Buy a bag of Hills Pet Nutrition. Help feed a shelter pet.
Buy another bag of Hills Pet Nutrition. Help feed more shelter pets. Buy Hills. Help feed shelter pets. Buy Hills. Help feed shelter pets. Every time you feed your pet Hills, you help feed a shelter pet in need, helping them become healthy, happy, and more adoptable.
Science did that. Visit hillspet.com slash radio or tap the banner to learn more. The following program is sponsored by What's Right, What's Left Ministries, and is responsible for its content. Portions of the following program may be pre-recorded. I am Pastor Ernie Sanders, the voice of the Christian Resistance. Stay tuned. My radio broadcast, What's Right, What's Left, is coming up right now.
Coming to you live from Independence, Ohio. We change our life for the better in many different ways. Heard around the world every Monday through Friday. Pastor Sanders is always years ahead of the rest of the media telling you exactly what they're covering up.
This is What's Right, What's Left. I tune in every chance I get to hear exactly what's going on with the voice of the Christian Resistance. Unabashedly cutting through the rhetoric by exposing the hard topics facing our society and world.
A lot of the other news medias don't pick up the news items like he does. And bringing to light the enemies of freedom who are out to steal your rights, your children, and enslaving you. You really get the truth out. I can tune into your show and hear the unvarnished truth. Thank you. This is What's Right, What's Left with Pastor Ernie Sanders. Good evening and welcome to another edition of What's Right, What's Left on this Thursday. Yeah, you see that? I'm just testing them.
The sixth day of June, 2024. And our producer and contributor is none other than a guy with a smile his name style. And here, almost live in the studio. Well, we're live, right? Yes.
Yes. All right, Pastor Richard Lewis. Welcome, everyone. Glad to be here.
And where we can keep a close eye on her. Leaving lizards is Lisa. Good evening, everyone. And it's that time of month again, we have him back. And that is the world renowned homeopathic doctor, Dr. Peter Glidden. Pastor, it's always a pleasure.
Thank you so much for inviting me. We have a whole lot to do talk about tonight. So I'm going to read an article. Once we get started after the scripture for you called killer Fauci.
And it's a short article that I want to have you comment on it, Peter. But first, we got to get right into the scripture. And the title of the scripture was a green tree and the dry, the green tree in the dry. And we took that out of Luke chapter 23 verse 31, where the Lord Jesus, when he was about to be crucified, and he had a number of women that were following him weeping. And he turned and he told him, don't weep for me weep for yourselves. Because he told him that the day is coming when you'll be blessed if the for the womb to be barren and for the paps to be dry. And he said if they will do this to in a green tree, the green tree was referring to himself.
In other words, being full of life and innocence. What will they do in a dry and he was referring to Israel, the corrupt nation, national leaders that were having him crucified, and they were filled with nothing but sin and trouble. And so, that is again, where we get the flag, the white flag with a green tree on it. And it's a plea to heaven, is what it is. And so, in fact, that was in the news because of actually should be the appeal to heaven.
It was in the news because of Judge Alito's wife, she had flown that that one of her homes or cottage and she had flown that flag. And of course, the they got the attention of the Communist Party out there, anything that's got to do pro God, they're against. And so anyhow, what made that again in the news was the fact that President Trump last week, he came on and said, if they will do this to me, a former president of the United States, who has broken no laws, what are they going to do to you? And we know what they'll do. We saw the January sixes. We know that they've been going after radio talk show host, they've been trying to shut Alex Jones down.
Also, they went after Steve Bannon now today. And of course, we know that for many years, Richard, you know, they've tried to take me down. I don't know how many times. Oh, yeah. My goodness. Yeah.
Can't even count the times. Yeah. And so but I mean, by God's grace, we're still here. And so anyhow, we're not going to cop. We haven't in 50 years, we haven't compromised. Amen.
And we're not about to who will will stand our ground. And we're going to pick it up in our scripture today. And we start there in James chapter four with verse nine. So Peter, if you have a question or comment, just jump in there.
And so we read it. Let's take it a verse at a time. So that's James chapter four, verse nine. Be afflicted and mourn and weep and let your laughter be turned to mourning and your joy to heaviness. Why do you think James is telling them that they should to be afflicted and to mourn and let your laughter your morning and your joy be turned to heaviness? What was what was the the point that he was trying to make? Well, if you read the first eight verses, the whole point is that, look, every day people are dying and going to hell.
