WED HR 1 020823

The following program is sponsored by What's Right, What's Left Ministries, and is responsible for its content. Portions of the following program may be pre-recorded. I am Pastor Ernie Sanders, the voice of the Christian Resistance. Stay tuned. My radio broadcast, What's Right, What's Left, is coming up right now.

Coming to you live from Independence, Ohio. We change our life for the better in many different ways. Heard around the world every Monday through Friday. Pastor Sanders is always years ahead of the rest of the media telling you exactly what they're covering up.

This is What's Right, What's Left. Tune in every chance I get to hear exactly what's going on with the voice of the Christian Resistance. Unabashedly cutting through the rhetoric by exposing the hard topics facing our society and world.

A lot of the other news media don't pick up the news items like he does. And bring into light the enemies of freedom who are out to steal your rights, your children, and enslaving you. You really get the truth out. I can tune into your show and hear the unvarnished truth.

Thank you. This is What's Right, What's Left with Pastor Ernie Sanders. Good evening and welcome to another edition of What's Right, What's Left on this eighth day of February, 2023. And tonight we have, well, he does his job with a smile.

He's behind the glass. His name is Kyle, our producer. Hey, Pastor. Hey, Kyle. And then, here, she can't be on the farm, so we've made her the studio marm. Little Lisa.

Good evening, everyone. Get back to the farm. Anyhow, way out yonder, way out yonder, he's, well, they're in Missouri. He's that back roads preacher.

The parson, Joe Larson. Still here, still working, and still with you. What can I say? Well, I would say tonight is Wednesday and, I mean, every other Wednesday is Wendy Wednesday. And so we have what is to that little Miss Wendy Wilson.

Beauty with the beasts. We had a little hiccup with Wendy. She'll be right back. All right. Okay, we had a hiccup with Wendy.

She just, when you said that beauty and the beast. Well, yeah, so. Oh, well, I better quit the humor.

Oh, no. All right. We'll have Wendy coming back in a minute.

Yeah, well, you could have had Wendy's with the beasties. Okay. Okay. And, you know, you could, you could have tried to pull me in on that.

I don't think when he would go for that, though. Would you, Wendy? You're here. All right. We just introduced you, but you weren't here.

I was disconnected by mistake. Okay. So there you go. Joe was saying how when I introduced you after he introduced him, he said the beauty and the beast and plural. Well, we know which one is which, don't we?

It's still there. Did we scare her off for the night? Did you get scared again, Wendy? We'll see, you know, I'll just have my pepper spray.

Yeah, she's coming in. All right. Well, we better get to business here. Now, the title of the message was The Perverted World and the Perverted Word.

The Perverted World and the Perverted Word. I thought it was counterfeit. Oh, yeah, that's right. The counterfeit. That's right. World and a counterfeit word.

Yeah, you're right. I'm here in Jeremiah where we use the word perverted there. But anyhow, let's pick it up where we left off. Wendy, we went through the scriptures and first we went through and I did a commentary on our society today from the so-called medical profession, the education profession, the, you know, the clergy, the so-called churches and the military. And all of this, we went through it and seeing how they've been so degraded and perverted today.

It's not just in America. We're living in what the time that the Lord Jesus called the end days, the last days. And he referred to them as the evil days and the days of sorrow. And so we looked at that and then we went to the Word of God and how you have over 200 New Age perversions of the Bible. And we compared the Bible with a lot of these New Age perversions.

And that's where we're going to pick it up. We looked at the perverted church, how they perverted the deity of Christ, the perverted word of the NIV, the ASV. We looked at the Philippians 2, 6 again, where they perverted Christ's deity, where these false versions. And then we looked at Luke chapter 2, where they perverted a virgin birth. And then we looked at Colossians 1, how they removed the blood.

So all the way down the line, we're going to pick it up tonight. And tonight we looked at Hebrews 9, 22, also how they removed the blood. Now, tonight we're going to pick it up in Jeremiah chapter 23, verse 29, Joseph. Would you read 29 through 40?

29 through 40. Is not my word like as a fire, saith the Lord, and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that steal my words every one from his neighbor. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues and say, He saith. Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies and by their likeness.

Yet I sent them not, nor commanded them. Therefore, they shall not profit this people at all, saith the Lord. And when this people, or the prophet, or a priest, shall ask thee, saying, What is the burden of the Lord? Thou shalt then say unto them, What burden?

