Downy Rinse & Refresh.
Break up with stinky clothes. Rinse it up. Every now and then I get a little bit tired of the stinks that just will never come out.
Oh, I'm downy in the wind straight. Every now and then I rinse it out. One wash and it delivers. One wash it smells so clean. Downy Rinse & Refresh. It's a dream. Downy Rinse & Refresh.
Fights odor in just one wash. Guaranteed. The following program is sponsored by What's Right, What's Left Ministries, and is responsible for its content. Portions of the following program may be pre-recorded. I am Pastor Ernie Sanders, the voice of the Christian Resistance. Stay tuned, my radio broadcast, What's Right, What's Left, is coming up right now.
Coming to you live from Independence, Ohio. We change our life for the better in many different ways. Heard around the world every Monday through Friday. Pastor Sanders is always years ahead of the rest of the media telling you exactly what they're covering up.
This is What's Right, What's Left. I tune in every chance I get to hear exactly what's going on with the voice of the Christian Resistance. Unabashedly cutting through the rhetoric by exposing the hard topics facing our society and world.
A lot of the other news medias don't pick up the news items like he does. And bring into light the enemies of freedom who are out to steal your rights, your children, and enslaving you. You really get the truth out. I can tune into your show and hear the unvarnished truth.
Thank you. This is What's Right, What's Left with Pastor Ernie Sanders. Good evening and welcome to another edition of What's Right, What's Left. The voice of the Christian Resistance on the 17th day of February 2025. This is pledge week, pledge week folks, pledge week. So, get ready. Out there in the phone booth, we have pastors mighty men out there.
We have Eric and Lee. And there at the helm, at the controls, we have none other, okay, than the man himself, Kenny. Captain Kenny here at the controls. Good evening, Pastor. Good evening.
And here in the studio with me with a cackle, we have none other than the studio man, Little Lisa. Good evening, everyone. And we're going to start off tonight, we have to start off with prayer. We just got message tonight that the host of Monday night's round table comes on here an hour or two before me. George Sattari has not been here the last couple weeks and I wondered what's going on.
Well, George has got a very, very bad body infection and so he is doing, he is very ill. So, we're going to pray for him right now. Remember folks, there's power in prayer, there's a lot of power in prayer. It's very important to think about this. Every time you pray for someone, all your prayers are heard and they're kept in heaven and God has a record of every time you pray for somebody. So, if you would pray, join with me, join with me and just pray along with me because George needs it and one day every one of us will need prayer.
And that's just a fact. And so, let's just pray. Heavenly Father, Lord God, I want to hold up George.
Lord, I don't know all the details but I talk to him, he's very, very sick. Lord, I just would ask, Lord, that you would touch him tonight, Father God, Lord, that you would touch him, that he might receive a healing. And Lord God, that he would receive, in every area where he could receive a blessing, he would receive that blessing. And I know, Lord, that he's been, he's been down now for a couple weeks.
I just found out and we know, Lord, in these days with the, his business is hurting, he hasn't been here, so again, Lord, help him and bless him in the finances, bless him with a healing, Lord. And then, Lord, turn his desires towards you more and more. And everyone that's listening to me right now, Lord, let their desires be turned towards you more and more every day in every way. In Jesus' name we pray. Amen.
Amen. Alrighty, we have, okay, Little Lisa pledges $125, Wendy Wilson pledges $351, Deacon John pledges $100. Alright, the numbers are 888-281-1110, that's the credit card number, folks.
888-281-1110, or 888-677-9673, 888-677-9673. Tonight, we have, we're going down and the last, well, the last of our, our pastor Ernie, 50 years, parts one and two. So, we've got, I'm not sure how many left, probably somewhere in the area about, only about 30 left and we're going to be moving on to parts five and six because parts three and four has got to be redone. And the content's not bad, it's just, I don't look good in those.