OK. And that's what is the point that he's making. And he tells you over there in verse seven. Submit yourself therefore to God and resist the devil and he will flee from you.
Draw nigh to God and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, appear by your hearts, you double minded. And boy, does that apply today more than ever, huh?
Really, it does. And so it mentions about wars and coming of wars and things like that. And that's people are dying without Jesus Christ.
People are going to hell trying to defend what they think is right without knowing the truth about the Bible. Absolutely. Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord and he shall lift you up. Is that a reference to repentance?
Yeah. Speak not evil. Here's here's something a lot of people don't understand.
It goes right over the top of their head. The the when they hear speak not evil of someone to their opinion. It means if you say something negative about someone, then that's speaking evil. But that's not what he's saying. He's saying speak not evil, meaning don't speak untruths, things that are not truthful.
OK, don't tell a liar, don't embellish. OK, but are we to be the salt and light? Are we to warn the wicked and the righteous? Are we to expose the wicked? Absolutely.
Yes. He says, speak not evil one of another brethren, that he that speaketh evil of his brother. Who is our brother?
Brothers and sisters in Christ? Certainly, but our our brothers are everyone. OK, well, no, our brothers are people that are he's talking about Christians. He's speaking to Christians here. OK. Jesus was very specific when he said, your father, the devil. Remember, they when the Pharisees were trying to refer to them as brothers, he was making a point. No, no, no, no, no. We're not brothers.
OK, I get it. Your father is the devil. And so here he says, speak not evil one of another brethren. He did speak of the evil of his brother and his judges, his brother speak of the evil of the law.
So here. Now he's making a point, is he telling us not to judge? OK, that's not what he's actually saying, but he but he's making a point here when he says. And judge that is judge who judges his brother, speak of evil of the wall and judges the law. But if you judge the law, though, we're not a doer of the law, but a judge.
So what what is the law? He's talking about something very specific here. He's talking about the letter of the law.
Right. And then he's talking about what? The spirit of the law. OK, so the letter of the law judges who? The lost, the unsaved, the unsaved, a judge by the letter of the law, the saved, a judge by the spirit of the law.
OK, OK. And he's making another point there, though, here. When he says they were not a doer of the law, but a judge of the law. So now the only thing is the letter of the law could do for us is condemn us. Does that make the letter of the law a bad thing?
No, it reveals sin. So being but we are judged by by the law, if we are judged by the law, then we're we have a problem. So if we're judged by the letter of the law is perfect.
We're not right. And that's why the only thing that the letter of the law could do for us is condemn us. And so here now.
So we go. And he says there's one law giver who is able to save and to destroy. Who art thou that thou judges another? Now, he's asking the question, who art thou that thou judges another? We'll go back to that.
We have to come back because that's very specific. Then he says, go to now you that say today or tomorrow, we will go into such a city and continue there a year and buy and sell and gain. Whereas, you know not what shall be on the morrow. What is your life is but a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanishes away.
So let me ask this. What what do we have when it comes to time? What are we what what are we given the moment we have right now?
We're not promised anything in the future. So can we reclaim five minutes ago? No, it's gone, right?
It's gone. And the next breath we have, we may not be be alive. Take it right. Because we don't know. We might not be here five minutes from now. Right. And so you don't know what's going to happen, especially nowadays. Right. I mean, anything could happen.
I mean, Biden's trying to get us in a nuclear war with Russia. So here he says. Whereas, you know not what you shall be on the morrow, for what is your life is even a vapor that appears for a little time and then vanish. Now, there's only one person that can reclaim only one that can reclaim, I should say, the past. Now, time takes its toll on us. OK. Look what it's done to us, Richard.
All right now. But God controls time. Time is what God says it is.
He he's not burdened like we are. He can he can go back back in time or he can go forward in time. And he knows what the past is from the beginning and he knows what the future is. You see, that's really, really hard to wrap your brain around.
