How One Investigative Journalist Discovered the Shocking Truth About Red State DEI Policies

Dr. Peter McCullough says the most common question he's asked is, how do I get this out of my body? Spike Support Formula is the only product that contains ingredients researched to block and dissolve spike protein in the bloodstream.

So whether you got the shot, had a bad bout of COVID, or are worried about shedding, there is something you could do now to protect yourself. Head to twc.health slash kirk to buy the wellness company Spike Support Formula and get back to feeling your best. Use promo code kirk at checkout for 10% off your order.

That is promo code kirk for 10% off your order. Hey everybody, today on The Charlie Kirk Show, John Salier joins us to talk about Ohio State University, Texas Tech, NIH, and the deep state Leviathan known as DEI, the DEI commissars. A really important episode about how entrenched DEI is.

The Soviets had commissars, the Maoists had the Red Guard, the French Revolution had Jacobins, and all were tasked with enforcing party orthodoxy and punishing anyone who stepped out of line, and DEI bureaucrats are America's commissars of wokeness. Email us as always freedom at charliekirk.com. Fight back against all this nonsense with Turning Point USA at tpusa.com. That is tpusa.com. Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa.com. Email us as always freedom at charliekirk.com. You have got to get your tickets today to Amfest.

It's been there for a couple years. It is a game changing, life-changing event. It has secured the title of the largest multi-day conservative gathering in history. You know, over 10,000 people attend. You better get your tickets.

They're popping. Amfest has an electrifying environment, leads the charge to fight the American culture war as we bring you to the epicenter of freedom. The speakers are unbelievable. You might ask, well, when is it? It's December 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, and come on.

I mean, these speakers, hold your phone. Tucker Carlson, Glenn Beck, Patrick Bet-David, Candace Owens, Rob Schneider, Roseanne Barr, Dennis Prager, Allie Beth Stuckey, James O'Keefe, Riley Gaines, Ben Carson, Jason Whitlock, Gad Saad, Brandon Tatum, Seth Dillon, Jack Pessobic, Benny Johnson, Yanmi Park, Michael Seifert, James Lindsay, Steve Bannon, Eric Metaxas, Donald Trump Jr., Josh Hawley, Marjorie Taylor Green, Matt Gaetz, and bigger names than even that to be announced soon. So get your ticket today, amfest.com. That is amfest.com.

You're going to really love it. I think when you come, you'll meet new people. Maybe you want to find a husband or a wife, come to Amfest. Find a best friend, come to Amfest. Have kids that you're afraid are slipping to the liberal side, go to Amfest. Have conservative kids that you want to give them the best Christmas gift ever, amfest.com. Meet your heroes, see them in person.

Plus there's breakouts and media row. It's an incredible, incredible day, amfest.com. Just coming in a couple of weeks, Phoenix, Arizona. We're doing our show live, by the way, from media row.

Love seeing all of you taking selfies. It's great. We spent a couple of hours there last year. It was really amazing, amfest.com. This four-day event is packed with empowering speakers, hundreds of patriotic partner organizations, and the America-loving community that you have been searching for. Don't miss on the amazing concert too.

And let me, I mean, come on, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Rob Schneider, Roseanne Barr, Dennis Prager, Allie Beth Stuckey, James O'Keefe, Patrick Bet-David, Glenn Beck. I mean, just drop everything and come to Phoenix. See you all at Amfest, amfest.com. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

That's why we are here. Brought to you by the loan experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage at andrewandtodd.com. Joining us now is John Salier, Senior Fellow and Director of University Policy at the National Association of Scholars, a great organization and also contributor at the Wall Street Journal. John, welcome to the program.

Several stories here I want to hit with you. The first of which is inside Ohio State's diversity equity inclusion factory. You obtained 800 pages of the diversity faculty recruitment reports from Ohio State, the Ohio State University. Let's add insult to injury. It's been a tough couple days for the Buckeye faithful, but beyond a football game in Ann Arbor, this is real damage to Ohio State University.

