The following program is sponsored by What's Right, What's Left Ministries and is responsible for its content.
Portions of the following program may be pre-recorded. I am Pastor Ernie Sanders, the voice of the Christian Resistance. Stay tuned, my radio broadcast, What's Right, What's Left is coming up right now.
Coming to you live from Independence, Ohio. We changed our life for the better in many different ways. Heard around the world every Monday through Friday. Pastor Sanders is always years ahead of the rest of the media telling you exactly what they're covering up.
This is What's Right, What's Left. I tune in every chance I get to hear exactly what's going on with the voice of the Christian Resistance. Unabashedly cutting through the rhetoric by exposing the hard topics facing our society and world.
A lot of the other news media don't pick up the news items like he does. And bringing to light the enemies of freedom who are out to steal your rights, your children and enslaving you. You really get the truth out. I can tune into your show and hear the unvarnished truth.
Thank you. This is What's Right, What's Left with Pastor Ernie Sanders. Good evening and welcome to another edition of What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian Resistance on this winter day of September 2024. And tonight our producer, he's there, he's ready. Just a case like Joe or I should fall asleep. Kenny is ready to step right in and take over.
Good morning. There you go. He's on the ball. Way out here. We've got the legendary, none other than the parson, Pastor Joe Larson.
That's legendary, I don't know. Anyway, your highly unpaid professional assistant is here ready to go to work. Let's do that.
Let's go to work. And Kenny, if you want to join in with us, be ready to jump in any time if you have a question or comment. Do you remember the title of the message, Joe? The Antichrist According to Scripture. There are a lot of things in Scripture that have more than one application and then other things where you can, since they're not salvation issues, you can disagree on them. And we're going to take a look at some of those today and it has to do with the Antichrist.
So let's start in Daniel chapter 11 verses 36 to 38. Go ahead. Kenny did check things. I had to turn my ear volume way up to hear you and I'm sounding real loud. Okay, I'll double check everything. Alright. Yeah, you're coming in loud and clear for me. Okay, you're better there.
36 and how far through 38? Right. And the king shall do according to his will and he shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every God and shall speak marvelous things against the God God of gods and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished for that that is determined shall be done. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers nor the desires of women nor regard any God for he shall magnify himself above all. But in his estate shall he honor the God of forces and a God whom his fathers knew not shall he honor with gold and silver and with precious stones and pleasant things.
Alrighty. Here we're talking about the king is the king of fierce continents that Daniel spoke of in Daniel 8.23. Gabriel also prophesied in the same year as Daniel and you'll see that in Daniel 9.26. So he says and the king shall do according to his will and shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every God and shall speak marvelous things against the God of gods.
Now here, first of all, I want to say this. This is a future God. This is a future king, not a God.
He's a future king. Now a lot of people get confused because he's spoken of in the Old Testament here and Daniel and Gabriel spoke of him. But now throughout history you've had the spirit of antichrist. You've had Judas who was the son of perdition. You had Herod. You had Nero.
You had Antichias. You had a number, in fact today we have that spirit of antichrist in Obama. And others have the spirit of antichrist.
Now, but we're not, we're... Scripture said there were several even at the time of Jesus. Yeah. Yeah, there are many antichrists now, but now we're going to be talking about the antichrist. Right. He was the capital. Right.
Now this one is going to be the world's final. He's going to be the world's final antichrist and he's going to obtain world dominance. And so here, here again he says, and the king shall do according to his will, he shall exalt himself and magnify himself above every god. Now, that god with a small G, O.D., that doesn't mean deity. He's referring to people of authority.
Usually it refers to judges, judges. And he's going to, but people of authority... In this case it's going to be other world leaders, right? Right. In fact it's going to be all world leaders. And so he's going to exalt himself and he shall speak marvelous things against the capital G, against God himself.
Okay? And shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished, for that it is determined shall be done. And so he's going to blaspheme. Do we have people blaspheming God today?
