The Left Launches Disgusting Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Family & Religion

Jay Sekulow already watching disgusting attacks on Judge Amy Cody Barrett's family and her religion. Talk about the war to confirm next justice of the Supreme Court today on Jay Sekulow live live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow fully understand that this is a momentous vision for President media honor of confirming me. I plans to discharge the responsibilities of this job, to the very best of my ability. I love the United States and I love United States Constitution. Phone lines are open for your questions right now: 1-800-684-3110 more than 20 years ago I learned still Bethany, if he is mind to judge must apply the law as written, judges are not policymakers and they must be resolute and setting aside any policy views. They might hold and know your host Jordan secular Jay Sekulow this Jordan secular so you no doubt present drop is nominated to be the next associate justice of the United States states Judge Amy Cody Barrett of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals originally not nominated for that position about 3 1/2 years ago – formerly was a professor of law at Notre Dame and again this is someone who has a long academic background and of course has now got the judicial experience and I think said all right there with what you really need to know what the left already understands which is why their attacks are so nasty process could move pretty quickly week the process will not suffer couple weeks. That's what's interesting here so the Senate Judiciary Committee process can start October 12 Saturday wants to wrap it up by October 22 that would be today's questioning. In the meantime, should be meeting with Senators. The attacks will heat up some Democrats say they will meet with her at all.

I say that's great. They were so nasty to her the first time Diane Feinstein is nearly 90 years old. She is the ranking Democrat. She's a highest-ranking Democratic them. They have said they're very nervous about having her be the one in charge of the district committee since there is some talk, they may not go at all to the hearers which either be wonderful. Judge Barrett, please do it because we don't need your votes and we don't need your just harassment of the next Supreme Court justice and she again I think what what for all of you out there who want to know more about her judicial philosophy rubric Harry Hudson not to talk about that later.

The broadcast of record.

L also a special advisor – carryforward policy. He'll be joining us later. The broadcast as well. I discussed this domination of the debate tomorrow but is she said. I clerked for Justice Scalia and his judicial philosophy is by judicial philosophy that is exactly the kind of nominee to present drop is been looking for is in the mold of the late just say it's it's glia people like Justice Alito. These are these are true ritualistic to the Kaiser's judgment Barrett has authored 94 opinions of us and she's gone on the bench. She clerked in addition to clerking for associate Justice Antonin Scalia, the late great justice clear.

She also clerked for the former Chief Judge of the DC Court of Appeals Judge Lawrence Silverman so she has really startling credentials in that regard. She's well-respected during her clerkship.

She obviously worked with you come in is a year basically and in that year.

Everybody that worked with her, including people. Justice Ginsburg's chambers block works there wrote a previous letter saying she's eminently well qualified were the smartest people that they've never met and that she will do a fair, honest and great job as a Supreme Court justice even know they don't agree with the position she was advocating so I think this bodes well up there to try the religious harassment that's coming up and we come back from the break and the play what Jeff Toobin from CNN said about that. I think Toobin said is absolutely fascinating. Maybe it will hit you know, after a faith again.

Last time it worked out so well. Good luck with that. The words of Jeff Toobin will be back with more just a minute, 1-800-684-3110 to talk to us on air.

That's what hundred 684311.

Jerry excited about this nomination.

Are you ready to go to war because Judge Barrett already facing attacks, calling her a supervisor of savage children because her two adopted children, 80 that is either he can do here is now professor right now might not be much longer at Boston University when he wrote that famous how to be an antiracist buck and all that he's now show he's a racist to be black. Be racist.

He certainly is an disgusting profile anymore so please people start falling by the wayside will be back the challenges facing Americans is a time when our freedoms are constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms and rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and exceptional track record of success.

Bottom line, we could not do our work out your support. We remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. You are already a member. Thank you. Well, this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ God. You can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn, called life will show you how you are personally publication includes all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission in life today online/684 31 to talk to us on air so that now we know it is been confirmed because the present trip made the announcement on Saturday we was widely expected. He reported on Friday that is was leaking out that it will be Judge ABI Cody Barrett after the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals who is the nominee to fill the late Justice Ginsburg seat on the Supreme Court. She was in her announcement speech. She said this about her judicial philosophy. I think this is key for everyone listing right now because you wonder about, like where she comes from looking at the Constitution. She made it really clear and in this statement. I think this almost kinda says everything you need to know more than 20 years I have learned still happening so far 59 sale jobs must apply the law as written, policymakers may not be resolute and setting aside any policy they might hold.

There you go.

