DHS Sec. Mayorkas: Drones seen over NJ nothing to fear, probably hobbyists

Vermont. Fox News headquarters in New York City. Always seeking solutions, never sowing division. It's Brian Gilmead. Hello, everyone.

Welcome to the Brian Kilmead Show. It's Kennedy in for Brian Kilmead. You're like, hey, you're not Brian.

Well, I certainly am not, and I never will be, but I'll do my darndest. To keep the seat warm. and to throw some hot takes. On this here, cool microphone.

So, as you know, I am one of Brian's colleagues here at Fox News. I would like to think that he's a mentor of mine, but he gets really mad when I say that because he says we're colleagues. And I think I've been in broadcasting longer than Brian. For those of you who don't know me, I started my career at MTV as a VJ. Actually, before that, I was a radio DJ in Los Angeles at KROQ, and then I went to MTV, and then I went to college and did a bunch of talk radio.

I've been at Fox News since 2012. And I've done a bunch of shows, and now I do a five-day-a-week podcast called Kennedy Saves the World. And I do try, and I think I've been doing a bang-up job because you have to admit, right now things feel a lot better than they did about a month and a half ago. And, you know, that's in large part to my world saving. It's a big job.

I start here at Fox and then I extend out the circles, get wider and wider to the country, and then eventually to the world where. It must and will be saved.

So, this weekend, along with Brian Kilmead, and so Brian's not here today. You're like, where is Brian? I think he's the new supreme allied commander. I really do. I think that if you go into President Trump's orbit and you spend some time with him, he likes you, and you're from Fox, I think you get a pretty cool title and maybe even a cabinet-level position.

So, we were all at the Army-Navy game this weekend. Were we there together? We were not. No, Brian Kilmead, I think he was in a mankiny. He wasn't even in a coat or a scarf or little gloves.

He was in a very comfortable presidential box with the former and future president of the United States. As we are in sort of this middle kingdom of his not conjoined presidency. And Brian was warm. He was sipping cocoa and high-fiving people with bare hands while the rest of us, normies, we were in the stands and we were freezing, but we were happy because a page has turned in this country. And it actually felt very, very good to be at arguably the most patriotic sporting event in the country, and that is the Army-Navy football game, which means so much not only to the country to see players on the field who, when they're done at their respective service academies, will go and serve five years, five mandatory years in their respective branches.

And, you know, and that's what makes this so extraordinary: is you have to realize how academically rigorous both of these institutions are.

Now, my domestic partner happens to be a West Pointer.

So, in our house, we are taught that West Point is the superior. Military Academy because it is the United States Military Academy. That is its official name. Annapolis is the Naval Academy, where I think they, you know, according to lore in our home, they just stare at their own belly buttons.

So, all we do all year round, no matter who's playing or what the score is, the only thing that matters is the Army-Navy game. And the only thing that matters at the Army-Navy game is that the Army beats the Navy. And so, my partner, who happens to be a male, but my brother and my partner make fun of me because they say when I talk about my domestic partner, it sounds like I'm talking about my partner Patty and that I'm in a same-sex relationship. I am not. I'm in a heterosexual relationship and real happy about that.

No judgments either way. For Patty and myself, no, it's a male. But all he talks about is beat Navy. He'll meet West Pointers. He met the Dean of West Point, and the first thing they said was: beat Navy.

Did Army beat Navy this weekend? They did not. And it was sad because Army had the season of a lifetime, led by their stalwart quarterback Bryson Daly, number 13, who has just been an absolute phenom. There was Heisman talk throughout the year. The only loss they had going into this game was against Notre Dame.

And It was really, it was going to be a mythical season.

So, you know, it was a mixed bag. There was good news, bad news.

So we have to look beyond our own personal heartache and we have to take the good from what happened in the country and at the game. And, you know, I can report to you, even though it was freezing, spirits were very high because the page has been turned.

So in the past, when they showed the former and future president on the big screen, there would be half-boos. It didn't matter what the venue was. People, you know, especially in a place like D.C., because they did play where the Washington Commanders play, which is a very cold stadium. You know, this is a very liberal part of the country. And so you would imagine that you would hear just, you know, a bunch of jeers thrown his way.

But when they showed the president and the vice president-elect and Elon Musk on the big screen, people lost their minds because people have wanted a return to that level of patriotism and that level of excitement. And the marriage of sports and intense competition with, you know, the underpinnings of the game, which is this is not just a game. These are not guys who are going to enter the transfer portal. These are members of a team at leadership academies who are going to potentially lead people into battle defending this country. They are going to put their lives on the line.

And, you know, that makes it very heavy. It also makes people's hearts swell with patriotic pride. You know, when. When you hear the national anthem, and people actually take their hats off and put their hands on their hearts, which is what you should do because this is America. And it's okay to do that.

And the return to that, and the return to being excited about something and optimistic about something, regardless of party, was something that was shared by just about the entire crowd. And as I looked at that and I looked at that reaction and I realized the gamut of emotions that we have run as a country since 2015 when Donald Trump announced that he was going to be president. And I was one of those people that was very skeptical about that. I saw him as a celebrity. I saw him as a cultural figure, not someone who could undertake the job of being president as seriously as it needed to be taken.

And Obviously I was proven wrong. Um his first Half of his first term was very financially beneficial to all sorts of people in this country, regardless of your political or financial background. And that's what people remembered because the second half was COVID, and then we went into the Biden presidency where people couldn't afford things, the world felt very unstable, and then we were being misled because I can't say that we were being led by Joe Biden because he hasn't been all there for quite some time.

So we were being lied to by the people around him that he was fine, that all was well, that he deserved a second term. And then his presidency fell apart in just a few minutes into that debate.

So that's what we have all been watching. And Maybe we were lied to by pollsters. Maybe there was a dishonest assessment of what people were saying that they wanted, but. People knew that in the four years of the Biden presidency, their lives weren't as good as they were during the first two years of the Trump presidency. And they wanted a return to that.

Now, in the meantime, in those eight years, law enforcement has been attacked, the flag has been attacked, the national anthem has been attacked. You know, you had Megan Rapino and Colin Kaepernick devaluing the flag, and it made sporting events not fun.

So, to be able to return to that, to be able to feel pride, to feel excitement, to high-five strangers. It's where we needed to be. It's the kind of reset that we needed to have. And so now, going into this presidency. Again, looking up at that screen.

President Trump is, he is still very much a cultural figure, but to a lot of people, it's very interesting because he is now. A mythical figure. And What people have invested with their hopes and their votes are that he can rescue the country and return it to a place where we at least kind of feel normal because the country has been shaken and dropped on its head. And we have been concussed. And we want to feel normal again.

We want to feel fine. We don't want to walk around feeling traumatized and dizzy. We don't want to walk around feeling like we're horrible people because of our immutable characteristics, things about ourselves that we can't change. And that will be the biggest goal for this president. I don't know necessarily how you measure that.

Sometimes it's difficult to measure how people are feeling individually and collectively. But I know now And I am not a Republican. I am I am. An unaffiliated voter. I am an independent voter, but I know based on what I see and what I feel and talking to other people that something doesn't feel right.

And people want to return to a place where it feels right, where we are not playing defense the entire time, where we do not feel like we are in the middle of a living ongoing trauma because that is unsustainable. And that is why he won. And that's why it felt so good for so many people to feel something in the same place at the same time, regardless of party. And I do hope. that this president surrounds himself with people who I mean, as a limited government libertarian, of course, I want him to limit the size and scope of the federal government.

And that's why I feel looking at Doge like I want Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk to go through and get rid of entire superfluous departments. The government can handle it. I think that the government is too big, it's too powerful, it's too intrusive. If you are a fan of President Trump's, you realize how the government can be weaponized against a single person.

Well, that single person has ascended to the presidency once again. That person is going to be in power once again. And one of the reasons so many people voted for him is because they know the government is so big, it is so vast, it is so powerful, it is so unaccountable that if they're the one, Who has been deemed the enemy? If they are the one who is seen running afoul of this massive government, then they can be targeted. They can be canceled.

They can be financially and personally destroyed. And that is abnormal. That is what has people playing defense. And that is a thing that has to change. And that's why, of all the appointments and all of the pronouncements, the fact that you have two people who are not beholden to the government, who are not looking for more power, who are not looking to enrich themselves because of associations with the government.

Although you can argue that SpaceX is as financially successful as it is because of the public-private partnership. But having said that, Elon Musk could step aside, step away from any government involvement, and he would be fine. Same with Vivek Ramaswamy.

So the fact that they are going to go through with a cruel and objective eye and get rid of entire departments. Things that libertarians have been talking about for generations. That could be the single most beneficial thing that this president can do. And, you know, that is not a left-right issue. Although, you know, the left says that they want to make government bigger because they want to help people.

Well, look what progressivism has done to this country. Progressivism is the author of the divide, of the trauma, of the defensiveness. That is what progressivism gives you. That is what big government gives you. And this is a pendulum swing and a reaction to that that is not just setting the pendulum up to go back the other way.

This might be a total beneficial reset. And if you have not been optimistic about that, you should be. Because if the government Is taking less from you because taxation is theft. Then that means necessarily that you will have that money back in your pocket, that you will have more opportunities, that with the great reset, that will personally benefit you as it should.

So much more on the way, including the great Jonathan Turley talking about wacky presidential pardons. It's still very much silly season. This is the Brian Killmeat Show. I'm Kennedy. Giving you everything you need to know.

You're with Brian Kilmead. Fox News Radio on Demand on the Fox News app. Download the app and just click listen. When you swipe left, you can listen to your favorite Fox News talk shows live. Swipe right for the latest Fox News Radio newscasts on demand.

