CGR WEDNESDAY 061423 Part one David Shestokas

Hi, this is Pastor Greg and you're listening to Chosen Generation Radio. Get more at chosengenerationradio.com.

That's Chosen Generation Radio, where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glass. My passion is the fight for freedom. My father fought for World War II defending our country. Today, we are no longer fighting with guns. Instead, we are fighting an ideological battle for control of our country by contributing to causes that support your constitutional rights.

I am Patriot Mobile. I thank and praise God for this borewell that God has enabled us to put in this village with the prayer and support of Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Radio Ministry. And by the prayer and support of Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Ministry, we could put the borewell in this village for the community. Before this community was drinking dirty water and that was really causing a lot of sickness, but now they are getting pure fresh water. All the community is so thankful for Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Ministry and all the support. And we pray for all of you that God would bless you and God would use you so that we can put more and more borewells in this village.

Thank you, Vietnam! Okay. Hi, I'm Tim Scheff, certified natural health practitioner for over 40 years.

Close the door and you get a chance. I want to introduce you to a product that changed my life. The product is called Vibe, available at BGRWellness.com. I was on a good nutritional program before I discovered Vibe. I was taking the traditional vitamin and mineral tablets.

I wasn't really feeling any different, so I cried Vibe. Vibe is an all-in-one vitamin and mineral supplement. It's a liquid multivitamin. It's cold-pressed, whole-food sourced, non-radiate, gluten-free, and has no pasteurization. Vibe is like fresh juicing without all the work.

It supports four areas of the body, cardiovascular health, immune health, anti-aging, and healthy cell replication. Vibe is available in a 32-ounce bottle for home use or a very handy one-ounce travel packet for life on the go. For the first time I tried Vibe, I had more energy in about 20 minutes. I started thinking clearer.

I even believed I slept better. Get yours today at CGRWellness.com, coupon code CHOSENGENRADIO at checkout, and receive $20 off your first order of $50 or more. That's CGRWellness.com, coupon code CHOSENGENRADIO.

Get yours today. Which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy. And now, Chosen Generation, where no topic is off limits and everything is filtered through biblical glasses. And now, here's your host, Pastor Greg. Here we go, here we go, here we go.

And welcome back to Chosen Generation Radio where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glasses. Oh my goodness. So I'm looking at my Impeach Democrats page on Facebook and it has, and I don't know if everybody else can see this or not, probably not. I'm the administrator on it so I get to see it.

But it says, and I'm going to take a picture of this actually and send it over to NewsBusters, actually to Sensor Track. Your page is not recommendable. Content on your page is preventing it from being suggested to people.

Let's help you be recommendable again. Wow. Okay, so the only content that's going on my page right at this point, I don't have news articles going up there. The only content going up there is this program.

That's the content that's going up there. And somehow they've decided that it is not going to recommend that to anybody. Good morning, Mr. David. David Shostakovich joins us. Good to have you, man. I was just going to recommend you to somebody too, Greg. I'm sorry to hear that you're not recommendable. Apparently not. Let's make Greg recommendable again.

That made such a wonderful ball cap. I don't know, recommendable. Just FYI, it's not even a word.

But that's neither here nor there. Good morning, Greg. Great to be with you on this post arraignment Wednesday. Thank you. Yeah, it's going to be an interesting conversation. Real quick, I want to let folks know too.

Bottom of hour number three, how do we stop? Big Tech plans to steal the next election. They plan to shift votes and steal the next election, much as they were responsible for a portion of the stealing of the last election. And there's only one man standing between them and accomplishing that. And he has created a program. He monitored them. He has the evidence that they did it last time and that they're and what they're going to do.

And they killed his wife to try to silence him, but he won't be quiet. His name is Dr. Robert Epstein, and he'll be with me here at the bottom of our number three. Fake news. MRC's news busters Michael Morris will be with us and sensor track and I just took a couple of pictures. I'm going to send those over to Michael here in a minute while we're while I'm conversing with Mr. Shostakos. And then also Claire Lopez will be with us and Rick Manning will talk about some of the of the foreign issues that are going on in the CCP and the WHO and what's going on there. There's a lot happening with regards to those folks.