I mean, I don't look good on the good days, but it's really bad in those there. Anyhow, so we're going to redo number three and four. Anyhow, so here's the deal, $25 each for one of the DVDs and we have the Bible answer book, the Bible answer book, that's that little red book that is next to my Bible, that's my favorite book right there. And it really, well, when you have a question, when you have a, on the topic, whatever, it's there to help you, it can make you smart, it really can. And so, I encourage you, now that $25 donation, we ask $25 donation, or if you get one of each, you get one of the DVDs and the little red book, you can get both for $40 and you can save $5 on each one.
That's the deal, that's the real deal. So, with that, the title of the message this week, what was the title of that message? Anyhow, okay, the title of the message was those that wallow in profanity, those that wallow in profanity. Man, here, you know, at first I thought that I was the only one that was cognizant of the sudden increase, it seemed like there was a huge increase in profanity spewing out like an open sewer. I was watching cable on the internet and the print medium. Just one cable news broadcast, five female and one male reprobates, and these were all Democrats, folks, unbelievable, spewed the F word some multiple times. One thing that state representative said, I've never done this before, but now I feel I must. And with a strange gaggle of laughter, she shouted, F U Trump, F U Musk, F U Doge. I wonder if she understands what it means, what she's saying, okay? Anyhow, even Jesse Waters mockingly parodying the Democrats referred to President Trump and, what's his name, the kid that weren't as big, well, they used to call it kahunis. Kahunis, yes.
Stones. You know, this, you know, I mean, where's the respect, you know? And here now, at a sanctuary state city council meeting, here would be a sanctuary city council meeting, four reprobates there, and that took place in Massachusetts. You had this woman dressed in clerical garb. She professed to be a pastor. She was a woman pastor, right?
Well, anyhow, she said when Jesus returns, he will probably be either a sodomite or a transgender when he returns. This is unbelievable. It doesn't surprise me. They've lost their mind. They've gone crazy.
Yeah, I mean, they're stuck in a world of pretend and make-believe. Yeah. Then after getting up there and doing all that cursing, using all that profanity, the screamers went on to sing communist union songs from the 30s. Like I said at the beginning of this commentary, at first I thought that I was the only one that was noticing the upsurge in profanity. Then I heard several news media commentaries noting the sudden increase. But here's the thing.
It's not just amongst the heathen, those on the left. You have Joe Rogan. I mean, Joe Rogan was spouting profanities like it was, you know, where's the integrity there? And then Greg Reese. You know, I never thought, I mean, Greg Reese is a professing Christian. I never thought I would hear these people dropping the F-bomb like they're doing, but they're dropping the F-bomb.
Unbelievable. So, with that, all right, we have Bob and Queens Pledges 500 in New York. Thank you, Bob. And so, we're going to start tonight and see what God's Word of Bible has to say about all that. And we're going to start over in Exodus chapter 1 with just one verse.
Chapter 20, I mean, Exodus 20, verse 7. Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. At one time I used to own furniture stores, and in the furniture store, over the counter, we had a sign that says, God's last name is not damn. Taking the Lord's name in vain will not be tolerated.
And this establishment was very clear because it's something that really, really aggravates me. I hate to see people taking God's name in vain. It's just like, you know, where's the reverence there? It really is just a simple commandment.
It's very simple and easy to follow. It's not hard to not take the Lord's name in vain. So, when people do it, it's irritating. It's frustrating. It is.
It is. When they do it like, well, and here, and when they do it without thinking, and I'm talking about professing Christians, okay, you know, that take, that use the GD. Then, but, and how many times have you heard professing Christians say, Jesus Christ, Kenny, what have you done? Okay. I've heard that a lot. Yeah.
But they don't realize what they're doing. You don't use, you don't say, and take the name and use it like that, or when you hear people say, and I know that they don't, sometimes they don't mean disrespect, but they don't understand. You're supposed to approach God with fear and trembling, you know, and reverence, and when they say things like, you know, well, now I've been praying to the big guy upstairs, you know. You don't call him the big guy upstairs, right? Okay. Or, you know, the man, the man. No, the Bible in fact says, pardon? He's not a man. Right. The Bible says God is not a man, right? That he should repent. Okay.