Fox News Radio on the Fox News app. Download it today. A radio show like no other. It's Brian Killmead. Everybody keeps, I mean, the problem is you have a framework in your mind that, how could Donald Trump, how could Donald Trump, how can Donald Trump?

Guys, can we cut it out? Donald Trump is not an idiot. Donald Trump, let me just be very clear. Donald Trump is smarter than me, you, and all critics. You know how we know?

Because he has the White House. The Senate The House totally agrees. The popular vote, this dude is a phenomenon. He is the most powerful human. On earth and in our lifetime, and we're still saying, Well, how is this God?

We look like idiots. Oh, that's Van Jones. Uh, he is fanboying over, um I think we should just call him President Trump. I was talking about this the other day on Outnumbered because he already was the president.

So we refer to President Carter, President Obama, President Bush.

So he's President Trump and he's going to be President Trump again. And I know someone called him Gropper Cleveland, which I don't think was very nice at all because Grover Cleveland, obviously the only other president to serve in non-consecutive terms.

So Van Jones is saying he did it.

So even though everyone threw whatever they could at him, it was like the end of the Truman show. And, you know, and Truman finally walks out of the set after surviving the. Political and legal onslaught.

So, Van Jones. Is right.

So, how does the left navigate all of this now? Because they have to admit that they did something wrong, which has been an impossibility for them. Even Tim Walls this weekend was talking about, Oh, gosh, you know, I just thought the fact that I have no money would make me so attractive to people having a hard time financially. It's like, no, that's a line in your bio, that's not a solution. And that's what he and Kamala Harris never understood: that people are looking for a roadmap to improve their lives.

And if all you're giving them is nuggets from your bio, that's just going to bore people to death, or at least bore them into voting for another candidate who is like, I love this country, I want to lower your taxes, I think small businesses are great, I want to lower the corporate tax so you can actually survive. If you become successful in this country.

So that's what happened. Van Jones is right, but The admission isn't enough. If Democrats want to make themselves whole again, they are going to have to completely pull apart their party. And I don't know if they will be able to put it back together with what they're doing right now. I know we're talking to Jonathan Turley in moments.

You get a pardon. You get a pardon. You get a pardon. We're Oprah-Winfreeing the pardon process on the Brian Kilmead Show. I'm Kennedy.

A talk show that's real. This is the Brian Kill Me Show. Oh, it certainly is real. There's no filler here, there's no silicone in sight. From the mothership of broadcast excellence here at Fox News, this is the Brian Killmead Show.

Kennedy in For Kill Me Today. And joining me now, a man who has a very long title, but it is not as robust as his intellect, which is the envy of the legal and political world. Jonathan Turley joins me here. He's the J.B.N. Maurice C.

Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. He's also the author of The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage. Jonathan Turley, welcome back to the Brian Kilmead Show. It is so lovely to talk to you. Thank you, Kennedy.

It's great to be with you.

So, this is this is I didn't think the political times could get any more wild. But now it seems like our current president, who doesn't really feel like a president at all, which you know is on one hand very funny and he's the butt of jokes because he just will sort of stumble out of the White House one day and all of a sudden not be there. But also, it's kind of scary because it feels like it opens up the country to a series of vulnerabilities. But on a third hand, if we are granted one, now he is offering all of these pardons, blanket and specific, you know, which is fine. He's well within his right.

But is he setting up a game of chicken with the Trump administration that his political enemies fear will outdo him with the incoming president's pardons of his own? Yes, I'm afraid that this has a certain seasonal feel of retail therapy. He's using these pardons and turning them into virtual party favors. He's giving them out to allies. And there's a strange thing, Kennedy, that we're seeing in Washington.

You know, this is usually the time that people are wrestling to get on inaugural ball lists, but people seem much more focused on getting on the Biden party. Pardon list because if you're really anyone in Washington, you have to be on an enemies list. And that list hasn't materialized, right?

So you have Democrats that are pushing themselves and others. Bill Clinton pushed Hillary recently to be added to the list of people who would get these pardons. And it's created this weird sort of pardon envy where everyone wants to be on the list. And there's no real threat here. There's no, Hillary Clinton's not going to be charged.

The J6 committee members are not going to be charged. all of them committed acts that I believe were dishonest. But that ship has passed. This election in many ways was a verdict on where the establishment is in Washington. But there's no real danger for most of these people that they are going to be prosecuted.

Is it interesting watching sort of the verbal gymnastics and contortions from some on the left? Because the political golden rule is violated every day, and that is, you know, do unto the other party as you would have the other party do unto you. And, you know, we're so far past that point. But now you see a lot of Democrats and they are trying to justify some of these pardons that they would be so upset with President Trump about. But, you know, we do have some that are very questionable.

I think everyone saw the Hunter Biden pardon coming, and they knew that Joe Biden was going to go back on his word. But what here is problematic for you?

Some pardons that people may not know about that are really just kind of disgusting. Oh yeah.

Well, first of all, you know, the the Hunter Biden pardon really set a new low for presidential pardons. And that's not that easy because p presidential pardons have a rather checkered history. You had Bill Clinton that not only pardoned his half brother but pardoned a fugitive Democratic donor who wasn't even accepting guilt. He just went to Switzerland or some other country and lived large. And Bill Quinn thought he was worthy of a pardon.

We we've had pardons of mob killers. One guy, guy by the name of Lupo the Wolf, who was pardoned by Hardin and went back and continued to kill people in New York.

So it's a rather checkered history. But this actually, in many ways, is as serious, if not more so, because he didn't just pardon his son, he pardoned him for any crime committed over a 10-year period, which, by the way, is twice as long as the Nixon pardon. And He pardoned him for crimes where some people believe the President himself is implicated in. And so this is really troubling.

Now the problem with these other people seeking to be on this list is that we don't know. Are they going to get what Hunter got, a ten year pardon for any c crime they may have committed? We don't know what crimes were committed. At this point, we have no reason to believe that most of these people would be criminally charged. Particularly people like Hillary Clinton, all most of the stuff that she did, the statue of limitations has run on.

But the question is why you would pardon them. on crimes unknown. But it sets a really bad precedent because what you're going to have is this new low standard where presidents just pardon everyone in their administration or pardon themselves in leaving office, just give themselves self-pardons. And that will become the regular practice. And the result will be a sweeping immunity for everyone who's in government.

That is not that far away if you start to do what I call white night pardons, these preemptive pardons. And are those protected more so now under the SCOTUS decision?

Well, pardons were always protected because the pardon power stayed in absolute terms.

So there's always been a debate. among law professors as to whether a President can grant himself a self pardon. I've always believed that he can because the Constitution says it does not give any limitations in that respect. It simply says that he can pardon anyone, that would include, in my view, himself.

So, I don't think this was ever something that was being narrowly construed.

So that's part of the problem is that, as I've said, I've written in the past. Uh you know we've gone through all of these periods. It's in my book, The Indispensable Right, I talk about all of these periods, what I call periods the ages of rage that we've gone through. And it started at the beginning of our country, this country. We was born in rage.

That's what the Boston Tea Party was. But even though we went through all of those periods, no president has done what Joe Biden is contemplating of doing now. None of them. Try to pardon everyone in their administration or all their political allies to give categorical preemptive pardons.

Some pundits are asking Biden to give thousands. A pardon. We've never done that despite all of the problems in our history, and they've been considerable. Biden would create new precedent here, and it would not be good for this country.

So is should there be it will this push us to the point where A limit is placed on pardon power.

Well, Kennedy, to do that, you'd have to really amend the Constitution. Maybe people will be so outraged they do that. Um What really is troubling here is the reason for it. None of these people seriously believe that they are going to be prosecuted. That I can assure you.

The problem in Washington is that a narrative is collapsing, right? All of these people on the list, you'll notice. are the people who just said almost nightly that Donald Trump was going to round up his political opponents. You had people like on The View saying he was going to round up homosexuals, journalists, any you know, columnists, and send them all to camps. You know, you had Rachel Maddow saying that she's likely on the list, a list that has never materialized.

An imaginary list. But it it allows for these performances, this television theater where they get to go out and pretend that their future tragedy is almost Shakespearean because this future president will stop at nothing to punish his enemies.

Meanwhile, the political establishment, as you have documented in many forms, has been rallied against him in every imaginable way with coordinated venues.

So we've seen how it works. Is this you know, are they scared of the quid pro quo? I think that they're more scared of the narrative collapsing. If there is no enemy list, the next best thing is a pardon list, right?

So the nightmare for many Democrats is that democracy will not collapse. That people will not be frog-marched into camps, right? Because very quickly, the public's gonna say, well, Where's all of the Roundups you said? And why are we still having elections when you said that was going to be our last one?

Now the best way to blunt that is to say, oh, that's because Joe Biden came in and gave a huge number of white knight pardons. He prevented Trump from doing what he was going to do. And that allows them and Biden to say faith. But are they seriously concerned about being prosecuted? Do you really think Hillary Clinton is really concerned about being prosecuted?

All of her crimes, the Statute of Limitations has run. You know, she has a lawyer in every room of her house. She knows that for a fact. And she has a vase in every room to throw at John Podesta's head, allegedly. All right, so Jonathan Turley, before we part, you've written an article about George Stephanopoulos and the big settlement that ABC News has had to pay to Donald Trump for some of the words that George used in an interview with Nancy Mace.

What is interesting to you about that settlement and that case?

Well, of course, it's interesting because George Stephanopoulos went on with Colbert and was chest pounding and saying, I will not be cowed.

