah, that's what exactly. And the Nazis, they both, they call them like insane enemies of the state.

Really, that's what it was. So they would just take them and say you were crazy because you were against the United States now. And the United States means you're against the Democrats, Hardy and, you know, and the hard, the deep state. And that's now, they might have criminal charges against you, but they can say you're dangerous mentally and put you away.

And you're there and that's the end of it. Here he goes on to say this. Representative Clay Higgins says the FBI was not only involved in the actions on the January 6th from within, they had suspect over 200 agents embedded within the crowd, including agents or as they would call human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened. Beyond that, the FBI had embedded themselves and infiltrated online chat groups and websites, social media accounts across the country with any group that was discussing objections to COVID operations. And the FBI effectively infiltrated those groups, too.

There you go. Well, here's something that's really a tragedy and, you know, with that Merkel in Germany, a couple of years back when you had these Muslims, they wanted to have a thing right out there in the public park and they claimed that 100 Muslims raped a woman out there and Merkel ended up saying it ended up because of the way she was dressed. But here, very sick, this is another article from Gateway Pundit. Eight out of nine migrant rapists will avoid jail time after gang raping a 15-year-old German girl. A highly contentious ruling emerged from the Hamburg Regional Court's youth chamber Tuesday as eight of nine men accused of sickening gang rape will avoid jail time. In a haunting September 2020 incident, a group of young men aged 19 to 23 violently assaulted a defenseless student at a Hamburg city park. The ordeal involved repeated rape, several main mistreatment and robbery with the victim being only 15 years old. The suspect was predominantly of migrant background. The suspects were of migrant backgrounds, including nationals, such as they came from Polish Egypt. In other words, they were illegal aliens is what they were, called migrants there.

And they were Polish, Egyptian, Libyan, Kuwait, Iranian, Armenian and Afghan. The incident occurred post-midnight following the victim's departure from a friend's birthday party. The verdict concludes a lengthy trial that began in May of 2022. Throughout the extended trial, involving 96 witnesses and several experts over 86 days, or 68 days, compelling evidence emerged, including DNA findings affirming the presence of the suspects and semen on the victim.

This is, you know, this I, you know, John, when people would just stand there and watch, it just makes me absolutely. Despite the severity of charges, including video evidence of the crime that was reported and has been deleted, the court's application of juvenile justice statutes resulted in suspended sentences for eight of the defendants, according to the German media Bild. The sole predator receiving custody of sentence of 19-year-old Iranian national was sentenced to just two years and nine months in juvenile detention.

Amidst the trial proceedings, the reports highlighted that convicted delayed it. Boy, that's unbelievable, isn't it? All right. You remember, of course, you remember years ago, not too many years ago with feminism and everything turned like we'll say in every way and in the favor of women. Yeah. But now, but now with the Muslims in this, it's in the way Muslims treat women.

It seems like the Muslims, it's going the other way now. Yeah, it is. This is what drag queens are all about. Drag queens are mocking, and it's a show of total disrespect for women.

Yes, it is. And same with the transgenders. You know, you get a full male, you have a full male in the women's locker room in like these colleges and participating in swimming.

And Pastor Ernie, did you see where that transgendered man in volleyball, I think it was in Vermont, he hit the ball so hard in the opposing woman's head that she has a severe concussion now and has to drop out of school? Yeah. That's the other thing they're doing. They're making a mockery. Mockery?

Yeah. And you see, they've used this feminism to anger the men, and a lot of the men are saying, well, you know, now they're finding out that they're not equal with us, that women and men are different. You know, all of this time, and you know, like what they did on purpose to divide and conquer, you know, in the Special Forces, you know, even when I was in the military, you know, women got treated a little better than we did. And well, we knew, hey, you know, they are women, and they needed more privacy than we did, but there was a number of things that, you know, they told you when you went into the military, they shaved your head for health reasons.

Well, apparently the women didn't have to be healthy because they never had to get their hair cut or shaved. But they were treated different in a lot of reasons, and we said, well, they're women, you know, they are different than us, and we didn't think much of it. But then all of this feminism, and all of a sudden white men are the enemy.

White men, you know, we're, and now people are getting angry. You know, the whole idea was to get the men angry, and now as we're looking, you're right, John, they're degrading the women, but the whole idea is to destroy the nation, destroy relations. They're using the very same thing now with its open marriages. The whole idea is to completely destroy marriages, destroy families. Yeah, it's to fracture us as a nation.

Yep. But, I mean, they're going to open up, the way things are going, they're going to, if a draft comes, they're going to draft all these women, like with no difference. Well, you know, that's the other thing to destroy. You know, remember they had them, when they tried to make women the first Green Berets, they had to lower the standards. Then they had to lower them again, okay?