What's going on here? Yeah, thanks so much for having me on. So part of my role is to investigate what's happening at universities, and I think you can't understand the university culture and all of the problems that we can see in it from the outside without looking at how faculty are hired. And so I was given a tip from a professor at Ohio State that every single search committee in their college of arts and sciences, which is a big part of the university, was required to submit a diversity faculty recruitment report. In order to bring job candidates onto campus to interview them, they had to do this. So they had to describe on this forum how the search committee discussed diversity, how they used diversity statements to evaluate candidates, and how each of the candidates they were proposing to bring to the university contributed to diversity equity and inclusion. And now there's something very interesting about these documents because Ohio State stands out for its commitment to DEI. They have 189 diversity officers who are compensated at 20 million dollars a year total. Their president two years ago announced a massive DEI-focused faculty hiring initiative saying that we're going to hire as many as 150 new professors who focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion.

And so what these documents really do is give us an inside look into what universities mean when they say they're going to invest heavily in DEI. And the results are not pretty. So I just did the math. So that's 20 million dollars divided by 189 people. That's an average of 105,820 a year average in Columbus, Ohio. You can live on that in Columbus, Ohio. Great, great spot.

Low cost of living there. So let's walk through this. What I think is striking, though, is that Ohio has become both gubernatorial and from a state legislative perspective, a red state. The taxpayers of Ohio on all elections, they do not want this DEI thing. If a candidate like Sherrod Brown were to run for the United States Senate reelection on the message of DEI, he would lose by 10 points. Right.

Tim Ryan, when he would run against J.D. Vance, if he would, he would say like, look, I want, you know, black only dormitories and white people are to blame. You're not going to win Ohio with that message. I'm I'm saying this for a reason is that the Ohio State University, which is a flagship publicly funded institution of the great state of Ohio, is out of lockstep with their voters. This is not State University of New York, Albany, right where critical race theory is really embraced by the Manhattanites.

What's going on here? How could something so unpopular be funded so generously? Yeah, it's really remarkable. You would expect this kind of initiative in the University of California system.

But this is just about the worst I have ever seen. Look, we have positions in freshwater biology, molecular genetics, a whole just wide array of sciences where search committees very explicitly said we're going to focus on on DEI and prioritize it heavily throughout the hiring process. And if you look at the way that they actually evaluated these scientists, it involves basically the use of a political litmus test throughout. I mean, it's really remarkable.

And you're exactly right. This is happening not in California, not in Illinois, where there's not really any there. You wouldn't expect political pushback.

This has happened in Ohio and it's been allowed to happen in Ohio, which is really, I think, stunning because you're right. This kind of thing is remarkably unpopular, even amongst faculty. When I made this request, the College of Arts and Sciences at Ohio State emailed all of the faculty in the college and said, we're going to turn over these documents to the National Association of Scholars. What happened after that was I got multiple faculty members reaching out to me, telling me, you need to look here too, telling me, here's some tips. I heard from one faculty member, look, there is a total sense of impunity. And ultimately that's not just a problem with a few rogue actors.

That's ultimately a problem of priority that starts from the top. And I think that there's really some, anyone reading this should think really hard about how we got to this point where Ohio State is the exemplar of basically the craziest DEI policies you could possibly put down in writing. Yeah, I mean, MAGA might be winning politically in Ohio, but DEI is winning culturally and academically. I mean, Ohio used to be a battleground state, now it's not. It's a place where the media libels Ohio as a white working class revolt. OK, great.

I mean, there's some truth to that, I guess, but I don't know why they have to racialize it. But again, the average person in Athens, Ohio, whose grandfather used to work at the steel mill that got shut down and they've seen their wages go down, they want to hear that there's some bureaucrat at Ohio State University earning one hundred eight thousand dollars a year. So let's walk through this. What does a DEI czar do? Like, what is their day to day job? You said there's one hundred and eighty nine of these people at Ohio State University.