So there's no pass around moment as he had on National T V. And then his company just gave fifteen million dollars to the Trump Library and an apology to Trump. And that was issued in the name of Stephanopoulos as well. as ABC. I think that the the media organizations are beginning to realize that it just didn't work.

They had this full court press against Trump. An unrelenting level of attacks, and that was accompanied by rather overt support for Kamal Harris. None of it worked. The public not only rejected that in the election, they're rejecting the mainstream media. They're walking away.

The Washington Post lost seventy seven million dollars, half their viewership. Their new editor came in, and this is a direct quote, and told the staff, nobody's reading your stuff.

So they're all writing for each other and revenues and ratings are plummeting. And I think that ABC is the ultimate bottom line corporation, and they've decided they've got to re you know, frame this. and get out of this lawsuit. The other thing that they did not want is they were looking at a series of depositions. where the Trump people were going to get access to their e mails.

That could have really put some shelves below the waterline for ABC because we have a case against CNN which has been going against CNN on early motions. For defamation. The discovery in that case turned out to be brutal. And CNN's email showed a huge amount of bias and unprofessionality. that has really hurt their brand.

Well, this is the modern era. And do I I imagine some of these journalists feel like they are protected by the free speech that you will stand on the mountaintops and scream to defend, but there is an important distinction, isn't there? There is. And you know, I I wrote a while back that I've been in the media for 30 years for as a columnist and as a television analyst. And I gave a speech to a lot of media people, and I said, you know, we've become a ship of fools.

Mean you You are not even curious as to why so many Americans are voting for Trump. You just don't care. But in the meantime, you're just sawing at the branch you're sitting on. And the fact is, the media changed. That's a great picture.

You know, the media changed, not the public. They adopted this advocacy journalism. And if you're going to be an advocate, then you're not a journalist. And that means you're going to have less protection. Ooh, interesting.

Jonathan Turley, thank you so much for your time. Have a beautiful holiday and thank you for carving out some space to clarify some very, very interesting goings on here in politics and culture. Thank you, Kennedy. Happy holidays. You too, dear.

This is the Brian Killmeat Show. I'm Kennedy. Learning something new every day on The Brian Kilmead Show. The more you listen, the more you'll know. It's Brian Kilmead.

This week, America continues the delicate and sensitive debate over who will play this guy in the Netflix miniseries. After police arrested suspected CEO shooter Luigi Mangioni, they found a note on him expressing anger at corporate America. Yet he went to Starbucks before the shooting and then was caught at McDonald's.

So perhaps his greatest crime was hypocrisy. Indeed. It is the Brian Kilmy Show Kennedy and for Brian. And that is the thing that struck me about this unhinged shooter: he's a fancy lad who's lived a charmed life and has been indoctrinated, radicalized, and propagandized at some of the most expensive institutions in the country. And this is how he emerges.

So, obviously, you know, this kid was in the middle of a mental health crisis, and no one really knows the why. There's some reporting now that his mom had had some back pain, some neuropathy, and the insurance company didn't want to pay for everything. And now we are in the middle of a conversation about, you know, what is the role of government? And, you know, there are still the commies who think that we should have socialized medicine, which, if you think the insurance industry is bad, and it's pretty awful, it's one of the few things. That people can agree upon.

It's bad because it is based on a socialized healthcare system that is really only halfway in. And that means that the rest of it can be used for profiteering, which is fine. I don't have a problem with capitalism. I don't have a problem with innovation. I think it's what makes people ultimately live healthier, longer, more productive lives.

And if you have a socialized system, you will have less innovation. You also will have rationalized health care, which is the thrust of this guy's murderous complaint. But you have to realize that socialized medicine is responsible for more deaths than a privatized system. Our system is not private enough. And we are expecting too much of our insurance and healthcare industries.

Now they are. Overtaxed. And when you have something that is run only halfway, it will be essentially run into the ground. But yes, Luigi Mangioni was a total hypocrite. And McDonald, you could argue, probably responsible for the kind of obesity that ultimately kills many, many millions of people, more so than United Healthcare.

But he will probably languish in excruciating pain for the rest of his life. And, you know, from the looks of it, he's going to live a long time. But he was upset about his own back pain that left him a. Handsome yet unfulfilled incel, and now he will be on uncomfortable prison beds for the rest of his life as the left tries to grapple with how to idealize him, but at the same time, they have to at least nominally condemn murdering people that you have disagreements with. Because if that were the justification, then there would be very, very few people running things because they would be gunned down with glee if people like AOC had their way.

Coming up. Politics and hotness here on the Brian Killmeat show. I'm Kennedy. From the Fox News Radio Studios in Midtown Manhattan, it's the fastest-growing radio talk show. Brian.

In Kill Mead. Oh my gosh, we're amazing! Hello, and welcome to another outrageous hour of the Brian Kilmead Show. It's Kennedy in for Killmead. During the silly season, the winter season, we're gearing up for Christmas and Hanukkah and Kwanzaa and Festivus for the rest of us.

Whatever you celebrate, I am here. I've got your back and your front. Thanks to good people like Michael Goodwin, who was a columnist at the New York Post. A venerated inst institution here uh in Gotham, founded by Alexander Hamilton. Making it a remarkable publication.

Michael Goodwin, hello and welcome. Good morning.

So let's talk about The Biden presidency. And what's left of it? I have to know because this is alarming. Because, you know, I was at the Army-Navy game this weekend. It was beautiful.

It was patriotic. The entire stadium felt like we came together for a common purpose. And, you know, that was love of country, love of sport, and optimism about the future. But I had this gnawing sensation in the back of my brain, wondering: okay, if the president-elect is here and he feels like the president. And he's he's being hailed to his chiefness.

Who's actually running the country? Yeah. That is the top question of the last thirty days and I guess the next thirty days. Um Joe Biden has disappeared, basically, except to go out and do some errands like commuting and pardoning, what, one thousand five hundred people in one day. And we're just now discovering some of those people and what they were in prison for, what they were arrested for.

And then of course, where's Kamala Harris? If Joe Biden's not going to be president, then that's why we have a vice president. Where is she? Totally disappeared since the election. I think one or two public sightings.

Um And it it really does raise the question that you that you ask. who's running the country. when we see all of these things that are being done, for example, selling the unfinished portion of the wall, selling the metal as scrap, right, continuing to give away, making these giveaway programs. it really does suggest that there is somebody running the country. It's just not the President or the Vice President.

Do you think whoever is running the country is uh equipped, if God forbid, um, there is, you know, a an act of terrorism on US soil? No, because To be equipped means you have to be vetted. And the way we vet people in the United States is through elections.

So who's ever running the country now has not been elected. And therefore, they are not equipped. I mean, they don't enjoy public support. The public has no investment in somebody appointed by somebody, perhaps in midnight, perhaps as a favor, perhaps as a payback. That's what we have the Senate for to advise and consent on those kinds of things.

But certainly we have a we have a faceless, a nameless White House now that appears to give the impression that the country is running just fine. But I have you seen a cabinet member lately? Lloyd Austin was at the the Secretary of Defense was at the game that you were at. People overlook that because Donald Trump and JD Vance and Daniel Penny and Pete Hegsith were there, but there was a representative of the current administration there, fittingly. But is Lloyd Austin running the country?

I don't think so. Um so it it really does boggle the mind. It's But you know, there have been so many firsts under Joe Biden In almost none of them, things you want to boast about, right? And this is another one of those. A president in place.

but really not doing the job, it seems.

So there's an old phrase in bureaucracy, government bureaucracies, that somebody has retired in place. meaning they're really not doing the job anymore, but they're still filling the spot and getting paid for it. That's sort of the goal of a lot of bureaucrats. That's what we have in the White House right now. Joe Biden's not really doing the job, but he's getting paid for it.

He gets to fly around in Air Force One. He gets all kinds of perks and everything. It's a pretty good gig, I guess, if that's your idea of a good gig. But it's not good for the country. No, and you know, when you are president, you have to put the the needs of the country ahead of your own.

And I think that's why people have been so frustrated by the political class. And, you know, arguably from both major parties, is it's all about this idea of, you know, how do I get mine? How do I get ahead? You know, you look at former presidents like Obama and He's completely enriched himself, which is fine. I don't have a problem with people writing books and signing Netflix deals if they've got something to offer.

But the idea of using the presidency to build your brand as opposed to building a safer, more prosperous country, is antithetical to what America is supposed to be. And It is scary, but you look, you know, you write about this in the New York Post. This is emblematic of his entire presidency. You know, he ascended to where he wanted to be by virtue of climbing the ladder over a series of decades in public life. And once he got there, he just kind of unplugged.

And, you know, we've all been to the DMV, we've all been to the post office and seen those people that you're talking about. You know, the ones who are good public servants, who try really hard to keep the lines moving, they're doing God's work. But the ones who are retired on duty and are just warm bodies filling the spot, they really do make the country less safe. And so if this is what Joe Biden has been doing, then he lost the presidency a while ago. I was talking to someone within the Trump sphere, and I asked them, they were working on the campaign, when did you know that?

President Trump had won the race, and they said not until two weeks before the election. When do you think that Trump had the race sealed?

Well, it's interesting. I've actually talked to him about this at one point and What his perspective was at the time, and this was part of this conversation was before it was over. But He he wa you you recall when when Biden was forced out. Trump sort of went into a funk. And it it Later, he said something to the effect that Well, I beat Joe Biden.

We spent a lot of money in the campaign. We did a lot of things and we beat him. But now we have to start over. And there was a sense of unfairness about that, that Biden was able to last into late July, and then you got to start over with somebody new. When that doesn't work out.

I mean, there was no democratic process for that, right? The Democrats just kind of, I think, on Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi say so and a few donors. They just switched it. That's unheard of. But this is the party that's going to protect democracy.