The WHO is in the CCP's pocket. And of course, we've already agreed that whatever the WHO says, literally, their act has already been approved and signed by us without a treaty, by the way. And so, yeah, we're going to follow their lead. That's what's going to be the law here. And it's already been passed. A lot of folks are not aware of that. So we'll get into that topic with with Claire and Rick.

And, and let's see, there was there was a particular Oh, I want to talk to you to about the attack that is coming. And I don't know if y'all are aware of this or not. But Daystar Christian Television was shut down because they interviewed Judy Mikovits. Marcus Lam passed, as many of you may be aware, who was the founder, he and his wife, Johnny, or Joni, Marcus passed away, they said that it had to do with COVID-19 complications.

I don't know all the details about that. But they had done an episode talking about the danger of the vaccines. Now here we are. And, and we have people, we have all kinds of people dropping dead. The numbers are staggering. And, and we have Peter McCullough, and Robert Malone, and a number of others have have the evidence of the pathological evidence I've had. Tom Haviland on the program, who interviewed you died died suddenly, he went and talked to many of the 800. What are those called David the corners, you know that that the morticians that do the embalming embalmers that's where I'm getting to. But he went in and spoke with many of the 800 embalmers across the country. And every one of them validated that died suddenly is presenting factual evidence, and that those strands that they show showed up in 2021. Never before.

Never before. Anyway, there you go. It's, you know, I man I'm telling you. Oh, there's something else to it that I that I found interesting friend of my posted this up on his Facebook page with, you know what's happened and we'll get into this now with with President Trump but all this stuff that's going on. This is the 74th anniversary of the week of the release of the, of the, or of the Orson Welles book, 1984. 70, it is the 74th anniversary of the week in which that book 1984 was released.

Holy smokes, I mean I get it it wasn't 1984 it's taken till, you know, it's going to be 2024 when it all comes true but you know 40 years is kind of magical when it comes to biblical prophecy if you stop and think about it right, you know, Moses, you know, there's something about 40 years there and I don't know it's just kind of interesting when you stop and think about it right they were, they were in the wilderness for 40 years. I don't know. Anyway, so I, I'm sure that you've taken a look at the Trump indictment and and and and perhaps. Oh, absolutely. Yeah, Greg. It's good to good to be with you. Yes, sir.

You know I am. Hopefully I can get you in the car. This morning because I'm going to I've got about an hour drive to court out west of in the western western suburbs and almost more or less in the country and in Illinois today. And so I'll have an opportunity to listen to all these fascinating folks and yourself in the time after right after I have to leave. But yes, I did spend some time with I've read I've read the indictment. And it's, it's one of the among the things that are more interesting in it is what's not in it. There's something that governs what presidents do with their with their with the documents accumulated during the course of their presidency when they when they leave the presidency. And it's called the Presidential Records Act.

And by the way, the Presidential Records Act is not mentioned at all. In the course of the indictment and the presidential records defines what what a president does and what he can do when he's leaving office, what what happens to the documents after he leaves. But just as importantly is that there's a leading court case, Judicial Watch versus the National Archives and Records Administration that actually defines in detail the authority of the president when it comes to documents associated with this presidency. And the interest in the language of the court case is extraordinarily powerful in terms of the fact that it says the president has sole discretion as to the classification of the documents that he takes with him. The Congress doesn't get to say what was the presidential record once that the National Archives and Administration Administration and Records Administration does not get to say what a presidential record is.

And that has impact on how it's stored and how it gets kept. It says the president in his sole discretion gets to decide what these what those matters are, how they're kept, where they're kept, whether they're personal records, whether they're presidential records that have to be turned over. And it, in fact, goes into detail why there's no judicial review of the president's decisions. I put out a tweet yesterday that actually cited this case, Judicial Watch versus National Archives and Records Administration. Judicial Watch had actually sued to try and get access to a series of tape recordings that Bill Clinton made during his presidency that Clinton took with him, did not turn over to the National Archives and Records Administration. And that's where where the where the court in the District of Columbia, of all places, went into detail about the president's sole discretion and that nobody else had that authority to, in fact, question that discretion. And so there's no mention there's no mention of this this act whatsoever in the indictment. The other the other aspect of the indictment that's incredible to me is that it seems like 70, 80 percent of the narrative that's told during the indictment involves quotes from President Trump's lawyers.