And when it came to making women Navy Seals, they lowered them three times, the standards, what they had to do three times before they could make that. And what does that do when you lower your standards? Does that help your military or destroy it? Well, but you see, that's the whole point. It absolutely destroys it.

Yeah. It destroys it. It's like if you lower the standards, there were very high standards back in the day when I went to college. You know, you had to have certain grades in school and you had to have certain SAT, and that's all kind of gone by the wayside now in many, many, many areas. And anybody came in and it just watered down the whole system.

They have to kind of teach at the lowest level. You know, if you read in Isaiah chapter 3, John, God gave women as leaders, he put women as leaders, women and incompetent people, women and incompetent people as a judgment, as a punishment against a nation. In other words, he punished a nation by giving their leaders to be women and incompetent men.

We'll be back right after this. To Satan and the father of lies, how he did all the things that he did because he was Yahweh's own son. He said, I am the way and the truth and the life. So they hung him from the tree till he was crucified. Then they carried him and buried him in a tomb three days and three nights long. And where the bang and the clang and a great big boom, the angel removed the stone from the tomb. And when they all went looking inside, Jesus, he was gone. Now, you know, there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. The father calls it for the son to be redeemed.

When you're resurrected from the grave, you leave no deposit. Yes, there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. Now as the spirit moved in, the church caught fire and the gospel spread through the Roman empire.

That old devil's old world order was turned upside down. It seemed the more that he martyred and he crucified, the more the Holy Ghost of Jesus Christ was multiplied. Until the gospel of the saving grace of Christ was finally spread the world around. All because there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. The father calls it for the son to be redeemed. When you're resurrected from the grave, you leave no deposit. Yes, there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. Some say it's down to all you bow. The Hindus pray they'll come back as a cow.

The oriental say only Buddha's the way. But what are they going to say on resurrection day? Now the world's got leaders that are trying to lead, but the truth of the matter is they're all deceived. Because they've all got secrets in their past they're trying to hide. So when Satan steps up to make his deals, he threatens to tell all the other big wheels.

So they all conspire together to save their own hides. But you know there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. The father calls it for the son to be redeemed. When you're resurrected from the grave, you leave no deposit. Yes, there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. Yes, there ain't no skeleton in Jesus' closet. Absolutely.

You can take that to the bank. Right, John? All right. We're back. And U.S. Supreme Court blocks Florida law that protects children from sexually explicit drag shows. They did not have a good excuse. I automatically knew that this would not be a 9 to nothing vote. I knew there was going to be at least two, maybe three justices that consented, voted against this.

And I was absolutely right here. Let me go ahead and just, according to a report from Tampa Free Press, Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Secretary Melanie Griffith has set an emergency application to Justice Clarence Thomas requesting that the law be reinstated while the lawsuit is in the state plays out. Florida is now unable to enforce its statute at all to the detriment of Florida's children and the state's sovereign prerogative to protect them from harm. Moody argued, Hamburger Mary's has not allowed much less proven the application of the Protection of Children Act to others in the state of Florida will cause actual or imminent injury to Hamburger Mary's itself. Here, these Hamburger Mary's, they're the ones that's taking this suit. Now, here you go. And, you know, I wanted to see actually who Hamburger Mary's are. Are you familiar with this one, John?

No, I never heard of that term. I thought I was waiting to hear from you. OK, let me see. I'm going to see if I can go back to the beginning because I started reading this and I wanted to.

We'll go all the way back. I think it's some kind of a business, but anyhow, here, Justice Thomas could act on the request alone to refer to the full court for consideration, according to the report from the Hill. On Thursday, Florida's request to the Supreme Court to limit the lower courts injunction solely to Hamburger Mary's was rejected in a six to three vote with Justices Thomas Alito. And gorgeous dissenting.

Here's the ones that sold us out. Justice Kavanaugh and Barrett clarified that Florida's failure to raise the First Amendment issue in the case means that the court's decision does not reflect a stance on whether the law breaches First Amendment rights. That is a flimsy excuse. What do you think?

Do the Democrats ever have a problem with things like that? OK, well, no, or here here, Hamburger Mary's is a drag bar. It's a drag bar. And I'm looking at now pictures of these topless, a topless drag queen taking them. Well, this one actually must be a real female. She got a little bitty girl about three years old by the hand, taking her in.

And this woman's just about naked. It's pretty, pretty bad. What I'm saying is those leftist judges on the court, they don't ever seem to have an issue with something that lines up with their ideology. You know, you never hear of things like that with them, but so I don't know the technical aspect for it, but there you go. They were two Trump appointees and they're not they're not like fulfilling what they were put on the bench for. Right. I hear you.