And so, here, I don't know, people are not cognizant, but others, they're, let me ask you this. Do you ever hear anyone ever say, Buddha, dammit? No. What about, have you ever heard anyone say, Allah, dammit? No. No.
You don't hear that? No other religion. Only people that profess that they believe in God will take whoever they believe. Well, anyhow, I'm going to jump over to 1 Timothy chapter 4. And in 1 Timothy chapter 4, we're going to, verses 6 through 10, if thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shall be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished up in words of faith and of good doctrine, whereunto thou hast attained. But refuse profane and old-wived fables, and exercise thyself rather in godliness, for bodily exercise profiteth a little, but godliness profitable unto all things, having the promise of the life that is now in is, and of that which is to come. This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, for therefore we both labor and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the savior of all men, especially of those that believe.
Now, let me ask you a question here, when he says here, but refuse profane and old-wived fables, exercise therefore rather in godliness. Now, what are some of those old-wived fables, things that you've heard, you know, that the Bible talks about, and of course, there's a lot of those things today, I mean, we could actually call some of, well, the feminist movement today, old-wived fables, some of what they have to say out there. But here, remember, Kenny, what they used to teach, if a woman could not get pregnant, if her womb was closed, that it was because she had offended God, or that she had sinned. Or God had, and they used Sarah and Elizabeth, they're two very good, and Hannah, three very good examples of that. But you know, that's old-wived fables because God made it very clear that he closed their womb for a special reason, okay?
And it fell out to his glory, didn't it? Absolutely. Okay, what about those women that had a number of kids that were wicked women, like Jezebel, Athelia, her daughter? Those were wicked women, and yet they had, some of them tried to kill their own grandchildren.
Athelia did it. Just because you were able to have children doesn't necessarily mean that you were doing everything correct, you know, we know that by all the people today that are having children out of wedlock and then going and aborting them too, you know? I mean, just because you're able to produce children doesn't necessarily mean that you're in God's favor. We know this.
Absolutely. Alright, so those were some of the things that weren't true, and they were profane. There were a number, actually there were some things in the Bible that we really, I don't know if we really wanted to talk about on here, but they were referred to the uncleanness. But I want to go over to 2 Timothy 2. And in 2 Timothy chapter 2, well I was there.
Should just be the next page over. Okay, there you go, ready? 2 Timothy chapter 2 verses 16-19, but shun profane and vain babblings. Boy are there a lot of vain babblings today out there.
Boy have we been hearing the vain babblings. You know, they're coming loud and clear from the Democratic Communist Party, for they will increase into more ungodliness, and their word will eat, as does the canker of whom Hymenaeus and Philetus, you know, Hymenaeus and Philetus, they were apostate Christians. And you know, what they did, who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already, and overthrow the faith of some. Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, the Lord knoweth them that are his, and let everyone that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
Now, so what do you think it was that they did that upset the apostle Paul so much? Saying that the rapture has already happened? Yeah, the rapture had taken place, and that here God had left you behind, he didn't want you.
You got double-crossed, you know, it's too late. And so here, that's where Paul says, now concerning the truth have erred, saying the resurrection is past already, and overthrow the faith of some. Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, the Lord knoweth them that are his. And that tells you very clearly that God knows who his people are, and he won't leave them behind, will he?
No. Okay, Tony in Toronto pledges 125. Thank you, Tony. Tony always matches Lisa. Thank you, Tony.
Alright, the phone numbers are 888-281-1110, that's 888-281-1110, or, and that's credit card numbers, or 888-677-9673. You know, we have some clips there, you know, people agreeing kind of, Newt Gingrich had something to say about that, and what the profanity, so go ahead and play those clips. I say **** Trump! We have to **** Trump! I was gonna say ****, but no, we're not, no, I'm not gonna say that.