And the only way and, of course, generally speaking, the idea that communications with your attorneys are privileged and sacrosanct is a longstanding piece of American law. And if they're building this upon the worst testimony of President Trump's lawyers, there's a good problem. There's a high probability of having some sort of successful motion to dismiss because all the stuff in those 47 some odd pages and going forward, regardless of whatever a judge did in terms of the grand jury and if the grand jury judge decided that it was OK to for whatever reason to break the attorney client privilege, all the matters that may have been decided in another court in another time or another place are not binding on the judge in the that's involved in the charges against the president in Florida. That judge gets to review each and every one of these issues brand new. So there's a lot of litigation going to happen in advance of any kind of any kind of activity when it comes to trying the case.

And I'll be surprised if there's a trial before the before the election, there's a fair probability that Mr. Trump may be president again before before the trial takes place, because they're going to wind up litigating the attorney client privilege questions. Then they're going to wind up litigating, even if those are acceptable, how those could possibly be hearsay and how those could possibly be admissible. You know that there's stuff in the indictment that says President Trump told his lawyers who told us. That is not anything that you can use in a court of law when it comes to when it comes to conviction. That's what they call hearsay. So every 90 percent of what they've put in this indictment is not anything that could be admissible when it comes to conducting a trial. And that all gets to be litigated. And these regardless of what may or may not have happened in terms of court rulings in the grand jury process and otherwise, it doesn't matter. None of that is binding on this judge when it comes to when it comes to actually the criminal trial. Now, what about the recording that they have and the transcript then of that recording of him having a conversation apparently in front of some staffers and I guess some media people?

It doesn't necessarily who they are. Where he's basically making his case that what he said was true about and then he said he, you know, I don't know if he showed it to him or flashed it, but the indication or implication is that he was waving some documents in his hand. But he does say in there that these documents that he could have declassified them, but they're not declassified at the point in which he's holding them in his hand. Does that present any issues for him? Potentially.

Potentially. In terms of in terms of the charges themselves, there are basic there's basically elements that the government has to prove. One is that they have to prove that he possessed these documents. Number two is they have to prove that the documents themselves are in fact classified. Number three, they have to prove that he knows or knew that he was unauthorized to have these documents at that particular point in time. When it comes to number three, proving that President Trump knew that he was unauthorized to have them, that may have some bearing in terms of because, of course, proving a defendant's state of mind in a criminal case very seldom do you have a note that says, I, I know I knew this. Right. That are et cetera. And so other kinds of actions and other things are utilized to determine the state of mind of the of the defendant.

And this could be utilized in that in that in that circumstance. Of course, we do not know the provenance of this recording. We do not know the whether or not it may very well turn out to be a hearsay. We don't so we don't know whether a jury will ever hear whatever this recording is.

I've not heard the recording. I've just read what people say it says and just and what people say it says is not something that gets into the court. It's not it's not in the actual indictment itself.

No, no. You know, there's reference to him doing such a thing. But again, that's the word of somebody who told somebody who told somebody. And those are interesting for establishing what they call probable cause. But they're not that kind of that kind of information. So separate out because usually I mean, when when you receive your documentation about the charges that would be brought as I've seen them, usually they lay out or have to lay out that kind of there. I mean, they present the case in essence in in the document that you're given. It would seem that evidence would be a part of that logically to me.

So do that. So what's the difference here relative to some of these things that are easier as you're discussing them hearsay, but are somewhat presented as would be evidence in the case, why would they be left off of the indictment? Because the indictment is being put together, not necessarily as a court document, but as a marketing piece, knowing that the knowing that the country is going to be reading it. OK. And they they leave off things about potential potential defenses.

They leave off like the Presidential Records Act being that being one like attorney client privilege being another. And that's to leave off potential defenses is not not unusual. Yeah, not unusual. Right.

Right. Because they're the prosecution. But the fact is, is that to have a case document that's built entirely on hearsay and that is little direct evidence that's usable in a courtroom is unusual. So, so his now at some point, Trump's defense team, though, is going to get I mean, because of disclosure, they have to get whatever evidence the prosecution has in the case. Are those those documents are then confidential or are those part of public record? Well, they're not they're not public record until somebody makes them public record. They don't have to be confidential or they're generally speaking, there would be confidential from the prosecution side. But if the defense cares, who cares to share things with the public, they're certainly free to do so. There's not, generally speaking, what one would call a gag order that prevents a defense defense counsel from providing information to the public about stuff. But but it's going to work where we'll come out and be marked part become part of the public record is in the various motions I anticipate motion to suppress the motion to suppress the motion to suppress the documents themselves, because there's certainly been questions about the actual validity of the actual search warrant.

