From the Elections in France to Bill O'Reilly and More

From the elections in France to charges of sexual harassment against Bill O'Reilly got you covered right here for the line of fire with your host activist and author, international speaker and theologian Dr. Michael Brown your voice of moral cultural and spiritual revolution Michael Brown is the director of the coalition of conscience and resident of fire school of ministry get into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH. That's 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown. Is anyone surprised that things continue to shake worldwide. There is something new, something different. The old being challenged or the status quo being challenged and then maybe not being challenged, France and beyond.

A friends welcome to today's broadcast. This is Michael Brown. We got a lot of great things planned for you on today's show is always our virtually always our phone lines are open 866-34-TRUTH.

That's 866-348-7884 before we get to France before we talk about Donald Trump gets close to the end of his first hundred days before we talk about Earth Day in the science March 4. Talk about some dialogue I had with folks identifies all rights, and by the way, some of the dialogue with a couple of folks again not representative of everyone on the all right not right is not monolithic, but interesting that folks take exception to being called racist and then identify as racist and everything they say that's that's another subject will get to before any of that.

I got a question for men, women alike.

I love your feedback. 866-34-TRUTH let's say a woman comes to work and she is in suggestive attire. Let's say she's wearing a very low cut top and the guys at work or her boss say come check her out. By the way, I'm not saying women should dress like that believe women should be godly women specifically should be dressing in such ways to draw sexual attention to themselves but let's say she dresses like that. Let's say the guys come check her out late this Derrida all right with their boss does is that a form of sexual harassment or is she getting the attention she asked for or she totally unaware that her her top is low and in revealing or did she feel a pressure to do that because of the strongly sexist society in which we live.

Or I should say oversexed society in which we live, which is sometimes sexist as well. Isn't sexual harassment if she notices guys checking her out when she comes in that outfit she comes in and the supershort supertight miniskirt and she notices the guys looking at her legs's is that sexual harassment is that hey she got what she asked for is that a matter of commodities just people being people not talking about from a leaving gospel based standard for believing gospel based standard godly woman would would not seek to look un-beautiful but she would seek to look modest for sure she wouldn't be showing herself off to other men, and godly man would not be checking out the ladies if if a lady was dressed inappropriately. He looked the other way rather than check her out so we understand those things but I'm asking about sexual harassment.

I posted this question on Twitter. It was as light lessons like 233 in the morning but I thought you just going to do this in an people join in more in the morning of, but I asked the question if one was a low cut top to work as sexual harassment for men checks around and then II repeated yes no female distal for males to know exactly who was responding. The answer. Answers are fascinating to say the least. I bring this up as a whole.

Bill O'Reilly error on the line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown your voice of moral cultural and spiritual revolution. Here again is Dr. Michael Brown today, one fire Bill O'Reilly is out of foxes that just power play. Murdoch family was O'Reilly generally guilty of sexual harassment over period of years, and should you been removed or disciplined a long time ago O'Reilly since all the charges are unfounded.

Right now I'm making no judgment on the situation, not knowing any more about it than you know. But I'm asking the larger questions about sexual harassment in the workplace today begin to weigh in 86634 may be you could argue that for a woman to dress suggestively, I mean very suggestively in an obvious and over way that that is sexual harassment of her male coworkers or or bosses that she is harassing them by dress like that. That's another side to it right. Never heard that razor don't hear it raised on the flip side yes it would crazy come on their guys if if a woman came in dressed in a sack, they'd they'd be lustfully attracted to her and they think filthy thoughts all the time and what you what you do where crimes were burqas to work fair question.

Absolutely fair question.

We told our daughters as their growing up so you don't understand how boys think anisotropic check you out there trying to get a look in your shirt all day. I said that's what boys do that not every boy but many, and probably most yeah and and men as well do those kinds of things and that's why being disciplined with your eyes with your thought life is part of following the Lord part of self-control and women not seeking to present themselves as sexual objects. That's part of godliness can be beautiful wall modest, but when it comes to the O'Reilly case, I want to see if you things plainly number one I'm not denying the reality of sexual harassment in the workplace not denying it, minimizing I'm not denying that some men feel that the right to treat women as sexual objects cannot denying it, not minimizing that reality. I'm not denying that many women feel constant pressure to dress and look sensually not denying that. And I'm not denying that that some judges have outrageously implied that rape victims busy dessert with a God is the way they were dressed in dress like that to be raped. Yeah, think, think of pouring salt in a very open wound already so I'm I'm not denying any of these issues not minimizing any of these issues when I am asking is where the line is properly drawn thankfully and in the decades that have served in ministry. Leading schools teaching at schools leaving ministry organizations.

We would not have issues with these things. We we've had people who are modest. We've had people who understood what it was meant to work in a ministry environment would not have issues like this, but I'm sure these are issues that are faced in the workplace all the time and I want to minimize them, but I want to ask about reality. So one of the women who came forth at the end to bring charges against Bill O'Reilly African-American woman. I mention that because one of the one of the charges that she brought was that he referred to hers. Hot chocolate one time now.

She said made her feel she was on a plantation paraphrase her words of did he say that the envelope if he did with that harassment was that racial harassment was just being cute may be in his role was just being cute. Just ask questions she claimed O'Reilly told her looking good there girl one time.

She's getting off the elevator is that sexual harassment a woman comes on the job in a nice outfit and amasses hey you look good that sexual harassment is the way he says it is it how he looks when he says it is. It is being claimed on some college campuses. A micro-aggression to say that as if to say you're of no worth, no value whatsoever. I don't stimulus appears a colleague in any way absently look at you sex is that was being said or if if you as a woman wore a really nice new outfit to work one day and nobody said a word to him, not just women but the man was in a word to you with the father you would you expect some compliments particular burgers claimed O'Reilly would come by her desk and would leer at her up and down.

She felt he was looking at her cleavage, and made her feel uncomfortable. Maybe did this. Maybe that's what is yeah in my book. If you did that you leer at some of you call overlook a more up and down all the time you that would be sexual harassment on the flipside, if Sewall was wearing a low cut top symbol was wearing a low cut top. She put it on.

She stood in the mirror looked in the mirror, which put it on and coworker comes by and talking to her in and she notices that he's staring at that place is partly uncovered is that sexual harassment 866-34-TRUTH 784 when I found interesting on my twitter pole was that the responses from men and women in terms of their feelings were almost equal that I found fascinating that the responses were almost equal. In other words, it wasn't that the man overwhelmingly said now all is not sexual harassment in the women overwhelming, so you better believe it is to the contrary and just look at percentages. Now, the percentage that of women who said it was not was higher than percentage of men who said it was not grandma call a Tyler in Monroe North Carolina. Thanks for joining us on one for which your take on this complicated staring down at.

I wouldn't say it sexual harassment depend on how long he could expect all know about five but you have to realize that it's about political correctness as well.

Going going to mark time now but just having just redid yes so so okay the first thing is if somebody it again hopefully godly men or more careful with their eyes, and godly women are modest in their dress were just talking the general secular workplace.