What they meant to say? **** Donald Trump and Elon Musk! I mean, after all, Elon Musk spent 277 million dollars to buy Donald Trump's **** and put it in the White House, right? I mean, first of all, when I watched the video you showed, I concluded that it was a real commentary on the decay of American education. That you had all these so-called leaders who were utterly, totally incapable of speaking in an understandable way. I mean, going around yelling curse words, if you're an elected member of Congress, is just stupid. And it tells you how much our education system has decayed, that this is the best the Democrats can produce.
Go ahead, and you had that clip also of Vice President Vance, I believe. And unfortunately, when I look at Europe today, it's sometimes not so clear what happened to some of the Cold War's winners. I look to Brussels, where EU commissars warn citizens that they intend to shut down social media during times of civil unrest, the moment they spot what they've judged to be, quote, hateful content. Or to this very country, where police have carried out raids against citizens suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online as part of, quote, combating misogyny on the internet, a day of action. I look to Sweden, where two weeks ago the government convicted a Christian activist for participating in Koran burnings that resulted in his friend's murder. And as the judge in his case chillingly noted, Sweden's laws to supposedly protect free expression do not, in fact, grant, and I'm quoting, a free pass to do or say anything without risking offending the group that holds that belief.
And perhaps most concerningly, I look to our very dear friends, the United Kingdom, where the backslide away from conscience rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular, in the crosshairs. A little over two years ago, the British government charged Adam Smith Connor, a 51-year-old physiotherapist and an army veteran, with the heinous crime of standing 50 meters from an abortion clinic and silently praying for three minutes. Not obstructing anyone, not interacting with anyone, just silently praying on his own. After British law enforcement spotted him and demanded to know what he was praying for, Adam replied simply, it was on behalf of the unborn son he and his former girlfriend had aborted years before.
Now, the officers were not moved. Adam was found guilty of breaking the government's new buffer zones law, which criminalizes silent prayer and other actions that could influence a person's decision within 200 meters of an abortion facility. He was sentenced to pay thousands of pounds in legal costs to the prosecution. Now, I wish I could say that this was a fluke, a one-off, crazy example of a badly written law being enacted against a single person. But no, this last October, just a few months ago, the Scottish government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so-called safe access zones, warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law. Naturally, the government urged readers to report any fellow citizen suspected guilty of thought crime. In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat. Well, that was powerful.
You know, that really was, it is so good to hear someone stand up there and tell the truth. I mean, just think of what we had. You know, just think, if we could have had Joe Baba and, or even worse. Or four years of Kamala. Yeah.
Oof. I mean, I don't know that, you know, here, we're at the point, totally immoral. Joe Biden is a completely, totally immoral person. The man, everything that God's word in the Bible called a sin. A sin. When we asked why the Catholic Church did not excommunicate him, the answer came out 59 billion reasons. And the money that they had been getting from this U.S. AIDS. Unbelievable.
The Catholic Charities. Just unbelievable. But these are the days that we're living in today. And so, already, Mary in Toronto, or no, Mary in Ohio pledges 300. Thank you, Mary. All right, folks. The lines are busy and that's good.
Keep them ringing. We really do need to hear from you this week. So, I hope you got the pledge, the newsletter.
This should be, if you haven't, you should be getting it at any time now. Here's one, you wanted to know what's happening with that AIDS money, the U.S. AIDS money. Chelsea Clinton, folks.
Chelsea Clinton receives funding from USAID, U.S. AIDS, allocated by Obama for her foundation, which provides afternoon meals to children in Africa, India, and Bangladesh. Well, that's a good thing to provide afternoon meals, okay? But here's the problem, folks.
Now listen to this. However, as of today, the reported number of meals served stands at 11,886, implying an astonishing cost of $1,410 per meal. Well, I mean, those are expensive meals. I'm sure they've got steak and shrimp and caviar. What do you think that they're feeding these children in each meal? You don't suppose that there's a whole lot of kickbacks coming, right? Oh, I don't know. It doesn't add up, and none of it ever will. It never will. Chelsea's net worth is $70 million.