No, do we ever. So, when Oprah said she is her own savior, would you consider that to be blasphemy? Yes, she said I can make my own salvation. That's blaspheming God. That's claiming to be God yourself. When George Soros says he is a god, when he said I am a god, is that blasphemy?
That's blasphemy, yes. Okay. When Kenneth Copeland... The mama said I am the one you've been waiting for. The way he said it, he said I am.
I am, yeah. Then he said... Pause. Right. I am the one, so he said it in that way, I am, pause, the one, pause, that you've been waiting for.
I am, pause, the one, pause, that I've been waiting for. Yeah, I would say that's an esoteric message there, right? Very much so. And so he said, and so he's going to speak out against God himself and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished for that that is determined shall be done. Of course, that's what, that's the 70th week of Daniel until the end of the 70th week of Daniel be completed, huh? Right. Okay, so... God had already said how long it was going to last and what would happen, so he's in control because he's telling us what's going to happen.
Absolutely. Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any God, for he shall magnify himself above all. Now, here's... That means he's human as he's had earthly fathers, right?
Right. Now, he was, what he's referring to, the God of his fathers. See, people mistakenly thinking he's referring to the fathers are Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. That's not who he's referring to. That's not the fathers, those of Israel. That is the fathers of Israel. But see, the Antichrist hasn't come yet. See, this is where people get a little confused. So, anyhow, let me give you an example.
Obviously, you probably know who Henry Morris is. So, it really couldn't be the fathers of the Old Testament because we're a long way from that. We're into the church age. In fact, this will be happening after the end of the church age. Right.
So, now... So, it will have to be the Christian father. Let me, you know who Henry Morris is? Well, he is a Bible scholar and wrote Bible commentary, right? Well, Henry Morris, Ph.D., L.L.D., L.I.T.T.D., former president emeritus, the institution for creation, he's one of the best known Bible scholars in the country today.
And I'm not sure if Henry's still alive or not, but anyhow, he wrote a commentary, and here it is, really. God of the fathers. This phrase, the God of his fathers, would indicate that the Antichrist would come from a national heritage that once was Christian. Daniel 8-9 indicated also that he would come from one of the four divisions of the Greek empire in Daniel 9-26. That he would be from one of the nations that developed out of the Roman empire.
These nations are all part of Christendom. See, this is what people get misunderstood. And so, and they misunderstand that the Antichrist is actually a Gentile.
We'll take a look at that, because he comes up out of the waters. Now, many places in scripture where it refers to, like in Isaiah, where it says the rivers will overflow. And he's not talking about liquid water. The rivers he's referring to are occupying armies will overflow and come against Israel.
And led by kings in that. And then, in other places in scripture where it refers to, well, the waters of the rivers. Well, let's give you an example in Daniel chapter 12. Then I, Daniel, looked and behold, there stood two, there stood another two. The one on this side of the bank of the river and the other side on the other side of the bank of the river. He's referring to, it's got more than one application, but the rivers, the waters, refer to nations.
And so, anyhow, then he said, and one said to the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters. And that, again, refers to the nations, the peoples. Gentile nations, correct? Right, the Gentile nations. How long shall it be to the end of these wonders? But anyhow, so, he goes on, he says, Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women.
The desire of women indicates what? He is homosexual. Right. The anti-Christ is always in total opposition of what Christ stands for.
He's in total whatever. And so, nor regard any God, and again, that's personal authority, world leaders. Right. For he shall magnify himself above all. But in his estate shall he honor the God of forces.
And a God to whom his father knew not, shall he honor with gold and silver and precious stones and pleasant things. Now, do you know what the God of forces is, Joe, that he's referring to? No, I don't remember. Have you heard of a guy named Neptune? Yes. Or Mercury?
Yes. Those are the gods of legend. Well, yeah, but it's environmentalism. It's the mother earth, Gaia. The God of forces, mother earth, where environmentalism today, where people, people are looked upon by the left as parasites on the back of mother earth, on the back of Gaia. This is why they wanted the world depopulation, because they consider us to be parasites on the back, and they consider Gaia the goddess, Gaia. And so, and that's mother earth. So this is, so actually God in this case is female, mother earth is being called a god?