Well, that's exactly right. That's why he tells you that his ways are so much higher than ours would do. We can't even begin to try to claim the ability to even begin to. We can't comprehend the magnitude of God. You know, when you look through the scriptures and you see Almighty God and what he has done and spoken everything into existence and all that. For us, we can't get we can't grasp that. And that's one of the reasons why Jesus Christ had to come.
That we can relate at least to a physical man image, but the Almighty God is for our little mortal minds is impossible to grasp. Let's ask Peter a question, because he's a pretty smart fellow. Peter, how would you compare the intellect of those authors of the Old Testament compared to our great minds of intellectuals and philosophers of today? They're about a thousand times smarter. Yeah, it would seem that way, wouldn't it? OK. Yeah, it definitely would.
He says, you know, go ahead. I was I years ago, I saw a when I was in medical school, I saw a high school final exam that was given in the United States in the 1700s, and I couldn't have completed it. It was so complicated, the math and the geometry and everything, it was way above anything that I'd ever been taught. And, you know, that was in the 1700s. So we've gone backwards dramatically.
We haven't gone upwards with intellectual capacity or education. When I was back in the elementary school in early grades, we still had McGuffey readers, and they were way ahead. In order for us to go to move from what we call to graduate from third grade to fourth grade, we had to be able to read any part of the front page of the newspaper that the teacher told us to read. Now, we didn't have to understand everything as a third grader, but we had to be able to read every word of that. And we could do it.
It wasn't a problem. I could read it, you know. But today, there's a whole lot of these kids coming out of school can't read. Can't read.
They can't do math. Simple changing, making change. Yeah.
They can post videos on TikTok, though. Yeah. For that you ought to say, if the Lord will, we shall live and do this or that. But now you rejoice in your boasting, and all such your boasting is evil. Therefore, to him that knoweth to do good, here you go. Therefore, to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth not, to him that is sin.
Now, that covers a whole big area. For those that know to feed the hungry and do it not. Those that know to house the homeless and do it not. Those that know how to clothe the naked and do it not.
Okay. Those that know to visit those in prison and do it not. Those that know how to visit those who are sick and dying and do it not. See, all of those are sins of omission, right? The widows, yes.
And the Lord Jesus preached more on sins of omission than he did sins of commission, didn't he? Absolutely. Yes. And so here.
That's very interesting. I've never thought about it like that, but you're absolutely right. Well, that's why you're here. That's why you're here. So you can think about these things, right? Yeah. Well, yeah, and most people don't.
They don't think about it. Let me go back here to where it says there is one lawgiver who is able to save and to destroy. Verse 12. Who art thou that judges another? So he's asking the question, who are thou the judges?
Now, we have for years and years out the streets, out in front of those bloody abortion mills preaching out there. I preached, I don't know, for 45 years out there. You would often have people coming in and say, these women would come in and say, judge not lest you be judged.
Okay. Matthew 7, yeah. They would, you know, they're parroting something they heard, but they didn't, if you kept on reading, he goes on to say, but when you do judge, judge with righteous judgment, meaning don't hold others up to a higher standard than yourself. You know, when it comes to judgment of sin. Yeah, and righteous judgment is judgment according to the scriptures.
Absolutely. Using this book to judge what you're saying, not your opinion or I think or I feel, but what God says about it. And that's why you need to be familiar with this book. Well, that's when the Lord Jesus made a statement that a prophet is not accepted even in his own home. Okay. Remember, he had to raise himself from the dead before his own brothers would believe on him. Remember, they said, go on into Jerusalem and show people who you are then.
Okay. If you're really who you say. Now, they grew up with him. Now, people have a natural tendency to somehow think that maybe they're in some ways superior to their brothers or their sisters or siblings. And there's a good reason for that. You know, when you grow up with people and you see all their faults, all their faults and then, of course, the natural instinct for people to say, well, I know I'm not perfect, but compared to style, yeah. A lot of people say that, to be fair. I know my sins aren't so bad.
Well, you know, that's the point he's making. So then it comes down to, are we to judge or judge not? Okay.
And so these people, and you hear that, you hear preachers say, don't judge, don't judge, but that's not what the Bible teaches us. In fact, if you read that passage, I think it's Matthew 7, if you read that passage about where that comes from, if you read the whole passage, it talks about, I believe it's the one with the moat, isn't it? The moat and the eye. Yeah. Yeah. And it says, then thou wilt see clearly to take the moat out of, remove the beam out of your own eye first. Right. That's what he tells you to judge with a righteous judgment.