Yeah. And, you know, in some ways it's a mystery to me how they could possibly employ one hundred and eighty nine people in these kinds of roles. But the documents I acquired give a few hints as to what they do on the day to day.

So, for instance, there was this really crazy moment in one of the documents. It was a search for an astrophysicist. So a professor who studies astrophysics and teaches astrophysics. And they said that they required a DEI statement. So a statement from a candidate on how they contribute to DEI. And they then go on to say that the DEI statement was given equal weight to the professor's research and teaching statements. You know, research and teaching are really the only two other things professors do. So they're saying that DEI was on par with the most basic thing a professor should do. Now, what's really interesting about that document is then they make a comment right in those notes that say we we prioritize DEI just as much as teaching and research. They said that this was basically explicit instruction in the diversity faculty hiring training, which was conducted by, you might expect, some of these diversity officers. So often what these diversity officers end up doing is they end up telling professors what they should do. They end up telling faculty this is how you should prioritize these diversity criteria throughout the selection process and in other parts of the whole university life.

I want to build this. This is such an important detail. So 20 million dollars a year, 189 people that basically create a DEI administrative state that are like a permanent DEI deep state at Ohio State University.

So at the astrophysicist has to bend their knee to that all white people are racist or whatever garbage that Nikole Hannah Jones is publishing. With the world quickly descending into chaos, the next medical crisis is just around the corner. Whether it's another pandemic or something closer to home, preparedness is no longer an option.

It's a necessity. That's where the Wellness Company comes in from something innocent and natural like a tick bite to COVID to the next bioweapon manufacturing in a lab. The Wellness Company's medical emergency kit is what you need to be prepared. It contains life-saving medications like ivermectin, emergency antibiotics, a z-pak and more, as well as a guide book to aid in the use of these life-saving medications. The Wellness Company and their doctors, including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Harvey Riesch, Dr. Drew Pinsky and Dr. Robert Seek and more are medical professionals that you can trust.

Rest assured, knowing that you're ready for whatever the globalists throw at us next. To order this kit, which I use and I have ready at disposal everybody, I'm not here to give medical advice, but it is the gold standard, TWC.Health slash Charlie. That is TWC.Health slash Charlie.

Enter promo code Charlie for 10% off. It contains life-saving medications like ivermectin, emergency antibiotics, z-pak and more. The Wellness Company and their licensed doctors are medical professionals. You could trust their medical emergency kits.

They are the gold standard to keep you safe. Again, that is TWC.Health slash Charlie. Promo code Charlie for 10% off. C-site for details. Prescription may be required. Again, ivermectin, emergency antibiotics.

There's all sorts of nonsense going around right now. COVID, RSV, flu. Go to TWC.Health slash Charlie.

Promo code Charlie. Wellness Company and their doctors. Check it out.

C-site for details. Texas Tech University. I've been there. In fact, we might be going there this spring. Lubbock, Texas is one of the most conservative places on the planet. And yet, there was some reporting here that we want to explore.

Jon Saylor continues with us. Jon, what did you learn about Texas Tech University? So in the summer of 2020, Texas Tech University's Department of Biological Sciences passed a DEI resolution that created all sorts of policies that the department was supposed to follow to essentially embed can be style anti-racism into the biology department's basic operating system. And so one part of that resolution happened to say something that was of interest to me since I used Freedom of Information Act requests and public records requests to do a lot of my investigative reporting. It said that for every job candidate, they have to submit a diversity statement describing all of the ways they contribute to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

I mean already that's pretty remarkable for a department of biology to even require. And they said they're going to heavily weigh that statement and that they have a rubric for evaluating the statement, which was I would say very ideologically charged. But it also noted that every single candidate who was evaluated would get a specific report done on their contributions to DEI, the way that the committees evaluated them.