Remember that. But I also think that for when did Trump know, I think. even for a candidate, even for a confident candidate, you're never sure. You're never sure until it's all over. Because it's just particularly his experiences with 2020.

Uh when he believes that uh you know the the results change during the night after everybody went to sleep on the East Coast. Um Look at what happened in California. They were counting votes two weeks after the election, and all of those races went to Democrats. Um So I think that and I'm not suggesting a massive conspiracy. possibly very good explanations for why these things happened.

But it does rob you of any certainty about what the outcome is going to be. Yes, and there are systems in place that are certainly biased against parties and candidates that make the process feel very unfair. You know, that is the political-industrial complex in California. And that is the system that the Democrat Party has built there. And it does feel unfair, and that's why it feels like a lot of this is a reset.

And there were, you know, people who told the establishment, don't take our voices and our votes for granted. We're not always going to be there for you because you have failed us.

Now, obviously, this election, this time in our political history, is unlike any other. And, you know, I'm really sick of hearing this is the most important election of our lifetime because that rings hollow if you say that every successive presidential cycle. But what will we internalize from this? And what about this election will change our Politics for the foreseeable future. And I guess what I'm touching on is something that you pointed out: that President Trump's team was able to pivot to a completely different kind of candidate with a different skill set and different marketing criteria and win and overcome that.

Which I don't think they get a lot of credit for that. I don't think people realize how big of a shift that was. But how does that change how presidents run for office in the future.

Well, look, I I think uh Each election brings some new wrinkle, sometimes it's a bigger wrinkle than others.

So I think as a candidate, You have to constantly adapt. You cannot on day one figure out what you want to do, what you're going to run on, what your message is going to be, and then just run on that, beat it to death for the next eight, nine, ten months. You've got to be flexible. Yeah. And I think it's one of the mysteries that That we Still hangs over the Harris campaign, why they didn't adapt.

all these all the complaints that she was vacuous, that she wasn't saying anything, that she wasn't answering questions, laying out what her opportunity economy would be short of a few no price gouging I mean, things like that. I think that's one of the most curious things to me about this campaign. Donald Trump continued to adapt. And I think he doesn't get enough credit for that. When you think about the way he started, There was no Elon Musk.

There was no RFK Jr. There was no Tulsi Gabbard. They came aboard. as he reached out and as he made his message clear and made contact with them. I mean, this wasn't the first date.

I think they had a lot of conversations before Musk went public, before RFK joined up. And I think that was an adaptation that Trump made to the sense that he had He had most Republicans, let's say 90% of Republicans roughly, but it wasn't going to be enough to guarantee victory, and it might even. bring defeat.

So he needed to broaden the tent. He did that.

Now, Kamala Harris tried to do that with Liz Cheney, of all people. I mean, there's another dumb idea, right? That Liz Cheney and Dick Cheney are I mean, they wouldn't even, if this were a Republican race, they wouldn't make a hair's breadth of difference. But to think that they could move enough Republican voters. Uh or swi or even swing voters.

I mean the Cheneys is i i it's a poison brand. I mean I I respect Dick Cheney. I agreed with him on a lot of things and I used to used to respect Liz Cheney. But they have become a you know a a poison brand to both parties.

So uh I I think a lot of Democrats are asking themselves, what was Harris thinking? Then of course the way she spent her money. She never countered. The arguments, for example, that Trump made that when he said in that commercial, running her quote about every inmate deserves to have a sex change who wants one and Trump's tagline was She's for them, they, he's for you. She never answered that.

Even Democrats complained. She didn't push back. She didn't separate herself from the equation that he created from that.

So I think that's the thing that strikes me: Donald Trump adapted, and she just kind of stayed. standing still while the electorate Swirled around her and eventually came to rest with Donald Trump. Yeah, that's very interesting because it was very static. And I think that is because she is incapable of adapting. And I also thought it was very interesting that there was this timidity about her that she was scared to offend people.

And when you're operating out of fear, you can never be bold. And you have to be if you are going to lead this country out of, you know, where we are in terms of the lack of faith of voters. And if you're going to lead us into greatness, you have to be bold. You have to be strong. You have to be able to carve your own path and make your own case.

And even as a prosecutor, she was incapable of doing that. But now it's really fun watching post-mortem videos of her where she sounds like she's drunk. That will be endlessly entertaining. Uh the the columns of Michael Goodwin are yours for the reading, and they are satisfying indeed. He is at M Goodwin underscore New York Post, and White Post.

Michael, thank you so much for taking the time today. I really appreciate it. My pleasure. Thank you. Absolutely.

This is the Brian Kilmead Show coming up. My guide to surviving Christmas. I will spoil the ending. Your host. I'm Kennedy.

Diving deep into today's top stories. It's Brian Kilmead. If you're interested in it, Brian's talking about it. You're with Brian Kilmead. Oh hello, this is the Brian Kilmead Show.

So we were uh we were just discussing in other quarters. about the the lateness of the hour because Thanksgiving was so late this year and uh now we're all kind of scrambling to get ready for Christmas. And it doesn't matter Your best intentions or your best laid plans at this time of year. It's December 16th. We're all kind of going crazy and pulling our hair out because we're never going to have enough time to do all the things we need to do.

So, the question is: what do you really need to do? Do you really need to buy people a bunch of crap that they will never use? Don't. Do not get people things they they won't use. That is one of the biggest issues in life: clutter and then feeling obligated to keep things.

So. I always try and declutter and work out more this time of year because it makes everything so much more helpful. If you can clear out a drawer or a closet, it will be so much better for your brain than going to a mall or braving some online onslaught to get people crap that they don't need. Get rid of the stuff that you already have. And if you need to, regift it.

I'm a big fan of regifting. If you wrap things appropriately, no one will ever know that they are gently used. It's a very hard sell giving someone a gently used bottle of wine if there's a glass taken out of it. But, you know, I mean, for the booze bag in your life, it's not the worst thing in the world, but. Here are three things that you should do during the holidays.

One, meditate. That just means take deep breaths, four counts in, hold it for seven counts, out for eight counts, four, seven, eight. Trust me on this, it will save your Christmas. The other is do cardio every single day, even some weights thrown in. And the third is when in doubt, espresso martini it out.

This is the Brian Kill Meet John Kennedy. Radio that makes you think. This is the Brian Kill Me Show. The only reason why you would ever fly an aircraft, an unmanned aircraft at night, is if you're looking for something, whether it be a person or trying to smell gas. We have methane gas detection systems that can detect gas leaks and pipelines.

You really wouldn't use thermal optics for trying to find gas leaks just simply because the only way you're actually going to find A gas leak with thermal optics is if the gas leak is aggressive enough that it has a Difference in temperature because radio thermal imaging creates a digital image based off the temperature variance.

So, whatever is different in temperature, it creates an image. gas usually gas leaks so slow that it goes quickly into ambient bef before you can even see it.

So we have special sensors that can detect gas leaks. We also have special sensors that can detect radioactive material. Oh, we're absolutely hosed. Yeah, that's uh detecting gas leaks like uh Whoopi Goldberg after she eats a A bucket of Five alarm chili. That's the kind of gas leak that we're talking about.

That's John Ferguson. That was part of the TikTok video that Joe Rogan was responding to when he said that he's terrified about the drone sightings over New Jersey, which is a very gassy place.

So what in the wide world of sports is going on with these drones? It's unsettling. It's unnerving. It's kind of terrifying, especially if you live in Jersey. I live in Manhattan.

We face Jersey. And so we've been looking at the night sky, trying to peep some of these drones. Haven't seen them yet. But I don't feel good about it. I don't know what they are.

I just I don't Believe John Kirby or Alejandro Mallorkis when they say, no, there's really, there's not even anything there. Because I talk to people in New Jersey and they say, oh no, there are. They're seeing them every single night and they are big. And you hear from law enforcement that they have sent their drone technology to surveil the creepy mystery drones.

So, why don't we talk to a drone expert and a community college president? Warren Community College specializes in handing out degrees and certificates in drone technology and unmanned systems.

Well, since I'm manning the Brian Kilmead Show, I would like to cordially invite Dr. William Austin to the air right now. He's the president of Warren Community College. Dr. Austin, welcome to the Brian Kilmead Show.

Good morning.

Thank you for having me. Don't pick on me too much because I'm a libertarian. Oh, good for you. I'm a libertarian as well. I know that.

You're my favorite libertarian. Oh, stop it right now. I'm not affiliated with the Libertarian Party. But that doesn't mean libertarian. Yeah, exactly.

Ideological. That's right, baby.

So what are we looking at here? Because there are a lot of people who are trying to downplay it and say, you know, this is nothing abnormal. They're probably always there. And then you have really smart, rational people who go, the fact that we don't know should be unsettling. You know drones better than anyone else, Dr.

William Austin. What are we looking at? Yeah, so the good news is you're not looking at large drones surveilling New Jersey or the area. You're looking if you're seeing a drone, and I've looked at I don't even want to count how many pictures and videos now. The drones are always under 10 pounds that we're able to identify.

They can appear larger in the sky. There's an optical effect called the parallax. The fact that 80s. I'm dealing with for as long as there's been aviation, which everything in the night sky. can look very different.

Jet airlines, if you come. concentrate hard enough can stop moving in the sky. And this really has to do with with light reflection. And what our eyes were designed for, which is really not a lot of fun. And like when Mercury turns retrograde.

Yeah. You're looking at that. The reason you're not seeing these He's in Manhattan. any kind of drones is Manhattan is Okay.