I mean, it's it's it's just like betrayal, betrayal, betrayal. You know, who was it that just died today? You know, it was today. O'Connor. Yeah.

I wanted to mention that to you. Do you know what President Reagan said? He said he ever made. He said that the one thing he regrets more than any other thing during his term was appointing Sandra Day O'Connor to the to the bench. And so I remember that, Pastor Ernie, back in the day when that happened and oh, she was touted as a real conservative, but, you know, the ones that rely on the Constitution and not making up things. And what a disappointment, especially in pro-life, Pastor. You're telling me dirty Jack Smith and Obama Judge Beryl Howell attempt to cover up how both just to Trump was a flight risk to justify secret Twitter search warrants.

There you go. Now, you know, we know, but but he's even known as Jack Smith. Listen, he's even known amongst the own, amongst the Democrats as dirty Jack Smith. And so just like Adam Schiff, you know, amongst the Democrats, they'll say that Adam Schiff is one of the best liars they have out there. Remember when they said before when Bill Clinton was in office was an article, I think it was in Time magazine and they are. Was it Newsweek?

It was Newsweek and Newsweek. It said that Bill Clinton was not only a good liar, he was a great liar. And they boasted the Democrats. And he is our liar. They were boasting about him being a great liar. So what do you think out of their own mouth?

What does scripture say in Revelation 21, verse 8? All liars. Right, right, right. Will have their place in that lake of fire. Jack Smith.

Go ahead. Pastor Ernie, the thing about Bill Clinton. There was something about him that was very likable to people, people. Now, Hillary was not like that. But Bill Clinton was just seemed to be likable. And his laughing kind of I mean, his lying. The people would give him a pass or they wouldn't even notice it because they liked him.

You follow what I'm saying? Well, yeah. See, his security guards that were with him 10 years straight used to tell me, Larry Patterson for one, and then of course, Larry Nichols worked with him all of that time, that he had a good sense of humor. He would joke around and he would make fun of things. One of his favorite sayings was, who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?

Remember Stanislav Lunev, who was that Russian, the highest ranking Russian defector. He stayed up here with us for a while and I got to know him very good. Had him on the radio. His job in December of 1969 was to go there and to because they were going to run Bill Clinton as president for president to teach Bill Clinton no matter what he said, whatever he came out from under his nose and over his tongue to believe, whatever lie he told, and here he said that was the easiest job he's ever seen. He said he never met such a natural born liar as Bill Clinton.

Right. And he's likable. He's likable. He seemed to be able to get away with the lies because he was so likable.

Yeah. Larry Patterson used to tell me that a woman would come up to him and maybe he'd be someplace as governor and a woman would come up and she'd tell her about his situation and she wasn't in her workplace or she was having a hard time getting, you know, her some aid or whatever. And so Bill Clinton said, okay, get her name and address. And he would say, we're going to take care of this for you.

And then she would walk away and Patterson would say, do you want me to run this down? He said, of course not. Heck no.

I just told her that we're not, don't bother with it. Yeah. That he would do that all the time.

And so anyhow, there you go. Let me go back here with Jackson. Bill Clinton seems to have like disappeared. He's still out there and I wouldn't count, I would not be surprised if old Hillary was to, to try to manipulate a third run if she could, if she thought she could get away with it. She's been, she's been making the rounds, old Hillary's been making the rounds out there everywhere. Yeah, but it's a different Democratic Party now because about the third of the party is woke and they have a whole different, well, her agenda is mostly like theirs, but they're not submitting to her best earnings.

Not right now. They're not, but look, you know, Joey ain't going to get it. And I mean, I mean, it would have really, I mean, they really, really would have to do what they're good at. And that's election fraud. I mean, they would really have to shine in the election fraud to be able to put him over on the American people again. Okay. His popularity is, is, but they didn't put him over pest or any, they stole it. Yeah, I know that.

I know that. But where people, there's even the Republicans are watching, you know, you have four or five different true to vote and others that now are there inspecting and everybody expects the Democrats to more like election fraud. This is one of the reasons we're working so hard with tactical civics.

Once we get set up within our County, we can go back to paper ballots that accounted by hand. And so anyhow, this article here, let me just go with this. Jack Smith and Obama appointed judge Beryl Howell are now attempting to cover up the fact they both suggested Trump was a flight risk to try and justify the nondisclosure order on Twitter or X Twitter. As previously reported special counsel, Jack Smith admitted he included inaccurate information when he asked judge Beryl Howell and Obama pointy for a secret search warrant on Trump's Twitter X was fine $350,000 because it delayed producing the subpoena records. The search warrant was so secret that Trump didn't even know that Jack Smith issued a subpoena to the right. They don't do anything according to the law today.