So using the public records law in Texas, I asked for those evaluations and what I found was truly remarkable. So we have instances where candidates were said to be weaker because they couldn't describe the difference between equality and equity, which as I'm sure you know is pretty much a progressive political talking point. Most of the time people say, well, equality is equality of opportunity, but in order to achieve true justice, you need to do more than just strive for equality.

You have to strive for equity, which is really equality of outcomes. You have people like Kamala Harris on record saying basically exactly that. So now if you're applying to these positions in high stakes science at Texas Tech University, until recently you could have been docked for not making that distinction about basically progressive politics. Other candidates were praised for things like starting their job talk with a land acknowledgement and the list just goes on. But what you saw here was not just that they evaluated it in a politically charged way, which is probably in violation of the first amendment because it constitutes compelled speech, but it was also a significant part of faculty evaluation.

We're talking about 30% of their total score went to these DEI statements. That means that you have candidates in positions, applying for positions in virology, immunology, cell biology, which is integral to studying things like the cures for cancer. You have people applying for those positions, scientists, hoping to do serious science instead being weeded out on the basis of their political views.

It was truly, you know, this was the first time we ever got a look into how these statements were evaluated. It confirmed everything that people like, you know, groups like NAS have been saying for a long time that these constitute political litmus tests and that they're basically, you know, a disgrace to academia. After your reporting, the Texas tech chancellor testified saying that race would not trump merit.

Play cut 39. It was a single department in a single school within the university, but and the way the article read, it made it look like it was university policy. It's not that. When we find out about something like that, we correct it because it's not appropriate to have litmus tests. And so we do do things to correct it. And then you take action to make sure it's not going to occur in other departments as well. That preventative action, chancellor Mitchell said, is underway right now, calling for a thorough review of the hiring practices in all departments to ensure they focus on merit and not ideology.

Does he tell him the truth? You know, the day after I published my article, Greg Abbott made sent a memo to all universities saying you cannot use this criteria. It is against the law. So I think they are telling the truth, but they're telling the truth because they face political pressure. And I think any politician looking at these at times blatantly unlawful policies, they should take note of that.

It requires political pressure to actually end these disastrous policies. Strong cell is amazing. I got to tell you, the combination of NADH, CoQ10 and collagen is really something. You know, people ask me, they say, Charlie, how do you keep your energy up? How do you just keep on pushing? Look, part of it is diet nutrition. But I'll be honest, I take supplements really seriously. Fact check me on this. You can say, oh, try.

I'm going to fact check you. Type this into your search engine. NADH.

Just type it in. What does it tell you? It might tell you that it is the secret to living long, anti-aging properties, more energy. All of that is being proven in more and more clinical trials. NADH is a precursor so that your mitochondria can remain healthy and vibrant. The elites, a lot of billionaires, people a lot of money, they spend a ton of money on NAD. So in fact, NAD just might be your secret weapon for more energy. I take NAD every single day.

I could tell you that NADH compared with CoQ10, the trials show very, very good things. I don't take my word for it. I mean, honestly, my word should be good for something. But fact check me.

Look at it. And if you do it over 30 days, you'll see an increase in energy. I wake up better than ever before. NAD can help you potentially, again, fact check me on this with depression, anxiety, other issues that you might be dealing with. It is nature's gift to you.

So you might have extra energy and mental clarity. You guys can use promo code Charlie for 20% off. It's StrongCell.com slash Charlie. NAD might be nature's secret weapon for you.

I love it. I take it every single day. Try to try it for at least 30 days to see the maximum benefit.

And let me know, has NAD helped your life? StrongCell.com slash Charlie. Check it out.

StrongCell.com slash Charlie. OK, so John, I want to continue to the third story here, which I think is really important, how the NIH pushes DEI on scientists. You mentioned this at Ohio State University, the astrophysicists. But now are you saying that the federal granting system is laced with DEI requirements?