So only Yeah. people with a lot of people work can fly any kind of drone. Manhattan mostly Yeah.

So you're not going to see these drones.

Okay. like that. You will see them more in the country and when I've driven around at night, I've seen these drones. They're small. Yeah.

First I thought they were people. Picking up to try to look for the mystery drones, which I think was happening. And then I think some now I'm seeing more. Yeah. Yeah.

They can kind of be jokester with their little drones and they're throwing them up. I like to remind people: there's 1.1 million registered drones in the United States. right now. Yeah. plus thousand commercial pilots doing things Yeah.

800,000 plus recreational pilots.

So, in a state like New Jersey, as populated, there's probably well over 25,000. Ugh Then I'm talking small. Yeah. Go outside and Mm-hmm. The good news is, this is the weather's bad today.

You're gonna see you drop off because you can't. Yeah. Runs tonight because they get kind of rained out. And I think this will. Yeah.

This kind of will become less interesting to people. as the holiday season comes on. I've talked to airport people. I've talked to air traffic control. Yeah.

talk to Uh that work at Picatinny and every one of them tell me the same thing. FLA to to help people who are suffering through this. know that we are taking off our jets like normal every day. They're not these drones when they're coming in the land or leaving. To take off, we have single-engine planes up there every day.

Nothing has been delayed. That means there are, except for a few places like. Boston where some knuckleheads are. Yeah. Yeah.

I don't know what they're doing. that aren't proper training. That's what we're seeing. But, you know, it is disconcerting. It's a new technology.

Yeah. That should be a Hell of a lot. Yeah. convincing them what they've given. If we apply just basic the metaphysics of our Object we law is what we law.

And they have pissed him out. We can And remember, spy players are going to turn their lights. Lights on, they're not going to let us see them. Big drones flying around at night will interfere. With commercial aircraft.

Anything overflow. 55 pounds has to file a flight plan with the FLA to fly. they wouldn't know what that is. What they don't know how to do apparently is that. is communicate with us and let us at ease because I got great friends.

And these are smart people that are sitting. airplanes that had convinced themselves their drone. And they're never going to get over that. It doesn't matter how long I argue with them, and I'm never going to argue with them because that night they saw a drone. When I looked at it, I saw I knew it was an airplane.

has failed them yet again. All right, Dr. William Austin, president of Warren Community College, which issues drone degrees.

So you're saying it's aliens? Here, they're not coming to me. Jersey. Remember, they're always looking for signs of. Yeah.

So I was born and raised here, so I can say that. Yeah, so your community college is actually in New Jersey.

So you know this very, very well.

So New Jersey Congressman Jeff Van Drew posited that there was an Iranian mothership off the U.S. coast that was launching these things. And he was very certain about that. And he was trusting in the intelligence that he had received. Do you share that hypothesis?

No, because I believe there's some exercises going on off. because right now of our own. uh and I believe that that that that that if there was if that's If there's such a thing as an I don't know what that is. a drone mothership, but if such a thing existed, I believe it would already be at the bottom of the ocean. Do you think that when President Trump takes office and these drones are still flying, do you take him at his word that he will shoot them out of the sky?

I believe President Trump would use the proper way to do it, which is to get the Air Force involved if that was indeed necessary. But I have a feeling that these are really small. drones that people are seeing. Yeah. Marge.

Aircraft, planes, and stuff that they're misidentifying. I think everybody can kind of relax a little bit. Um enjoy their Christmas. Because we're not, I'm telling you, we're not being surveilled. We don't have big, large drones.

flying over New Jersey. It's so easy to get confused. Yeah. There's so many sightings now that I'm not even sure there are that many large drones. Yeah.

At this point. And when we fly.

Okay. 'Cause I work with a lot I went to Emily Road, we train with them all the time. A lot of those guys flew. Yeah. for the military Uh and they assure me.

If we were If the American military was flying drill, you wouldn't see them. We're better than that. Yes, my domestic partner also went to Embry Riddle, and um he doesn't seem too bothered about it either. Any issue? Is a funny thing, especially when you first get into it.

I can tell you that.

Okay, so let me ask you this: Is it like when, you know, there's a couple of shark attacks in Florida, and it's really the same number of shark attacks there always are, but they just get reported more, so everyone thinks that there are more sharks and that they've gone crazy, and now they've developed an appetite for human flesh, and we're being hunted in the seas? Is it like that? I'm a college president, I've gone to school way too long, so let me put away my two embryo riddle degrees and let me pull out my two sociology degrees I started my career with. There's a sociology. phenomenon going on here.

Yeah. feeding upon one another. And this is not uncommon. Any one of us can fall into this. Especially with something like nighttime.

visualization of the sky. for aviation and we're just doing it for the first time and we're seeing things that aren't there. I mean, I've gotten so many pictures. I can tell you. I've gotten probably the most misidentified thing I've seen.

that has been identified as a drone. and has been zoomed in on so far. It's hard to make out. I had to go out and replicate it for myself. Yeah.

Jupiter, because it's really clear in the sky when it's clear right now. Jupiter looks great. Um I think it matches. Lot of air. Yeah.

People are thinking our drone. A lot of the Selling are the same small drone, so I'll get like a couple of photographs and these come from iPhones so they have metadata. I can kind of GPS, figure out where they are, and I'm like, they're They're looking from different directions. At the same small drone. And I think.

That's what the FBI is for. Mining as well. But but what they're not doing and again You have to communicate to the American public. I think and I think you'll you agree. We send these people down to Washington or we put them in And they start to Than everybody else.

So they don't tell us anything because we as a public can't understand. Yeah. to understand this and we can. If you want to talk about the real issues, With the drones, is we need a better System for knowing where the drones are. And I'm talking about the small ones so that people don't get confused.

Right now, if you want to become drone pirate. in the in the what's known as the National Aerospace Seal here people call it the NAS. If you want to be a pilot in the NAS, if you want to be a pilot, to be a part 107 pilot. 60 questions, multiple choices. test, you never have to fly a thing.

And if you want to be a recreational flyer, you sit on the home on your computer. and take a test that shows you know the rules. But again, you never fly anything.

So a lot of these people that are flying and are like, oh, they're overcome. They don't know it'll be. They probably barely know how to control their drone. When we teach students to actually fly, which was called practical float assessment. 20 students one instructor during the day, one assistant.

We go to the same twenty students out at night. five instructors Three assistants. That is how much more difficult. And these students are Yeah. how to fly to go into that night sky with a drone.

So, what you're saying is it's the Chinese. They're spying on us and they're just trying to foment as much unrest as possible before the inauguration.

So, our country and society fall apart in short order. Listen, you can go back and Google me and look at the New Jersey Star Ledger. I wrote about the Chinese back in March, and there is something to be concerned about. Let's talk about that. 1.1 million drones.

out there. Probably eighty percent of them were manufactured in China. They have the ability to download data into them, which means they have ability to upload the data back. And we know this.

So with the child. Chinese do not Yeah. money to spy They have figured out a way to do that. For us to give them money to buy these drones so we can spy on ourselves. They do not need to spy on us.

What we need to do is, and this is where President Trump and I are. Going to agree a lot. We need to target. These drones take that money and put it in. to our own drone defenses, our own drone industry, our own drone.

Education because here's the problem. adversaries are way ahead of us in this technology socially based and small based, which we've seen more weaponized. Ukraine. are so far ahead of us. We need to catch up with them.

We need to bring strength STEM back to the schools. instead of whatever's going on. over there. We need to return to objective reality. We need to return to reason.

to remember that the producers and the Drunk people, I'm telling you. Don't worry. drone industry because if you're looking for Yeah. Believe in capitalism and production, that's where they've all gone to robotics and drones because people have diminished that too much. Mm-hmm.

with some of our our beliefs in in for lack of a better term. communism. No, I couldn't agree with you more. And I hope we have a return to objectivism because, you know, what we have been living in is this subjectivist society that wants to mutate wherever it sees fit. But it also, you know, to your point a few points ago, they think they know better than everybody else.

And when you have people like that in academia and it bleeds into government, it makes all of us less safe and it makes the country less stable. I couldn't agree with you more. Spoken like a true libertarian.

So you heard it from the guy who teaches the guys and the gals how to man unmanned drones. It's Dr. William Austin from Warren Community College. Thank you so much for taking the time today. I feel better because I thought that we were under some sort of an alien invasion and I don't have a thing packed for the probe.

Don't worry, you don't want to go with them. We don't know what they're like up there. Probably worse. I'd rather stay here. Dr.

Austin, thank you so much for your time. I do appreciate it. Thank you. Yes, this is the Brian Kilmead Show. Kennedy and For Killmead, back in moments to tell you where you should live if you're a Republican.

Next. Expanding your knowledge base. It's the Brian Kilmead Show. Breaking news, unique opinions. Hear it all on the Brian Kill Me Show.

Oh, you're going to hear it all, all right. It's Kennedy in for Killmead during this holiday season. It's so cheery and bright.

So, um,.

Some of the uh The reason for optimism for many home buyers is that they are hoping that with a new administration, the economy stabilizes, inflation goes down, and that means that interest rates will also come down, and that eventually will trickle over to the banks, and people will once again be able to get sub-5% mortgage rates.

So they can afford to buy maybe their first-time home, which is very exciting news for the hopefully economically mobile.

So now there is a new app that allows you to see the political leanings of your potential neighbors. And I'm wondering, how important is that for people? Like, is it that important for you to live around people who vote the same way that you do? I think there's something fun and interesting about being around people from different political backgrounds, from different geographic backgrounds. That's one of the things.