This was executed in Mar-a-Lago. You go back to the very first situation. There are there are issues with the approval of the search warrant in the first place. And that's exactly where the lawyers will probably start, is that we don't believe these documents are admissible. If you go to them, if you go to the fact that if you go directly to the documents in the first place and they win, the documents not being admissible, there's no case. You know, of course, at the moment, we don't even know what those documents are. But if you move along from that to the extent that they say, well, we got these documents based upon the probable cause developed from the conversations that we had with President Trump's attorneys. There's then the documents become admissible, possibly becoming admissible again, because, of course, you can't reach attorney client privilege. And then if you improperly breached that, then any evidence you gather as a result of that breach is not admissible. All right.

Yeah, we're going to we're going to we're going to need to take a break here in just a second. When we come back, there's another piece to this that was also a part of what I what I read. And that had to do with you mentioned about gag orders, that there is a gag order of sorts that's been put on the president. He there there are individuals within his circle of influence that he is not to talk to at all. And there are individuals within his circle of influence that the judge has said you can talk to, but you can't talk to them about this case. So it presents kind of an interesting conundrum in my mind, you know, relative to because some of these are individuals that are that are a part of his inner circle and and people that he speaks to quite regularly.

I imagine about a variety of issues and and perhaps, you know, counsels with them. Let's take a quick break. We'll be back to talk more about this. I know you're going to have to jump. So we're going to take our break.

We're going to hit our segment and then and then we'll make that jump. And there is another case that I want to talk to you about that. I sent you an email on that we'll look at for just a second that the Supreme Court did. And it has to do with an exemption for religious organizations having the right to determine who they hire and who's on their staff. And the messaging and and making sure that they align with the belief system of the religious entity that hired them. And they're trying to pierce that and say that the First Amendment. Free speech trumps freedom of religion, and the government is going to mandate to religious organizations that we don't care what you believe what about whatever you're going to have to bend and yield to our diversity, equity and inclusion. We've had to talk about that right after this brief break.

Get this lined up. So up next, we have clean slate. When you have different things like cancer and different diseases that are autoimmune related, it can really help with inflammation because you're helping clean the bot.

And clean slate is a formula that's made from a natural or the silica acid that basically is put into a formulation that's naturally occurring that uses different processes from polarization to heating to cooling to different types of catalysts, which will go in the body and really help communicate to get rid of those things that don't need to be there. People don't understand why there's so many autoimmune disorders, but our environments toxic, the land, air and water have changed. We've been exposed to nuclear war.

And the issue is, if there's a nuclear bomb, or there's pollution or there's war in one country, it actually affects everything up to the stratosphere. So we're all connected. And we've really got to clean things out. You can pick up your clean slate today at cgr4life.com. That's cgr4life.com.

Pick up your clean slate today. for the best prices ever. For example, we have my standard size my pillow regularly $69.98, now only $19.98 with your promo code. Or you can get custom fit with my premium queen size my pillows regularly $79.98, now just $29.98, or my king size regular $89.98 now just $34.98. So go to my pillow.com now and use the promo code on your screen or call the 1-800 number below to receive this exclusive offer. If you do it right now, I'm going to include a free gift with your purchase.

Thank you and God bless. any difference. So I tried Vibe. Vibe is an all in one vitamin and mineral supplement. It's a liquid multivitamin. It's cold pressed, whole food source, non rad, gluten free and has no pasteurization. Vibe is like fresh juicing without all the work.

It supports four areas of the body, cardiovascular health, immune health, anti aging, and healthy cell replication. Vibe is available in a 32 ounce bottle for home use or a very handy one ounce travel packet for life on the go. The first time I tried Vibe, I had more energy in about 20 minutes.

I started thinking clear, even believe I slept better. Get yours today at cgrwellness.com, coupon code chosenjinradio at checkout and receive $20 off your first order of $50 or more. That's cgrwellness.com, coupon code chosenjinradio.