I will even forsake you, saith the Lord. And as for the prophet, and the priest, and the people, that shall say, The burden of the Lord, I will even punish that man and his house. Thus shall ye say every one to his neighbor, and every one to his brother. What hath the Lord answered, and what hath the Lord spoken? And the burden of the Lord shall ye mention no more, for every man's word shall be his burden. For ye have perverted the words of the living God, O the Lord, and of the Lord hosts our God.

Thus shalt thou say to the prophet, What hath the Lord answered thee, and what hath the Lord spoken? But since ye say, The burden of the Lord, therefore thus saith the Lord, because ye say this word, The burden of the Lord, and I have sent unto you, saying, Ye shall not say, The burden of the Lord. Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you, and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence. And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame which shall not be forgotten.

All right, thanks, Joe. I'm just going to jump over here for just a minute to Jeremiah chapter 20 verse 9. Then I said, I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name. But his word was in mine heart, and as a burning fire shut up in my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not say.

And so here now, Jeremiah was kind of feeling a little bit sorry for himself, but just like you and I, we have to preach the gospel. I mean, we have to. There's no way, there's nothing that we could possibly, no way anyone could make us stop it, you know, without taking away our ability to speak. And so, as long as we can speak, we're going to speak the word of God, aren't we? Yes.

But see, that's hard to explain to someone. We said yes. Yeah. And so here now, we talked about that, how those out there today, these New Age perversions, one thing about all of the New Age perversions, they all get together, they all single out one, one version of the Bible, and they're all against it. And they've said this.

Joe, do you remember some years ago on the John Ankerberg show, where he had him on, there were two Baptist preachers who were there to preach on the King James, to stand up for the King James, and then you had three others that were there and Ankerberg, so you had four to two that were for the New Age versions. And I don't know, do you remember what happened on that program? No, I don't. I really don't remember. I was watching it. Those that were there to support the ASV and the NIV, they lost their voice. They could not speak. Right on that program, the Lord took it, and the look of pure panic was on their faces.

And Ankerberg had to edit that program. But we watched it live when it happened, okay? You mean you watched people sit there unable to speak while the other side was in full charge?

Right. When the King James pastors spoke, they spoke the word of truth. When the others went to defend the New Age versions, they couldn't speak. The Lord shut their mouth. He shut their mouth. I wish I could remember that. I don't know that I got to see that. Yeah.

Anyhow, I still have, of course I don't have that tape, but I have the article, big articles was written on that, and it showed them all in the studio, this and that. Anyhow, so what we read here is very, very important that you have the word of God. Now, there are those that are, how often do you hear people repeat, well, we don't have the originals, we don't have the originals, these guys who don't quite have the courage to believe that God could do exactly what he said. Did God not say that he would deliver us his word, that we would get his word, pure word?

Yes, he did. Okay, did Jesus not say that heavens and earth would pass, but his word would stand forever? Never pass away.

Never pass away. Now, we're going to play a little clip later on, another example of one of these United Methodist drag queen preachers perverting the word of God. But here, what he's telling you in Jeremiah is they've twisted the word of God to make it say other than what God has said, to make the plain meaning of what he was saying perverted. They perverted the plain meaning, that's why he says here, and the burden of the Lord shall you mention no more, for every man's word shall be his burden, for you have perverted the words of the living God, and the Lord of hosts are God. So, here he goes on to say the burden originally just God's message to the people, and they took it as a heavy burden instead of something wonderful to possess and share, they coined it a burden, right? Well, yeah, you see, not just that, but here, they didn't want to hold to, in other words, they didn't think that they were sinners, they didn't believe that God, that they thought that, well, remember what they said, no foreign army will ever come to the gates of Jerusalem there.

And guess what? What God had told them that that was going to happen through Jeremiah and Ezekiel happened exactly the way he said it would be, and they were taken into the Babylonian Exorcist, so here, exile, the Babylonian exile. But here, but they don't, in other words, they didn't want to believe what Jeremiah was telling them, that you need to repent, you need to repent or you're going to perish, and you've offended God, and their idea was, no, we don't want to hear what this guy's saying. We're God's chosen people, and not only that, but like in Hosea, they liked their sin.

