Let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith. The Son of God's arrival in Bethlehem fulfilled countless prophecies and drew the attention of legions of angels. There's a good reason why our calendars pivot from B.C.
to A.D. at the time of His birth. For the details, stay with us. From the Moody Church in Chicago, this is Running to Win with Dr. Erwin Lutzer, whose clear teaching helps us make it across the finish line. Pastor Lutzer, today you begin message number two on Christ among other gods. How crucial is it to believe in the virgin birth? Well, Dave, you know, I have to say that liberal scholars have often downplayed the virgin birth. Many of them don't believe that Jesus was virgin born. And then there are some evangelicals who even think that believing it is somewhat optional, but they don't understand. Jesus had to be virgin born so that he would not be a partaker of sin. That's a longer story, but we need to be able to understand that the virgin birth is the logical outcome of the fact that God became flesh.
And by the way, as we will learn in this series of messages, Jesus Christ's miraculous birth is very different from all of the other myths and the supposed miraculous births that are attributed to others. These are critical messages. And I've written a book entitled Christ among other gods, a defense of Christ in an age of tolerance. Let me tell you, my friend, that you need this book. Your college students need this book. Skeptics need this book because it will help all of us to understand why Christ is totally unique.
Christ among the other gods. Now, here's what you do for a gift of any amount we'll send you this book. We'd love to be able to put this resource in your hands. Go to rtwoffer.com. That's all one word, of course, the rtwoffer, and then dot,.com. Or you can call us at 1-888-218-9337. That's 1-888-218-9337.
As I mentioned, rtwoffer.com . Or you can call us at the phone number I just gave you. Now let's go to the pulpit of Moody Church where we will understand much better the necessity and the consequences of the virgin birth of Jesus.
Listen carefully. I think that all of us remember the story, the tragic story that was on the news some time ago about a grandmother who had the responsibility of caring for her little two-year-old granddaughter. And the little girl fell into a swimming pool. The grandmother did not know how to swim. But in absolute desperation, she hopped into the pool to try to rescue the little one.
And some time later, both bodies were pulled from the swimming pool. You know, if you're in the middle of an ocean and you don't know how to swim and you're beginning to go under, you need somebody to rescue you. But it can't just be somebody who is willing to rescue you. It has to be someone who has the ability to rescue you. You need someone who isn't in the same predicament as you are. You need somebody who is not subject to those waves in the same way that you are, someone who himself does not need to be rescued. That's what you need when you're going under. And the same is true when it comes to sin and its power and its awful consequences. To be rescued from sin and its consequences, you need someone who is able to reach down to rescue you who himself is not a sinner. Because when you're going down, you don't need somebody who is in the same mess that you are.
You need someone who is above the situation. Which leads me to the question, who is Jesus Christ anyway? Who is he? Well, there have been two views throughout history. One is that he is just a mere man. Remember when Scorsese made his movie, The Last Temptation of Christ, he said, I tried to create a Christ who in some sense is like the guy down the street. Well, the problem is that I am a sinner, and I need to be reconciled to God, and I need more help than the guy who's down the street is able to give me.
I need somebody who is not in my predicament. historic Christianity is always held. That Jesus Christ, though he is fully man, he is also fully God. And because he is fully God, he is different from all humanity, though he has some similarities. He is in all points like as we are, except that he is sinless and that he is joined to a divine nature. And because of that, he is a perfect, sinless savior.
And that's why he's the only one who can rescue us from the consequences and the effects of sin. When I was at the Parliament of World Religions, I decided to go through those booths, those display areas, and some of you know that I spent several hours there. But one of the things I decided to do one morning is to go in search of a sinless savior.