His judicial philosophy is my two Harry Hutchison*retirements of these nasty attacks on judgment prefers to talk deposit for all the conservatives out there very excited about this using you widespread praise the White House put out a document that are state-mandated. It had all the senator's statement said it had all of the even house members and groups like ACLJ's are all listed in their with this praise. This is the kind of nominee that gets people excited about whether philosophy comes from Harry and by making the statement that about Justice Scalia at the late Justice Scalia that his judicial philosophy is my judicial philosophy that is very telling because he has got a long time. He served on the Circuit Court and in the US Supreme Court and is a clerk for him. She knows how to apply that philosophy as well. That statement should make conservatives very excited about Judge. I think you're absolutely correct.

I think Judge Barrett brings to the court and originalist textual its understanding of both the Constitution and the rule of law she understands for the nation to remain to gather as a union that the rule of law must be enforced now approach is quite different from the approach favored by left-wingers and if you look at specific decisions that Amy accompanied Barrett has reached particularly in a gun rights case called Cantor versus bar. Also, in a case involving due process involving John Doe versus Purdue University, and thirdly and a pro-life case, Planned Parenthood versus commissioners. She took the position that the Constitution trumps policy analysis from judges and certainly in the pro-life case, Planned Parenthood versus Commissioner in that particular case and evenly divided vote of the Seventh Circuit denied Indiana's request that it review a three-judge panel's ruling that invalidated the state provision regulating the disposal of fetal remains that lower panel or the three-judge panel held that the Indiana law violated the Constitution. Judge Amy Cody Barrett said no and she dissented from the en banc panel and in a 72 ruling by the United States Supreme Court summary disposition judgment I 72 ruling, Judge Barrett's analysis was upheld. In other words, Judge Barrett is saying you must treat fetal remains just like or at least as good as the remains of cats and gerbils that is any indication, Harry tried a lot of glasses on Roe versus Wade where she stands on that on on those issues that we have pretty clear analysis from her. Well, I think the record is a little bear on that. But in about I think it's three cases she did at least touch on the analysis which might lead to a decision in Roe V Wade and she basically steered very close to the United States Constitution and to an originalist understanding of the tax and if you look at the Constitution. There is nothing in the Constitution that says that abortion is controlled by the United States Constitution. So then I think this issue goes back to the states right asserting your phone calls 164 3110 gather there's another thing here think that's important that as last time she was up. She was really attacked for faith.

I mean, they made that Diane Feinstein and Dick let me play the government. Let me play the I Diane Feinstein attack about her dog read your speech is the conclusion one draws is that Donna lives loudly within you and that's of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for four years in this country. The dogma lives loudly within you, which I think sounds like something out of Star Wars, but the fact that she even said that created a firestorm. In fact, CNN commentator Jeff Toobin said you can thank Diane Feinstein for your next Supreme Court justice Amy Cody Barrett. Here's what he said. Number eight. One person who was not fact during the during the ceremony was was one of the people who is most responsible for any coming Barrett being nominated to the Supreme Court, and that Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who in 2017 when she was that the ranking Democrat on the committee engaged in questioning of each of now Judge Barrett that was so incompetent, so inapt, so apparently religiously discriminatory that Amy Cody Barrett became a hero to religious conservatives so there you go. So that was that line of questioning created this entire problem now complicated, more good for Amy Barrett. I think she's good to be confirmed and I don't think she will be confirmed she would be seated before the election and we will have a full nine panel full Supreme Court in place for what is likely to be multiple cases that will be involved in at the Supreme Court of the United States, but Truman went on to say this is again focusing on Feinstein is the leader of the opposition here is that the Democratic ranking member of the Judiciary Committee in the Senate here is also what he said about the continued attacks on her face. Number nine Diane Feinstein was and is a distinguished public servant who has served for many years on the Supreme Court. She is now 87 years old and she has repeatedly engaged in behavior in recent months that seem out of step with what Democrats want to do and she is going to be the leader of the Democratic forces on the judiciary committee and all I can say is good luck without Democrat. Say much more than that, not listed, they are very themselves. They arty bury themselves looking like that you would send admitted that because they made her a name. Most conservatives, she came back at the academic world she wasn't she was made a judge by Pres. Trump Seventh Circuit that hearing highlighted her. The dog was deeply within you know that that has become a phrase conservatives understand that that means a key voting block to get them out to vote.