Walk us through it. Yeah. So the policy at Texas Tech might have ended because Governor Abbott took action, because state legislators took action. In Texas, at least in theory, it's no longer allowed to require a job candidate to submit a diversity statement, which I think is a big win for academic freedom and for the universities in Texas.

But I don't think that policy is going away anytime soon. And I have a really good reason to think that because right now the NIH, the National Institutes of Health, has a quarter billion dollar program funding faculty hiring. The main mechanism that they are pushing with that program is precisely this policy, using DEI statements as a heavy criterion for assessing all faculty candidates. Now what's particularly noteworthy is the NIH is the predominant way that we fund medical science in the United States. Really, if you think of medical schools, if you think of medical research, you should be thinking of the NIH because that's the way that academic medical researchers think about their job. It's science funded by the NIH. So what's really remarkable is exactly what they're doing. They created this grant program, which gives money to universities across the country for faculty hiring.

And they say, go out and hire university professors. And what they do is they say, as a condition for getting this money, your grant has to show how you are going to, or that you're going to require the use of these diversity statements and that you're going to heavily weigh them in the evaluation process. And doing some investigation on this, I found that when I asked for the rubrics at public universities that received this grant, the way that they evaluated diversity statements, here's the most remarkable part of that. One of the rubrics that was used at the University of New Mexico and the University of South Carolina explicitly gives a low score to job candidates who say they want to treat everyone the same.

That's not an exaggeration. That is literally what the rubric says. So I want to take a step back here and play the opposite advocate here, which is people will say, but what's the big deal? This is anti-racism training. It's just workforce development.

It enriches our environment. Why are you racists being so difficult to get in the way of the new progressive standard operating procedure? Why should we care about this? Give us some evidence of where this leads us.

I would say there are a couple of things. So first, when you make ideologically charged statements a requirement for hiring faculty, what you're going to do is create a political echo chamber on campus. And I think that that's so important to recognize when we see university professors increasingly say crazier and crazier things.

Look, I'm a believer in free speech. I think university professors should be allowed to say crazy things if that's what they believe. But you have to ask, why do they exist in an environment where they can say that kind of thing and not be completely embarrassed by a number of people who are colleagues pushing back and saying, no, equivocating about a terrorist attack or something like that is just a really bad and dumb thing to do. The reason they can get away without being horribly embarrassed is because they live in a political echo chamber.

And why do they live in a political echo chamber? It's policies like these that either formally or informally weed out any dissenting voice. And that's really, really important that we have dissenting voices.

Otherwise, it just totally discredits academia. And I think that's what we see today. And so that's one of the main things I focus on, but I think that there are also a lot of other reasons that this kind of policy is really bad. So for instance, I think often it also just feeds into overt discrimination. I actually think it's a good thing that we have moved to a point where we say, no, you should never be hired on the basis of race. But now that's kind of what people are trying to do. And I think often when you see these diversity statement policies, what you should think is, you should be asking the question, is this an attempt to get around civil rights law that prevents discrimination?

I know of instances where it absolutely was. And lastly, I would say it speaks to a kind of lack of seriousness. This is the NIH. This is the way we fund medical research.

There are still numerous forms of cancer that we have not cured. We need to be spending our money on things that are going to improve people's lives. And to say that we should instead spend money to prioritizing DEI is really an absolute shame. And it just makes a mockery of what, you know, science is for. Well, yeah. I mean, how about the NIH worries about why Americans are so overweight or why so many young people are killing themselves?

I mean, I just it is almost gets to an obsession by certain ideologues that the greatest sin is to be racist. Now, you deal a lot in kind of academic waters. Is that, for example, when they write the A.I. code for chat GPT, it's so interesting because elite values are mirrored into A.I. chat boxes. If you really want to find out what the intelligentsia believe, just type something into chat GPT and it can't say anything racist as if that's like the ultimate prime directive to use Star Trek language.

Right. Like, do not interfere with native populations and you can never say anything racist. But in their quest not to say anything racist, they almost create this new. Worldview of anti-racism that in reality is incredibly bigoted and hateful and spiteful.