Yes. He's not telling you not to judge because if we go to 1 Corinthians chapter 6, go to 1 Corinthians chapter 6 and read me verses 1 through 8. Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust and not before the saints? Do you not know that the saints shall judge the world? And if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
Let's stop there for a minute, okay? So how would that apply today? I mean, look, we had in our church the ecclesiastical council, okay? These are for people that don't want to go, don't want to drag one another before the heathen courts, they come.
Right. And they would agree and sign an agreement that they would accept the judgment. And once, you know, you do that, you can't really, once there's been a judgment by the ecclesiastical council, they can't take that to the heathen courts.
They can't hear it because it's already been rendered. And you know as being, you are a clerk of the common law court. Yes. And so here we know that we're much more likely to get justice from the just than we are from the heathen courts. But go ahead and keep reading. Verse 3, know ye not that ye shall judge the angels? How much more things that pertain to this life? If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.
Okay, here now. A lot of people don't understand that verse. He's making a point there and he's telling you that a believer, even just a brand new babe in the Lord, a brand new convert, is much more qualified to judge righteously than a heathen who's been on the bench for 30 years. Yes, yes.
And so, go ahead. Just to emphasize that, he says, who are least esteemed in the church. Right.
There you go. I speak to your shame. Is it so that there is not a wise man among you?
No, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren. Why is that so significant here? Because he's referring, he's speaking to the church of Corinth. And because of that, it's of great significance because what was it that they did to pass their time away in the afternoon when all of the so-called wise men would get out and they would go to the pavilion and they would stand up and they would give their philosophy and all of their palaver on how wise they were. This is their pastime, so they put a lot of emphasis on that. And it's so Paul's saying, is there not one wise man among you? That's right.
They puff themselves up. Verse 6, but brother goeth to law with brother and that before the unbelievers. Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you because you go to law one with another. Why do you not rather take wrong? Why do you not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded? Yea, ye do wrong and defraud and that your brethren.
Yea, ok right there. He's making a point that you'd be better off to accept the wrong than to drag one before a heathen in court because when you drag a brother before the heathen in court, who wins? The lawyers in the court, they win. You guys both lose.
That's right. We'll be back after this. Don't go away. Since the battle that you fought here, you were young the day you took these cliffs. Some of you were hardly more than boys with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet you risked everything here.
Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here?
We look at you and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief. It was loyalty and love. The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge, and pray God we have not lost it, that there is a profound moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause, and you were right not to doubt. You all knew that some things are worth dying for, one's country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty, all of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew the people of your countries were behind you. The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They felt in their hearts, though they couldn't know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m.
In Kansas, they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia, they were ringing the Liberty Bell. You know, Peter, we played that in 1984 on the radio program here, and it seems like I blinked and 40 years passed by. Yeah, it's funny like that, isn't it?
Yeah. It's funny like that. Time's a funny thing. Yeah, it seems so real.
It was just like it was just yesterday. And here today, you know, we're facing another enemy, one that walks among us. It's right here among us, the Antichrist Communist Party. And again, the same thing is at stake. Our freedom and our liberty is at stake. And we have to stand and fight and take it back. And so, folks, that's why we're here. That's why we are the voice of the Christian resistance. I'm going to read an article, Peter, and then have you comment on it, and then we'll open up the phone lines and let you have at them.
Because usually you keep these calls coming in. Here's the title of the message is, Killer Fauci. Now, Marjorie Taylor Greene, she really tore him up the other day.
That was beautiful. She told him, you belong in prison, and he does belong in prison. And this guy, I remember what he did. They found him. He took puppies, little puppies, big old puppies. He cut their vocal cords so they couldn't whine. And they tied them down, and they left them there and let sand fleas eat them. And you see how long it would take sand fleas to eat them and to test their pain.
Unbelievable how long they could survive. This guy is, and he calls this science. This is evil. This is from the pit of hell. This is the Democratic Communist Party thing to do.