Well, yeah, that's Gaia, that's earth worship. Pretty much any explanation for earthly weather events that does not relate to God. Well, yeah, what you have, environmentalism, let me ask you a question. Are there certain people that are getting very, very wealthy over environmental, environmentalism today in this country? Oh, a great many. Like would Al Gore be one?
That Green New Deal being forked out for the Green New Deal, many people are becoming rich. Would John Kerry be one? Would Joe Biden be one? Yep, yep. So, yeah, there are many.
This is? Al Gore, extremely rich. But this should be the honor of the God of forces and the God whom his fathers knew not, shall he be honored with gold. In other words, they didn't worship the earth back in the days of the early church, did they?
No. And so, anyhow, now they did worship things. People have always worshipped gold and silver. Well, gold and silver is what he gives, the anti-Christ gives to the God of forces. In other words, the environmentalist, the environmental wackos.
They hand out the money, he's handing out, but he's getting his power cut. Right. And so, now turn over to Revelation 13. And in Revelation 13, we're going to read verses 1 through 4. And I stood upon the sand of the seas and saw a beast rise out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion, and the dragon gave him his power and his seat and great authority. And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death, and his deadly wound was healed, and all the world wondered after the beast. Okay, one more verse.
Oh, one more verse. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power to the beast, and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast who is able to make war with him? Okay, so here now, when he said, I stood upon the sand of the sea, and I saw a beast rise up out of the sea. I stood upon the gentile nations, looked over the gentile nations, and saw the antichrist coming out of the sea. Okay, so now the dragon had seven crowns, and those were represented seven kings here. I'm not going to go into all the leopard and all that, because that's a whole sermon in itself.
Right. And of course the beast had ten crowns on the ten horns. Those were like seven historical kingdoms, and ten horns were future kingdoms is what we're referring to there. But here now, so, you saw the beast coming up out of the seas, which were the gentile nations. Now, here, in fact, actually, what Morris wrote in that would be the sea of peoples, the sea of peoples is what he was referring to. In fact, you'll quickly jump over to Revelation 17 and read me verse 15.
All right. And he saith unto me, the waters which thou sawest were where the horse sitteth are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues. Well, see, these are the same waters that we referred to all the way back in Daniel, and here, these same waters referred to here in verse 1 of Revelation 13, where the horse sits. Now, the horror is you have Babylon, the mystery Babylon, the mother of harvests, and you had the three aspects, the three parts.
You had the economic, the political, and the religious. And so here, in fact, all three of them were housed in New York City. By the way, New York City is referred to around the world as Babylon. In fact, going into New York, in a harbor coming in just outside the city, there's a big billboard that says, I don't know if it's still there or not, but it used to be, Welcome to Babylon. And so, anyhow, but I think that's another small town before you get there.
Okay. And so here now, he says, And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, his feet were like the feet of a bear, and his mouth was his mouth. This is the same one talking about over in Daniel. Daniel 7-3.
Daniel 7-3. Now here, listen to this. And I saw one of the heads, as it were, wounded to death, and his deadly wound was healed, and all the world wondered after the beast. Every time I read this, I remember what happened back in 2008 when Obama was inaugurated. I was there in D.C. And all the way down Constitution Avenue, you had these vendors, probably about every 75 yards apiece. I was walking down there with several other pastors.
We walked, and they had these plaques, and I looked at the plaque, I picked one up, and immediately I knew exactly what was happening here, and I showed Paul Rowe was one of the pastors. You know what I mean? What are they saying? What are they telling you here, folks? What it was, Joe, you had this plaque that was probably about 14 inches high and about 18 inches long.
Could be 12 and 16, but we're on that area. But you had, Joe, with that, you had five ovals, and on these five ovals, these are slight ovals, not real, just very slight ovals. You started, if you're looking at it, on the bottom left, if you're holding up in front of you, the bottom left-hand corner, about 8 o'clock, you would have Abraham Lincoln. Then at about 10 o'clock, it was JFK. Right at high noon, you had Martin Luther King. Then at 2 o'clock, you had Robert Kennedy.