I'll give you just one example. The Wall Street Journal, I know you're a contributor, had this very powerful story here today and I wanted to cover it. And I think it's perfect. I know if you saw this or not, the Evanston High School I grew up in the suburbs of Chicago, where in Evanston High School, they say we have black classrooms and white classrooms. That's all done in the spirit of anti-racism. Now, when I say that to a regular everyday American, they almost refuse to believe it. So I think part of our job is to say, hey, you know, that D.E.I.

commissar that's walking around, they actually do want you to end up in some form of segregation. Your thoughts, John? I think that's, you know, it's correct. And it's also correct that it's hard to believe. That's the kind of thing that prior to my, you know, career as somebody who does reporting, I would have had a hard time believing that.

But again and again, I find evidence that that kind of thing is happening. You know, what you're describing is a form of racial affinity groups where people for trainings or classes or, you know, a variety of activities are separated by race. So you have the Black Caucus or the Hispanic Caucus or the White Caucus. Now, that already to many just sounds like segregation.

And really, that's what it should be called. And we've seen really disastrous effects. You know, we're creating a world where students, young people have started to think of race as one of the most important parts of their lives.

And that, I think, is a huge step backwards. But, you know, one thing to tie it back to the story that I wrote about the NIH, the rubrics that I found through a public records request at the University of South Carolina and the University of Mexico, both of them also gave a low score to anyone who expressed skepticism about racial affinity groups. That's literally a part of the rubric. So you have these layered effects where first you have the policy, which itself, you know, creates an environment where people might be afraid to speak up. You know, if you're a white student and you've suddenly been put in an all white racial affinity group to undergo a kind of diversity training, it might already be pretty hard for you to say, hey, I think you're thinking about this the wrong way.

But then you have a layer of bureaucrats and policies that are adopted over time and kind of pick up steam over time that it even harder to question at the second level to question the existence of those policies. And that's what we have with this, you know, diversity statement requirement. If you say in a diversity statement that I think we should live that I think we should live in a race neutral society where we are not separated out on the basis of our race, because that is not the kind of thing Americans should do. And that is more an expression of true diversity as it should be than anything else. That would get you a low score. That would get a scientist disqualified from a job, according to these rubrics that that be uncovered. And, you know, I think that's crazy.

I think that's absolutely crazy. Wall Street Journal School District offers classes separated by race. I found it.

Evanston High School. I mean, there's no mystery. The headline in The Wall Street Journal, as you well know, they're not for sensationalism. They really strive for accuracy.

It's not an exaggeration. Let me read this from you. Read this for you. School districts in Minnesota, Seattle, San Francisco, Oakland, offer race specific elective courses. This is what's so funny. It's right in the article, The Wall Street Journal. Federal anti-discrimination laws prevent public schools from mandatorily separating students by race.

But education lawyers say optional courses can comply with the law. I mean, the obvious thing is which white only classes are coming next. It's just this is where we're coming to. You know, a rebirth of white identitarianism in public education, which you have to wonder is that what they're trying to provoke. Right. And it continues here. And by the way, they changed their whole criteria as soon as The Wall Street Journal started to reach out. And they're right here.

The district offers middle school and high school students electives focused on black history and social emotional learning support specifically for black students because they say it's an easier way for them to learn. Everybody, Charlie Kirk, your exciting news to share about saving babies by providing ultrasounds. Right now, there is a dollar for dollar match, doubling the number of babies you'll save with preborn. There are babies alive today about to celebrate their first Christmas because of what we did together a year ago at this time, providing ultrasounds. And right now you could save twice as many babies. Maybe you're already wondering about end of the year getting and want to give every dollar, get the most results. Or maybe you just want to know that a girl making this decision deserves the truth that next year at this time, she's picking out a Christmas stocking for her baby's first Christmas. It's beautiful to think about your gift of fifteen thousand dollars.