They liked their sin, just like today in America. Unbelievable. You know, the Democratic Party, Joe, they've officially adopted Satanism as their religion. In fact, I've got the, we're going to look at that tonight. Biden Defense Department sued for improper use of the military. Do you remember when Biden gave that speech, and the last one, the State of the Nation, and he had the Marines standing in the background with that red devilish satanic, he put a satanic, that was sending a message. Isoteric message is what it was. Yeah, the message is, they've adopted Satanism. What pastor, what was the message? The message was that they have, when Biden had, that he had the Marines there behind him, they had a red, a devilish red background in the dark, like the gates of hell, and that message was to confirm to the Democrats have adopted Satanism as their religion. Do you remember when Obama was in Colorado, and he gave that big speech out there, and they had brought in from Germany, the seat of Satan, the seat of Satan, where they had duplicated what he spoke of over there in Revelation. The background for, oh, senior moment here. Help me out, Joe, you know what I'm talking about? Yeah, it was just a big, I can't remember, but at the time it was shocking, it was, as I saw it, it was like one of those things that your hair on the back of your neck goes up, that it was evil, it was Satanism, and I, at that point it was like it was hard to watch.

I know, it's right on the tip of my tongue, and we'll probably have 25 people calling now to tell us. Well, was it like a, you know, I guess a graven image? Is that what it was? No, it was the background of it was the pillars, you had the pillars where you had, and they had the big, I guess like an ox or a bull would be in the background where they would actually sacrifice people, and they would heat that thing up, and this was, and I'm trying to think of the name of the house that is called the seat of Satan. And it'll come to me sometime, but you'll find it in spoken of in Revelation, it would be, maybe, I think it's, if I remember, maybe to the church of Pergamos, if I remember right, maybe, let me see, it wasn't, I know in Revelation chapter 2 he talks about Jezebel, and the seat of Jezebel, and let me see what I'm, well he also refers to the synagogue of Satan, but that's not what I'm looking for. But anyhow, I'll come across one of these days, it was the temple, it was the temple that they used, and it was called, he referred to it as the seat of Satan, and I can't. Wasn't it the same temple where the Jews came in later, destroyed the temple and put the toilet in place of the idol? No, no, but I'll come across it, wouldn't you, this happens, I guess when you get our age, Joe.

Can't remember everything. Yes, the, I'm looking right now, well okay, he's referring to the synagogue of Satan and he's referring to the seat of Satan in Revelation 3, or Revelation 2, and that's the, what I was looking to. And it's supposed to be a temple? Yeah, it was the temple, not of Zeus, but I'm trying to think of the... Is it in 2 Thessalonians? No, it would be in Revelation chapter 2. So, why was this doing a search, the temple that's the seat of Satan, where it was called something else?

Yeah, yeah. The synagogue of Satan? Well no, the synagogue of Satan, that's the apostate church, and that's the apostate Jewish church. So what else would it be called?

Pardon? He said it was the temple, the seat of Satan. The seat of Satan, right. He said it was called? The seat of Satan, right.

Yeah. And, well, anyhow, it doesn't matter. He's talking about the church at Pergamos, or it said, even where Satan's seat is. And then he goes on to say, and it was an apostate, it was my faithful martyr who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. That's probably what you're thinking there. And that was, but it was like the temple of Zeus that they had, remember Obama? The temple was there at Pergamos.

Yeah, okay. Anyhow, they had this thing set up in Germany, where, you know, it's a pagan temple of the seat of Satan, and they had moved it to Colorado. And that's where Obama made his big speech out of when he came out. This was the seat of Satan, the people, the vast majority of people are clueless, they didn't have an idea.

Because it went over their head. But let's go back here. And so the last verse that he says in Jeremiah 22, or 23 is, And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten. And so he's referring to those that have perverted his word. Now, turn over to 1 Peter 1, and read me verses 22 and 25, Joe.

1 Peter 1. Which liveth and abideth forever, for all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof fadeth away, but the word of the Lord endureth forever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.

Okay, so it says the word of God endureth forever, so that means it doesn't change, does it? Right. Okay.

Never ever. Alright. Well, for eternity it can't change for eternity, and that's kind of a long time. Okay, we're going to jump over very quick to Romans chapter 12. And in Romans chapter 12, here, I'm going to just... Romans 10 or 12? Romans chapter 12.

Okay, so, and I'll get there in a minute. So, Romans chapter 12, we read verses, verse 2. And be not conformed to this world, but be you transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove that which is good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

I'll read that again. And be not conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God. We're going to play a clip here, a little clip we have ready. It's just about a two-minute clip, and it's United Methodist Apostate Church here, and you've got this drag queen. He's delivering the sermon in this United Methodist Apostate Church, and they're pushing the lewd, gross, belligerent, transgressing, queer propaganda.