And then at 4 o'clock, you had Obama. Now, what did the first four of those four guys all have in common? They were all assassin. They were all shot.
Where? In the head. In the head. Now, we'll ask Kenny, because he's a pretty smart guy.
Hey, Kenny. What was Obama trying to tell? He was sending an esoteric message out there, and these plaques were going into, like, all the black barber shops.
They were putting them in there. The opposition likes to kind of tell you what they're going to do, or at least plant a thought in your mind, don't they? And what do you think that thought would be? If we see Obama get shot in the head, take a shot to the head, die, and then all of a sudden he's back to life.
Obviously is revived somehow. Yeah. That's kind of what falls in line there. If you look at what you're describing in that picture, Lincoln, RFK, JFK, MLK, and then Obama, it's almost trying to foreshadow, if you will.
Yeah. There's a story there, okay? But again, the vast majority of people wouldn't... Like you said, it's an esoteric message. It's a message. Yeah, but the vast majority of people in this country tonight would have no idea they would be clueless. They wouldn't pick up on it because of biblical literacy.
They just think these are famous people, and they probably never bother to think what would they have in common, you know? All righty. Well, here, it's time for us to go to a break.
We're going to hear a little bit about... Remember we told folks, Joe, three weeks before the first person took the first kill shot, remember we said, don't take it? It's not a vaccine. It is not a vaccine. It's a bioweapon. Now you're going to hear from the guy that made it.
So take her away, Ken. Moderna has a patent on the use of RNA for vaccines. It happens to be patent number 2019-024-0317A1. And in that, Moderna explicitly acknowledges that RNA is superior to DNA for vaccine purposes because problems, including the possibility of insertional immunogenesis, which could lead to the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of tumor suppressor genes. So FDA says they're not aware of any concerns, but Moderna in its own patent lays out exactly the same concerns that exist about DNA and insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity.
So Moderna knows it. Was DNA a contaminant? It is a contaminant. It is left in because the way they make it in process two is they purify circular DNA from bacteria. They make the RNA, RNA makes DNA, I'm sorry, DNA makes RNA, RNA makes protein. Okay, so they use DNA to make the RNA, and then they degrade the DNA, and then they have to purify the degraded DNA away from the RNA.
And the process that they're using is apparently not very good. And so they still, and this was just revealed, it was just detected because some scientists, both in the U.S. and in Canada, managed to get their hands on some unopened vials with clear chain of custody, sampled those vials, and these are people who their business is to do deep sequencing on samples and rebuild information about whatever DNA they find on that. So they were just doing the technology that they know how to do in their business that they're experts in, and they found, lo and behold, that there were these large numbers of DNA fragments in this RNA preparation, and they could apply standard tools that they have to reconstruct what those circular plasmid DNAs look like. None of this was disclosed to the public, and it appears that the documentation is that there are certain sequences present that are normally not allowed in anything that's going to go into humans, not the least of which is an antibiotic resistance gene, okay? So this is going, these are going into our bodies, including an antibiotic resistance gene for kanamycin or neomycin.
Normally you're not allowed to do that if it's a DNA engineered for human use, okay? And they include these sequences from simian virus 40, not the whole virus, but highly active promoter sequences, which is exactly the thing that the FDA in their older regulations said must be avoided because it confers even more risk for insertional mutagenesis. And what appears is that Pfizer, when they provided these documents to the FDA and to the EMA and to Health Canada, they took these standard plasmid maps that are generated through programs that we all have access to, and they deleted the little notation that said there's SV40 sequences in there. And the FDA apparently, out of I can only think incompetence, didn't take the raw DNA sequences, reconstruct those plasmid maps, and look at them themselves. They just took for granted what Pfizer had given them. And now this has all come out because of these researchers that did functionally something akin to the lot release testing that is not happening.