How? Her husband's net worth is $45 million. Her inheritance was $52 million. USAID earnings are $3.9 million per year. Yes, see, she gets paid virtually $4 million a year to serve meals to these children at a price of $1,410 per meal. Her real estate assets are $25 million. And she spends monthly, she spends $100,000, and she has eight cars.
That's absolutely absurd. I was answering the phone earlier when you said Mary, so I wanted to make sure she got her applause. All right, since you're on it, give Carl one too. He pledged $325. Carl from Cleveland, yep.
All right, very good. You had that little clip by Marco Rubio too. Yeah, Marco Rubio was on, I believe it was CBS with Margaret Brennan, and they were talking about J.D. Vance's speech that we just played, and she was trying to make a connection between free speech and the Holocaust, which was just completely absurd, and Rubio kind of gave her a little lesson.
This is pretty good. Listen. He was standing in a country where free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide, and he met with the head of a political party that has far-right views and some historic ties to extreme groups. The context of that was changing the tone of it, and you know that, that the censorship was specifically about the right.
No, I have to disagree with you. Free speech was not used to conduct a genocide. The genocide was conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also be genocidal because they hated Jews and they hated minorities and they hated those. They had a list of people they hated, but primarily the Jews. There was no free speech in Nazi Germany. There was none. There was also no opposition in Nazi Germany. They were a sole and only party that governed that country, so that's not an accurate reflection of history.
I also think it's wrong. Again, I go back to the point of his speech. The point of his speech was basically that there is an erosion in free speech and intolerance for opposing points of view within Europe, and that's of concern because that is eroding. That's not an erosion of your military capabilities.
That's not an erosion of your economic standing. That's an erosion of the actual values that bind us together in this transatlantic union that everybody talks about. And I think allies and friends and partners that have worked together now for 80 years should be able to speak frankly to one another in open forums without being offended, insulted, or upset. And I spoke to foreign ministers from multiple countries throughout Europe. Many of them probably didn't like the speech or didn't agree with it, but they were continuing to engage with us on all sorts of issues that unite us. So, again, at the end of the day, I think that people give all kinds... That is a forum in which you're supposed to be inviting people to give speeches, not basically a chorus where everyone is saying the exact same thing. That's not always going to be the case when it's a collection of democracies where leaders have the right and the privilege to speak their minds in forums such as these.
All right, we're back. I guess he told her, right? I mean, how could you say... I can't believe that she was saying that it was the free speech that caused the Holocaust.
Free speech for the right to genocide. Yeah. Unbelievable. And they wonder why... I heard another one of their talking heads complaining about how now they're the minority, what they call the mainstream again. So, they're parroting each other saying, we no longer... we don't have the support. The people have let us down. We were there. We've been there for the people, and they've let us down. We're no longer... you have Democrats now that are listening to conservative talk radio.
I mean, just really... Well, they're the minority because it became blatantly obvious to everyone else that they were only there for themselves. Right. Well, you had these people, a number of them, actually saying that when this Stahl person... what was her first name?
Leslie Stahl. Yeah. That we did this to ourselves. They're saying we didn't tell the truth. Yeah.
Well, she's right. They didn't. Finally said something truthful. And then you had the CEO of NPR. By the way, I believe that NPR is getting defunded. Yeah. It looks like they're going to.
And did you see Cheryl Crow, the singer? She sold her Tesla truck and donated the money to NPR. So, it's already working. They're getting donations from someone else.
They don't need taxpayer money. Wait a minute. You see here. If she sold her truck, that means she must have owned her truck. And that means that she'd already paid for it, right? Yes. Elon already has her money for that. Yeah. Yeah. So, he already got... She gave up on going green to support NPR because what's she going to buy now?
Probably a gas-powered vehicle. It's unbelievable. The CEO of NPR actually came out and said that, yes, we don't always tell the truth because sometimes it doesn't make as much sense to tell the truth as to what we do. And she said that out loud in a forum, talking to people. It wasn't like someone caught her on hidden camera. She had a microphone in her hand talking to people, telling them this. Yeah. And she wonders what she did wrong. Sometimes it makes me think that maybe there's a lot of empty space in the attic. Yeah.