So it's one thing for guy to notice something. It's another thing for God to stare and they coolly feel uncomfortable right make that distinction, but right. The helmet is the the PC environment which were living so it expand on it PC in what sense of political correctness run amok on.

I spent that much say years ago.

I'm 23 but I can remember that you were able to speak your mind and they wouldn't jump to the right card or check card. I just I just believe like political correctness is one amok. Bill O'Reilly else but if you didn't do it on the show. Then I why you need to hire my never liked the guy. Yeah, but we have certain yet let loose a separate two things though one is yet that the PC attitude run amok. So I I'm glad that we are more sensitive to things that can be insulting that can be racist or sexist comments that we don't realize, but it's gone to your right. Crazy crazy extremes and and just simple comments are now taken his micro-aggression sort as as being somehow insults or jibes in so I'm totally with you on that. But as far as as far as O'Reilly and work, but let's think of this, let's say that someone was a prominent TV host and was found to have raped someone when they rape them on the job and rape them on the TV set, but obviously that only going to jail, but they can lose their job. Even if they didn't go to jail if someone was found guilty of extortion you know and and and they are they they are stealing money you know from from somebody in some scam, even if they didn't do it related to work.

They suffer the penalty so that that I understand.

I have no issue with it if it if he was guilty and again I don't know if he was guilty of genuine sexual harassment of of telling women okay you want to get ahead on the job.

You have to sleep with me or some of that if he's guilty of that. Of course that's the kind of thing you lose your job for no matter how prominent you are. The question is did the liberal host with the attack come against them the same way or the standard. Those are the questions for Tyler. I appreciate you weighing in your comments or heard and taken the number and the Expo line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown.

I'm not minimizing the reality of sexual harassment in the workplace not minimizing that there are men that feel that the right to treat women as sexual objects and women who feel they need to climb the ladder of success by presenting themselves as sexual objects, but denying any of that nor MMI minimizing the problems associated with an it must be very difficult for women today to with all of the airbrushed and plastic surgeon enhanced plastic surgery enhanced images out there must be pressure on women to look a certain way and then they may just try to dress in a way that they think looks nice into some man that's that's presented themselves as a subjective object. Men can miss read things the other hand, women often know exactly how they are presented themselves so they are there different aspects to this. But I don't want to for moment downplay the problems that exist or minimize and when I hear accusations say against Bill Cosby. These are more extreme than the charges against Bill O'Reilly well easier wanted to, you wonder, when you hear enough.

You begin to think okay this this does sound like the person is guilty and and you still wait for choose to emerge as best as possible Bill O'Reilly number one have no idea if the charges are true or not.

If they were true that surprised me know. Why wouldn't surprise me.

He's a man of power and influence and prestige and they can easily get your head and although he's a Catholic background on a look at him as a true Christian would be walking closely with the Lord and having godly convictions in his life of the week have good motions, many other areas. On the other hand was surprised the people come against with false charges and it seems pretty orchestrated within your times release the story at the same time that advertisers were were were were were being influenced by media matters to pull away from O'Reilly and just kind of the perfect storm hitting a certain moment seemed orchestrated but putting all those things aside those things aside, I look at some the accusations and I scratch my head others.

I think yeah that's if he did it. That's terrible.

If he had stepped down because of it.

So be it, but others I look at and think to what, what's so bad about that. For example, particular burgers, says O'Reilly told her looking good there girl one time and she was getting off the elevator when good there girl now and some cultures Frenchwoman is girl itself would be insulting all right or from man to dare say to them is not married to. Looking good in Ellicott it if if someone if if there was a female employee in our ministry organization and and she came in in a nice outfit right. I wouldn't complement her I would support. That's a really nice outfit. I mean it be the rarest of rare why so my wife said simple and and I'm the leader of an organization ministry. So when do it you know if I might say all new hairdo results are that if it was, I conspicuously how can you not say something right now. Others others have male colleagues. It would have no problem say all great out really nice outfit that's fine perfectly fine, but for Riley to say what she said and now this is national.

Lucy said to look good there girl that suspect witchhunt is that sexual harassment okay and again I wonder if it meant an lesion tell me if you got a really nice new outfit you came into work one day wearing for the first time and none of the men.

This phenomena none of the men set you had a nice outfit you got friends there and coworkers, and of no boss or to whatever would that bother you when you think how come nobody noticed it would you say will they can say it's a nice outfit that they can tell me I look good just ask 866-34-TRUTH of take one more call James in Charlotte. Thanks for calling the line of fire. I agree with everything that I think it is kind of a witchhunt because, for example, if you did a you have to sleep with me to move up in your job that it fixed Orap yet but Danny looking there looking good there girl that can go either way I think it out and how it currently. I mean I felt coworkers another woman you know you look nice today and all that how you say it may never feel threatened or anything like that but also the same time I have to unite up at the edge look nice today is that if you like to keep that air and some of the type of person you are the type of person they are the kind of relationship you have. If if you've known each other for period of time and you've always conducted yourselves with the highest ethic.

You know then all all those things you could be fine and inappropriate. Why wouldn't you be surprised if there was a witchhunt to take on O'Reilly say that they of course hundred percent note no justification. Note no minimum right but Bill O'Reilly had to controvert a valuable aid pain levels of right wing agreement. Bill O'Reilly is known. You know what date we need made out matter what. Looking good girl. I don't think anybody I anymore at about a baby veteran like that John it got it. I I do this if he speaks his mind on TV speak his mind probably private as well James, I appreciate you weighing in. Listen the limit.

Let me just say a few things and and I'm writing an article about this probably posted tonight or tomorrow about the subject of just to think it through with folks but let me say once more that I believe that that we should treat one another with respect and that we should take the higher road when their two options, a lower road and a higher road take the higher road and that an act is people with dignity, especially especially if you claim to be a believer if you claim to be a follower of Jesus, then by all means, by all means conduct yourself with certain dignity and end. Women don't try to present yourselves to draw sexual attention from the opposite sex for marriage.

You have your own relationship with your husband but don't don't demean yourself in doing that and don't be a stumbling block to others. If you been blessed with with a beautiful body then then don't don't make that a curse don't go make a stumbling block for others right but that being said of we need to stand up to the extreme political correctness of this day was sobriety say sexual harassment. Let's work together against it sexism over six culture let's address it at the same time. Let's be realistic silver so my pole 6% of women, and 14% of men said yes sexual harassment 26% of women and 50% of men said it's not. That's because the men-portion. It's the line of fire with your host activist, author, international speaker and theologian Dr. Michael Brown voice of more cultural and spiritual revolution get into the line of fire now by calling 66343 here again is Dr. Michael Brown voice, which ran clarifies thing on the polling data that I did we've got on Facebook about 530,000 followers. There and on YouTube. It's it's much smaller.