Get yours today. These statements have not been evaluated by the US Food and Drug Administration. Negro products do not treat, reduce, cure or prevent disease. My passion is the fight for freedom. My father fought for World War Two defending our country. Today, we are no longer fighting with guns. Instead, we are fighting an ideological battle for control of our country by contributing to causes that support your constitutional rights.

I am Patriot Mobile. And now, back to Chosen Generation with Pastor Greg. You And welcome back to Chosen Generation Radio where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glasses.

My special guest David Shostakis, Shostakis.com, our constitutional originalist. You know what, I think what we'll do on this other case we were just talking about is put that off and we'll talk about that maybe next week when we can try to dig into it a little bit further and gain even more clarity with regards to the situation. The fact that the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty is still engaged and actively involved in it tells me that it's not a dead case.

There's still process that they're legally going to go through. Anyway, I have an argument about what I think is going on here relative to trying to now go after religious liberty from a different approach. They've been doing it kind of from the outside, trying to shut, you know, churches down and force churches to change their doctrine which has caused denominational splits. But now they're going after the very root of it to say, you can't believe what you believe.

We just won't let you. In terms of a religious organization and its employees, generally speaking, they've had carte blanche in terms of seeing to it that the employees that they have are, particularly if they're in a situation where they're involved in the instruction or the sharing of the doctrine. They've got pretty much carte blanche in terms of not hiring or letting people go with whom they disagree on religious grounds. That doesn't mean that they can let go a janitor on that because the janitor has no impact on the mission of the organization.

But when it comes to people who have an impact on the mission of the organization and employees, generally speaking, the organizations have a pretty much blanket ability to say, you know, given that you're in the position of sharing our goals and our mission and putting them forward, and you disagree with that, we're sorry we don't have to do business with you or we don't have to have you in our employ. That's pretty much the case. We don't know what the what the whole procedural posture of this particular case that you're talking about is. We'll take a look at it and see, you know. In the meantime, just to recap, there's going to be a lot of litigation in advance of the selection of a particular of a juror number one for President Trump's indictment. There's a fair possibility the selection of juror number one may never happen.

There may very well be. And I will be surprised if after they get through the litigation and determine that certain things are inadmissible, there may very well be a motion to dismiss the entire the entire matter because there's nothing outside outside to support the case. And because of the potential shield of the Presidential Records Act, which, of course, nothing has ever been discussed in the in the indictment and that.

And typically, of course, most of the media avoids the Presidential Records Act entirely. They don't they don't want to talk about it right away. Apparently, Jack Smith doesn't want to talk about it. Well, you know, Alan Dershowitz doesn't seem to want to talk about that much either. I mean, he's he's written, you know, an article that was published at the Wall Street Journal, you know, asking the question, you know, is is is there enough there? You know, is is the is the indictment strong enough to to bear to bring about a conviction? But he does not bring up that particular issue, which I which I which I find, you know, to be interesting.

Well, maybe he only had so many words. I don't know what Professor Dershowitz refers to, but certainly, as I as I put in the outline, so much in the indictments, as Trump's lawyer said, Trump lawyer number one said, Trump lawyer number two said, Trump lawyer number three said that take up probably 75, 80 percent of what the indictment has to say. And if they've built it upon the information that breaches confidentially, breaches confidentiality and is hearsay on top of it, that because one of the one there's a paragraph in there where I said presidential lawyer number three says President Trump told presidential lawyer number three.

Well, guess what? None of that comes into a courtroom. And so it's evidentiary that the evidence situation that they laid out is based upon mostly what I can tell, inadmissible evidence. So when they get through with the litigation, if there is a hollow case and the and the and the judge in this case rules that because of privilege in the Presidential Records Act and some some of the other issues that there isn't enough to bring the matter to trial, there's a possibility the case will ultimately be dismissed. Yeah, it.