They're not very bright. Yeah. Anyhow, Dorothy in Illinois pledges 100. Thank you, Dorothy.
Those numbers are 888-281-1110 or 888-677-9673. Folks out there, we've been talking for years about the CIA. We've been telling you that they've become like their own country. They've become rogue, an agency within an agency, if you will. And I remember years ago, when we were reporting, now at one point, Ronald Reagan actually wanted to strengthen the limits of the CIA, but then he changed his mind at the end. He wanted to eliminate them, okay? JFK wanted to eliminate the CIA. He wanted it gone, okay? Trump talked about eliminating them at one point as well.
I said Trump talked about it as well. What do all three of those have in common? Yeah, well, they've all been shot. They've all been shot. I'm not saying it was the CIA, but I mean, here's the dots. If you want to connect them, let's see what picture you get.
Yeah, well, the CIA's got a good reputation for assassinating people, okay? But anyhow, we're going to play sections of this now. Here, we're going to play maybe five or seven minutes, and then I'll have to make the pledge for money, so we've got to keep the phone lines ringing. But you really need to listen to this. It's very, very interesting, and I might do an article in between, but we're going to go with this clip.
It's actually kind of a long clip because it's got many parts to it, so go ahead, and would you take that away? Okay, Mike, before we get into the scandals, we have so destroyed the intelligence operations in this country that people don't even really understand what the CIA is supposed to do. What are they supposed to do? Well, the CIA is supposed to be a plausibly deniable support organization for the U.S. Department of State on national interest grounds and the U.S. Department of Defense on national security grounds, which is a long way of saying that in 1948, when the rules-based international order was set up, we needed a way for the State Department to operate a cloak-and-dagger, plausibly deniable black ops shop in order to do the sorts of things that would cause a diplomatic scandal if it turned out the U.S. government was responsible for. So the U.S. government needed a way to make things happen without looking like the U.S. government did it, and when it's State Department related, that's usually on U.S. economic grounds or political grounds, and when the CIA work is related to military, it's usually involving paramilitary groups or terrorist groups or other unseemly factions that we are providing military support to. So there's both a political and a military component to what the CIA is supposed to do. The problem is because they are a professional political subversive organization literally set up to inaugurate organized political warfare. That's the exact term that George Kennan used in his 1948 memo, the inauguration of organized political warfare, to give the CIA its remit. That is, that political warfare can boomerang back on Americans when the U.S. foreign policy establishment thinks that Americans are domestically going to vote for someone who will undermine their preferred foreign policy agenda. That's what you saw in the 1960s when the CIA was playing around at home to influence left-wing groups to stop the anti-Vietnam War movement. That's what you're seeing today as the CIA is working to basically do the same thing to the right wing when it comes to the anti-war or the nationalist rather than globalist wing of the Republican Party. Now, 1948 to the 60s is not by any stretch of the imagination a long period of time, Mike.
So why did they face inward so quickly or did they really just face inward from the very beginning? Well, you could argue that they did from the very beginning. I think it was that the 1960s is when there really was a break in the bipartisan consensus when it came to the construction of the American empire. There was a fair amount of optimism from the late 1940s into the early 1960s about the purpose of American statecraft and establishing America as the global hegemon in the face of the Cold War with Russia. In the 1960s, the rise of the civil rights movement, the rise of third world people's movements and anti-imperialist movements, also influenced to some degree by the popularity of Marxism in U.S. universities, led to a breaking of the Republican-Democrat consensus as this ascendant coalition within the Democrats pushed against U.S. interventionalism around the world and pushed against the war in Vietnam. And then that resulted in scandals during the CIA's history starting in the early 1960s. There was something called Operation Chaos, which was a big disaster for the CIA when it was revealed the CIA was personally intervening in campus politics by sponsoring groups like the National Students Association to effectively bribe young people to write counter propaganda against the harder left faction. The CIA was busted constructing front groups like the Congress for Cultural Freedom where they were taking high-level U.S. musicians, writers, thought leaders, poets, visual artists, musical artists into a sort of CIA artist club.