These are these are the kind of notices they make that your choose that person that came to attention because of Democrats attacks, but that now they're attacking her for having adopted kids we have Abraham kidding. He is a professor at that be you and he wrote the that out pretty famous book, how to be an antiracist like a number one seller on on Amazon for the last year between out some white colonizers court adopted black children they could civilize these savage children in the court superior ways white people while using them as props in their lifelong pictures of the Nile while cutting the biological parents of these children out of the picture of humanity that is in response to Jenny Beth Martin from the tea party patriots friend of ours who wrote that with two adopted children from Haiti. It's going to be and should watch Democrats try to smear Amy Cody Barrett is racist that we saw the Prof. Harry from BU who wrote the how to be an antiracist work do exactly that.

How do we make a racist.

She adopted black children from Haiti.

She must be a white colonizers. Yes, it's highly ironic in terms of looking at the brim candy because he has written a book on how to fight racism but in reality if you think about this book carefully.

If you read this book if you read what the social justice warriors are actually saying they believe in fighting racism through racism and his statement attacking Amy Cody Barrett is quite frankly a racist statement and it's too bad that individuals like Hendy are able to further advance their own racism because they receive huge contributions from the left.

That was interesting as it hit.

He is getting like cartridges for the left but it was easy to lose his job as a professor. Do you that this attack went too far and his comets have gone to far too radical to almost 2 racist he's become a racist. And this rat using this kind of rhetoric that what they want from the University professors so that even if you mainstream institutions of said liberal BU certainly has lots of liberal professors at it that he crossed the line on his attack line crossing the people losing their jobs. There were spot for losing their minds, but who is really to blame me.

I think you know you look at die if I see you delete just as it did not resign under Obama when she was in her 80s and had specific politics believe that the chance that this is what happens only when a society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice. Is there any hope for that culture to survive. And that's exactly what you are saying with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We've created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn gold mission will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later there would Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question mission in life today online/challenges facing Americans is freedom's or constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public and exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do our work support. We remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you, are not well this is the perfect time to stand with us. ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing, member today ACLJ hearings will start October 12. He writes it will escalate if they were to get this done before the election. But here's their thinking and this would be for stimulant ramp certain of the hearings will start on October 12 they will be done within 60 days or less. That includes the one week before they allow the markup so basically hearings Tuesday, Wednesday, and on the 15th of begin their markup to hold over to the 22nd and on the 22nd will go to Mitch McConnell he can have the vote by the 26, 27, 28, that was before the election judge Barrett if all the people were out will be on this record a full nine justices on the court before the elections of any election issues which is likely reach and yet you think folks allow the President but there is an article that we cannot know if his New York Times roster about May politico how the left is lighting up and how even Nancy Pelosi is figuring out the options on right now. See, the problem goes constitutional. If you go to house the Democrats even though they have the majority of the house start of the majority when it comes to the state delegations 26 to 22, and there's two states that are there is 1/4 increase of 22 because Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are tied. That's right, they would actually if no changes there.

The house they would cut it take themselves out that there's also a legal question whether it's the new house, whether it's the all now say we gotta target our races based off of house races based off getting back there making up the deficit we have in the house now my seats, but by states which means this moment.

I think that's why think that Amy Barrett nomination morning Harry, I think you go pretty quickly. I think it will be rancor but it's good to get right through and she will be seated before the beginning of the first Monday in October. Now, having said that, I do think and I mean we would know this on first name basis that will be a series of cases that ultimately under a quick basis will move to the Supreme Court of the United States on election issues may be electors. It may be the issue about how ballots are verified of absentee ballots verified are mail-in ballots verified may be issues of harvesting your casinos develop this and now there's a case out about working a very close eye on on the fourth circuit court of appeals involving South Carolina. There's a situation with going to Pennsylvania had the one just a few days ago so there's a number of these cases that are developing and look there significant constitutional issues with each and every one of them. So having nine members of the Supreme Court in place becomes very very important that you move these issues, but were not having said that let let me take something attack. I think that you have to stay away from her fate because they bet is gyp tube and said good luck with that. That didn't work out so it's going back to they make they make every out tweets of her with a dog collar so they say there are be Gina with her with a really scholar.

That's fine. Yes, right. But David output, but for a become imperative between the value of the mean. That's were in the liberal world is a dog collar.

Let me ask my husband so by the way, let me ask as we have it just a joke right like she sees the judge husband's attorney. Verse seven kids to adopted but who do you think is probably having to run a lot of household there.