YouTube is what 2525.8 thousand but it's much easier to do a poll on Twitter are it would got a 30,000+ subscribers to your YouTube channel, but it's much easier to do a poll on Twitter because you you simply post a question and has been with a certain number of characters, and then you can give up to four options newly have so much space for each of those options. So what what that means is that you can get an instant response tallied on Facebook. We gotta read through the responses and and then compile your people come out on Facebook were probably about 55% female, 45%. May I only know this because there demographics just go unintelligent.

Although our largest single demographic is probably men 18 to 35 thereabouts in the right after that women 1835 significant number of young people there which is positive, but Twitter is is seriously much more male presence than female presents on on Twitter and I'm looking for the whole which, for the moment seems to disappear here on Twitter here we go here we go so 32% of the responders were female. So far, and the other 68% male.

So out of the 32% female who responded 26% said no it's not sexual harassment floors look at tough to work at a mansion extra 6% of the women said it sexual harassment. So the Nomos were more than four times the amount of the yeses are right so over 75% of the responses. If you if you multiply right over 75% said no of the men they can. They were at 68% 14% said yes it is sexual harassment 54% said no it's not sexual harassment not not notice this notices it's slightly under 75% of the men said it's not slightly over 75% of the women since. Not so the women slightly higher percentage saying no, it's not sexual harassment.

Now why is it the case, would you have thought that the women would have been more prone to say, this is sexual harassment. What's my interpretation of the polling interpretation is that the women are saying consciously. Yeah if you dress like that you know what you're doing and you even want the attention and the men are saying but I've got to treat women with more respect and I don't want to be sexist in my answer. Hence, the man or responding with more sensitivity. Shall we say or care about the sexual harassment charge than the women again as no surprise that that happened for the reason stated not I could be wrong but that's that's my guess. Men want to be more careful in how they answer this women are be more candid didn't really looking it to 500 votes so far and it's my interpretation of data on a page, but I found it very very interesting Kiki Road. That's why women wear revealing stuff with admit or not some and will look at them. Greg suggests but do women have responsibility redressed of dressing themselves properly.

Men are visual. Let's be real.

Susan said women should respect themselves more if they want to be respected on both sides of responsibility with his finances in a very interesting will write back to France.

File the line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown get into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown got it in terms of certain outfits all clear. All right, right we switching over with switching now from sexual harassment issues to French politics. So what happens in the elections yesterday and not. Not surprisingly, is that real the pen the national front party which is normally branded extreme right extreme right wing nationalist party. She got 21.7% is 22% of the votes and Marcon who was from a so-called centrist modernist party. He got slightly hard.

About 23% of the vote and you had other candidates, but the so-called mainstream candidates.

The ones that would be the equivalent of all Republicans and Democrats did not make it for the first time in decades and decades and decades. Neither of them represent who will now join the runoffs you have the other two top candidates out according to what's expected with another conservative candidate, saying throw the votes towards Marcon.

We don't want the pen to get in.

It seems that Marie Le Pen will lose now. Anything could happen. There could be another horrific terror attack and I could further shift opinion, but let's let's try to analyze this use of what happened to the other candidates. The main party socialist party, led by the current president is is terribly unpopular. The party that would become of the conservative equivalent of the Republican party that that should have done well in many ways, that should've done well because it would stand for French security stand against radical Islam without having some of the extremist leanings that the Le Pen families been known for over the years by check this out personal scandals brought them down yet so the looking at a headline on Breitbart Francis for long leads establishment conservatives to historic defeat former premier Fran�ois for long, was one of the early favorites to become president.

This is AP news from France, but in the end he led the French writer this historic defeat as a fake job scandal engulfed his campaign is not amazing, potentially the fate of a nation you talking about the direction of a nation for years to come. You're talking about issues of security and economic strength in relationship to the rest of Europe and the rest of the world and perhaps for long.

Could have been the candidate to lead the way with with with us a strong conservative stance, but personal scandals destroyed often sale what level are you ready the former prime minister was charged in March with misuse of public funds over the employment of his British-born wife Penelope is a parliamentary assistant for 15 years that that's the fiasco that's the scandal was a severe blow to the 63-year-old who clinch the nomination for the Republican party in that November by presenting himself as unsullied by the scandals that surrounded his rival and former boss. Ex-president circles but is really one place in a May 7 presidential runoff also marks the first time since 1958. There, France's main right wing party has failed to make it to the second round. It was said to be a fight which the right could not lose, and which is ended in a lamentable fiasco, said Jean Fran�ois Cope not sure the pronunciation from head of the Union for a popular movement. The right has been swept away.

The right has just experienced its April 21, he said, referring to April 21, 2002, when socialist candidate Lionell.

Your spin was knocked out in the first round by Sean real Le Pen to start a Marine will take on centrist Emmanuel Macon in two weeks time. Difficult to Marcon instead of monochrome. I think I did rough refill on the devastating allegations that the elderly had earned �680,000 for friction roller first reported by this newspaper in January. He denied things in any way. That's what hurt him even more is that while one scandal could sink a party and a leading politician and understandably so.

But you got these major national issues and and that's with six things so how bad is Marie Le Pen. Her opposition is a man who is much were liberal who will not try to pull France out of the European Union. When that senses less nationalistic will he deal properly with radical Islam. One of the major problems in France. Excellent chance that he will not decisively decide that despite what he says so them. What's wrong with Marie Le Pen. Is she being tarred and feathered, because of what her father did Civil War what her father do what he is a Holocaust denier.

He has been fine multiple times for Holocaust denial. He wants a quote if you take a thousand page book on World War II the concentration camps take up only two pages in the gas chambers 10 to 15 lines. This is what one calls a detail of yet. He's a known anti-Semite, with some extreme views on other subjects.

So is real Le Pen simply her father's daughter. There's an article on fusion.net five terrifying facts about and reading the pen in the French far right wondering Le Pen is her father's daughter.

While on the flip side. On the flipside, she kicked her own father out of the party. She kicked anti-Semites out of the party. She saying in that respect, I am not my father's daughter.

On the other hand, she has said that extremist mosques should be shut down and the preachers and leaders should excuse me kicked out of the country so let's say you've got an immigrant to Muslim immigrant from another country there in France. They are preaching violence from the pulpits of their mosque.

Should they be expelled and the problem is that if there saying overthrow the government.

You're an immigrant. Another country and your sailors violently overthrow the government. Or let us attack the nonbelievers. Let us kill them or are you saying after church I good this was, to the glory of Allah good. Why should we be expelled.

Why should you be able to stay explained that in and should these mosques be monitored yes absolutely.

I got no issue with that.