And here's what he says. Go ahead, and the pastor is there, the pastor of this apostate church. He's got his pastoral garb on, and this is a transgender thing, a trans, well, a, what do you call it, drag queen, called Miss Penny Cost.

Miss Penny Cost, go ahead and play that. No longer may we sit idly by in wooden pews of fallen trees from lands that were stolen. No longer may we listen unshaken to the words of those dispersed seeking refuge from church-appointed supremacy and pseudo-sanctified nationalism. No longer may we allow the tears of our ancestors to be that of a well of sorrow.

Today, we turn them into a raging river of defiant joy and resilient action. For in scripture of today, it is said, woe to the shepherds who are destroying and scattering the sheep of my pastor. Reading modernity into the scripture, we see what can be described as a gentrification, not just of economic measures, not just of displacement of bodies, but a gentrification of grace itself.

The privileged elite have enacted the social reality of generations of oppression and injustice, redlining and wealth capping, all leading to the destabilization and displacement from the one place that the oppressed sought refuge, their home and the houses of God. All right now, the so-called pastor there of that church who invited this drag queen pastor in to preach, he makes this statement and he reads from what we just read about the transform and the renewing of your mind. And he said, what God is talking about as times change, as times change, we have to renew our minds to the new way of thinking.

And we, in other words, we think the new ways and the new things we accept. In other words, he's trying to make them, he's perverted that passage of scripture. Let me ask you this, when Jesus said heaven and earth will pass, but my words will never pass away, in which way did he say they would change? His words would never change, but the people would be forgotten, their sin would never be forgotten. So did he just do what we just read in Jeremiah, did that apostate preacher, did he not pervert the words of God?

He sure did, and the Bible said, we read it, I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you and a perpetual shame which shall not be forgotten. That was pretty clear, and that's what that pastor just did upon himself, he's not a pastor, he's a hireling, but upon all those that were present. So he goes by the name of Pentecost, and here's what he, what has happened as an outcome of that, according to this article here by Sabrina Dee, she says this, 1800 churches, 1800 United Methodist churches have now left the United Methodists because of that, and they give a listing where they're at here. They talk about starting in Kenya, they're talking about here, 1400 member Texas megachurch votes to disaffiliate with United Methodist Church. Great coverage, let me see, it goes on down the line in a number of these, according to this 1800 altogether have said that they will no longer affiliate with the United Church or the Antichrist, no, with the United Methodist Church. The United Church or the Antichrist, that's right here in Cleveland, their headquarters. But there you go, and that's the end of that. Well that's what we're up against today, look at the world is turning to communism, and really their God is Satan.

It is, and I mean they're not making any bones about it, Satanism is the official religion of the Democratic Party, and so hang tight we'll be back right after this. He was born of Elizabeth, the son of Zachariah, sent by God the Father to proclaim the Messiah. He was as bold as a lion, he knew no fear, an awesome man, a coat of camel hair. Big John, big Baptist John, Big John. In the wilderness of Judea you could hear him there, he was preaching repentance, it was very loud and clear.

O generation of vipers who have warned you to flee from the wrath to come, better listen Pharisee. He preached to the sinner, the thief and the liar, only one way out of that burning lake of fire, the truth thundered forth from this righteous man and those that believed found the promised land. Big John, Big John, Big Baptist John, Big John. Chosen by the Father to baptize the Son, it was there in the Jordan this awesome thing was done. The Holy Ghost ascended as if it were a dove, a mighty voice thundered from heaven above.

This is my son in whom I am well pleased. John his friend, none greater than he, he told all the people about God the Son, he never quit preaching till the job was done. Big John, Big John, Big Baptist John, Big John. Now two thousand years later the story is still being told, how he was thrown into prison for being so bold. He was martyred for God, to him it was an honor.

He earned himself a mansion, heaven way out yonder. Big John, now John's enemies they perished in the shame, but John took his place in the saints hall of fame. Now in heaven above the angels understood, when John preached repentance, he sure did a good Baptist John. Now there's one thing John wants you to know, it's a fearful matter to lose your own soul.

To call upon the Lord while you still can, and better take the advice of this mighty righteous man. Big John, Big John, Big Baptist John, Big Baptist John, Big Baptist John, Big Baptist John, Big Baptist John, Big Baptist John Big Baptist John, there you go. I like that better than the other one, Big John, right?