There's probably somebody at Pfizer who knew what they were doing. Absolutely. Okay.
And Moderna. And then what are the specific downstream diseases or bad outcomes that come from having these- Anything that is associated with DNA damage. For instance, cancer?
The birth defects in cancer being the notable ones. Okay. Alrighty, there you go. That was Dr. Davis Pfizer and, oh, the other fellow, and I'm having a senior moment, the guy we've been on here before, the one that actually invented the- Oh, yeah, doctor. I've got the article right in front of me, but it's a long article that was abbreviated on the clip. McKernan? No.
I'm trying to- I'm skimming through the article as well. Malone. Dr. Malone. Malone. That's it, Dr. Malone.
He was the one that actually invented the thing. Right. And if you look through this whole thing, it's a lot of very technical stuff, but basically it comes right down to they confirm that the COVID shots are causing cancer. Period.
End of story. And it was detected in two types. The COVID-19 vaccine spike sequence detected in two types of chromosomes in cancer cell lines following exposure to the COVID mRNA shots. And they believe that the DNA contamination of the shots is most likely the cause of the global spike- global spike in cancers. Because what the shots were given, the shots were given around the world, folks. I know. So here- And so it's happening at high rates of cancer in almost every country where they had the vaccines. All right.
There you go. We warned people and warned people and warned people and warned people, didn't we? And this is just, you know, that's added to the heart problems, the problems with- Stroke. Clots in the blood, several other unusual diseases coming up. I mean, this is just one of, well, we could call it a litany of problems with the vaccine, problems including death, the heart, the sudden deaths. And a lot of the people, they said within what, three to five years of the shot would die.
And we're seeing an increase in mortality rates already. Well, ideally- It just baffles me how many people just blindly took it. We're told our entire lives, don't experiment with drugs. And then here's an experimental drug.
Here, take it. But what you see, the people were told by the, you know, government who mandated the different vaccines you got. Like as a child, you got your diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, you had the polio, which saved the world.
Polio vaccine was a tremendous thing for the world. But all of these have run through years and years of testing. That's the same. We were programmed that we always get what the government said, these are the ones you should take. This time, they still came out and said, well, it's experimental, but you should take it. It's good for you.
It will save lives, you know, and people were programmed to believe the government. Well, there you go. But here's the bad part. I mean, the really stupid part.
Here's the really stupid part. They're still promoting that. All of these people died. They're still promoting it. Here in Cleveland, Cleveland Clinic came out about two years ago and said, look, if you've got the COVID shot, you're four times more likely to get COVID if you've got the vaccine. And that means you're four times more likely to die from COVID.
Now, after doing that, they were still promoting it, but I guess they quit promoting it now. People that are high risk, those with diabetes, overweight, heart problems, other diseases, they claim that the benefits outweigh the risk. Well, if the risk is you die within three to five years or can die, I'd say that's not to me what I would call an acceptable risk. And who's benefiting from it? That's the question. Yeah, someone's benefiting from it, but it's not you. Right, it's big pharma. Big pharma, yeah.
Their benefits outweigh your risk. Yeah. And people are still, you know, wanting to give it to their children, and it was never, never tested on children. And, oh, I gotta get the latest booster. Six, seven shots in.
Gotta get another one. Well, you know, this is why, you know, we kept telling people, listen, think about this. If every one of the lab animals tested, that they tested this on died, what does that tell you, okay? And so, you know, and we told people don't do it, don't do it, and they did it. And now over, the last count was, this is known to people that have died from the Vax, over 17 million, over 17 million.
Those are the ones known. Now, what was it, 78 percent of the people, well, I don't want to say it wasn't Greenland. It wasn't Greenland. It was another country there. Iceland? No. Finland? It might have, no.
Just go throw it to land. Anyhow, 78 percent of them that died, they died from COVID, or from the shot, that had the shot. More died from the shot than COVID. Yeah, yeah, mm-hmm. And unlike you, I can't remember which country, because there was, at the time, we had so many stories and countries and, yeah.