Somebody out there can do it. I'm sure will provide not one, but two ultrasound machines. Two hundred eighty dollars saves ten babies. Twenty eight dollars a month saves a baby a month for less than a dollar a day.

And right now, any gift saves twice as many babies with preborn. I'm a donor to this organization. We love this organization with the Kirk family clay three three eight five zero two two nine full endorsement. Amazing people click on the preborn banner at Charlie Kirk dot com.

Go to Charlie Kirk dot com right now and click on the preborn banner. So, John, other work you want to plug research you're doing, talk about the National Association of Scholars, please. So the National Association of Scholars is a think tank and membership organization that focuses on exactly this kind of issue. I would encourage everyone to go check it out.

It's N-A-S dot O-R-G. And, you know, you can become a member. I'd encourage you to do that, especially if you're working in education or academia. That that does a lot for our work. And at the same time, I do a lot of reporting on you know, I posted a lot on Twitter.

So you can follow me at John D. Saylor, S-A-I-L-E-R. I have something on this story about Ohio State coming out a little bit later today talking about what's really inside some of those documents following up on the Wall Street Journal story. And yeah, you know, I have over the last year submitted over 250 public records requests. I'm constantly talking to professors and trying to to get to the bottom of what's happening in higher education and show people, you know, what I think is a true scandal. What this is a true scandal.

I think a lot of people don't recognize that. And to a certain extent, none of us knows how far it goes. And so my job as an investigator is to look into these things and try to tell people what's happening. That's what I'm doing. I'm going to continue to do it. And I really appreciate the opportunity to come on today and talk about its hero's work.

So let me just ask you spitball in here about two minutes remaining. John, when donors pull gifts to universities, does that make an impact? What are some of the action items for our audience when we're fighting this rather calcified, institutionalized Leviathan?

It's like you turn around and there's another nine commissars here and twenty five here and twenty million dollars. What are the effective countermeasures that can get that can be done here? I would say it it takes three things. First, it takes exposure. And that's what I'm trying to do. That's what a lot of people in this space are trying to do. They're trying to get to the bottom of what happens. And if you're in a role at a university, you can help me with that.

You can tell me what's going on. You can tell me about things to request through FOIA. And that actually makes a big difference. But beyond that, yeah, there are certain levers of power that we have to take hold of and use effectively in smart ways. That involves things like lawsuits. A lot of what's happening is illegal and people are rightly pushing back and universities are afraid of that. I think donors, I mean, it's it's we have still have yet to see what's going to happen because honestly, donors have been very slow to pull out funds. I think that they should be a lot more aggressive about saying this stuff is bad. Same with politicians.

Often they don't realize that the public and, you know, the just common sense is on their side. They need to do basic smart things like push back on the use of mandatory statements. But finally, I do think we need to think about building new institutions and building new things within existing institutions. And I'm given a lot of hope by what we've seen, but I think we're really only getting started.

Just final question. Where have you seen, if anywhere, an institution reclaimed once it goes woke? Have you seen that at all? You know, I have to give a shout out.

I live in North Carolina. I paid attention to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for a long time. And what their board of trustees and board of governors have done has been a fantastic start. They eliminated, they explicitly banned compelled speech, no more diversity statements.

They explicitly followed up on the Supreme Court's decision saying, we are absolutely not going to try to bypass this ruling. And they've created a school of, I would say, intellectual freedom where they really want to hire, from what it looks like, they want to hire people who share this vision for open, free intellectual discourse. And that kind of thing is amazing to see. I'm really excited about what's happening in the United States. That's promising. That's promising.

I will be, I'm scheduled to speak there in the spring. So I'm going to put that to a test, John. We'll see.

We'll see how open and accepting they are. Excellent work, John. Really great. Thank you so much. Thanks so much. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us as always freedom at charliekirk.com.

Thanks so much for listening and God bless. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com. It's time to grow up and get back to work. Introducing the number one woke free job board in America, red balloon dot work.