I like Big Baptist John, yep, already. So does Wendy, right, Wendy? Yes, sir.

There you go. All right, Wendy Wilson, what do you have for us? You always got a very interesting information.

I got an idea of some of what you're gonna talk about, but go for it. Well, you know, it's no secret, Pastor, that drug companies hire ghost writers in order to publish a lot of drug or medical device studies. They get them printed in journals and doctors read about it. So why do they use ghost writers? Well, it's convenient for drug companies to use someone else to author the research, but the drug company takes the credit for the work. So it has become a very common practice, and most of the journal articles are written this way.

There was an article in the New York Times in September 2008 commenting on this. They said, medical ghost writers are employed by pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers to produce apparently independent manuscripts for peer review journals, conference presentations, and other communications. Ghost writers make more than freelance writers. A good ghost writer costs between 40 and $70,000 per project and it depends on the ghost writer's experience. And it's quote, so that's, you know, so if you hired a ghost writer to surmise your research, Pastor, and get it published in a journal, that's what you'd be paying them. What do you think of that?

Well, you know what, I've had experience with all of that over the years. A lot of the authors in that, you hear out there today, have ghost writers. A number of the presidents in their memoirs have ghost writers that have written these things. They go under different names.

Right. Well, there was this study too. It was an independent study on medical ghost writing and how it gets published.

It was in September again, 2008. It did wind up eventually in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But this article was not written by ghost writers. It was by the editors of the medical journals.

So this is an interesting notation in the article they wrote. It was nearly, they said nearly 8% of journal authors who qualified for acknowledgement on the review, not a ghost writer, were not given the credit on the article. So what happens is the journal articles are written by ghost writers and the author credit is usually given to an academic scientist who supported the research.

So you often see this. There's a lead scientist in their field. They're listed as a sponsor of the research, but they don't really partake in the research itself and they don't actually write any of the article. So their credentials and their name are just there to give the research the impression of scientific authenticity and credibility.

Okay. Here's a quote from the American Medical Association. They say, our concern with industry sponsored writers is it has the potential to produce bias affecting treatment decisions by doctors and overall patient care. So ghost writers with regards to medical research can impact patients, whereas ghost writers for memoirs, they don't really impact patients, do they Pastor? No.

Right. Now the New England Journal of Medicine only admitted to publishing 11% of the articles by ghost writers and to the editors of this research. The editors of the journals often have voiced a really deep concern about the scientific research. In most of their articles, they've said this. We are puzzled and skeptical of the findings in journal articles, especially written by ghost writers. I'm not believing this for a skinny minute, are you Pastor?

No, no, we, you know, he, well, what can I say? The JAMA Journal, that's the Journal of the American Medical Association said that frequency of ghost written articles has gone up 8%. Lancet reported a similar finding. Public Library of Science, 5% increase.

The Annals of Internal Medicine said 2% increase. But you want to keep in mind, these numbers were from 2008 when these editors were doing this report. Scientists now are saying currently over 50% or more of your journal articles are ghost written. So apparently the journal editors have taken some heat from their subscribers regarding their publication with regards to not vetting the authors of the articles. Now could it be doctors are skeptical now also of the reports they're reading? Are they essentially reading a well-crafted advertisement instead of a pure scientific research report? Well, a lot of the doctors out there, they were taken, they were had, they knew it, they were conned. They went full force, they bought the lie, the whole Pfizer thing, these MOs, GMOs and all of these. And so now what's happening, they're hearing from people like us. I know I've had a number of conversations with a number of these doctors and I told them, I says, haven't you realized you haven't noticed that you folks are losing credibility? And when you ask them, how can you actually justify the AMA when the AMA now says that they really, they're gonna refuse to put gender male or female on birth certificates because they really don't know if there are differences, if there are males or females.

Now, how could you possibly, with any kind of common sense, go for that? And they kind of just shake their head, they just look down and they shake their head like, I don't know, you know? So they're losing credibility, much like the fake news media. Yeah, science is shooting itself in the foot, I agree. Now Joseph Whistler, he's a survey research specialist, he says this, we are recommending that the journal editors take additional action in requiring that all contributors be listed if they are not named as the author. So if that were to happen as a requirement for publication in your medical journals, which it hasn't happened yet, this could make the ghostwriters liable for what they write. So if ghostwriters are writing articles that make the end results better than what the actual test results showed, then I would think, oh, I don't want to put my name, I don't want it to appear on that article because they're committing fraud.