And so she showed all of the other things he did. I'll read this article here, and it says, on March 16, 2020, Dr. Tony Fauci received an email reporting China's success using hydroxychloroquine and treating the coronavirus. Dr. Fauci and the Uniparty had to try to derail President Trump's monkey wrench. They used the hydroxychloroquine, the cure, as if it rivaled Fauci's pet drug remdesivir. Now that kills, I don't know how many people were killed with this remdesivir.
Now here, at remdesivir, at $1,000 per dose versus hydroxychloroquine at 70 cents per dose. Okay. Also, that would have derailed all the vaccines as it would have ended the pandemic by October 20th. They couldn't let that pandemic end.
They had to keep it going, didn't they? Okay. So the patient cured is a customer loss.
Yeah. So this was not the only time Dr. Fauci has sent information telling hydroxychloroquine and treating COVID. Hydroxychloroquine was specifically mentioned almost three dozen times in Fauci's emails.
The number may be much larger since. He now, we now know that the top doctors of the NIH were discussing their emails to prevent the Freedom of Information Act detection. Five days later, on March 21st, 2020, Dr. Fauci chided President Trump for suggesting hydroxychloroquine was successful in treating COVID. Goes on to say, the president is, now here's what Fauci said, the president is talking about hope for people.
And it's not an unreasonable thing to hope for people. So when you have approved drugs, the physicians have the option and a decision between the physician and the patient. Are you going to use a drug that somebody says from an incidental standpoint, not completely proven that might be effective?
It seems to me that guess what? That those the vaccines were experimental. Remember, they had not been approved. And so here there are those today who lean to the point of giving hope and saying, give that person the option of having access to the drugs. And then you have the other group, which is my job as a scientist to say my job is ultimately to prove without a doubt that a drug is not only safe, but that it actually works.
Those two things are really incompatible when you think about the particularly when you're in an arena where you have anything, you don't have anything that's proven. So Fauci said there was not enough tests to prove hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment for the deadly virus. Well, frontline doctors were where he were cured. A lot of people were getting cured. But big pharma said, no, no, there's no money in curing these people.
There is no the money is in treating them. And I'll I'll just let you go with that, because here this guy, you know, she said that as Marjorie Taylor Greene said, you belong in prison. He I tell you one thing that that guy died today.
He'd go right to hell. What he caused so much damage to so many people in that room does appear. I had a doctor, one of our pastors who passed away. Pastor Bruce called me from the hospital in the hospital. And he said, I want you to tell my doctor here, make it clear to him that I have refused redness of here and that you are going to be checking into this. So I got on the phone with a doctor and doctor told me, well, it's not that redness of air is such a bad thing. He said the problem was and there's what he said was killing these people. What's killing is the doctors have not been trained in how to administer redness of air. They just got it.
They just came out in the wanted to get it out there on the market, make all that money out of it. And he said that if you use it, you have to use just a minute amount. I mean, it's got to be applied just a very small amount.
And you have to do it in a in a manner which, you know, you separate gradually, gradually. And he said they're not doing that. They haven't been trained to do that. They're killing people. And so, well, according to Johns Hopkins University, the third leading cause of death in the United States is M.D. directed pharmaceutical medicine.
Yeah. And there was a study that was done about 10 years ago that looked at all of the data and concluded that M.D. directed pharmaceutical medicine was the leading cause of death in the United States.
Well, some of this is Pastor Lewis here, Peter. Some of the most easiest cures make more sense. I remember probably 30 years ago, we had a tape talking about hydrogen peroxide and all the uses for hydrogen peroxide that could be done for all kinds of ailments.
And the guy had listed, I think, hundreds of uses for hydrogen peroxide. So, yeah, but here's here's the thing, Pastor, and, you know, from the proper perspective, everything makes sense and all of the COVID nonsense that kind of laid bare the shenanigans that the pharmaceutical industry generates without any fear of reprisal. Is the tip of the iceberg concerning all things medical here in the great United States of America?
And here's why. In the early 1900s, there was a hostile takeover of the medical market by the American Medical Association, the Rockefellers and the Carnegie's. And that hostile takeover granted the American Medical Association exclusive control over who could and who couldn't call themselves a doctor. And that control was given exclusively to the M.D.
who were trained in the use of pharmaceuticals. And, you know, it's not the drug. It's how it's used.