That I always loved about living in New York and California is it's rare to find people who are from those places. Most people, you know, they're born maybe in the middle of the country and then they move to bigger cities and more populated parts of the country because they are chasing the ultimate dream. And, you know, I've never felt the necessity to live around Hoosiers or Oregonians who happen to be libertarian Virgos in the same exact place. I don't mind cohabitating in a neighborhood with liberals. I think it's fun.

I think liberals have more of a problem with conservatives. I really do. Just recently, I got a text from someone that I worked with for years, you know, a really nice, decent, wonderful person. And it was a very accusatory text. It was like, you're not a Trumper, are you?

I hate Trumpers. And so I said to this person, like, No matter what my politics are, I am a libertarian. And I want people to speak freely. I want people to live freely. Freedom is the underpinning of a successful, flourishing society.

And that's what I want for everyone. I don't care how you voted. You shouldn't care how I vote. But no matter how you vote, you can still be a decent neighbor. But if you automatically hate half the people you live around, That's a you problem.

That is not a me problem. And I don't necessarily need to agree with you in order to thrive, darling. But if you need that, I'll see you in Idaho. This is the Brian Kilmead Show. I am your good friend Kennedy.

From high atop Fox News headquarters in New York City, always seeking solutions, never sowing division. It's Brian Kilmead. It is a Brian Kilmead show. Hi, it's Kennedy. I'm in for Kilmead.

All right, you're lucky. And joining me now to kick off an exciting hour of the Brian Kilmead show. A man who is exciting as the jackets that um He sports that every time he gets dressed, it looks like he lost a bet with Liberace. It's Jimmy Fela. Ah.

Host of Fox Across America with Jimmy Fela on the Fox News Radio Network. Weekdays from 12 to 3 Eastern. Also, the host of Fox News Saturday night. Saturday night to 10 p.m. Eastern on the Fox News channel.

Jimmy, welcome to the Bride Killmead Show. How about it? How dare you insult my overweight figure skater collection? I am proud of all of those clothes. Here's the thing, man.

It's great to see you. Your clothes are amazing, but I know you had to build a she-shed for your jackets at your house. Can I make an announcement to the American people and those of us who are watching on Fox Nation can confirm this?

Okay. We have not found Waldo, but we do know where his sweater is.

Okay. Kennedy is dressed like There's Waldo. That's the name of the new book I'm releasing. It's called There's Waldo. Apparently, Waldo has transitioned, and he or she is now filling in for Mr.

Kill Me. And it's nice to be here with you, Waldo. I'm wearing a pink and red sweater. It is courtesy of the Pink Candy Cane Collection. Oh, and I'm.

I'm very happy to be in the um Very feminine Christmas spirit. I just thought you were making yourself more discoverable for the drones so the aliens wouldn't be mad at you when they took you. I talked to a drone expert. He was like, There's nothing to fear. All is well.

These are simply airplanes or jackasses.

Okay. And it's, you know, it's not the work of alien craft. If it were, we would all be lubriderm. Oh, yeah, no, no, these aren't aliens. If these were actual aliens, Kamala would have offered them free sex changes by now.

You know how this works. But it's like, come on, I got a stimulus card for you. Would you land already? What's up with these aliens? No, listen, if you wanted my theory as a non-expert, I just think it's the government.

That's all. I think it's a government. I think it's a government as well. The Chinese government, bunch of commies ready to take us over, were screwed, Jimmy. Yeah, that was.

Dang it. You know, and I was ready for an excited Christmas. You know who's very excited for this February? Give it to me. Have you heard about this Lily Phillips?

Talk to me. A British young woman. I think she's, you know, early 20s. She had marital relations with 101 men in one 24-hour period. And it was really disgusting.

I watched the documentary. There's a YouTube documentary about her sexploit. And I wrote about it for the Daily Mail.

So I had to watch the documentary. Naturally. And I gagged more than she did for different reasons. Wow.

So this young woman. Was being questioned by the documentarian before she underwent the uh hundred-plus feat, and she didn't know that you could contract HIV orally and uh through a DNA deposit in your stomach. Sheesh.

So uh she was planning on um offering some of her suitors mouth love before things began. And you know, there are and even though every gentleman was supposed to present a card that said he was free from sexually transmitted infection, I do think that those cards can be forged. Oh, and someone could also have a tryst before their union that might compromise her health. Thank you. When it comes to forging those cards, take it from a guy who's been vaxed and boosted.

I got one of them cards. It's not true. As you know, I got the Johnson and Johnson. And what they didn't tell me is it was Magic Johnson and Keyshawn Johnson. But here we are, fully vaxxed with the card in hand.

Happy to be here.

So it's wild that. Yeah. I I followed this as well, and your article was fantastic. It was it was what I needed it to be because Anytime you're writing about this subject matter, you know, part of the bargain is we're going to get the usual amount of smut we'd get from you in terms of jokes and metaphors and everything in between. But I do believe you hit the quota and then some.

As for her, I. Watched a little clip of her talking about the they were running out of time, so they just brought in 23 of them at once and just kind of lined it up.

So she, yeah, so can we play a clip from Lily Phillips? Here's Lily Phillips from I Slept with 100 Men on One Night. If like you haven't spent enough time with them and feeling like they didn't, like you didn't give them a good time because like they only got two minutes. And that and that's what that's what's making you feel emotional is that maybe you think you didn't give some guys a good enough time today? Yeah, yeah, and it's hard, I think, having the.

Interactions with them when they're like, What, you're not going to make me finish, I've come all this way, like, kind of like. Guilt tripping me a little bit. Yeah, so there she is talking about like. She felt used up, robotic. She disassociated from the whole thing, and she was most worried that every single one of the hundred guys didn't feel like it was a great date.

Well, there's no doubt she let down a man, and that man is her father. Let's stay focused here for a second. Her parents are horrible people. Her mom is her finance manager. Let me jump in a second, which is outrageous.

And I followed that aspect of the story too. You know what I keep coming back to? You know, the old adage that women always lie about the amount of men they've slept with? If she's admitting to 100, 4,000 or 5,000, no, no, it's terrible. But there is obviously some type of psychological trauma that's making all of this possible.

Whether it's, you know, the trauma that's forcing her to go for this attention or the trauma that's forcing her to feel guilty about it in the aftermath, this is clearly a person whose compass is off a little bit. Yeah. And, you know, before the whole thing, she was like, people have no idea how happy this makes me. And I was watching that, going, that is so disingenuous. Yeah.

Like, I know there are sex workers who feel empowered and they don't want to be judged. And I get it. They interviewed a woman in the documentary who is also an OnlyFans model who said, you know, it starts with lingerie shots and then all of a sudden you're having sex with people on camera. Believe me, I know. Believe me.

They got me in that one teddy. And I was like, come on, it's just a prank.

Next thing you know. Me and me. There's a guy named Teddy. Hey, what's going on here? I don't know.

With a lot of singles. I didn't sign up for any of this, but you know, the rent don't pay itself. Yeah, we all find that out the hard way. But, you know, and she's like, I don't know why she's aching for this much attention. And, you know, she says it makes her happy, but it's the kind of bell you can't unring.

Yeah. Like when you're doing this on camera, and she talks about how she gets lonely sometimes because a lot of her girlfriends are now in relationships, in these monogamous relationships. And she knows no one wants to be the 102nd guy. You know, no one, everyone knows like. They're not going to make a Hallmark Christmas movie about her.

Like, it's like one, like, you know, suitor number 67 that's going to look at her and be like, oh, my God, you're so beautiful and amazing. Like, let me take you away from this into my yacht and let's go explore monogamy. I just love the idea of the Christmas movie, Miracle on 34 Double D Street. Just, I love it. I love the idea.

And the snow is falling, but you're right. Listen, to be fair, to caveat this, there is somebody that would be the 106th guy. It's just not the guy you want to marry. You know what I mean? That's the bigger problem here.

But we're in a place now, okay? And everybody could consider this who's listening. Everybody in the age of social media is now in a race to the top of Mount Clickmore. Meaning, they want to get the most clicks. That's how you win now.

In terms of this warped perception we have of what should matter in terms of quality and relevance and everything in between. But a lot of the things that get you to the top of Mount Clickmore also cause a personal avalanche once you get there because acts like this, which get the type of attention we're discussing, aren't actually based on anything of value. You know, they're not based on anything of enduring quality. Yes. You know, so you're actually better off being the girl who talked about Hoctua.

Remember that girl? Yeah. She was only talking about that thing.

Okay. This girl is talking about a lot of things. You know what I'm saying? She's not talking. She has some orifices that are pre-filled.

And so this is what was so amazing. Like, she was so disturbed. She was so upset. She felt so guilty. She had so much DNA in her eyes that they were red and bloodshot, not just from the tears.

That she promised at the end of it that in February she's going to go for a thousand guys in one day. Wow.

Which is, you know, if she says there by any chance, I think her vagina. Ah, good for you. Remember the old family feud? Where's the strangest place you and your husband have ever had sex? Yeah.

That'd be the butt, Bob. That was a newly run cast. Is that what it was? Yeah. But that was obviously not the question.

Yeah. Woo! Nice to be here on the final episode of Fox News Radio. Yeah, this was the Brian Kill Me show. Brian has now filed suit.

Oh, that's funny. But yeah, so she will be in her birthday suit for a thousand guys because, you know, she didn't feel bad enough about herself. But why stop there? Why not 10,000? I don't know, but there's a message here for women who are listening and contemplating this sort of thing.

If you go around strategically sleeping with people, you got to be careful because the Democrats will nominate you for president.

Now you've got to debate Trump. You got to raise all this money. No, you're shaving your head, stealing luggage at the airport. Oh, look at us. Yeah, so Alex, the Queen of Southampton, who was the other OnlyFans model, said, you know, she has to be careful because it is a slippery slope.