I thought to myself as I walked down those aisles with all of the displays and the books and the videotapes and the 105 different faiths represented, I thought, I'm going to find me a sinless savior. So I walked over to where the Buddhists were, and after engaging them and asking them what they believed, I asked the question, I said, did Buddha claim to be sinless? And they said, no, he was enlightened, but he wasn't sinless. He gathered some people around him and taught them the eight ways, taught them that the things that we see outside of ourselves are not the real reality. We must go within and we must meditate and we must seek to change ourselves. Buddha, it is said, was enlightened, but he did not claim that he was sinless.
He died still seeking more light. So I thought, well, what about the Hindus? And I walked over and there was a Hindu Swami behind the desk there and behind his display booth. And I said, could you tell me in all of the Hindu traditions with all of the gurus and all of the teachers, did any one of them claim to be sinless?
And his answer was very direct. He said, no. In fact, he said, if you ever find someone who claims to be sinless, he is not a Hindu.
Well, that's interesting. So I walked over to the booth where you have the Baha'i faith. And I thought, Buhala, I wonder if he was sinless. No, he claimed that some of his teachings were better than those of Jesus Christ. And by the way, you know that that's what the Baha'i faith believes, that Jesus is one step in the evolutionary cycle and Baha'u'llah is now a more modern, updated version of religion. And that's a matter, incidentally, that we are going to take up in a subsequent message to show you how to answer those who think that Christ is one prophet among many in the evolutionary spiral. No, he claimed that some of his teachings perhaps were perfect, but he was not sinless.
He never claimed it. So I thought, well, what about Muhammad? I walked over to the Muslims and talked to them about Muhammad. And I said, by the way, did Muhammad claim to be sinless? And I already knew the answer, because in the Quran, he claims that he needed forgiveness.
And if you have studied his life, you'll know how accurate that really turns out to be. And so I asked them, and they said, no, he did not claim sinlessness. He himself needed to be forgiven.
Turn where I will. I could not find a sinless prophet, much less a sinless savior. Well, you turn to the Bible, and what a different picture you have of Jesus Christ. He's standing there with all of his accusers, those who hate him and want him to be crucified. And he looks at them, and he looks at them in the eye and says to them, which of you convinces me of sin?
Is there any one of you that wants to point out a fault? And they answered him not a word. He said to his disciples regarding Satan, he says, the prince of this world comes, but he has nothing in me.
There's no commonality between me and Satan. Judas said of him, I have betrayed innocent blood. Pilate said, I find no fault in him. The apostle Paul said of him, he knew no sin. And Peter said, he knew no sin, neither was there any guile found in his mouth, a sinless savior. Now how can Jesus Christ be sinless? All of us are born sinners. Well, there's only one way, of course, and that is for Christ to have been conceived in the womb of a virgin.
That's the only way. Because the Bible says that when man fell in the garden and when Adam partook of the tree and disobeyed God, God looked at the whole human race as being bound up in Adam. May I say it? You were there in the Garden of Eden. You say, well, I don't remember it.
Well, I don't either. But we were there. Yep. Just like the entire tree is in that acorn, so the whole human race was in Adam. And through Adam, God imputes Adam's sin to all of us. We are born under the condemnation of sin. We are born with a taint of sin that comes through human conception. That does not mean that sex is sinful.
It simply means that all of us who are a product of our mother's and our father's involvement, all of us are born sinners. And so Jesus was exempt. He was the one who had the grand exception because he was conceived of a virgin.
God did a miracle within Mary so that a perfect sinless human being could be born. You see, there are several requirements Christ had to meet in order to be our Savior. One of them is he had to be a male. It says in the book of Genesis chapter 3 verse 15 regarding the coming redeemer, he shall crush the head of the serpent. He had to be a human male, by the way.
No other species would do. Angels could not die for our sin, as the book of Hebrews makes very clear. It had to be a man and it also had to be a perfect man because the perfection was necessary for God to receive the sacrifice that was made. Sinless and perfect. And of course, he had to be God.