This just security doesn't matter if there's religious guys or not there was a Christian church with the same rhetoric yes they should be monitored. If you had some emigrant pastor that they came into America and and they were preaching the massacre of of certain part of our population. They should be wiped out. They should be destroyed. Here's how to build bombs. If why should they have the right to stay in the country when they are seeking to format violence against people within that country. The problem is that Marie Le Pen in order to come against radical Islam is also say look, we we have to have equality in the way we treat Muslims and Jews and and she is said a couple of things that have really raise concerns one is that Jews living in France. The citizens cannot have dual citizenship with Israel. They cannot have dual citizenship if they want to stay as French citizens. They will have to drop their Israeli citizenship. That to me is an example of an extreme and unhealthy nationals. She has also said that Jewish man should not wear the keep the head covering yarmulke as it's called in Yiddish. They should not wear that public and and she's going to be calling for equal sacrifices for Muslims as well.

Why this makes me wonder. Our Catholic priests in France allowed to dress as priests or Catholic nuns allowed to dress as nuns of the country is tremendously secular. It's it still considers itself in certain ways Catholic. Although his essay, it's tremendously secular in its culture and Outlook is as humanistic a country is you'll find but what about when you cross in public. Should that be disallowed.

So my problem is in dealing with radical Islam is now dealing unfairly with Jews. By the way, I have a new article you have it ready just good asked her to Brown.org KSK DR Brown.org and it it's entitled Marie Le Pen of the Jews of France, it's complicated but clear. My perspective by Expo light a fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown your voice and more cultural and spiritual revolution. Here again is Dr. Michael Brown showgirl is our Rabbi Russia said that if the pain gets elected French you should leave my college as it is just so shortsighted French right is is not the enemy of French Jews. Then I pointed out that hey Jews get scapegoated all the time. Things go bad. The country does not take much for sentiments to turn against the Jewish people there got all their the cause of it there.

The guilty ones they control the money to control the media. They control this. They control that it's the juniors. You'd be amazed how much ugly stuff I get I see posted our YouTube channel and other places with his public discussion going on virulent anti-Semitic ugly ugly stuff and some from professing Christians.

So I I don't know that I agree with chief Rabbi Burroughs are obviously he has his finger on the pulse of role jury more than I do. On the flipside he's praising of Leonard Putman, Russia for the liberties and freedoms. Jews have their and now that's interesting. There's deftly been a crackdown on Buddhist freedom and certain other way especially towards evangelicals. Russia is a non-Russian orthodox Christians in in the country, but he lives there lives. There so he knows the situation better than I do. But should Jews leave France. I say this should be on the Garth Marie Le Pen get selected.

Be on your guard. On the one hand, she certainly could be of help to the Jewish population by fighting against radical Islam naming it for what it is exposing it for what it is coming against it for what it is certainly on the other hand, on the other hand, what if she treats Jews in an unfair way. Can't wear religious garb should wear a head covering can have dual citizenship that is negative so I some questions are raised in in my article and in there is a an editorial I saw after I was writing my article in in Ha'aretz which is a very left leaning Israeli publication in the article Sabrina Penn's instinct is right, fighting an Islamic takeover requires France to fit its guilt and shame over its past, but a desire for foolish consistency means Vichy and Jewish identity are also included. So, here, here are my questions. Why shouldn't French Jews be allowed dual citizenship as their solidarity with Israel over the decades damage the people of France has made them any less loyal citizens have a plundered France to aid and abet Israel and why should the Jewish man go elsewhere head covering what is beer that's part of his religious identification, but must shave his beard to again as she is is Le Pen going to require Catholic priests and nuns. That's where the ritual attire for Catholics in general, as were crosses is not why sit on Jews want to deal with radical Muslims. As such, without penalizing everyone else, including moderate Moslems.

So again, some questions for me in the pan and her party where the Jewish Ter. in France where you penalize Jews while seeking to discipline deal with radical Muslims where the Jewish Ter. in France.

How many of murdered policeman in cold blood what was shouting out pros really slogans how many RAM trucks into civilian slaughtering doses. How many of massacred scores of concertgoers. How many of attack restaurants and kill as many dodges they could. How many are broken into magazine headquarters and butchered anti-Jewish journalism. These are all things that radical Muslims done juices and then these Jews have often been the victims.

So why put restriction on Jewish population when his radical Islamic draft or just deal with radical Islamic and ask moderate Muslims wherever they may be whatever number they may be to work with you against the plague of radical Islam. After all, if you get if you have a list of casualties people killed by Muslims worldwide, whose highest on the list would you say Christians will Chris is a very high list, but whose highest on the list. In all likelihood, other Muslims. This happens all the time, Muslims killing Muslims in just a few days ago in Afghanistan Caliban retreat against an army base there. There the Army taken out a couple of their people and they retaliated this and I got army uniforms the public to the base while the soldiers were stopping for prayer as their fellow Muslims and they slaughter them as it is a long gunbattle explosives and things like that. Like 100 soldiers massacre.

If you Caliban casualties Muslims killing Muslims shouldn't shouldn't the shouldn't the moderate Muslim say we want to stand against this as well and less than a really moderate look. Once you have a strongly nationalist government. It is very easy when things go bad to scapegoat minority group in your midst, and all to happen and by the way can go extreme left exclude extreme right but but all too often all too often Jews got scapegoated during the black plague in Europe that killed as much as one third of the population got blamed for starting Jews poisoning the wells allegedly using parts of animals and elements from the Lord's supper making some mixture to poison the well did you start to yes.

Do they guys I never know why not. Hi Jean, Jewish law, various things but about that. They practice that gets a little safer, they guide you know they poison the wealth and in Germany there was Nazis, the Jews, it's their fault was economy crash was a country such a message. The Jews, that's my concern. France if Marie Le Pen was elected she could do good in certain ways.

In terms of working against radical Islam and the Islamization of France. She could potentially too good for country by pulling them out of European Union. The bricks it of of the France so it's it's a bad thing okay could that can be debated, but for sure if she was elected with her current policies.

Even if she is not her father's daughter.

Even if you pours anti-Semitism the hyper nationalism is dangerous and destructive, and because of that I have concerns again read my latest article and asked Dr. Brown.orc all and we've got new videos up for you in our digital library. Let me check really quickly and just see our latest. We got always new articles of and and I'm listless to see here in our digital library what's new.