This included not just classical musicians, jazz musicians, writers from high-level magazines, but also feminist thought leaders like Gloria Steinem. And this was all Gloria Steinem herself would later describe her role in the CIA-sponsored Congress for Cultural Freedom as saying that the reason it was so important for the CIA to focus on culture was because you can think of culture as permanent politics. When culture is established, it sets the boundaries for what politics can and can't do. And so a group like the CIA, whose role is political subversion, first and foremost sets its sights on control over the culture, which sets the bounds for the politics. During that same period in the 1960s and 70s, the CIA was busted in other scandals like assassinations of foreign leaders. They assassinated the president of Congo, Lumumba. They assassinated Allende in Chile. They were busted with constructing assassination weapons like the heart attack gun that was held up by Senator Frank Church in the Church committee hearings. They were busted in scandals like MK Ultra, which involved effectively behavioral modification programs both at the individual and at the group level to be able to control the psychology of both individuals and political groups. All this came to a head in 1975 and 1976 during the Church committee hearings, which established for the first time in US history a Senate Intelligence Committee and a House Intelligence Committee to be able to have congressional oversight of the rogue CIA.
Jimmy Carter rode to power in 1976. On the back of all this left wing resentment against the CIA, he went to war with the CIA. He fired 30% of the CIA's operations wing in a single night. It was called the Halloween Massacre because it was done on October 31st. He then crippled the CIA's budget and put a CIA director in, Stansfield Turner, who was basically like the left wing cash Patel for the new left Democrats, who basically put huge bumper cars on what the CIA could and couldn't do. At the time, in the 1970s, Bill Barr was working for the CIA.
Let's talk about Ivermectin. We need to, um, the lines aren't ringing or 888-677. Now there you go. That looks like to ring 888-677-9673. Want to remind you out there, folks, that we have the last of the 50 years, parts 1 and 2. Let me read that because, let me see, it says here, now you can get to know him.
That's me. More personally, in the multi-part DVD series, part 1 covers how he got started in the early days with some behind-the-scenes stories of what's right, what's left. There are quite a few things that's very interesting over the years, folks, because I was actually out there on the streets doing these things.
I mean, involved in the courtrooms, being arrested for saving babies, going after, fighting the Clinton mob out there. I mean, we were, 50 years, it wasn't any boring days, it was a lot of action taking place out there. So, anyhow, we got to that. For a donation of $25, we're asking, and if you're absolutely destitute and you can't afford it, let us know, we can help you out there.
Or we have the Bible answer book, those little red books, $25 donation we're asking, or if you want both, you can get one of the DVDs and a little book, both of them, for $40 to save $5 apiece for a donation. Anyhow, Dorothy, no, we did Dorothy, right? Ruben and Brooklyn, that's Brooklyn, New York, not Brooklyn, Ohio.
So, the numbers are 888-281-1110, or 888-677-9673, that's 888-677-9673. Go ahead and let's go back and play a little bit more about the CIA. At the time, in the 1970s, Bill Barr was working for the CIA. Bill Barr would go on to be the Attorney General of the United States twice, including during Trump's term. Bill Barr wrote in his biography that he had wanted to become, he told his high school guidance counselor that he wanted to run the CIA, be the director of the CIA when he grew up. He then worked for the CIA directly out of college and went to law school at George Washington University night school. He went to night law school while he worked for the CIA, and he said that he only decided he didn't want to run the CIA when Stansfield Turner under Jimmy Carter took power and put the reins on what the CIA couldn't do.