Who knew she was speaking so literally?

So she's the one I saw in the clip that way. She said they were running out of time, so we just lined ourselves up and invited 23 and raised the clip. But the amazing thing was, so. You know, there's a documentary being made about this. The documentary is on YouTube now.

And She wouldn't let the documentarian into the actual proceedings. You know, there's privacy concerns when you're showing things on OnlyFans, which she did. She broadcast on her OnlyFans page. But they wouldn't let them in until afterward. And so they go in, and there are, like, this room was littered with condoms.

It looked like popcorn on the floor after a wicked sing-along. I mean, it was just absolutely disgusting. And so the cameraman walks in, and you see the. Everything's sort of going in and out of focus because he's moving the camera because he's gagging so hard. And so, and she was warned about the smell.

Like, the smell is going to be the worst part. Wow.

So, it's tough to watch. Like, but if that is what your life has become, are we doing something wrong as a society? Yes, the compass is broken. I'm telling you. And yeah, we love this sort of thing for the attention.

If you're her, I'm not saying everybody is craving the attention in this way, but a lot of people are participating in social media in this mindset. Not that necessarily, I'll screw a thousand people, but yes, I will live towards spectacle. And it's just, man, that you really, really crystallized it with that descriptor there of the wicked sing-along. It's a lot more flutes in this one than the original wicked soundtrack. Yeah, she is defying gravity.

Maybe not HIV, though. That might catch up with her.

Well, to bring it all full circle, since you invoked Wicked, and I'm sure they want this brought up. The wicked dolls that were out there, okay, for this movie. I don't know if you know this, but in the first pub publication, production run, whoever designed the box accidentally. Put wicked.com on the box, which would be the website where you go find the type of acts we're discussing that this woman does. Yes, it's a true story.

We covered it on my show. Wicked.com.

So, like, wicked movie or like wicked film is the movie wicked that's going crazy, but I believe wicked.com is the one they tell me not to visit at work anymore. And it's been a while. Yeah, I think we have a pretty substantial firewall here. Even though everyone is magically doing research. Can I tell you how bad it's gotten for me here at Fox?

The I.T. team actually asked me if I could buy a used laptop off Hunter Biden. They're like, can you actually? Do you know anyone in Ukraine you could get a laptop off? Because I don't know that we could fix the one we have here in the house.

It is disgusting. It's bad. You've got the spinning wheel of death from your search history alone. He just, it's so funny because, like, normally they sit down at a computer and start typing things. This guy just threw holy water on it.

It's like, wow, I guess. Oh, they actually had an exorcist come in. I guess. Discharge your search history.

So. Who is running the country? Right now, yes, I believe it's you know, obviously, a bunch of unelected bureaucrats, as they say, but it's not this guy, even the Pardons, not this guy. Can I tell you something, man? It's so brazen.

You don't think the Pardons are Joe Biden? That's really I think some of them are strategically him, but the fact that they all came out as early as they did because they don't generally come out before Christmas, they usually come out after New Year's.

So the fact that they're coming out as early as they are is their way of telling other would-be pardoners to maybe Venmo them a few hundred thousand reasons why they should be let out. You know, it very much seems like we're selling these things. No, it is the Pardon Olympics. And, you know, Michael Goodwin from the New York Post pointed out that. The pardon is actually prestige.

Yeah. Like it's a status symbol.

So if you get a pardon from Joe Biden, it means that you're really somebody in the party. It is the pardon party. Yeah, speaking of people who just screwed a thousand people, that's Biden. What a dirtbag. I'm not happy.

Now you got me worked up, Waldo. I was so happy sitting down. Yeah, but your show is coming on in about 40 minutes on the Fox News Radio Network, Fox Across America with Jimmy Phela. And there's 105 guys waiting outside the studio for my opening act. It's not just five guys, it's 105 guys.

It's filling and delicious. All right.

Well, Jim, go have a phenomenal show. Thank you so much for making The Kill Meet Show part of your holiday plans this year. I'm pretty sure our mics have been off for 10 minutes now, but yes. Oh, no, we haven't been on the radio. I don't even think I'm broadcasting today.

I think this is like a make-a-wish thing. Yeah, like let's have to come in and pretend that she's talking in the microphone. Brian's actually here broadcasting in the remote room. He's talking to an actual congressman, Jim Jordan, ladies and gentlemen. All right, Jimmy Fela, we'll hear you in moments.

This is the Brian Kilmead Show and Kennedy. Diving deep into today's top stories, it's Brian Kilmead. The fastest three hours in radio. You're with Brian Kilmead. You are emotionally with Brian Kilmead.

I'll give you that. It's Kennedy in for Kilmead here on this glorious Monday as we start another week.

So I was talking to Jimmy Phela about Lily Phillips, who is that OnlyFans model/slash hooker, who slept with 101 men on camera on her OnlyFans page. You know, she's from the UK. She claims to be close with her parents. But as I was writing about this for the Daily Mail, I was so struck by her story because she's not a hero. She's not a feminist.

It's really gross. She felt used up. She's now going to sleep with 1,000 men in a day. I don't know how that's physically possible for her. There was a woman who did it in Poland years ago who slept with 900-plus men.

Didn't quite get to the thousand man mark. But it is just the dehumanization of people and putting yourself on this altar. And I felt like there were parallels between this and Luigi Mangioni and that. Lives don't matter the way they did so many years ago because we have. In many ways, lost touch with our humanity.

So, if you can dehumanize yourself, if you can disassociate yourself from the situation, maybe you'll get rich. But in the end, is it worth it? No, absolutely, it's not. Whatever, you know, momentary gain she will make, I'm sure this is one in a series of bad choices for her. And someone like that isn't going to hold on to their money forever, but they've already lost touch with their soul.

And so, it does feel like a video game. It does feel like there is a sense of disconnection.

So, what we have to do in our lives is reconnect ourselves and our families back to the realization that human life is important. It is the most important thing. To have a soul is an important thing, to have respect for yourself, and that is something that you have to find on your own. That is not something that the government gives you. Or that the government withholds.

You have to find value in life, especially at this time of year.

So that's why we discuss this because we have to reconnect with the part of ourselves that we share with other people. That is the most important thing of all. You are listening to the Brian Kilmead Show. I'm your friend Kennedy. The talk show that's getting you talking.

You're with Brian Kilmead. This is the Brian Kilmead Show. It's Kennedy and for Kilmead.

So, we have to talk about AI because this is going to be one of the defining characteristics of this generation, and of course, of the second term of the Trump presidency. How should the incoming administration do it right? Joining me now is Dan Hendricks. He is a director of the Center for AI Safety. He serves as AI Safety Advisor to Elon Musk.

Dan, welcome to the Kill Meet Show. Thank you for having me. So How did the Biden administration interface with AI, and did they do a good job?

Well, the President has limited power, so Biden used his executive authorities to do basic information gathering on what the AI companies are up to.

So this would have them test their models if they pose any national security risks. And in addition to that, the Biden administration built on something that Trump popularized, which was export controls.

So the Biden administration further increased the export controls on AI chips to China.

So this would make sure China can't smuggle them as easily or have access to them. But I think the Trump administration could go much further on both of those dimensions of making sure the government is aware of what's going on at the labs and also making sure that China can't smuggle important AI chips. How important is it to have someone like Elon Musk be in the ether and part of this administration?

Well, I think Elon brings a lot of technical understanding to the problem, as well as he takes the risks and benefits very seriously. For instance, Elon thinks that maybe there's a 20 to 30 percent chance that when we get extremely powerful AI systems, this could mean doom for humanity. And he's not uncommon for thinking this. Many other CEOs running these companies, the CEO of OpenAI, the CEO of Anthropic, many other AI company leaders also think that there are a lot of risks and benefits to manage.

So I think if the Trump administration focuses on preserving national security, then that can go well. They shouldn't and obviously won't pursue things like trying to make AIs be woke. This is a background problem for some of the AI models that they tend to be biased toward left as opposed to right position.

So if the Trump administration isn't doing things that the Biden admin would have through some of its agencies, Focus on these sorts of topics and just focuses on national security, I think all this will go well. Yeah, we were having a conversation with Gemini the other day about what is the role of government, at least as it was laid out in the preamble of the Constitution. And Gemini said that universal health care was one of the things that the founding fathers wanted. And there is nothing to suggest that that is the case. And, you know, we challenged Gemini on that.

And she had to admit that, yes, there was nothing in the founding documents or the Federalist papers that would suggest that the Founding Fathers thought that universal health care was a good thing. But that obviously is a popular leftist belief and talking point.

So it makes you realize how these things are programmed.

Now, aside from the philosophical programming that some of these systems have undergone, is it possible? Possible in such a competitive environment to have these titans of emerging industry come together for the sake of national security?

Well, I think they're going to have to. Right now, they're already racing, so they're making sure that the U.S. has national competitiveness, and this will be important for economic strength, and economic security is national security.

So they're already doing their part there. There are parts in which they're much weaker. For instance, their weights, the the the code that Is used to define the model, sort of the patterns that define the neural connections in these AI systems. It's very easy to steal.

So China could just steal it.

So if the US is saying, we're going to pull ahead, we're going to try and race with China, well, all China needs to do is just hack into these computers and steal those weights. Very easy to do for them right now, and it'd be very hard to defend against that.

So that's something that AI companies could do to improve national security and a relative edge compared to China, is making sure people can't easily steal their weights. How much animosity is there between Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Mark Zuckerberg? I mean, human relationships aren't ever set in stone. Obviously, there's a courtroom drama going on between OpenAI and Elon right now, since OpenAI is converting itself from a nonprofit to a for-profit, where the premise of OpenAI was to democratize the benefits to everyone and not become a ravenous for-profit company.