The thought that the yes her husband made so this is it is a game there tripe like they only care about feminism and women succeeding if that liberal women you understand that that's not feminism that's antiwar that's anti-will let me just pick and choose what woman is okay to be accepted to be excited about as a fitness that's gross. That's disgusting. This is same thing on raced there, the racist, the liberals are the racist liberals are the ones who are actually feminist because they they judge people based on politics not based off of qualifications or even the fact that you can say this should mean all women if they're moving up the power that's a good thing because of their more conservative or liberal, they can't go there because are so tied to ideology the LW racist be sexist that we bigots like to have it with religion so they can all three of those that is them will call you those three names, but really in reality, who were the racist deliberate the Democrats Joe Biden look at this time in an office means that he's the worst you are the worst offenders of all politicians who are the who are the sexist look at look at the look at what the dog collar, for instance, who are the bigots look at what Diane finds the did all Democrats not just liberal receipt was 50 Democrats are the racist bigots and sexist Republicans been fighting that for decades, and it's not to say the Republicans get to choose people because of that she was just extremely qualified and she became more high-profile because of what Democrats did to her.

So it's it was twofold.

She had the qualifications to be is for court justice.

She does and they gave her a bigger profile which is typically yeah people came to know her.

She was in the silly DC insider like Cavanaugh's was until I court the tribe may be a decade of experience of the court, but because of her academic experience or clerkships what people said about her and of course her time is a Circuit Court judge in the attack on her qualified. So I want is here is a question I had for you and that I have for you and that is on the legal issues where they can ago for the attack. What what's in the BD where they can say she's out of the mainstream of judicial thought, which is not always there like well I think one line of attack which Joe Biden already highlighted is to argue that she would invalidate the affordable healthcare. She has written law review article questioning Judge Roberts analysis and I think a first year law student could write a similar review of this analysis in the affordable care act case because it was poorly written or legally also means not just it's not just the cases that they're using that is put absolutely metal.

They are going to use that particular spiritual tactic. They are also going to attack her on grounds that she will necessarily overturn Roe V Wade, and it's far from clear from her judicial record that she will necessarily. She may carve it back a bit because she believes in originalist, but I think at the end of the day because of any component, Connie Barrett, impeccable qualifications and those qualifications. By the way resonate with the American people and because of her because her judicial philosophy is unimpeachable and because even left-wing Harvard law professors like Noah Feldman agreed that she is brilliant, conscientious, and that she will analyze decisions in good faith. I think the left is essentially left with the following approach attack judge Connie Barrett largely on the basis of fictional claims including either her affiliation with the Catholic group called people of praise or the fact that she's adopted two children from Haiti.

As a consequence, for instance, Newsweek magazine has published a highly fictional claim that Margaret Atwood's book, the handmaid's tale is based on people praise left maintains this bogus charge despite the fact that the author of the book denies that she based her novel on any component Cody Baratz real religious affiliation. So there is no factual basis to claim that Amy Connie Barrett and her husband engaged. For instance, in an illegal adoption, but if you look at if you look at the Twitter verse you will find plenty of claims that there something that demands an investigation.

So I think at the end of the day. This is a concession that judge Barrett is highly qualified October 12 question the coming pagan basics and by the way until October 12 this week. She meets Sen. sick, it really is that you gotta do that part of the process. You can shortchange that very quickly. Yet today's hearings and markup. Today's baby be under attack. Democrats might also this issue. They may boycott so we come back second half save our corrupt last week about restricting your phone calls I've got a question but that his kisses on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mel Harris will call about that as well so 1-800-684-3110 is that strategy Democrats are doing for for Biden Harrison St. engage because when they do again to come off as racist and sexist back decades. ACLJ on the frontlines protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking.

If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ live from Washington DC Jay Sekulow and secular parties heard this from the managing director of NexGen America former staffer for Sen. Heinrich Wendy Davis and NARAL. Of course, as adoptee, I need to know more about the circumstance of how Amy Cody Barrett came to adopt her children in the treatment of them since transracial adoptions fraught with prominent potential for harm and everything I see here is deeply concerning their two children from Haiti.

She has been vetted by the US government before she's a Circuit Court judge. But that's not good enough for him. He needs to know more about her personal life. Yeah, that's what. That's the only way they can attack them because he thinks what a judge or a federal judge. What about some illegal adoption process. You gotta be kidding me, right don't like the result that you now have appointed its okay so is female for the first time in US history to the Supreme Court of United States Sandra Day O'Connor was a pre-conservative yeah you let me know she was conservative-ish ISH image was conservative but I'm talking about a conservative in the mold of Antonin Scalia, this is the first time. So what you have there been a come up with everything they can think of and more.