Basically, as soon as Bill Barr encountered a CIA leadership who wanted to restrain its cloak and dagger, dark arts powers, Bill Barr said he lost interest in running the CIA at that point, which I think is just kind of funny. But that then led to Ronald Reagan's tenure in the early 1980s. He, of course, came to power on the back of the Iran hostage situation, which the intelligence community in the US argued would have been prevented if the CIA had had its old powers back. So Ronald Reagan quickly went to work trying to get the CIA's old powers back, but ran into a Democrat-controlled Congress who wouldn't let it happen. So he then put the intelligence community through a reorganization that we still live through today, where he basically diffused the CIA's old powers into a pair of institutions, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, so that just as the CIA was created to give a layer of plausible deniability to the State Department, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy became the main plausible deniability layer for the CIA. So it was pushed into this NGO layer, and so I think several of the scandals we're going to be talking about today are at that diffused layer rather than directly at CIA. It's at the CIA liaised rather than CIA run layer, which is where most of CIA work happens nowadays. Which brings us to the first of the scandals, the fake vaccination drive.
What did they do? Yeah, this was a major international scandal. So in 2011, the CIA set up a hepatitis vaccine clinic. They set up a ring of these in Pakistan, and they publicly advertised this to the Pakistani people that these clinics existed in order to vaccinate the local population against hepatitis. In the face of USAID promulgated media that there was a hepatitis outbreak in Pakistan, so everyone needed to get vaccinated.
But it turns out it was actually these were all fake vaccination clinics. The CIA was only luring people into these vaccine clinics in order to collect their biometrics. Now, the official story, as bad as that is, as bad as the official story is, officially when the CIA got busted in this, basically Pakistani intelligence noticed that there was a lot of strange goings on at these vaccine clinics and ultimately discovered that the whole thing was a US intelligence operation that the US later confessed to, to maintain relations with the Pakistani government and publicly apologized for duping everyone with these fake vaccine clinics. They said the only reason we did it is because we were looking for Osama bin Laden, and so we were collecting everyone's biometric and DNA information. They were basically they had a blood sample of the Osama bin Laden family because Osama bin Laden's sister had recently died in Boston, so they collected her blood and they tried to collect the basically the blood of everyone in Pakistan to identify their way up to the Osama bin Laden family.
But of course, even that cover story, as scandalous as that is on its own, I think is quite a whopper of a lie unto itself. You see, as this was playing out, David Petraeus had announced in a doctrine that he called identity dominance, which is part of US counterinsurgency doctrine, that they were having a problem with being able to contain guerrilla anonymous group activity where people were showing up in large crowds in protests. It was hard to be able to pinpoint in targeted strikes all the troublemakers in the area, so they wanted to collect the biometric data and the biological data of what they said was 85% of the population in Iraq, in Syria, in Pakistan, in all these Central Asian conflict zones. And so while the US military had announced that they wanted 85% of the country's DNA and eyeballs so that they would be able to have identity dominance and pick out basically anyone in a crowd, be able to instantly ID anyone who was a troublemaker, they were running these vaccine clinics in order to collect that, which I think if they were busted in Pakistan, there's an open question of how many vaccine clinics were playing this role around the world. There's a lot of terrorist groups. There's terrorist groups in Africa, there's terrorist groups in Eastern Europe, there's terrorist groups in South America. How many of these public health facilities have been operating as CIA fronts?
Adjacent to that in 2014, so that was under the Obama administration, also under the Obama administration in 2014, the CIA was busted running a fake HIV AIDS clinic, which was set up nominally to help solve the HIV. All right, we're back and we're going to pick up on more of this in a little while, but right now Joyce in New Jersey pledges 35. Thank you, Joyce. And the phone lines are open at 888-281-1110. We're going to be taking a quick break here in a second, or 888-677-9673.
We'll be back right after this with a whole lot more, so don't go away. Thank you for listening to What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian resistance. To support this ministry, head to WRWL.org. That's WRWL.org. Mail your donations to What's Right, What's Left Ministries, 14781 Sperry Road, Newberry, Ohio, 44065. If you missed part of tonight's program, you can check out the podcast at thewordcleveland.com, thewordcleveland.com. Once again, thank you for listening and supporting What's Right, What's Left Ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned, the second hour is coming up next.