It's not the gun. It's how it's used. But in an unregulated self-policing industry with some monopoly, absolute power corrupts. Absolutely. So the leading cause of death becomes pharmaceutical medicine.
Nobody blinks an eyelash. While this medical monopoly has been in place since before any of us were born happened in the early 1900s, from 1912 to 1915, chronic disease is escalating. Autism is through the roof. Alzheimer's is through the roof and chronic diseases. Obesity is everywhere all the time. A third of the adults and children in this country, not just overweight, they're obese. We spend almost as much of the pharmaceutical industry makes almost almost as much money on the management of blood sugar issues as we spend on national defense.
And how is all of this possible? Because inside of this monopoly, the only thing that can treat a disease is a drug. That's the law. The only thing that can treat a disease is a drug. So even though the hydrogen peroxide therapy is extremely successful, you can't use it to treat a disease because it has to be a drug to treat a disease. And in order for it to be a drug, it takes about 60 million dollars of research in order to bring the drug to the marketplace. And then even when you do successfully bring a drug to the marketplace, because of the corruption that is inherent inside of the monopoly, when the drug fails, nobody goes to jail. BIOX kills half a million people.
Nobody goes to jail. There are currently 29 lawsuits against drugs and medical devices, which were approved by the Food and Drug Administration as safe and effective for human beings to take. And now there are lawsuits against all of them because guess what?
They were not safe and effective. They were blown through the approval process because of money-grubbing, sadistic human beings who valued profit more than they valued human life. And nonsense like this can only happen inside of a monopoly. And it's a problem because this monopoly is so vast, so overarching and so complete that most people are not even aware that it exists. You know, we'd all have a problem if the federal government said, well, the only people that can make automobiles in the United States is Subaru. Nobody else can sell an automobile in the United States. We'd have a fit against that. We wouldn't allow that in a heartbeat. Or if they said, well, the only people that can make beer is Budweiser, Anheuser-Busch.
Nobody else can make beer in the United States. We'd have a fit because it's a monopoly, and monopolies aren't good except for the people in power. But when it comes to medicine, we don't question the monopoly because most of us don't even know that it's a thing.
We look around. The only medicine that's practiced in our hospital is MD medicine. The only medicine our insurance pays for is MD medicine. The only medicine they do research on at the college we went to is MD medicine. The only medicine they make TV shows about is MD medicine.
So a reasonable conclusion from an intelligent human being would be, well, the MDs are everywhere all the time because they're better at what they do than everybody else. Well, it's way past time for you folks to start your own frontline doctors and to start your own organizations. I know it's not easy. It's going to be difficult.
And I wanted to say this because the call is already coming in. Can't Fauci in some degree claim the effectiveness of remdesivir to cure the disease because once they kill you, you no longer have the disease? Well, there's a lot of ways to manipulate the data. They've been doing that for a long time.
I mean, I can understand it. That would be something the FDA would come up with. Okay. Phone lines are now open at 888-677-9673. That's 888-677-9673. We have Dr. Peter Glidden. He's a pretty smart fellow, and he can tell you how to feel better. And let's go out to Euclid and take Nancy. Nancy, you're in the air.
Oh, thank you, Pastor Sanders. And I have a question for Dr. Glidden. I've been diagnosed with acrofib a year ago, and two weeks ago, the aliquots that my cardiologist had me in started giving me nosebleeds, and I had one that was super long on Sunday, so one hour. And I almost went to the hospital, but I waited it out.
And so I looked online, and I found out that five supplements that I've been taking for years, not knowing that they were natural blood thinners, garlic, ginger, roots, well, also the actual foods, ginger, roots, and the garlic, melatonin, turmeric, and vitamin E. I found out that those are natural blood thinners. So I contacted my doctor and told her what the situation was, and I'm positive it's the aliquots that was causing the nosebleeds. It didn't cause nosebleeds before, but she insisted that I go back on aliquots. And to me, it does not make sense. I told her, I'm going on, she says, stop all your supplements. She says, go back on aliquots.
I mean, I just want to know what you think of this. Thank you. Well, you know, you need a different doctor. Because quite frankly, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And you know, in their defense, you know, the medical doctors, they only know what they're trained in.