And I will explain that in a subsequent message why that was absolutely necessary. And so I want you to take your Bibles and very briefly we are going to look at two passages of scripture that we normally read only at Christmas time to our detriment, I might add. But in Matthew chapter 1, we have the story of the virgin conception of Jesus. Could I point out to you how concerned Matthew was to preserve that doctrine? In chapter 1 verse 16, he says, and to Jacob was born Joseph, the husband of Mary, by whom was born Jesus.
You know, in English, that expression by whom could refer to male or female. Interestingly, in the Greek text, it is designated, it is female. To Mary was born Jesus. He wanted to make sure that we did not mistake in any way that somehow Joseph was the actual father of Jesus. Legal father, yes.
Biological father, no. And then we read the story, verse 18. Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows. When it is mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph before they came together, she was found to be with child of the Holy Spirit. And Joseph, her husband, being a righteous man and not wanting to disgrace her, desired to put her away secretly. But when he had considered this, behold an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream saying, Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, for that which has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.
She will bear a son. You will call his name Jesus, for it is he who will save his people from their sins. I want you to keep that passage open in your Bible, even though you also turn to Luke chapter 1, where we have a remarkable statement once again regarding this miracle. Luke chapter 1, the angel comes to Mary, explains to her that she is going to have a son called Jesus.
He will be great. He will be the son of the Most High. Verse 34, Mary said to the angel, how can this be since I am a virgin? And the angel answered and said to her, the Holy Spirit will come upon you and the power of the Most High will overshadow you and for that reason the holy offspring. Notice that the holy offspring shall be called the son of God. The only way for Jesus to be a man and yet to be perfect is for God to do a miracle that Mary might become pregnant with that which is holy and Joseph was not Christ's father.
Now, you know of course that the virgin birth has been criticized and what I'd like to do is to answer some of the objections and then we will give its necessity and radical implications. Some people have said, well, you know, we can't believe this in the 20th century because after all this is based on mythology. There are all kinds of myths in the ancient world. For example, there was a myth that Plato was actually fathered by the god Apollo. Zeus was a god who was having intercourse with a number of different people and creating a number of different gods and there were all kinds of stories about his sexual prowess.
Then of course you have stories like Alexander the Great, it is said, whose mother became impregnated when she swallowed a pomegranate. So people have said to themselves, you know, the Bible is just the very same. It's just got all these myths. Well, I want you to know that the gap between what mythology teaches and what the Bible teaches is a gap as great as the Grand Canyon. For one thing, the mythology comes in a context of polytheism, the belief in many different gods. Whereas the New Testament and the Old Testament is based on monotheism, that there is but one god, it is unthinkable that Matthew and Luke would have borrowed the idea of mythology from paganism.
But there's more to that. If you look into all the myths, there was always immorality. The gods were immoral. It is unthinkable that the god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob would have had a sexual relationship with Mary. We just can't even think of it because the context of this account is so radically different.
And then of course not only that. When you read this, it does not read like a myth. It is a very sober account. In all the other instances, these mythologies grew up after a time when the person became great. In this instance, even before Jesus was born, we already know the prediction was made and the text is clear that Mary had to be convinced of what was happening because a miracle was taking place. There are those who say, well, you know, perhaps the disciples made it up. They may have made it up to cover the immorality of Mary. They may have made it up in order to make it look as if prophecy was fulfilled.
But all of that misses the beauty of this account. Remember that Luke was a physician who very probably talked to Mary and got the details directly from her. When you read it, you have the impression that this is indeed a sober history. This is meant to be believed.
Now there's another view that I need to comment on. Bishop Spong, Bishop Shelby Spong has written a book entitled Born of a Woman. A bishop rethinks the birth of Jesus and it is being sold today and being widely read. Bishop Spong in his book basically says a number of things. First of all, that these accounts are symbolic.
They were never intended to be treated as literal. He says furthermore that Mary very probably was the victim of rape and that's how she became pregnant. And he says that Jesus Christ most likely was married very probably to Mary Magdalene. And he takes that from John chapter 2 when they were at the wedding.