We've got the article on Marie Le Pen oh got an article, video, what happens to the baby when daddy becomes mommy and article are universities producing spoiled brats a video. What is the best English Bible translation and and a bunch of other so check these out as a preacher rapture biblical all recent videos or articles on the website*around a member France if you don't get my E newsletter sign up for today I want to send you a fascinating e-book seven secrets to the real Messiah you get it you sign up for our newsletter do it and asked Dr. Brown.Ward from the elections in France to charges of sexual harassment against Bill O'Reilly got you covered right here it's time for the line of fire with your host activist and author, international speaker and theologian Dr. Michael Brown your voice of moral cultural and spiritual revolution Michael Brown is the director of the coalition of conscience and president of fire school of ministry get into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH. That's 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown got an honest honest appeal here right note. No mockery, no intent to disparage whatsoever. But if you are atheist or agnostic or simply a strong believer in Darwinian evolution. Could you give me your perspective on something we had the Earth Day, the marks on science, science, smart so-called on Saturday since there's great success. Others say it was self-defeating and even self mocking will come to that little while but III saw video today. I posted it on RS Dr. Brown Facebook page and if you consider yourself an agnostic or atheist, or simply a proponent Darwinian evolution. I love to hear from you today again is not to mock. This is not to disparage, just ask an honest question 866-34-TRUTH 784 and we gotta bunch of things to talk about Donald Trump almost completing 100 days in office. How is he doing is he keeping his promises or not, how far the Democrats going to be the party of death. A bunch of other things we want to talk about been talking the first hour, but elections in France and sexual harassment issues with Bill O'Reilly but will will mention a few things in that regard as well. But here's here's a video and here's read love to hear from someone who is a naturalist who does not believe in God the creator or in any type of intelligent design of the universe. So it's a video about the puffer fish. This little fish that is barely visible in its environment. Yet the mail and in this is BBC earth produce this. It's it's not produced by Christian ministry symbolic of this BBC earth. Here is this little fish. The mail and over one week. It barely barely sleeps because he has to do this in a certain pretty timeless. The current mess things up. He makes this amazing design. All he has is his friend so he he slides across the above the bottom of of the water there so that the bed of the sea were areas and he makes this remarkable image. It's it's concentric circles with with grooves coming in and out and and mounds higher and lower I mean huge sink. You have to design this you have to step back and look at this you, it is got a little appraisal of fascist little brain somehow was able to make the maximal mathematical calculations, and then if he's got like if he sees little shelves and things of that he pick some up with his mouth. But that uses them to smooth out grooves and things like that and he doesn't he does it so as to get the attention of the female half. Can you explain to me if you be if you believe in Darwinian evolution.

Atheist or agnostic or simply believing Darwinian evolution. Can you explain to me how this tiny little Fisher's tiny brain is fish is able to make all these mathematical calculations how it is that this now attracts the female who figured this out and and what were they doing to attract each other and all the millions of years that it took to evolve. This behavior and and how how can it be explained without some type of intelligent design. I'm talking just academically, intellectually, I don't see a logical answer. If you have one give me a call and I mentioned that not just as a so the videogame posted necessary for that I posted it on RS the ground, but also because a lot of what happened in the March sciences science ideology. Ideology will write back here again is Dr. Michael Brown all them yet from interacting during the break with the gentleman who was answer my question on Facebook this is Michael Brown you listen to the line of fire 866-34-TRUTH 7884 and I asked the question about this puffer fish in the video you got gonna watch it. It's at the Esther to Brown Facebook page as of this. How can anyone watch this video not recognize that God designed this fish. It's tiny brain just evolve with the ability to do this and it just so happens that the female fish is attracted to this and how, pray tell, this next generation learn to carry on this artful legacy that rinses just instinct. So one answer was, was this evolution is about adaptation to the environment. Science is shown that atoms naturally adapt remaining years of adapting animals will change based in environments of some unreasonable believe that this animal evolve exactly as it is female fish will be much like humans, we are attracted to any capability of survival and flourishing and passing on a strong genetic code so I replied it have these fish survive and multiply. While the mail was learning how to attract the female has this tiny brain figure out the precise mathematical calculations to create such a balance design is like saying we can evolve one day so that we jump to the moon. I think not. And the gentleman who actually was taught about theistic evolution, so seeing God involved see an evolutionary process and icy yes the evolutionary processes with in the species modification of the species that they will agree on that. It's of God designed things and it's a bit within a species but not to get from one species to the next or not to create life in the first place or to create the universe of the first place. Yet some of the get a big bag did a lot but he had the repercussions of the big baggers that billions of years later you have this fish with a tiny brain. These mathematical calculations and produce something amazing, so the gentleman without having civil dialogue and he sees explaining his answer to my question. How do these fish survive and multiply with a male was learning how to attract female has his tiny brain figure out the precise mathematical calculations creates its balance design is like same can evolve one days that we jump to them when I think not. He replace all instinct. The females are attracted to the fittest for survival available to them the same thing with humans. Female humans are attracted to wealth, health and confidence also so that we can evolve to jump to the moon may be a bit of a stretch, mostly because her survival is an call for that sort of thing.

The survival of the species call for flight. I'm sure the good Lord will allow us to evolve wings but the question is how do we survive until we have all the wings, no, I don't believe we can evolve wings right that someone I've seen no scientific reason that we can evolve wings but number two how we survive while were waiting to evolve wings there's some predator that is trying to devour us as you wipe us out, and the only getaway for them as is. We have to get airborne.

Well, if we so primitive right we don't we not planes and and all the stuff right somehow. How do we get airborne.

While the wings will evolve. While we will no longer species at that point we just got eaten up because we couldn't survive and and or the will know you hide in caves really evolve wings while hiding in caves and and one of the wings evolve out of the I'm fear I'm flapping I'm sitting I'm sitting at my desk in my stadium flapping, but I flop a lot. I keep flapping for year.

I flop all my life and my kids could flapping their kids could find. We still don't have wings that we survive. See the problem. So I again I'm not being facetious I'm I'm not being facetious of. I am asking for a naturalistic explanation to this because as I look at it.

I see none. And why would you say with the females are attracted to the males inducible.

Why would female be attracted to patterns of the ground. All that, why aren't the sharks attracted to that pattern. He must be really good tasty let's even he must be really capable fish whitefish about this piece is that why only the females that species attracted to that design, Inc. you trust me. Gotta check out this this video you can see it again on the Esther to Brown Facebook page.

Ask a deer Brown on Facebook and it's gotten just on on on my page. It's gotten a lot lot of thing I can's silly fuses got on my page but it's gotten overall since it's posted like 26 million views right and it's again about the puffer fish and it's it's posted by BBC earth so that leads me now to the subject of science. I been reading the writings of some scientific thinkers and they have been downplaying the March for science either. Scientists or folks who engage with scientific thinking, William Briggs, writing on the stream said this, I'm pleased to report the asinine March for quotes science has been a dud organized with diffuse what they thought was going to be an enormous stick of dynamite wait to hear the boom honey, but with a got was a tiny pop from a damp baby finger pop. No exclamation mark the independent quoted some guy called Peter Lipke who said I'm a science professor this prep the reader signalized signaling some solid science was on his way. Looking continue the current administration shown complete disregard for facts and the truth will a lot of this is a reaction against Donald Trump downplaying the human element of climate change or the global crisis of climate change and want to make perfectly clear that I am a total nonexpert on the question climate change it if you want to get the top 10 million people to talk to about climate change. I'm not in that list okay the question is not, is there climate change. The question is how much is being caused by human beings and house of your problem is as followers of Jesus. I believe we should be good stewards of the earth, just like if you inherit something and pass it onto the next generation you want to pass it on in the best possible weight. Your kids, grandkids absolutely think in a multigenerational way.