Right. But the problem with the training of the medical doctor and the way that the, you know, the health maintenance organizations are set up, is that it is the rare doctor, and I know a bunch of them who have done this, but they are the exceptions to prove the rule, that are able to look outside of the box of, you know, kind of intellectual proclivities that they were trained in in medical school, and look for alternatives. Most doctors don't have the intellectual capacity to do that. And they actually believe that, you know, the only medical treatments that are valid are the ones that they were taught in medical school. There's a lot of hubris and cognitive dissonance that's drummed into the minds of the unassuming medical student. So, you know, the doctor only knows what the doctor knows. The doctor doesn't know what they don't know. And you don't have thick blood because you have an aliquots deficiency, right?
Right. I have been taking, can I just say one thing? I have been taking Metropolol, 25 milligrams, standard release, DID, and Digoxin once a day, 125 milligrams. And my pulse has been normal for about seven months. It was totally erratic. And then when I got on the Metropolol and the Digoxin, my pulse was normal.
It was like 60 for five months. So these two medicines are helping my pulse stay normal. So, I mean, I don't know what the big deal is, the need for a blood center if my pulse is normal. It just doesn't make sense to me. But maybe you can explain why they think that. Well, because it's the standard of care now that the doctor has to comply with wherever they're employed.
There are standards of care which are created by the people who run the hospital, the people who run the medical group, and they have more to do with economic viability of the hospital than they do with actually what's good for the patient. One of the reasons that you'll take a blood pressure medicine or, you know, something for the heart to regulate the beat of the heart and it works fine for a number of months or a number of years, but then it stops working. Like all of a sudden, no, it doesn't work anymore. So what's going on?
Right, right. Well, the action of the drug works by up-regulating the metabolism of the body which is made from vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and essential fatty acids that are essential nutrients. So the longer that the drug works in the body, the less essential nutrients you have because the action of the drug burns through your nutrient reserves. And when your body runs out of the nutrients, the drugs stop working the way that they used to work. You know, one of the easiest ways to get the blood pressure medicine and the heart rate medicine to work better is to take 90 essential nutrients into your body because if you do that, you know, the drugs will have the raw materials that they need to produce the result that they're trying to do. And the pharmaceutical industry knows this, but if they put vitamins and minerals in with the drugs, the drugs would work better and they'd need to sell less of them.
So it doesn't make economic sense for them to do that. And one of the main causes of atrial fibrillation, by the way, is degenerative disc disease in the spine. So I'm going to bet you 25 cents right now that you are at least an inch shorter than you were when you were in your 30s. Is that correct? Have you shrunken in height? Two inches shorter, yeah.
Two inches. Well, there you go. That's what's causing the atrial fibrillation.
It's called degenerative disc disease in the spine. Oh, really? That's right. Wow.
The problem isn't with the heart. It's with your back. You're kidding. If you go to my website, that's crazy, right?
A little bit of anatomy and physiology goes a long, long way. If you go to my website, leavebigpharmabehind.com, I like the ring of that, don't you? Leavebigpharmabehind.com. I have a webinar that explains that.
It's about a 45-minute informational webinar. You can watch it and learn a little bit about what to do to help your body get over the AFib. Now, I do have a chiropractor who is also a naturopath. Well, then you want to tell the chiropractor that Dr. Glidden is of the opinion that your AFib is caused by degenerative disc disease in the thoracic spine. In the thoracic spine. Have him do an examination of your thoracic spine. That's the spine between your shoulder blades, the part of your backbone between your shoulder blades, and see what he thinks.
Guaranteed there's going to be a problem there. Oh, okay. He's an upper cervical chiropractor. Well, then you need to find a different one. You need to get a recommendation from him to somebody else.
I like chiropractors that are trained in a modality called applied kinesiology. But in any event, if you just go to my website, I've got lots of information about this that can really help you a great deal. Okay. Well, thank you very much. Okay. Thanks for calling.
I appreciate your trust. Thank you. All righty. There you go. All right. The phone lines are open at 888-677-9673. That's 888-677-9673. And we have Dr. Peter Gordon, not Gordon Glidden. Okay. You didn't change your name yet. Anyhow, so we're going to go out and let's go to Ohio and talk to Sandy. Sandy, you're in the air.