And researchers that conduct the research know that if they want to continue to do research and they want the grant money, they produce favorable study results, so they pass this information to your drug companies who hire the ghostwriters to write it up. Well, you know, Wendy, I could tell you who could tell us a lot more about this. That's Mr. Fauci.

Mr. Fauci, he could really tell us all about that, how that's done and so on. Well, halfway through their report, these editors, there was this sidebar that they probably weren't going to get their article published based on the topic. Of course, you know, we say, of course not. They don't want to publish this information. But I'd also think that three journal editors kind of put their fanny on the line for this, but they wanted this information because they were presenting it to an international meeting of journal editors in Vancouver at the time. So I think it went over better with their peers than it would with the drug company establishment. Now, the JAMA journal did make mention of their findings later. They said, this was Ginny Barber, editor. She's also with the Public Library of Science journal. She said, it was very compelling and I find it quite shocking, to be honest. I have very tough policies, very explicit policies on ghostwriting and contributorship. I feel that we've been lied to by the authors.

Well, I say, welcome to the jungle, Ginny. There's money incentive to lie. That's what I'm saying. Well, you said it very well.

Yes, very clear. Well, you know, they did a second survey. The editors did another one. And this was regarding journal articles were published from 1996 to 2008.

So the findings of the survey showed over 16% of the New England Journal of Medicine and over 15% of the Annals of Internal Medicine and over 7% of the Journal of the American Medical Association had ghostwriters and they were published in all three journals, which means your journals have an on-your-honor policy making it much easier to lie about contributing material and authors, and what they also found is that the lead authors on research articles will often hire a ghostwriter, under report the ghostwriters to the authorities, the editors, and not disclose that, which is considered an academic crime equal to plagiarism. But how often does this happen? Well, to their surprise, they found out.

It was 58 to 68, 86% of the time. So this is incredible bias. This is fraud within the medical community. This is teaching doctors treatment plans that really probably don't work. Now, we're supposed to believe your journal articles or journal editors didn't have a clue about this unethical behavior.

They say they're shocked, they were stunned, but they are saying that the amount of under reporting on ghostwriting is a big surprise, but the takeaway for the editors at their conference was, we have to go back to work, we have to strengthen our safeguards, and I'm thinking these editors, they don't have a clue, they're asleep at the wheel. Here's what the American Medical Association said September, 2008. Studies have found that journal articles involving ghostwriters are often financed by the drug companies. So money answers all things, pastor. So drug companies have turned your medical journals into advertising magazines.

Doctors and patients are at risk. Well, I mean, who would have ever thought, after all, pharma-chia, pharmacy, pharma-chia, what does that word mean, Wendy? Witchcraft. So who would have ever thought that the witches would deceive us? I mean, who could have thought that?

Witches and warlocks? I mean, don't they have standards? Well, I'm just saying I've reported on this quite often over the years, and I even was on your show once, and I was telling you that scientists are, ethical scientists are very upset. They are very concerned. Like what you said, the scientific community is losing credibility. It's like science is committing suicide, and they think nobody will see it.

One scientist said that, in his opinion, the last two decades of research are just going the dumpster. And he says, and one of the main reasons he sees is when people do journal research, peer-review research to get published that will influence healthcare. A lot of these people are at universities.

They get grant money. And if they wanna continue to get grant money, they're highly pressured by the people that would benefit from a good review of what they're studying. So let's say, Pastor, you wanted to do a study on prostate cancer, okay?

And so you've been reading a couple of journal articles that came about prior, and you're kind of leapfrog off of that kind of theory or hypothesis, and you're gonna write your own research. And so you order some prostate cells, prostate cancer cells to do your research with. The thing is, a lot of these people order cells from companies and they don't check them to verify they were sent the right product. So let's say you get breast cancer cells instead from females, has nothing to do with male prostate. And you conduct your research on the wrong cells, publish a paper convincing healthcare professionals to treat X, Y, Z, and it's not gonna do anything for them.

Yeah, but if you were to go to the mainstream media and tell them what you did, they'd back you up. Well, I'm just telling people, it's not what we think it is, you know? Boy, do I know that. Yeah, and you know, the more I read about this, the more I'm saying, you know, just be careful out there. Research your medical treatments very carefully, investigate some options, and investigate them very carefully. And you know, it's getting harder to investigate your options, you know?