All you get was the idea that COVID, the shot's bad, people are dying, people are getting, and, you know, having other problems, so. Well, and part of the problem, too, with trying to remember where it was, was at the time when these articles would come out, if you didn't see it within a half hour, it was gone. Yeah.
Oh, yeah. They were quick to go, yeah. And I was telling Ernie, I would be, you know, Friday night, they would start putting stories out, and Saturday night, and then Monday morning, they weren't there. So I was, you know, trying to write things down, take Friday night, Saturday night, looking on the Internet, because you knew by Monday they would be gone. You know, that's happened to me a couple times.
While I was reading them, they took them down. Yeah. Yeah, and, like, they were never there to begin with. Well, that's kind of like somebody didn't want you to know.
Yep. Anyhow, well, we have a lot of things to hit on tonight. One of the things I wanted to, yeah, go ahead, Joe.
I think one of the biggest stories that we should hit is this, during the debate, Kamala Harris came out and said, and you, Donald Trump, are supporting Project 2025, and, you know, you're going to do all these horrible things, and... We have a clip, but we're going to play on that at the top of the hour. Oh, okay. So let's wait and we'll talk about it then. That's a good idea, okay.
That'll work. And she said a number of things that weren't true. In fact, most of all... Everything she said was a lie. Yeah.
I mean, you're hard-pressed to find anything she said that was not a lie. Well, did you know that we don't have one single American service person in any combat area around the world today? Right.
They don't know that. All those serving over there, Syria and Iraq, they're saying, we're not here? Where the bleep are we was the quote I saw.
Yeah, yeah. And those naval personnel that are there where the hoodies are shooting at all the ships and firing rockets that are military ships and things, that's not a combat zone. It's just a notion that they fire missiles at you. But the problem here is that we're informed. She's not talking to us.
She's talking to the uninformed people out there who just take everything at face value. Well, I tell you, one of the things her and Tampon Timmy did, they really surprised a lot of the people there in Minnesota when they told them that their boys were having menstrual periods. And you know how that affected the boys.
They were just taken back. I mean, seriously. And during their convention, you had that woman on there saying yes.
In some cases, boys do have menstrual periods. Now, that woman was a dingbat. But anyhow, today, I just talked to a death row inmate. He was just talking to me. He was really upset because this is a true story here. They transferred Ray down to Warren Correctional. That's where they have the death row inmates. That's where they have for the criminally insane. And so Ray's not criminally insane. I talk to him all the time.
We have constant conversations with death row inmates. And so they just told him, get your stuff together. You're going down to Warren.
And that's out of from Ross and Chillicothe. So Ray asked him, why? Why are you sending me down there? He said, we don't know. And so he got his stuff together. They took him down.
And this is no kidding. So he goes in and he asked the people that he checked in there with, why did you send me down here? And they said, well, we don't know. You'll have to ask the psychiatrist. And so he goes and he has the meeting with the psychiatrist. And he asked her, why am I here? Why did you send me here? And she said, I don't know why you're here. Nobody told me why you're here. But I was just supposed to talk to you.
I didn't order you here. And this is the way things are running in our prison system here in Ohio. This kind of stuff happens all the time. It's like they think they're in Washington, D.C.
It's just amazing. I thought you'd find that interesting. So he got sent down to the psychiatrist and he didn't know why.
She didn't know why. Did we ever find out who sent him there? No.
Not as of yesterday. But here's the bad part. In his cell down there, there's no air at all. No windows, no air.
And it's about 90 degrees out. And, you know, because they have a little fan. He has a little portable fan that he uses. But he wasn't allowed to bring the fan with him. So we sent him some money for the fan. So, meanwhile, he has to lay on the cold concrete floor because that's the only thing that's cold.
Because it's so hot in there. I mean, that is pretty bad. He must be a Christian and he's being punished. I'll bet you dollars to donuts that it's because he's a Christian.
He's been witnessing or doing something that offended him. Yeah. He's a Christian. So, anyhow.