Hi. I just want to say that if somebody has AFib, and I'm a nurse, I'm a registered nurse, if somebody's got AFib, they have inefficient pumping, which can lead to blood clots. The problem with supplements, you know, I'm not against them 100%, but there is a difference. They're not measured. They're difficult to measure the amount of clotting time. We measure bleeding time, clotting times, and when you're on a blood center... My dad died from a massive blood clot because my mom took him off the Coumadin.
They didn't have Eliquis at that point. They were still giving warfarin or Coumadin. And he got a massive blood clot, and it killed him.
It plugged up his stents and all kind of stuff. So, you can't be telling people to get off of their prescription medications because everybody has different situations, and lay people are not familiar. It's not about the pulse. AFib is an inefficient pumping, and it can cause the clots to develop from the fibrillation of the atria. So, you can't do that. It is high risk for blood clots, which can kill people. So, I'm going to stop you right there.
Thank you very much. So, you're a nurse, right? Yes. Okay, and how much training have you had in medical nutrition? In medical what?
Nutrition. More than most physicians, but that's the truth. So, where did you learn that?
What academic degree did you get? Where did you learn that in school? Yes, but I'm trying to tell you. How do you measure these supplements that you're selling? Because you sell these supplements also, and you don't give that up. Ma'am, I don't sell the supplements. I don't make any money from the sale of the supplements, number one. Well, what lab tests do you do to measure the blood centers, like fish oil, like turmeric, like she's saying? How does a physician control the blood thinning amount without a lab diagnostic test? Well, you can't.
You use the INR and close up in time. Yes, but are you okay? So, if you're testing the INR and the troponin, it's difficult to get that accurate with supplements, because they are not... But it's not difficult to do that with supplementation, because you don't have any clinical experience with it. You don't have any education. I have plenty of experience, and I know that there is no test. You have to have a specific test to a drug or something. Ma'am, you don't have any experience with treating patients with medical equipment.
You don't have any. Can you tell me the test to measure turmeric blood thinning? What is the name of the test to measure, for instance, fish oil?
So, ma'am, here's the deal. If you have somebody on a pharmaceutical, or if you have somebody on a drug, or if you have somebody on a botanical medicine, or if you have somebody on a vitamin, a mineral, or an amino acid supplement, or you change somebody's diet, if there's a serious heart condition, you track that with the same blood work that you use if you're delivering the drug. And in this case, it would be the prothrombin time or the INR measurement. I'm not saying that you don't need to do these things. We do these things all of the time, and when we give people the medical nutrition protocol, which, by the way, is science-based and clinically verified, the blood values improve all of the time. And it begs the question, why would you, having zero clinical experience with the application of a medical nutrition therapeutic, have an opinion about the medical nutrition therapeutic? I'll tell you why you have an opinion about it, because you're closed-minded.
Period. No, it's not true. It's not true.
You don't know me. It's not true. You don't have any experience with this whatsoever, and therefore you should not levy an opinion against it, because you... I got to jump in here, because I've got an opinion. Here's my opinion.
The entire board is lit up, and people are getting a little... You know, they're waiting. So I'm going to have to move on. I'm sorry, Sandy, but we have to move on. Let's go to Leonard in New Jersey. Hey, Leonard.
Dr. Glennon, can you hear me? Yes, sir. All right.
I just have two quick questions, then I'll hang up. First of all, you spoke of Subaru. Now, Bill Gates, there was a lawsuit about an operating system for a computer.
It was about 10 or 15 years ago, and Congress wouldn't let him produce it. Leonard, you're going to have to wait for your question, because we're up against a heartbreak. We'll be back right after this with more. Don't go away. Thank you for listening to What's Right, What's Left, the voice of the Christian resistance. To support this ministry, head to WRWL.org. That's WRWL.org. Mail your donations to What's Right, What's Left Ministries, 14781 Sperry Road, Newberry, Ohio, 44065. If you missed part of tonight's program, you can check out the podcast at thewordcleveland.com.
Thewordcleveland.com. Once again, thank you for listening and supporting What's Right, What's Left Ministries, the voice of the Christian resistance. Stay tuned. The second hour is coming up next.