Absolutely the book of Revelation even speaks against those who destroy the earth, so healthy, environmentalism, sure, tree hugging, the question is how much how much of the so-called science, March was about real science and how much was it about Bob pushing various ideologies. Well, here's an article on pink news from the UK yes pink as in gay headline says clear transparent speaks of the March for science was because the March for science on Saturday was transgender, queer man is being reported by Joseph Patrick McCormick, thousands took to the streets of Washington DC as well as other cities around the world to demonstrate against what they say is an assault on science and facts, Baker Senior fellow with American progress book in Washington DC about data and how can be used to tell a story or provide a narrative will have a story.

One is that of a public health geek and a policy wonk.

I'm also a queer transgender man. So what exactly does that mean for us. Let's parse that queer transgender man so he is. She he is born female, but identifies as male and dresses as male presents as male made even had sex change surgery. Donna but born female. Then clear war that mean well at least gay, if not beyond. So perhaps as a transgender man now this individuals attracted to men. So why not stay a woman to be attracted to all the children understand different phobic okay adding so he said science is not neutral on political issues. All wool science is not science.

Science is not about politics and the less the politics directly intersect with science. For example, science has nothing to say about whether we should build a wall to keep out illegal immigrants. Science could say this is the type of wall that would be the safest.

This is the type of wall that would that would provide the most protection.

This is the type of wall that would be that the most long-lasting.

This is the type will be the most difficult to breach but can't say what you should build a wall or not. Science could identify. This is someone who is legitimately intersects, who as male body but with a mix of female chromosomes are rated D for chromosomal defect that makes important male-female science can tell us that science can't tell us the man who identifies as a woman she believes a ladies bathroom and in fact reminds me of a debate I saw with Richard Dawkins and John Lennox some years ago we watched the beginning of it, but Dawkins made this ridiculous statements about science and religion come to it. On the other side of the stay right there listening to the modified line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown voice of moral cultural and spiritual revolution. Here again is Dr. Michael Brown thanks for joining us 158-663-7884 so I do do we get your take Donald Trump are coming to his first hundred days. How you doing if you voted for him is he living up to your expectations were giving him a thumbs up. If you didn't vote for him as he confirm the worst fears were you surprised by how he's leading 866-348-7884 right back to science promote. This is a statement made by quote a queer transgender man at the March for science and science March in Washington DC on Saturday. He said science is not neutral on political issues advocacy is not a dirty word quote science is objective, but science is not neutral. The poet Dante wrote that the hottest places in hell reserved for those who remain neutral and moral crisis. We cannot pretend we are above the fray. According to the diversity statement of the March for signs of course, there had to be a diversity statement how utterly scientific sarcasm intended quote. People care about science or an intersectional group embodying a diverse range of race or sexual orientations, gender identities, abilities, religions, ages, social, economic, and immigration statuses so it has made judgment calls. It has made judgment calls about gender identities is made. Judgment calls.

We the March organizers represent stand in solidarity with historically underrepresented scientists and science advocates will hang out will will help me here help me. It is we are told, the overwhelming number of scientists who believe that human beings are causing global warming and its dangers, and it is a small minority in a vocal minority using bogus bogus bogus. There's been manipulation of data. This an exaggeration.

Things have not gone according to the predictions and the etc. things reversing in some other ways so false and with his global warming taking place. You can't say it's caused by people okay will the more interesting with them.

Why would positions like that of been completely out of place. I thought your sin in solidarity with historically underrepresented scientists and science advocates. It seems that you are standing in solidarity with extreme left-wing views then do a science little to do with science. The former atheists now deceased Anthony flew became a theist before passing away was a great champion of atheism for decades. One of the leading atheists in the world that as he explained, is coming to theism in and why he did one of things explains what science can and cannot say science cannot say that woman is beautiful face is that subjective signs can say the woman's face is well proportioned signs can say the woman's eyes are deep blue science can say that woman's hair is extremely thick, but science cannot say when is it beautiful face or that's a beautiful sunset because that is not a scientific evaluation is an aesthetic evaluation the right method that's with the subject. Okay so I'm watching this debate. Dawkins versus John Lennox, Richard Dawkins versus John Lennox and John Lennox is from Ireland and he has a PhD in mathematics and PhD in science. I believe he teaches at Oxford, I think, is Oxford and Cambridge educated brilliant man.

Multilingual. And when I had him on the air a few years back. He was in studio because he was speaking in apologetics conference in Charlotte North Carolina and full of joy as well and in a very caring man and unashamedly Christian men and I wish I had literally 1/10 of the scientific knowledge I could do really well in debates that if I probably would probably 105th scientific knowledge would be a massive boost from RM but but what love may have one test I debate a divinity sites history theist out there if I deserve more ammunition in that regard, and that he's he's ridiculing the idea John Lennox is that the universe just came into being human life just came into being by by the freak products as the freak products of random evolutionary processes and Dawkins had made the statement that concepts like vicarious atonement are completely unscientific only watched it that one time only part of it.

Some of that Dawkins is made similar comments or how it came up. If you cannot the rest of the debate, but I thought what will be talking vicarious atonement is a totally theological and spiritual concept, saying that God can allow someone to suffer from other persons since and and bring a person forgiveness and redemption so vicarious atonement is substitutionary atonement. So Jesus takes our place dying on the cross right that's that's vicarious atonement, substitutionary atonement, I'm guilty. I deserve the penalty Jesus pays it for me.

He suffers in my place. He pays the debt on my behalf and through what he did unforgiven on free that is vicarious atonement. Dawkins citizen completely unscientific idea paraphrases words what women scientific science does not intersect with that science does not intersect with the idea of God right minute unless it could be demonstrated scientifically that a God or a deity does not exist. Science does not intersect with that science is not intersect with the concept of human sin signs intersects with aspects of human behavior.

Is this behavior obsessive can of is this behavior learned we can begin to modify his behavior is his behavior healthy or unhealthy. Science can ask many of those questions and answer some of them, but science has no category about sin, guilt acute about the emotions one experiences while feeling guilty as abutment has is no category for this category and the idea of someone paying for the sins of someone else.

It transcends science, it does not intersect with scientists in a different world. Science one. Dawkins says it's unscientific again under the exact word use, but it was very close to that. Maybe network what Dawkins is saying is I is a scientist reject that IDI is a scientist find that again except Eliza scientists find idea morally repugnant or whatever. I scientist reject that because it sounds like Christianity.

I reject Christianity at that. That's all he is saying. That's all he could say sigh out loud together. So a lot of the so-called March for science without science is when ideology and I read of the scientists said that that it rejects on nonscientific grounds. The ideologies it rejects, so is a march against science. More than a March for science we come back Donald Trump. How is he doing in his first hundred days, it's the line of fire with your host activist, author, international speaker and logician Dr. Michael Brown voice of more cultural and spiritual revolution get into the line of fire now by calling 66343 here again is Dr. Michael Brown joining us on the line of fire.