But you know what either that, or George, as you said before the break or not show up at all yet boycott. We have a question at this is Frank Ford on my monies but hold on Frank Walker Jay Sekulow logger on the air separately at the debate tomorrow night so this is a lot of New Zealanders let it were lot of folks and Amy Cody bear but then everyone's going to be dissecting for a few days. First, this applies as all right as these the Presidential debate. Finally, for the first time be on the same stage going at each other, no Trump and Biden, and Biden is not A Teleprompter so is the first time in seeking out its what is that I think that that's kinda overtake the newsletter for the rest of the week, but there still be playing these attacks on Barrett Frank you're on the phone call is on the community or in Connie Barrett can see will cancel each use. This is a vice Presidential running shoes and after accuses up. There is no requirement that the only person that's discussing recusal of anybody is Jeff Toobin from CNN suggesting that Diane Feinstein because she did such a horrible job with that elevated Amy Barrett to the status that she's not in this report. She said she should recuse listen what he said so explain what you're saying you want her to recuse herself from all of this give that responsibility of being the top Democrat on the judiciary committee to someone else and she can leave the committee, she could become she could go to the intelligence committee this this is not some joke I mean the commit the these committee assignments are done largely by seniority.

Republicans don't do it entirely by seniority. They pick people up particularly in the house based on who they think will do the best job Democrats operate on the basis of seniority, speech where Jeffrey Toobin's were Democrats. Once either went Diane Feinstein out Two weeks. She's probably enough of a team player. They're pretty good at that other side of the aisle to keep things aligned up. She's but she's 87 and a woman is she going to represent the look they want to push her out of it are probably not prop so she had to really do it voluntarily.

Leslie boycott was all behind like there's a likelihood because they're already saying that three judiciary committee members who say they will not even meet with her. Okay so that's what they're already setting the put the that the light of it, you know, when I begin to show up because we don't want to give this that they can say we do want to make this really we don't yet.

But honestly, we don't need their votes because I may have. If they don't show up round the voting yes yeah you get an even have to have him me, but that makes it much easier to just breathe the vice President but I but my ideas that it also helps Kemal Harris.

It still give all their floor speeches being nasty about her. They would have to engage with her directly if they want Kemal Harris to be the back-and-forth judge Barrett right now is just now that she's a first report of a not a Circuit Court. It's different than wishing it's the questions different after she could rip the cabal yourself if she wanted to fit you what risks that you want to risk another dog lives with Vinnie right before the election. I hope they do. I want them at the hearings. I will bring everything they can it judge. Judge Barrett decided that only helps in the confirmation battle.

I think it brings more senators on like mansion in those Democrats.

They don't like these attack so let's see the true liberal attack on her. Let's see what cabal Harris does three days before the Presidential election. Wonderful this democracy in action and will watch it without a petition ACLJ.org as well record about Joyce tomorrow. The broadcast Wednesday folks abroad challenges facing Americans or substantial time in our Valley freedom sword constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to the American Center for Law and Justice ACLJ on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success.

But here's the bottom line we could not do her work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms than remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you for not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org more about her life changing become a member today ACLJ only one. A society can agree that the most vulnerable and voiceless. Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life. We created a free powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn is called mission will show you how you are personally publication includes all major ACLJ cases were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/164 3110 let's not forget to this. This is the future for those you are ACLJ supporters listener broadcast regularly. You don't I know you care deeply about the US record, but we also you're the best selection so tomorrow night we had the first of three Presidential debates.

This a case Western in Cleveland adds.

It was reason to be at Notre Dame, but because the coven things like that they they is about. Secondly, as big of a crowd at these now they're usually still very controlled President, raucous crowd, and sometimes does not like the primary crowds that people used to resent a computer with week 8000 people could be at a debate it would, but it is for these are very usually, this halls of universities. Chris Wallace is the acres at 1 acre to candidates if this will be the first time that again.

It's its present trump and Joe Biden.

That's it. Note no Teleprompter for Joe Biden note no aids helping them and he he does. He's walk into a room with with it to a debate with someone who will deliver very harsh blows one-liners yet that and you have a matters quick on your feet and often if you try to go to his go to hit back. If you look at Joe Biden's debate history.

This is not a guy was hard to get upset and kind of then unraveled. But you got also look at the fact that you look at the debate.