Yeah. One of the things that he points to is, is the is that the indictment quotes tape recorded conversations that form the basis for several charges. That's one of the things that Professor Dershowitz brings up in the article that he writes. And and then he says, the reason the recording is so powerful is that it's self proving it doesn't rely on testimony by flipped witnesses or antagonists of Mr. Trump. It's the kind of evidence every defense lawyer dreads and every prosecutor dreams about. Particularly important because an appellate court could find legal error in the ruling that Trump had vitiated attorney client confidentiality and reverse convictions based on his lawyers compelled testimony. So, as you said, he brings forward the the pros that perhaps a an appellate court would, in fact, say, no, these convictions have to be thrown out because you there isn't any reason to pierce client privilege attorney client privilege. And that's that may be the reason that it never, ever sees a jury in the first place, because the judge will be ruling on all these issues in advance of whether or not in advance of a jury selection. And with all due respect to Professor Dershowitz, tape recordings are also subject to what they call foundation. You still need to have at least one party to the tape recording validate that that recording is accurate and that it took place and there hasn't otherwise been altered.

And so tape recordings are not audible there. I'm sorry, Professor. There is no such thing as a self proving piece of evidence. And he argues back, you know, he said that the case is stronger than than he expected it to be. But is it strong enough to justify an indictment of the leading candidate to challenge the president next year's election? Even with recorded statements, this case isn't nearly as strong as the one that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation in 1974. Nixon was almost certainly guilty of destroying evidence, bribing witnesses and other acts of obstruction, which is which is conjecture. Because I know I've talked to John O'Connor, who actually represented deep throat Mark Felt with regards to you know, all of this.

And and this was this was all a CIA setup operation Watergate was, but that's a story for another day. But many of the charges in this case are matters of degree nor a prosecutor's any evidence that Mr. Trump's actions damaged national security more than those of Mr. Biden, Mr. Pence and Miss Clinton did. So, you know, he did. I mean, he argues it both ways. It's a balanced statement.

His overall statement is, is bottom line. Is it a strong enough indictment to actually bring about any kind of a conviction? And, and then he lays out, you know, that it's, it's, yeah, both sides and it and that it's a stronger case than he expected it to be. But, you know, but not necessarily, you know, ironclad and there's still lots of room for questioning, you know, whether or not it could bring about and, you know, I would also suggest that jury pools is should for Mr. Smith. I think jury pools an issue, in my opinion. Well, that's, you know, that's another thing that the judge will have a great deal of control over during the course of that selection, because of course, many because both sides get what they call so many peremptory challenges, that is the challenges that they don't have to explain. And then after that, they can still challenge jurors for cause. And the ultimate ruling on whether or not a juror is biased or is not going to be allowed to sit on the jury comes from the judge after you run out of those challenges. And so there's a the judge can have a great deal of impact on the makeup of the jury. And so the pool is the pool is the pool. We'll see what happens.

South Florida is I think probably you're going to wind up with a pool that's a little more potentially more favorable to the president than you might find in, oh, I don't know, Washington, D.C. And but but nevertheless, the judge had the judge doing the job fairly will, in fact, weed out those jurors that are potentially biased in either direction. Either way. Yeah. Yeah. Well, it's where we're, you know, we're a long ways away from, as you said, we're a long ways away from from a trial.

And certainly there's going to be a lot of jockeying for positions and and jockeying for evidence and trying to determine what is and what isn't going to be admissible in in the trial when it comes. And this is just one. This is one part. This is the Florida part.

He still has the New York issue that that still exists. That's that there's going to be, you know, timing issues with regards to what Bragg has bought in in in spite of the fact also that, you know, as you've been analyzed here, there's there's so much weakness to Bragg's case. That's not even a case. That's that's a that's just really, really horrible. They're using the election election finance campaign finance law as a predicate felony for a for a for to enhance a misdemeanor to a felony under New York law. It's just absurd and obscene. The New York case is just ridiculous. And sooner or later, that case will get that should get tossed.

That should never see juror number one. Well, and again, it just you know, I mean, at the end of the day, what this is an implication of folks is, is this show is showing you how far they will go to try to take out what they perceive to be their enemy. And, and make no mistake, what they're doing to him, you know, they'll do to every one of us.

And and you know, I there's a there's an op ed out that Mark Hough has put out. And he's the father whose door was, you know, kicked in in front of his seven kids. And the SWAT people showed up simply because he was standing out in front of a abortion clinic. And and a man was assaulting his son. And he wouldn't stop. So Mark stopped him. And the local authorities wouldn't bring charges against Mark, because of it was it was defending his minor child. And yet, the garlands Department of Justice, fully armed and fully equipped and sent tactical assault against an American citizen folks.