He says whose wedding could this be but the wedding of Jesus himself. And so what he says is these narratives were written to inspire faith, which makes us smile because faith in what after you've done that to the text. But nevertheless he says they were written to inspire faith and therefore should not be interpreted literally. And here you have a book that is being widely read and people say it is so eloquent.
But I must tell you it is so incredibly wrong. Now I don't want to get technical but I want to give you three words that highlight how a book like this can be written and why it might even be read by hundreds of thousands of people. But what is it that goes into the text when a man comes up with something like that? Number one, remember that books like this are based on unbelief, unbelief. It is the fervent desire of many different scholars to make Jesus Christ a near man no matter the cost, to strip him of his miracles, to strip him of his miraculous birth because what they are so desirous of is to make sure that we have here a man who is only a man, maybe a special man, but a man nevertheless. And so what Spong does as others before him have done is they've come to the text and they have said we must strip it of everything that 20th century people cannot believe. So interesting in one place Spong says, he says I am not going to subject my Jesus to the fundamentalists. His Jesus? That's exactly what you have in his book is his Jesus. His own private Jesus because he's gone to the text, discarded everything that doesn't fit with his view of Jesus. So first of all you have unbelief. A second thing that you have in Spong's book is agenda.
Oh remember that word agenda. I have read another one of his books and I've discovered much about him. I don't learn anything about Jesus in his books but I learn a lot about him. For example in his book about fundamentalism he says that very possibly the only thing that fits the facts is the belief that Paul was a homosexual. So I know that as Spong is going through the text I already know that he is for gay rights. I know also that he is a feminist because he says that the virgin birth has contributed to the idea that women are supposed to be at home and rear children. So there's that on his agenda. I know that he's an unbeliever.
I don't know anything about Jesus but I know lots about Spong. There's a third word. You have the word unbelief. You have the word agenda.
And the third word that I think is so very important in this sequence is the word arrogance. Imagine thinking that you know better than the writers of the New Testament as to what happened. Imagine that you can have such revisionism that you can go back and you can take a document that is nearly 2,000 years old and you can rewrite the story in accordance with what you want to see there and therefore you can put out the light of fundamentalism. Well I would say to Dr. Spong and to hundreds of other people like him that if you want to put out the light in our hearts by writing books like this it is about like trying to put out fire with straw. It simply will not work.
It won't work. What I'd like to do now in the time that is before us is to discuss very briefly the necessity of the virgin birth, the virgin conception and its implications. Well my friend this is Pastor Luther.
You most assuredly are going to have to listen to Running to Win next time to hear the rest of this message. And you know it is a matter of arrogance isn't it to think that there are people out there who believe that they know better than Jesus as to what God is like. Well you and I need to be able to defend the faith in an age of confusion and tolerance. I've written a book entitled Christ Among Other Gods A Defense of Christ in an Age of Tolerance. I want you to have a copy because it will be a valuable resource to you. When your children ask questions or your grandchildren or when you as a college student have some doubts about the Christian faith and why Jesus Christ is unique this resource is for you.
It's titled Christ Among Other Gods A Defense of Christ in an Age of Tolerance. For a gift of any amount it can be yours here's what you do go to rtwoffer.com or you can call us at 1-888-218-9337. Let me give you that contact info once again rtwoffer.com or call us at 1-888-218-9337 and when you connect with us let me thank you in advance for helping us financially and with your prayers because together the message of Jesus Christ is going out to thousands upon thousands thanks for being a part of the family. You can write to us at running to win 1635 North LaSalle Boulevard Chicago Illinois 60614.
Jesus was fully human but had no human father born to a young Jewish maiden who had never known a man his beginnings on earth were indeed extraordinary next time you'll hear more details on why a virgin birth was essential for Jesus to be a sacrifice for sin that the father could accept. For Dr. Erwin Lutzer this is Dave McAllister. Running to Win is sponsored by the Moody Church.
Whisper: medium.en / 2023-11-23 10:37:44 / 2023-11-23 10:46:37 / 9