They Donald Trump almost completing 100 days and office. How is he doing so for moments ago, literally moments ago I posted a Twitter poll asking the question, how is he doing in your opinion and I just I just gave for options that's the max you can give which were excellent. Pretty good pretty bad terrible right that was that was my poll question I was not appearing as a whole. Here it okay hopefully will 866-34-TRUTH what you think how is he doing so far. Did you vote for him.

Did you not vote for him. That's obvious.

Again, it influence how you think he's doing. I'm looking at an article in CBS News has Trump kept his promises for the first hundred days of his administration and looking at an article in the Washington Examiner by Byron York comes hundred days in executive success, and then on the daily wire were nearing the 100 house Trump doing so far on keeping his promises so eager to get to see those results. But why is this not appearing as a as a pole on twitter that's on and after perhaps redo that right so what's your take what you take. You think he's doing great but the secular media liberal media's blasting him day and night. Hence, hence, looks bad you think is make a joke of the presidency. He thinks five funny some of Senate doing the right thing thing is really a mixed bag.

If you voted for him is he living up to expectations with you down if you didn't vote for him.

More specifically, voted against him as he living up your negative expectations is a surprisingly positive ways. 866-34-TRUTH 7884 just some other political news and article on red state that was posted yesterday afternoon by Terry Kristof Democrats just confirmed they are the party of death what they've done it the Democrats to finally confirm that they will no longer support pro-life candidates from their party.

In a statement released Friday, Democratic National Committee chairman Tom Perez said, quote every Democrat like every American should support a woman's rights to make her own choices about her body or health that is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state at a time when women's rights are under assault in the White House, the Republican Congress and states across the country must speak up for this principle as loudly as ever, and with one voice. He got lambasted by the far left wing of his party. According to this article for supporting pro-life Democrat Keith Mello who is running for mayor of Omaha Nebraska. The DNC chair had ironically enough voice to support from Ella during a recent nationwide unity tour the pro-abort radicals of NARAL were having none of that: the DNC supported Bella politically stupid. There you have it.

Pro-life Democrats you got no place in the party self evidence to me for a while anyway the actions today. This is NARAL pro-choice America president leasehold the actions today by the DNC to embrace and support a candidate for office will strip women. One of the most critical costs. Constituencies of the party of our basic rights and freedom is not only disappointing, it's politically's do bid so pro-life Democrats good by get out. We don't want you, you're not welcome that's the message being sent the DNC's decision leaves pro-life Democrats in the lurch.

This is especially an issue for Southern Democrats is constituencies tend to be pro-life. At the very least favorite restrictions on abortion Democrats keep destroying yourself destroy yourselves God's grace. America is going to affect this mentality of death that I care on the line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown voice of more cultural and spiritual revolution.

Here again is Dr. Michael Brown, Michelangelo's really writing on Huffington Post.com. Queer voices are some Democrats going soft on LGBT Q rights in the age of Trump so not for living in North Carolina not only through continued outrage over the partial repeal of HB two which gay activists. There was no real repeal at all. There angered with Roy Cooper who was elected with one of the major pushes being to get rid of HB two. So not only sells it an insult to injury for Cigna really, there is the possibility that the Democrat Democratic Governors Association is actually going to hold a meeting in North Carolina.

A policy conference in North Carolina. How could they do that that would be rewarding. North Carolina we shall see how these things play out. Will there be a push back a backlash against the LGBT Q extremism.

So Donald Trump how's he doing CBS News has Trump kept his promises for the first hundred days of his administration. He laid out 100 day plan to make America great again in October.

He promised to work with Congress to introduce the following broad legislative measures and fight for their passage in the first hundred days of his administration, 10 measures were one middle class tax relief and simplification act to any off shoring act three American energy and infrastructure act for school choice and education opportunity act five repeal and replace Obama care act.

Six. Affordable childcare and elder care act seven and illegal immigration act. Eight.

Restricting the safety act by restoring national security I can clean up corruption, washing act, not just have a question when anyone even Donald Trump think that realistically realistically they could pull this off with anyone think that in the hundred days eucalyptus Zoe get on through Congress. Okay, for his part Donald Trump told the Associated Press last week that he should necessarily be held held accountable.

These promises because much of the foundations been laid things came up. I give an example that is put Supreme Court judge on the hundred day plan and I got a Supreme Court judge, so April 29 is the 100th day in office is an evaluation here about how is he doing that comes out you know it. This is basically still it's gonna be is the liberal new site say he's not doing well in the conservative web website saves doing well based basically that's that's my just glancing a number of articles today so Washington Examiner and executive success. That's how it rates his first hundred days on the executive action front Trump has kept a significant number was promises campaign he promised to begin the process of selecting seem Supreme Court justice course which is now on the court. He promised withdraw from transpacific partnership as president he did it. He promised require that for every new federal regulation to existing bank regulations must be eliminated as president he did it the promise to lift the Obama click robots of the Keystone pipeline. He did it. He promised to remove a begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants. He's doing it and that it evaluates the others. Let's just see before I go to the phones Ben Shapiro daily wire like I since be pretty objective account dispense a strong conservative and he was not never Trump but strongly opposed Trump in many ways of and by the way, just like in the polis is 96% of those who voted for Trump's of the group from again. And interestingly, with all the negative press coming his way.

And with the gaffes and with his press secretary Sean Spicer messing up at times and things like that was fascinating was fascinating is that a recent poll said that if you ring is so reclaimed he beat her today, 43% to 40%, which means the percentage is even got up, the percentage just remember he lost the popular vote when the electoral college.

So this is been a shift and maybe the reason is people realizing her client would've been an absolute disaster and trumps being Trump the good, the bad, interesting. Interesting how is Trump done. Let's see what Ben Shapiro has to say, so is God's list on cleaning up government first propose a constitutional amendment to impose term limits of all members of Congress know he has done it. Second, a hiring freeze all federal employees. Yes, then lifted it. Third requirement there for review federal exit 8 regulation two must be abolished to existing done it sooner than see him just a mechanical through everyone here he's got no peasant that yes but lifted yes yes yes but undercut by his own administration.

No complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections to protect the American workers. Yes, although not totally clear and true. Let's see yes yes no yes yes is looking at this it's okay Max, but comes out with a lot of yes is that he has done a lot of what is promised. It's it's interesting from those he hasn't fulfilled his largest campaign promise to easily fix government with the brilliance go to businessman that's way but in the presence of his hundred day plan on somebody yesterday said that but here's the bottom line. It's all too early to tell how Trump is doing some of his actions been terrific suburban garbage, some having taken place. Some of this rhetoric is been useful more.

Hasn't the bags mixed. Anyone who tells you anything different is selling you something that sounds like a fair valuation as I expected it would be 866-348-7884. Let's go to Gerald and Lexington.

Welcome to the line of fire. Thank you very much on already doing a great job and if I may say not what is out there, but honestly I just just my opinion and I tried doing a great job.