We've heard this before in many, many of the January Sixers. Look at the ones who they're really going after are the die-hard Christians. Oh, yeah. Who are seen praying and, you know. Oh, yeah. I've had several on the program. Jake Lang is one.
Yeah, Jake. There's this common thread they're going after Christians. And so many people I talk to do not understand, do not get it. Christians are under persecution in this country. It's increasing.
And if we, as a nation, vote for Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, it's going to get worse and worse and worse. They say, oh, she goes to church. Well, you look at her church and her, what they call a pastor, and it is more anti-Christ, you know, far more anti-Christ, not even close to what I would call a Christian church. Going to church.
It's extremely far left, liberal, well, whatever they want to call it. They call it church. I don't. Yeah. She says she's going to church, but it's really just a photo op.
Yeah. She's there to be seen. And you see it in almost any church, though, too.
There's a lot of people that are just there to be seen. Yeah, but the pastor of this thing is a far left, crazy, radical, I mean, he's not a pastor. Of course, yeah. He's a hireling. That's what you refer to as an apostate. Yeah, apostate, yeah. Did you hear the latest clip from Tim Walz, the one that's going pretty viral? You mean the one where he's working on the church? Oh, you mean the one where we can't take another four years of this?
Yeah, you want to hear it? Hold on. Yeah. Yeah.
We can't afford, we can't afford four more years of this. Yeah. He's right. It's the only time I'm ever going to agree with him.
You can bet Trump's going to have that in a commercial pretty soon. Oh, yeah. I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Anyhow, you talked about the J-6ers. Bombshell transcripts reveal Trump, in fact, ordered National Guard for January 9th.
General Milley confirms Trump urges top Pentagon officials to deploy Guard or soldiers in active duty. Now he confirms it. We knew that.
We were telling people that. We've been telling people ever since January 6th and it's like now they come out and because Milley says it, it's true, right? Well, they all knew it and the fake news media, they all knew it, Joe. They all covered it up all this time and now that, you know, with an official liberal saying it, it now becomes true, right? Well, about a month ago, Nasty Pelosi came out and said she takes full responsibility for the January 6th thing. Yeah, her own daughter videotaped her saying it.
Right, saying it, yeah. Well, you sure didn't hear that on NBC, ABC or CBS? No, they wouldn't highlight that. Why would they do that?
No. Because, again, the uninformed, the simple-minded out there will never hear it, will never know it and so what they do is they put it out in a point where it won't hurt anything and they can now say, well, that was out there. Everybody knows it and, again, it's kind of one of those half-truth lies and it's the way they give themselves what they call plausible deniability. Let me read just a bit of this article. Groundbreaking report from Steve Baker has unveiled crucial transcripts proving that President Donald Trump did indeed request National Guard and deployment to ensure peaceful protests on January 6, 2021. These newly surfaced transcripts, which were previously concealed, reveal the truth that many in the mainstream media have ignored. According to the documents, General Mark Mollie, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed that President Trump expressed concern about the potential for unrest and positively ordered necessary precautions. But they really kept that quiet, didn't they?
They didn't bring that out. And Mollie recalled the President saying, hey, look at this, there's going to be a large amount of protesters here on January 6, make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or soldiers. That was Trump's orders. So they disobeyed a direct order for the Commander in Chief. He was still Commander in Chief at the time.
I mean, it's like a totally lawless society we have out there in D.C., totally lawless. Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but Pelosi at the time, being Speaker, it was up to her to request them, even though he said, hey, I have them ready, they're available, but she refused them. So did the mayor of D.C.
Yes. She was the first to reject the mayor of D.C., the first one. But that's the same thing with what happened in Portland when they overtook Portland. It's the same thing. Trump was trying to send the National Guard, but legally it had to be requested by the governor and they refused to do it. And I know.
Same thing with Minnesota, until finally they were able to, I think Walz actually sent his own. I had some, I talked to some of the people there from Portland, Oregon, who lost their property, they got burnt out and things, and they called me and the one fellow who's, praise the good Lord, he's always supported this ministry, he was saying how he's selling off all of his properties and getting out of there. Smart move.