We live under tyrants. And I know you've got to run. I'll talk more about this when I get back from this break. David, thank you for being here. I greatly appreciate it. Great to be with you, Greg.

Yes, I have a judge waiting for me and in another case. All right. So I have to have to leave. But it sounds great to talk.

It's nice. And this although I will say that this is a sad day that we have to have this discussion, that we have a situation where in fact, the somebody that's occupying the White House is trying to criminally get rid of their opposition. It's insanity.

It's insanity. Third World Country. There's a banana republic.

And that's what that's what several of the Cuban you know, people who came here from Cuba were saying yesterday on Real America's Voice with Jack Posobick and and your friend. But Barquin. Oh, Ben, Ben, Ben. Yeah, Ben. Yeah, I heard a little bit of Ben interviewing folks outside.

Yeah. Ben's a great guy. He does a great job. He's a neat guy. I met him at CPAC Dallas. Actually, he interviewed me there.

Yeah, fantastic guy did did great work in getting that. And that's people should look into the judge, who, by the way, is an immigrant herself from Cali, Colombia. And she, she comes from a country where they know what happens when the narco terrorists get in charge. And so one of the things that we're lacking these days is judges with the courage to do the right thing. And I can only hope that this judge will have in fact, the necessary courage.

Her background indicates that she will. So we'll see what happens. All right. Thank you, my friend. I'll let you go. I don't want you to be late.

We don't want you to get in trouble with the judge. There you go. All right. Thanks, guys. You bet.

We'll be back right after this. Hi, this is Pastor Greg and you're listening to Chodin Generation Radio. Get more at ChodinGenerationRadio.com.

That's Chodin Generation Radio, where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glass. Without all the work. It supports four areas of the body.

Cardiovascular health, immune health, anti-aging and healthy cell replication. Vibe is available in a 32 ounce bottle for home use or a very handy one ounce travel packet for life on the go. The first time I tried Vibe, I had more energy in about 20 minutes. I started thinking clear.

Even believe I slept better. Get yours today at CGRWellness.com. Coupon code ChodinGenRadio at checkout and receive $20 off your first order of $50 or more. That's CGRWellness.com. Coupon code ChodinGenRadio. Get yours today. These statements have not been evaluated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Neva products do not treat, reduce, cure or prevent disease. My passion is the fight for freedom. My father fought for World War Two defending our country. Today, we are no longer fighting with guns.

Instead, we are fighting an ideological battle for control of our country by contributing to causes that support your constitutional rights. I am Patriot Mobile. Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow. Retailers, shopping channels and now even banks have tried to cancel myself and MyPillow. Well, during these times, your support has meant everything to us. So my employees and I want to personally thank each and every one of you by passing this savings directly on to you. We're selling the best products ever for the best prices ever. For example, we have my standard size MyPillow regularly $69.98, now only $19.98 with your promo code. Or you can get custom fit with my premium queen size MyPillows regularly $79.98, now just $29.98. Or my king size regular $89.98, now just $34.98. So go to MyPillow.com now and use the promo code on your screen or call the 1-800 number below to receive this exclusive offer.

If you do it right now, I'm going to include a free gift with your purchase. Thank you and God bless. So up next we have Clain Slate. When you have different things like cancer and different diseases that are autoimmune related, it can really help with inflammation because you're helping clean the body.

And Clain Slate is a formula that's made from a natural orthosilic acid that basically is put into a formulation that's naturally occurring that uses different processes from polarization to heating to cooling to different types of catalysts which will go in the body and really help communicate to get rid of those things. That don't need to be there. People don't understand why there's so many autoimmune disorders but our environment is toxic. The land, air and water have changed.

We've been exposed to nuclear war and the issue is if there's a nuclear bomb or there's pollution or there's war in one country, it actually affects everything up to the stratosphere. So we're all connected and we've really got to clean things out. You can pick up your Clain Slate today at cgrforlife.com. That's cgrforlife.com.

Pick up your Clain Slate today. All right, welcome back to Children's Generation Radio. Let me, there we go.

Welcome back to Children's Generation Radio where no topic, soft limits and everything filtered through biblical glasses. So what I'm doing here, some of the files have been removed because they caused the email to exceed the attached limit. Okay. So I don't know which ones were removed. Let's see. Censorship. And there's that one.