You just know and I thank you from New York and maybe I don't care about that great but I note that the defendant address. The address of the death of marriage that breath of God, and gender and time party of draft document that will I better that the fact against those for those Democrats that do not support the radical agenda, it does raise the question because many so I disagree with Republicans on this and this and this. But the agenda of the party is increasingly radical so Joe give me one example Argosy Trump supporter to be one example of where you think Trump has has made good business decisions.

Pipeline pipeline on their pipeline about environmental issues, whatever. To me, because of energy.

When I worked on the strip for energy and Dr. number one. I think that was a number one business life.

I appreciate the call.

Thank you for weighing in, clearly.

And hey, I'm a New Yorker scientist and with good business and instead about the attitude, 866337884. There's an article in the stream stream.org from Rachel Doug with these trip Austin incorrectly.

What else is new. A little ways, Trump has rolled back government regulations.

In his first hundred days as he reaches his hundredth day in the White House in April 29. He will have work with Congress to rescind more regulations using the Congressional review act and any other president according to representative Doug Collins in Georgia were excited about what we're doing. So, for we do more than ever is been done in the history of Congress with the sea, or a the Congressional review act as the true Trump lawmakers are using allowing Congress to repeal executive branch regulations once it has the Senate passed a joint resolution revolution resolution disapproving of a particular regulation. The president signs the measure of any gives a list of 11 regulations concerning the coal mining industry regulations defining streams in the coal industry regulations restricting firearms for disabled citizens regulation a rule consists governing the government contracting process rule covering public lands in Monaco's to be candid with you.

I'm unfamiliar with almost every one of these resolutions here, but apparently in deregulation people are writing him well and then let me just look at this polling data here American size of comes first hundred days; sis will be right back all my conversation with Albright folks I stated. Invariably, this for and the Expo line of fire with your host Dr. Michael Brown into the line of fire now by calling 866-34-TRUTH here again is Dr. Michael Brown so the white racist and then accused of wanting to put black speck of flavored you serious serious unexplainable Michael Brown. Thanks for joining us on the line of fire, be sure. Be sure to visit Esther to Brown.org and check out my latest articles and videos right to be equipped to be encouraged to be help. You will be challenged Esther to Brown.org and jute to get my weekly emails with updates of latest videos, latest articles or perhaps key things that are that are that are going on if, for example, our new TV broadcasts on the about those you know about word of fire about modifier TV about how to watch and states around the world, you would have given the emails. So here's how you do it and when you sign up to get our emails. I want to send you a free e-book of got a fascinating e-book, seven secrets of the real Messiah based on many years of study, but put simple eye-opening terms. Yet it's free when you sign up to get my email so here's a do even asked her to Brown ask a dealer Brown.org writer on the homepage just to see it get our weekly updates and free e-book to sign up for that just take you a few seconds to do when you're there check out our special resource offers as well or find out how to become a torchbearer and then we got our recent articles and videos they're all waiting for you.

866-348-7884. One of my recent articles asked the question or universities producing spoiled brats. So before I get to my all right conversation.

Let's see American size of Trump's first 100 days and post ABC poll's Washington Post and ABC trumps disapproval is is 53% right, which, getting close to his hundred days is is much much higher. Barack Obama's 26% George W. Bush 2032% Oakland 39 George H.

W. Bush, 22, Ronald Reagan, 19th recorder 1804 33 so it's the highest disapproval rating for any president going back to Eisenhower now is a simple answer for that tooth to choices in life you one. He's doing a terrible job to second meet is blessing them day and night, and people of certain perception based on but here's work. It's interesting of 53% see him as a strong leader, but most of his accomplishments. Honesty and empathy within check this out. 88% of Trump voters think he's accomplished at least a good amount. So far, but others obviously a minority are strongly critical so of Trump voters to approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is having his job as president, 94% approve. Okay.

94% approve that's that's significant 3% no opinion only 2% disapprove.

So those who voted for him or or speaking very strongly on his behalf again were early on.

Time will tell but will you voted for Manatt with her. It's been a dream come true for you to print you present or or the nightmare of your life either way. Pray for him. Pray for him on my twitter pole which is what 27 minutes old so just getting the first few responses coming in. Let's see where you were or are we here once again it it appears his opponent disappears as a pole, I'll find it. I'll get the data for you.

Why Phyllis is wonderful fabulous marvelous fantastic super grand best ever can be better super delightful excellent foxtrot okay so Moses can we choose at that will get those results for years just to get out of curiosity but but my dialogue with the folks on the all right all very very interesting. One gentleman said this about the antiwhite Jewish activists Dr. Michael Brown supports S&L nationalism for Israel, but not for whites and I a mensch is first on 11: antiwhite Jewish activists, the moments later, I'm told, I want to re-enslave Blacks seriously from someone else so it's fascinating was folks were responding to an article I wrote a few days ago. Again you consider my digital library Esther to Brown, the Lord is called five reasons why categorically reject the all right version of Jesus. My reasons Jesus was reconciling the racist.

He was a servant of supremacist will not a racist. He was king of the Jews are part of the KKK while a devoted member. The people of Israel. He was that hyper nationalist. He did not equate military might, with strength that's what I wrote again I nuance different points explain things in further detail, so based on that. I'm in antiwhite Jewish activists I support as though this was a prisoner left whites. Israel has 20% of our population, which is overwhelmingly Muslim 20% Palestinian population within was recognized as Israel 20% noise argument that and I said no but I mean that the vestment term is roses was with and peacefully that's fine as husband and you state is the only one on the planet.

Some is it you need a Jewish majority. This is the only place on the planet. It is, and is Nandu's race right be because of the or or or a skin color or ethnicity because there Jews from all around the world so it's it's it's race but not ethnicity. You could say in its religion as well. But you can be a secular Jew you can be a nonbelieving GTB Jewish Buddhist you can be a practicing Muslim to be Palestinian policy be Druze you can be one of these men are superbly welcome. There this miraculous North country you perfect welcome here. We live here for his first decades great. You get the family's great fine just still try to kill us, that would be in a position let us have our majority what's what's that got to do with white supremacy in America. I'm all for healthy nationals in a secure borders, but I believe we should have godly Christian values in the midst of what we do and I believe we continue to be a cultural melting pot/become part of America proper embrace. We are become part of us one grade. What was the issue of your skin color or ethnic background. If if if we are more dark skinned in the future more light-skinned in the future will what was I had to do with anything. So those are fundamental values of preservative nothing to do with white supremacy you denounce snow nationalism for whites for me to an article you advocate for open borders for Israel is white is not a nationality on for secure borders for American Israel keep the terrace murders out for sure. So you're saying that unlike ethnic Jews whites do not deserve to have their own countries and I said you believe America should be white only that sick and fruit for example is Rose do not believe Israel should be Jewish only in these folks is to look nonracist when I racist but you better believe your spouse racist views and then when I called George Washington in a positive way to let the Jews say Haley don't tolerate bigotry and so on.

Sources old washes a slave on the trumpet. Blacks in slavery another day in the life of yours truly right friends began most broadcast sure sign off aspect around or get her email