They played a very far for Joe Babb as like if he has any energy rightly so, that lies at solo right now that I think it's a could see that local number one inherently as the moderator debate that that Joe Biden did this is eight years ago with Paul Ryan was a bite at a very good 30 minutes. The present needs to be prepared for that years ago and it is a long time for Joe Biden to beat out the yacht like not not Nestlé deflating form, and I do. I do think that the bars would suffer. Joe bite is can he put together coherent sentences. It laments that's a pretty low bar is the let's see what happens. I will know tomorrow. So Ariel mentioned that Jordan recounted such that there is this talk that the Democrats may not actually show up for the judiciary hearings may boycott the idea being, were not even legitimized by attending what he what he think from a policy perspective dangerous for them while I think it is. But I also think on the other hand, it might be the safest course of action because there is significant number of Democrats in the judiciary committee who may ultimately make fools of themselves questioning this particular nominee who I think is on her game number one. Number two I think she will be well prepared for their attacks and number three. She has demonstrated a clear and unmistakable ability to fire back with to do it very gently and I think that will make many of the Democrats look bad so I think this is a huge risk for them, and I think many Democrats are not huge risktakers. Now they prefer to simply be in the attack mode with an unprepared witness and I don't think that will be the case here.

Do you think they've already figured out which is the political reality that that she's going to be confirmed there saying it already goes further to think they can say that would have to be for Republicans for Republican senators and and wheat we have a couple that's it so that it now to share with her to dinner but said Dave Latter Day Saints 02. They gave themselves room. It was know that we should vote. I'm not so sure it's me know if she's declares the committee that there is a they're not going to vote. I think I think they were out. I think they vote. Now you can't say she's not qualified know what you could say that impossible to say that was going to what it was called yet we together call, but I think it's good to be down to add that they've lost of the votes of the center they must have very quick that battle. They lost Cory Gardner and he lost the last bit Robbie immediately as he played on here. The dove another bite sometime.

At least I suspect it is now. Plaintiff tell me know if it's uptight, yet he was not one of them from dumb and dumber and they said that the sometimes you do something to redeem yourself. I don't sit around is fully redeemed after the impeachment being the one Republican eliminate arts in peace with these on the path to redemption with me in the path to redemption.

I think for it. For some, and probably also the voters of Utah who is also the electric like Michael. He said they really want just because he has a strong base there but you keep being the anti-conservative your guzzling down trouble because one thing but but he came around this quickly. It's a ghostly silk conservative and he is not interested in the future as he ran. I train on being a conservative on judicial philosophy. We're just what would make make sense of the camera very quickly. So the lost immediately. That battle was in question was going to Rolla and South Carolina on my three rod welcome to Jay Sekulow live. Thank you for taking my call yet. Okay.

One thing that I think that the way Democrats are so tough on President trumpet in his article to constitutional rights but they all need to take refresher course in the Constitution because they just don't seem to believe that he is doing everything within the boundaries of the Constitution was given and number two I think that the Constitution is an acid test just like when we inducted new citizens in this country. I believe that the acid test to prove their loyalty and so far the Democrats kinda wonder what's inside of their own anyway because they keep doing everything to try and in literally disrupt the fabric of this country and tear up the Constitution and you know while doing it understand me this idea. That's try to say that I think it would be better to wait till the after the election.

None of them said you can't understand.

You can do it. They don't like it, but they do understand that every President in the past has at least nominee, including Pres. Obama, and it is up to the Senate the syndicator to take the denomination's 17 of the 19 times the Senate and in the present were the same party. Harry 70 has 19 times.

They know that the President of is always nominated with his vacancy at 710 19 times with both were Democrats. Both Republicans nominee was confirmed in the election year and sometimes corrective 35 days 36 days out. I think the source of the discomfort for Democrats is the fact that indeed they have read the Constitution, but they are truly afraid of anyone who wants to enforce the text of the Constitution. Why because it limits their power and that is clearly the case with respect to any Connie Barrett. She has read the Constitution very carefully and it places clear and unmistakable limitations on both judges and on congressional power.

It is clear also. Beyond question that the Democrats when they have lost elections. They have looked to the Supreme Court to legislate on their behalf and so any Connie Barrett is prepared to carve back those types of initiatives in the future, and so I think the Democrats are rightly afraid of her right folks ready to take your phone calls 100 684 30 what that what you listen to this large tribe file a liberal law professor Harvard law professor, constitutional law, he gets asked a direct question because of Fox's Sunday is not Chris Wallace prefer Britt here and I wish he was that the Fox news Sunday host at these the much better much fairer and Chris Wallace who I do have some concerns about this debate, but again we will see how Chris Wallace performs I'm no fan of his. Let me go to buy 20 7X Britt Hume hosted Fox's Sunday yesterday and had large tribe audit. Here's the question we can Constitution us. Are you finding support for your argument in the Constitution itself. So I'm not suggesting it's unconstitutional to go ahead. It's perfectly constitutional, but a lot of things that are constitutional stupid here and it is the point.