So what I'm doing is I'm going ahead and forwarding, let me see, here is where the, where the files were marked okay after I disputed. There we go. So let me show you folks this. This is, you know, and I encourage you, if you're being censored, if you're having some censorship done to you, I want to encourage you, fight back. So these are, I mean, over and over you can see I was, you know, censored, censored, censored, censored, all this nonsense. Now, recently, what I discovered was is I resubmitted the posts and said, wait, wait just a minute. Okay.

So, so there's was some interesting things. So here, April 5, 2023, your video, our constitutional republic, where does it stand, reparations or a new slavery, the battles on its own violated our standards. Well, changes were removed.

Dispute accepted. Here's from May 10, your post goes against community standards on hate speech. Oh, your post is back because we're sorry we got this wrong. We reviewed your post again and it does follow our community standards. We appreciate you taking the time to request a review. Your feedback helps us do better, which is great. And I'm great.

I thank you, Facebook, for, you know, recognizing that. Here's another one. Same, same results. Okay.

Too previous. You disagreed with the decision about your post. No one else can see it because we, you know, we went after it.

Trump civil case, Proud Boys conviction, so on. Oh, it violates our standards. It was a Wednesday program, May the 10th. We disagreed. I said, and I explained why I disagreed. Guess what? They said, yep, you're right.

We, we, we agree with your disagreement. So there you go. It's, you know, some of this, you can, you can put up some of this, you're going to get pushed back on. But I would just encourage you that, you know, it's worth pushing back.

Because hopefully, hopefully, they will, they will change their opinion. And, and as a net result, you'll end up with a with a with a better situation. So there you go.

Definitely worthwhile to to take a push back. There was the case and again, I'm going back to this because I really this is in my, in my humble opinion, I believe this is a very important case. And I really do wish that Matthew Vadum had had written this in a more in just a clearer way.

Because I think that it is, is challenging to, to decipher in the way that it's written. But essentially, the Supreme Court decided not to hear a claim of a Christian school in Colorado, that it can't be sued for firing a teacher who accused the school, the parents and the students of racism. The school argued because it's a religious institution, it's beyond the reach of the First Amendment.

Well, here, here's the thing. So Matthew begins this conversation by not not arguing the facts of the case, which are that this teacher was pushing social justice and CRT and revisionist history and and all of this stuff on students and he was a chaplain there. So he's pushing essentially racial racism.

He's pushing racism on these students. I'm going to say something right now that well, you just I just I hope you'll hear me. I really hope you'll hear me. I do not have any black friends. Listen to me carefully.

In my mind as I look, and this is why I cover, this is why I have for 11 years covered the topics that I've covered recently, there's where I'm working through some things. But the reason that I cover things in the way that I cover things is that I don't have black friends. I don't have black Christian brothers. I have friends.

Friends. I have Christian brothers. Christian brothers. When God looks at us, he doesn't look at us and divide us the way that man has chosen to divide. The Word of God says that we are all of one, we all originated out of one man, out of one race, the human race, out of Adam. And by that one man sin entered the world.

God created division amongst men because men were trying to make themselves into God. They, they, they, and I'll get into that too because that speaks to the whole woman thing that we got going on. And that needs to be addressed and maybe I'll address that in the next half hour. But folks, I don't do topics when I, when I, when I talk, when I'm with Project 21 Black Leadership Network or, or other leaders discussing some of these things. Yes, we talk about what's going on in a community. But I'm very careful to make sure that what is understood is that what happens in one part of our country is happening everywhere. What happens in one church is happening everywhere.

I absolutely support and encourage those called into that particular arena, whatever arena it might be, to champion that cause and to speak out and to call out when things are not being done right. As Vince Ellison, who I have highlighted on my program, will you go to hell with me? But Vince is my brother in Christ. Vince isn't my black brother in Christ. He is my brother in Christ. Ken McClinton, who, who owns this network, is not my black friend. Ken is my friend and Ken is my Christian brother. Tuesdays and Thursdays, I'm on prayer with Pastor Carl Mitchell and Lady Devon. Pastor Carl is not my black Christian friend. Pastor Carl is my friend and he is my brother in Christ. And Lady Devon is my sister in Christ. Period. The other part, that's what's dividing us, and it needs to stop. I'll be back, Children's Generation Radio, coming up after this.