Yeah. You know, to me, the biggest story of the night is education. You go back and all the way back to Madeline Murray O'Hare, where one crazy person decided that she could help take God out of the public pool system, we stopped prayer in school, took the Bible out, all this.
And ever since then, education has been more brainwashing than education. And there's a couple stories out, one is out of the Daily News, kids can't read or write, but Democrats are pushing climate literacy in schools. Yeah, they're pushing this importance all through K-American, K-12 education, the need for students to be able to understand and interpret information relating to climate change. Now, meanwhile, the average reading scores for fourth and eighth grade students have fallen by about three more points. And it now ends up here, we will equip the students with knowledge and skills to understand, quote, complex scientific issues, center the rising tide of denialism by promoting environmental and climate literacy, and reverse Trump administration cuts to the National Environmental Education Act. Yet, less than 50% of all fourth grade students were able to read at or above the standard proficiency, and only 17% of black students and only 21% of Latino students can meet the mark. So they want to have this complex scientific issues and words like denialism to fourth grade, eighth grade students who can't even read.
You see the craziness there? Anyway, they're talking about getting worse now with the children of color and the low-income students are the ones suffering the most. And you look at these test scores, the NAEP data demonstrates about two in every three American students cannot read proficiently. This makes perfect sense.
If they can't read the data, they can't dispute it. Exactly. Not only that, but my grandson's in first grade and he can write cursively.
I mean, beautifully. But most of these kids in the public school systems, and I'm talking about fourth and fifth graders, many of them can't write cursive. They can't. Well, right here it said the Democratic platform mentions that conventional literacy only once in their entire platform. Climate literacy is mentioned several times and the word writing does not appear at all anywhere. And you go look at these, it's like the Chicago Teachers Union.
But one of the things that they need, issue a list of climate-related demands as part of their contract negotiation. Although their schools are one of the worst in the nation, but they demand not just teacher salaries and all this, but that climate-related demands as part of their contracts. Same thing in the New York public school system, on and on and on. And then you look at New York, it's almost $30,000 a year per student. And, oh, gee, nobody can read in New York.
What does it say in the National Assessment Education Progress math? Only 28 percent of the eighth graders in New York schools could do arithmetic. Only 32 were proficient in reading. So only 32 percent of their entire schools can read at grade level. And yet they're getting $30,000 a year per student. And in some of the private schools and Catholic schools, some of the schools are getting by with way less money, like $10,000. And they have twice the reading levels, the math scores are twice as high in some of the Catholic schools, and some of the private schools are even higher, and at about a third to a half of the cost. So government schools are indoctrination centers. You're paying a huge amount of taxpayer dollars to have your children indoctrinated to keep them stupid where they can't do arithmetic, can't read.
And yet you could take in for a third of the money, have a child who can read and write, and even do cursive. All right. We're going to be coming up to a break here in a minute, and then we're going to take a look at this Agenda 25, because there's been so much, as you say, misinformation about Agenda 25. How about just outright darn lies all over the country, through the media, the debate.
It's lies, lies, lies on this. They're using this like a club to beat Trump over the head. He's losing tens of thousands of votes because of this. We need to put a stop to it.
And how? I think Trump has made it pretty clear. But listen, I can see why the left's against it. I can see why the left is against it.
And after the clip, you'll see why, too. So we'll be back right after this. Don't go away.
A whole lot more. Fight the fight, win this game. Fight the lie, freedom of man.
Let's come against the night. Thank you for listening to What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian resistance. To support this ministry, head to WRWL.org. That's WRWL.org. Mail your donations to What's Right, What's Left Ministries, 14781 Spearee Road, Newberry, Ohio, 44065. If you missed part of tonight's program, you can check out the podcast at thewordcleveland.com.
Thewordcleveland.com. Once again, thank you for listening and supporting What's Right, What's Left Ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned. The second hour is coming up next.