So it's got the right to do it but your stupid.

This is where large tribe.

His cut has come to now calling people stupid for doing these illegal absolutely. So what you have is Lawrence 12 and elitist globalized member of the elite hierarchy who believes that his wisdom is superior to the wisdom of the founders to the individuals who actually wrote the Constitution and ratified the Constitution.

No one has elected Lawrence tribe Keenan and I think the American people are much better off because he doesn't control United States Constitution and he doesn't control the nation as he might, like to do right of folks repeating phone calls 100-684-3110.again another semiconductor Jay Sekulow live and want to get it to you, answer your questions and get questions about this nomination process this the time to get the bit because here's your here we go we go get the nominee on Saturday we had the attacks on the left then were to go to a Presidential debate tomorrow night at 9 o'clock Eastern time, which all the major networks will be caring and the news is going to shift right now, that they may discuss this in the debate.

This could be about how to do it. Joe Biden performed that he was he coherent, united, and who deliver the best punches. Really those first 30 minutes when you got the attention of the country, or in people set off my fight to keep it on and in the winter. The loser that is if this is not like that. Not 16 candidate is to as a waiter and a loser from the each debate. This is one of three so it certainly sets the tone for the Nexium 40 lesson 40 days but you got to walk event vice President to debate as well. I would start as Kiva role, but certainly this covert world were Joe Biden is on the campaign trail that does play, probably a bigger role that it has passed your questions and now in this report on our lot is debate analysis 164 30 what to sign our petition ACLJ.org only one.

A society can agree that the most vulnerable invoice.

Is there any hope for that culture to survive.

And that's exactly what you are saying when you stand with the American Center for Law and Justice, defendant the right to life, we've created a free and powerful publication offering a panoramic view of the ACLJ's battle for the unborn Gold edition will show you how you are personally publication includes a look at all major ACLJ were fighting for the rights of pro-life activist ramifications 40 years later, when Obama care means to discover the many ways your membership is empowering the right question for mission life today online/challenges facing Americans is no freedom constitutional rights are under attack more important than ever to stay with the American Center for Law and Justice on the frontlines protecting your freedoms defending your rights and courts in Congress and in the public arena and we have an exceptional track record of success. But here's the bottom line we could not do more work without your support, we remain committed to protecting your religious and constitutional freedoms that remains our top priority, especially now during these challenging times. The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side, you're already a member. Thank you.

Not well this is the perfect time to stand with us ACLJ.org where you can learn more about her life changing from a member today ACLJ. Jay Sekulow, I take a phone call now 800-684-3110 Chris conifer Michigan online for Chris, welcome to Jay Sekulow Lodge on the air. Hope believed to belong to children and mother. All everything to do with wanting a lot leaning judge to push their agenda was so important to them are really thinking so important, why didn't she retire under Obama where she would have been guaranteed a liberal judge because she's a concert was present to represent a liberal to the court like anybody but because you have see a woman she's kind of just it just shows that they're not really not feminist, sexist, and not the not there.

There the bigots when it comes to religion, then the racist attacking her to adopted children say she's a racist colonizer because she adopted kids in Haiti, which at countries had a lot of issues if they were you. It would throw you a process to adopted I mean that it's it's absurd. So who are the racist who are the bigots who are the sexist mechanistic liberals is the Democrat party specifically because they have more of a lock on it, study a liberal is due to brought the Democrat party. The racist, sexist the bigots because they judge people based on their philosophy to Be a feminist.

Unless you're a liberal feminist, liberal, you know, in the in the sense of that you agree with Planned Parenthood and NARAL and everything and that your judicial philosophy is one of the living Constitution to be like RPG Boulevard BG to be a natural feminist, I think RPG would agree with that, by the way, she may see she disagrees judicial philosophy. Certainly, I think we still besides a woman filling the role she might not like the philosophy that for that role, but she gave that chant like you said, very important.

It's getting nastier out there to the Presidential race, Harry.

We've got now Joe Biden calling you to present trumpet Nazi. This is I feeling this is the kind a like he's in a try the debate as well to try and paint the President as you know, on a get is that he that he somehow racist. The worse he call somebody like a Nazi and the Nazi propagandist take a listen, allow, or start a little, well, I'm not sure anybody had Artie made a reminder for Trump's voice who knows, but that's now a sister like Goble to say the lie long enough keep repeating repeating repeating it becomes common knowledge that they think so. Trump is a Nazi, he's a Nazi drop propagandist that and I think that's the kind of line is it so it Joe Biden is trying to say that in the debate.