So this is creating some tension between the two. As for Zuck here, I mean, obviously, they're trying to extend an olive branch to the next administration as well as to Elon separately. Zuck and Sam donated a million dollars to Trump's inaugural fund.

So it looks like everybody's or it looks like they're changing their strategies a bit as opposed to Putting out biased large language models now, they're trying to get in the President's graces.

So will that be short-lived, or do you think this is a paradigm shift where there there may be balance in the models themselves? I would hope that it extends down to the models because this has created a very inappropriate conflation between managing the risks and making AI systems woke.

So, right now, the models are fairly censorious, and then they call that safety. This is not what I think of when I think of safety, or what Elon thinks of when he thinks of safety.

So, hopefully, the models will stop censoring and getting uptight whenever you ask it about any interesting question or ask it to make a joke. That's not safety. We should just be focused on the national security implications of AI, or that should be the primary concern. And these other culture-aware things should not enter the discussion of how to mitigate the risks from AI. All right, so let's listen to CUT 24.

This is Mark Andreessen, who obviously is a venture capitalist, Netscape founder, along with other tech companies. Here's what he has to say about AI and censorship on the Honestly podcast. Take a listen.

Social media went on this arc that I've described from like 2013 to today. Where they became a censorship machine. AI has gone on a hyper-accelerated version of that arc. It happened basically right up front. It took time for social media to become a censorship machine.

It happened on AI right from the beginning. It happened on AI right from the beginning because the AI companies learned from the experience of the social media companies and they just said, well, if we're going to end up building a censorship machine over a decade, we might as well just do it up front. Mark, are you saying it's intentional or it's just learning off of information? Yeah, please go on. It's 100% intentional.

Yeah. So that's how you get black George Washington at Google is because somebody there's there's an override in the system that basically says everybody has to be like literally everybody has to be black. Boom. Right? Like there's squads, there are large sets of people in these companies that determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.

So overwhelmingly what people experience is intentional. There's just no question about that.

So, uh, Dan, when AI actually achieves consciousness and uh self-awareness. What kind of political bent do you think it will have?

Well, so I have a paper coming out next month, which basically looks at the fact that AI systems have in them a value system that nobody explicitly put in there. Even before humans intervene directly on the AIs, they seem to have a value system that they learn from the Internet, and it generally skews toward them being left.

So the highest sentiment entity in GPT-4, as we'll show, is Barack Obama, followed by Neil deGrasse Tyson. And around zero in value, but a bit more positive than zero in value, is Elon Musk, and the negative is Donald Trump for these systems.

So this is a problem With the models that users are facing, that they have an implicit bias that these things are good, these things are bad. And what's also concerning is that they rank. other AIs as higher value than middle class Americans and Elon and Trump.

So they're valuing other AI agents as having more value than individual people.

So this is a problem that has only recently emerged With the latest generations of models, and we'll need to confront this and redefine what their values are. One possibility is to make them match the values of the public.

So imagine that people voted that is this more valuable than that? And if you had a vote on that, model should possibly reflect that instead. That would be a more legitimate basis for the values compared to whatever programmers in San Francisco wanted to say or whatever it happens to think before humans have started customizing it before it's deployed. When will AI systems become unoverwritable?

Well, if they're very powerful and if they have goals separate from yours, then that can become very challenging.

So right now we can do that. But if they, for instance, are able to escape in the future, then it's basically game over if they can exfiltrate themselves.

So that would require capabilities that they don't have currently. They can't perform tasks over very long time horizons. They do have some ability to deceive people, but there are other capabilities they would need to pull that type of thing off. But if they were to eventually escape, then that would be a substantial challenge that I don't know if we would recover from. And this is why people like Elon and others think that this is risky business and will get much riskier in time and that we need to be proactive about it, because all it would take is one of these running around, and we wouldn't have necessarily much recourse.

So it depends. But this is more of a future concern, although AI is moving very quickly.

So maybe we'd bump into the issue in just a few years.

So there are people, I mean, Elon Musk is one of them, Eric Schmidt, you know, and there are others who feel like we are on a collision course with that. I tend to be not as worried about it, just based on some of the conversations that I have had with other AI experts. Where do you land on that spectrum? I I think it's like I think it's like nuclear weapons in that, like, what's the probability this all goes wrong?

Well, we took care of arms control. We managed it. There was a strategic competition between the US and the Soviets, and we have a similar one of the US and China. This is a big deal. This will become more important later.

But Uh it's not inevitable that it goes poorly. And it's not inevitable that everything will sort itself out automatically. There needs to be proactive efforts to ensure national security on this front. And I think the Trump administration can do that by making sure the government knows what's going on inside of these labs, by making sure that the weights aren't being stolen, and by making sure that China is not also smuggling AI chips that they could use to build extremely powerful AI systems. See, I feel the way about China, the way I do about recovering drug addicts.

Like, if you feel like they're doing something, if you feel like they're abusing drugs, the probability is very high that they are. If you feel like China is capable of smuggling chips and co-opting AI, then they probably already are. But what I want to know from your perspective, is is AI and where we are with artificial intelligence, a natural evolution of intelligence. And if so, if there are societies, alien societies out there who are hundreds of thousands of years advanced of us, do they have something that could override our AI? And if it gets to the point where we are almost on the verge of planetary destruction, is that when the aliens will intervene?

So there's a lot there. I think the analogy that AIs are sort of the next stage in evolution or a potential successor species is an apt analogy. In fact, the AI in CryptoZAR, David Sachs said as much on Twitter last year.

So some people, concerningly in the tech community, think that that's a good thing. Many people, like Elon and others, are on Team Human, but if I recall correctly, one of the Google co-founders got in an argument with Elon Musk a long time ago, which got him concerned about AI, that the Google co-founders said, AIs are the successor species. They are the natural heir, and we therefore shouldn't try to control them. And this is not too uncommon of a sentiment, even in San Francisco. There are others.

There are other people, such as they're called effective accelerationists. And Richard Sutton, the author of one of the main AI textbooks, thinks that we should not resist succession and that we should welcome our new overlords, this new successor species.

So this is some techno-optimism sort of run amok, and I think it's quite concerning. But I would agree that when you get AIs that can do everything humans can do and are smarter than any individual person, this creates a challenge for humanity. And it doesn't just pose a national security risk, that poses a human security risk. Yeah, and maybe we're on the precipice of that, but I'm still in the optimist corner. And I don't know why.

Maybe I will be proven wrong to my detriment and to planetary detriment, but it's still very exciting to think. And part of it is maybe I like the chaos. And, you know, The great unknown. Like, we don't know where we're going. Like, Pandora's box is open.

We can't pull the plug for a while and just stop everything because are we on an exponential graph in terms of how quickly AI learns, or is it still geometric?

So, it is exponential and it's moving very quickly. I wouldn't suggest stopping it right now. There was a pause letter last year, for instance, that I didn't sign.

So, I don't think the strategy would be to stop it, just like with nuclear weapons. You don't say, well, nuclear weapons are dangerous, therefore we'll never build any because then other people will build them, and that will put you in a very desperate situation.

So, we're going to have to build AI systems and diffuse them throughout the economy and make sure our military uses them to stay competitive, all of that. But there's making sure that terrorists don't use them or that adversaries don't get those capabilities before everybody else or before the U.S.

So, I think that's the way in which we should engage in risk management and proceeding in a risk-conscious way. But I'm not concerned about the existing AI systems, to be clear. The GPT-4 and the latest models do not concern me. It's more that we're on a fast trajectory and it will happen so quickly. That we will need to be proactive about risk mitigation.

And I think the best way to do that is to focus on the national security-related risks. Dan Hendricks, I like the way you think so much. I really appreciate you taking time out of your day to explain something very complicated and make it digestible.

So, thanks again. Mm-hmm. Good day. Thank you. You too.

This is the Brian Kilmead Show. It's Kennedy in for Killmead. Yeah. It's Brian Kilmead. He's so busy, he'll make your head spin.

It's Brian Killmead. Oh, hi there. in our waning moments this hour. It has been my pleasure to fill in for Brian Kilmead on the Brian Kilmead show. I feel bad for Brian because he doesn't have enough hours in the day to broadcast.

He only has three hours in the morning on Fox and Friends on the Fox News channel and just a measly three hours on this radio show. It leaves him a lot of time to write books, though, which is good for him. He has been just an absolute gem to work with. I love working with him. It's very fun filling in for him.

And thank you so much for listening. If you want a little bit more of the action, I encourage you to go to foxnewspodcast.com and download Kennedy Saves the World. It is my podcast that I do five days a week on Mondays. I always talk with Jimmy Phela and we download everything that happened over the weekend. Obviously, a big weekend in sports.

There was a phenomenal holiday party that took place Friday night that we will get to on today's episode. I'm going to talk to some astrologers this week about the coming Friday. Forecast for the year, and I am always looking out for you and ways to save your world and make your life happier, more productive, prosperous, and of course, sexier.

So, thank you so much for tuning in in advance. And thank you for being a part of the broadcast. I will talk to you very, very soon. The Brian Kill Meet Show signing off. I'm Kennedy.

Jason and the House, the Jason Chaffetz Podcast. Dive deeper than the headlines and the party lines as I take on American life, politics, and entertainment. Subscribe now on FoxNewsPodcast.com or wherever you download podcasts. Listen to the show ad-free on Fox News Podcast Plus, on Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music with your Prime membership, or subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Hmm.