And that's not by mistake. Natural wellness stuff is being suppressed, you know? There was one oncologist who said that, you know, she's really upset with people because they're turning her down for treatment. They leave her office saying they wanna go treat it with something natural instead. So they're turning down the chemo and radiation and it's not sitting well. Well, that's happening a lot more than you think.

Well, you probably are aware of that, but yeah, people are going back, they wanna go back. See, look, now think about it this way. We'll ask Joe, okay? Hey Joe, if you were given a choice to treat an ailment, would you use medicine given to you from God? Would you use the natural herbs that God gave us to heal the nation? Or would you go to pharmakeia and get what the devil has given you, which is witchcraft? Which one would you want, Joe? I think I would choose the medicines given by God. You're brilliant, I'm telling you.

You're right, I would do. And I think, see, and more and more people are figuring that out there. They're thinking, well, over here, God gave us this, but over here, where did this came from? Well, it comes from the pit of hell. Now, we're gonna play a clip, I think, if I can get it up, not today, but it's on the Dr. Artis, and he's talking about the snake venom used in these poisonous pokes, and why they were so adamant about not letting you have access to hydroxychloroquine, or what's the other one? Ivermectin. Ivermectin. Ivermectin, yeah. Because they, Ivermectin, what they do is they nullify some of the effects of the poison, of the venom. And that's one of the reasons that he tells you in here, this is why they were so adamant, one of the reasons not letting people have access to Ivermectin.

And remember Fauci, don't use that, it's dangerous. Remember they did all of that thing. These people, they don't know what they're doing. They're going out and they're getting horse-worming medicine.

They were calling Ivermectin horse-worming medicine, anything they could to keep people from taking what worked. Why? Well, because Bill Gates says, look, we gotta depopulate the planet. And all of us billionaires agree, you know, as Sorrows and Cloud Swouts, we have to depopulate the planet. So we're gonna volunteer that we kill off a whole bunch of you people.

Don't worry about it. The mainstream media will back us. Whatever lie we tell, they'll just call it a narrative and they'll back us up in it. That's exactly what's happening out there today.

So. There's an article out today and the source was just the news. And just the news, cited a paper produced by the US government, including Dr. Fauci, that suggests federal health officials knew that COVID vaccines were doomed from the start. It said decidedly suboptimal was the conclusion. The report explained that Fauci knew why the COVID-19 vaccine had been so unreliable at halting infection and transmission beyond just a few months.

And he's waited until he stepped down as director for this information to get out. The medical journal Cell Host and Microbe published a perspective led by Fauci's office and the government showing that the NIAID had good reason to think the experimental shots would fail. And the conclusion was based on spanning Fauci's 38-year tenure, bleeding, and it goes on and on about all the things that they had. It depended on the type of immunity and it gets kind of technical, but there was a, maybe you can explain this, mucosal immunity naturally promoted by infection was the key to a broad protection against COVID, not the Vax. It was natural immunity.

They call it mucosal immunity. And Fauci knew that that was the best way. And then they looked at the Lancet journal and confirmed natural infection was far better protection than the Pfizer and Moderna shots.

And it goes on and on and on. And it turns out that guess who was in charge of controlling any bad information on Dr. Fauci or having Dr. Fauci give out wrong information? The person at the NIH who was supposed to make sure that he behaved ethically was his wife. Oh yeah. I remember.

Yeah, yeah. We forget that she was the one in charge of keeping him from saying bad things. And then finally the report came out and said the gain of function research is just another way of saying, drum roll please, bioweapon. And he lied to Congress under oath.

He lied to Congress. Fauci authorized a paper in 2012 promoting the gain of function research because it could be used as a bioweapon. There you have it, folks. Yep.

That's exactly what you're right. Yeah, LION is something they do in science. It's been ongoing for decades.

And you have to wonder what percentage of our health care establishment is. We're going to have a real scientist in the church talking. And he's going to tell you what science actually teaches about the climate change. But hang tight. We're up against a heartbreak. And when we come back, we're going to take a look at what's really happening in the Ukraine.

So with Judge Napolitano and Turtle McGregor. Thank you for listening to What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian resistance. To support this ministry, head to WRWL.org. The word. Cleveland.com. The word. Cleveland.

Dot com. Once again, thank you for listening and supporting What's Right, What's Left ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned. The second hour is coming up next. Thanks for watching. I'll see you all next time. supporting What's Right, What's Left ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned. The second hour is coming up next.