I really can't take him on.

So I would have to just name call to be in the name-calling contest with the best of name colors nickname for everybody in the you could still remember I don't have to go through it because the many of those relationships have been patched.

But I mean what you could say I'm used to the lion Ted little Marcus thinks the O gap and yet low energy is with him is very dangerous to try to get it to preview them for him. We know is logic the suppressors taking in the media, so he saw Joe Biden: I Goble called a Nazi.

He's getting ready for the primaries, Artie has a come back to that line that is so devastatingly nasty.

It probably has to do with the fact that Joe Biden was afraid of people like Fritz Hollings and and and KKK members in the U.S. Senate around. He what he was basically where where the white hood with hanging out with these guys prettied that bad when it came to their racial history. This was that the Dixie Democrats. They were they were racist but many many apologize for that. At the end of isolators, but he was with them before that as well.

I was just trying to get legislation done in the general education legislation ganja right now. That's what they were doing the here's the question that I can cancel black babies right.

Here's the thing that I think is interesting.

That is, from the policy stamp to get the policy discussions of this debate. Jordan get the policy they actually get there. What is the one there to focus on Harry you alluded to this early. That's really the affordable care act when the mobile pandemic. The presence trying to change it by the Supreme Court ruling on it. The whole healthcare systems and going to Jeopardy that is to be as long. I think that is correct, but I also think that that line may lack a lot of resonance with the American people because I think the American people today are much more informed. For instance, about the coronavirus than they were free for five months ago one of the things that I think impairs Joe Biden's ability to be persuasive on that is the fact that he has a very poor record on dealing with the virus himself. So when he and Joe, I'm sorry. When he and Pres. Obama were in power they had to deal with a virus that actually infected approximately 16 million American people and Pres. Obama and Joe Biden did virtually nothing about it.

Number two Joe Biden attacked and this is in the record. Pres. Tromp on what he actually did including banning flights from China and it's clear beyond question that that move saved American lives and so would it Joe Biden say all this is xenophobia and then you had done. Nancy Pelosi parading through Chinatown in San Francisco, basically encouraging people from China to come to the United States and bring your virus with you and we got the New York Times on the say the storm because the New York Times doing these tax pieces which are incomprehensible and one point they say the President pays no taxes on the other point said he was asking for an $80 million Republic.

Let me explain something as a former IRS lawyer.

You don't get to do. You know, asked for an $80 million refund unless you paid at least that amount in taxes so that these inconsistencies put the to put your doctor will be asked by the way, for the document you got to say got information I like to do your documents.

I like to know how you know about what's going on in the audit by the way our essence was the coming New York Times mostly confidential. How do you know what's going on in the presence audit you meet somebody from the IRS is leaking this information. Yeah me for about something. As we look at this. Yes, it's because again I don't like paying attention to the tax issue that the truth is that Leslie's numbers are beyond what most people can even comprehend. That's how wealthy Donald Trump is now heats is beyond what most of us can ever comprehend and the transactions he's dealing with the beyond what most was given for him dealing with most of us could not comprehend buying multiple billion-dollar buildings or going into Miami and buying Doral at a bankruptcy and rebuilding. You know into an F for hundreds of millions of dollars and, of course, that that means you're going to have losses because it was already bankrupt. You bought a bankrupt asset and asset that was in trouble and and try to bring it back and so again, most of us are never going to be in the position to have that kind of cash to even purchase a property like that go on the Trump website.

See how many properties got a lot more than you could think is a lot more than just New York and few there are well-known a lot more. So if you want to get into a contest without someone who is more personally successful is not a godly man by Dragon Verde and you and you really want to get into that with your son taken the millions of dollars from the Russians in the sex trafficking because I have a feeling that's got to be line number one Joe Biden is to be up against the wall the entire night.

That's my prediction because he cannot defend his son's action pretty indefensible. Taken money from people link to sex trafficking.

That's Joe Biden, and Hunter by and that is who I think will be painted tomorrow night is the meeting is not to do that for Donald Trump boxes not to do that without he has to do that, that's up to him as the candidate running to be reelected as well. The whole right now. That's what he does best. ACLJ is been on the frontline protecting your freedom is defending your rights in court in Congress and in the public arena.

The American Center for Law and Justice is on your side. If you're already a member thinking.

If you're not well this is the perfect time to stand with us, ACLJ.org, where you can learn more about our life-changing work, member today ACLJ