No, no pestering. No, they're, they're alone to themselves. They're rogue now. Rogue Biden's completely corrupt Justice Department obtained a nondisclosure order that prohibited X from informing Trump and Jack about Jack Smith subpoena. So, you know, the American people are, they were born more have had enough. We don't, I don't give any legitimacy. I don't, I don't recognize that entity that causes Justice Department is being having any legitimacy at all.

They've got power, but, but any, any criminal with a gun has power, right? Yeah, exactly. And exactly this, you've got about how much time, seven minutes does he have to give an invitation? Derek, wake up, Derek. Yeah. John, you got. Yeah. Okay.

Derek had to do math. John, go for it, man. I'll give you the minute notice. Okay, Pastor Ernie. Well, I want to share with you about this, there's a verse that really fits what we're talking about. It's in first John, three, six, excuse me, it's a first John two, 16, it says the world passes away, and the lost thereof. But he that do with the will of God abided forever. All of this is going to pass away.

It's important now. But in eternity, it doesn't matter except what you do for Jesus Christ, but he that does the will of God abides forever. So what we want is everyone, all our listeners to abide forever in heaven with Jesus Christ. The Bible says for God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. So God's love is on everyone, everyone listening.

God does not discriminate, and even if you had a horrible past, no matter what it was, you can be forgiven through Jesus Christ, and have all sin forgiven, and have a clean start, and start off with assurance of eternal life with God in heaven. So the second part is he gave his only begotten Son, and there's a reason he had to give his only begotten Son, because only begotten also means that Jesus Christ is virgin born and sinless, only begotten Son of God. He was born without a sin nature, folks. All of us come from Adam, and Adam sinned, and that sin was passed down through our nature to every one of us.

Everybody needs a Savior, no matter who you are, what gender you are, where you're from, how old you are, everybody needs a Savior. So in Romans 5-12 says, God commanded his love towards us, and while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. So Jesus Christ was sent as our Savior in love, for God so loved the world that he on the cross, when he was put on the cross willingly, he went to the cross, and he died and shed his blood. That shed blood, and his death paid the penalty for our sin. And then the Bible says that God transferred Jesus Christ's righteousness into us and our sin to him.

It's a trade. He took our sin and then imparted his righteousness in us, and because of the righteousness of Jesus Christ, we can have eternal life. We can stand before God in heaven, not in our own righteousness, but in the righteousness of Jesus Christ. But then that verse also says, whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. So it isn't a matter of God loving us and Jesus going to the cross and dying for us, but whosoever believes in him. And that means personal confession of repentance of sin, that you repent, you do it about faith, and say I'm not living a life of sin anymore, and I'm going to live with Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior. That's repentance. And believing that he was the sinless, only begotten Son of God, who shed his blood on the cross for your sin. And that you, because that you've done that, you've confessed Christ, that his righteousness now is imparted to you, and that's how you have eternal life.

Nothing we can do by works. One minute. One minute. Thank you. So the message is simple, that God loves you, Jesus, but we're separated from God by sin. Everybody has the sin nature. And Jesus Christ was sent by love, died on the cross, shed his blood, and that whosoever will confess, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you shall be saved.

And I forgot to mention that. The other part is for salvation, what's needed is believing that God raised Jesus Christ from the dead. So there it is, folks. It's not complicated. It's easy.

But it is, you have to pay a price in repentance and turn from sin. Okay, Pastor Ernie. Amen. Very good.

Thank you. The Lord did it. Jesus did all the heavy lifting, boy, and that means we can spend eternity in heaven, which is a lot better than you can imagine. Well, we're out of time for tonight. So at this time, every night, we always do a couple things. One, we say good night.

Two, we say God bless. And then we say always, always, always keep fighting the fight. When I grow up, I want to work for a woke company, like super woke. When I grow up, I want to be hired based on what I look like rather than my skills.

I want to be judged by my political beliefs. I want to get promoted based on my chromosomes. When I grow up, I want to be offended by my coworkers and walk around the office on eggshells and have my words policed by HR.

Words like grandfather, peanut gallery, long time no see, no can do. When I grow up, I want to be obsessed with emotional safety and do workplace sensitivity training all day long. When I grow up, I want to climb the corporate ladder just by following the crowd. I want to be a conformist. I want to weaponize my pronouns.

What are pronouns? It's time to grow up and get back to work. Introducing the number one WokeFree job board in America, redballoon.work