Share This Episode
Family Policy Matters NC Family Policy Logo

Restoring Marriages and Reducing Unnecessary Divorce (with Beverly Willett)

Family Policy Matters / NC Family Policy
The Truth Network Radio
September 29, 2025 7:29 am

Restoring Marriages and Reducing Unnecessary Divorce (with Beverly Willett)

Family Policy Matters / NC Family Policy

00:00 / 00:00
On-Demand Podcasts NEW!

This broadcaster has 297 podcast archives available on-demand.

Broadcaster's Links

Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.


September 29, 2025 7:29 am

Divorce remains a common and often unnecessary occurrence in American society, with many couples able to reconcile with the right help and information. Beverly Willett, co-chairman of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, discusses the impact of no-fault divorce laws and the importance of valuing marriage in society.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:
Outlaw Lawyer Podcast Logo
Outlaw Lawyer
Josh Whitaker & Joe Hamer
Faith And Finance Podcast Logo
Faith And Finance
Rob West
Matt Slick Live! Podcast Logo
Matt Slick Live!
Matt Slick
Outlaw Lawyer Podcast Logo
Outlaw Lawyer
Josh Whitaker & Joe Hamer
Kingdom Pursuits Podcast Logo
Kingdom Pursuits
Robby Dilmore

Welcome to Family Policy Matters, a weekly podcast and radio show produced by the North Carolina Family Policy Council. Hi, I'm John Rust and president of NC Family, and each week on Family Policy Matters, we welcome experts and policy leaders to discuss topics that impact faith and family here in North Carolina. Our prayer is that this program will help encourage and equip you to be a voice of persuasion for family values in your community, state, and nation. And now here's the host of Family Policy Matters, Tracy DeVett-Griggs. Thanks for joining us this week for Family Policy Matters.

Sadly, American couples lead the industrial world in divorces. That trend appears to be shifting a bit in recent years, but our guest today says divorce remains far too common and too easy. Beverly Willett is co-chairman of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, a nonpartisan coalition dedicated to supporting efforts to reduce unnecessary divorce and promote healthy marriages. Beverly Willett, welcome to Family Policy Matters. Good morning.

The word unnecessary divorce jumped out at me. What do you mean by that?

Well, that's a great question. If you look at some of the research, you will find that many couples can reconcile if they get the help and the information that they need. And most marriages, too, are low-conflict marriages.

So, really, what you have is most of the divorces are involving low-conflict marriages. These marriages can be repaired.

So, if they can be repaired with help and with information, we know they don't have to happen.

So they're unnecessary. There are some times, though, when divorce can be considered necessary. There is some research, too, that if there are high conflict situations, then it can be better for spouses and especially for children to part.

Now, you know, I don't want to get into all the religious aspects because people have different views on that. I am Catholic now. I wasn't when I started this work a long time ago. And Catholics, you know, don't believe in divorce. There's an annulment process for various situations and also a process for those situations that have high conflict for separating.

So that just gets us into a whole other can of worms. But yes, generally, of course, there are.

So when you say high conflict, you're talking about the possibilities of abuse and other types of situations like that. Correct.

Okay, so talk about the trajectory of divorce in American society over the last 50 plus years. What have we seen trend-wise?

Well, basically, we saw a shift starting in 1970 when the first no-fault divorce law was enacted in California. And before that, we had false-based divorce. Just like any other lawsuit, you've got to have some kind of cause, some sort of wrongdoing that you go into the lawsuit and say X cause, you know, Y. You had a shift. Basically, that one person could go in and say, you know what, I'm done with this marriage.

I want a divorce. And they get an automatic out. That was a major shift in 1970. Over the next 15 years, every state in America, but three, I believe, enacted similar laws. 2010, New York signed on to no-fault, and there are only two states that have mutual no-fault divorce.

So that's basically what you saw in terms of the law. You saw a divorce rate pre-1970 across the country that was in the 20s somewhere. You saw more than doubling after the enactment of no-fault divorce into the 50% rate. And then you just, there's so many different things we can talk about that the consequences that occurred in society in terms of individual problems, poverty, so many different things that came out of this wave of no-fault divorce that was enacted. Why is this topic of divorce reform so personal to you?

Well, I went through an unwanted divorce. It was very complicated because at the time New York didn't have no fault, but they pretty much acted as if they did. I mean, that's really what the judges, you know, even though you had a right to defend yourself, the judges pretty much thought it was a foregone conclusion. Once you get to the court, you're going to get a divorce. And so they didn't really know what to do with me, someone who wanted to save their marriage and said, no, this is not going to be good for me and my children.

I think that my ex-husband and I can reconcile, which is what our marriage counselor thought. They didn't know what to do with me. And I knew it was wrong in my heart. I still love my husband. I believed in my promise.

I believed that the fact that he was having an affair and had broken his promise didn't absolve me of my obligation to keep my promise and to try and keep my family together. Inevitably, we got divorced because he moved to New Jersey where they had no faults and I really couldn't fight it anymore. Through the course of that, I then started writing about what I'd gone through. And from that, people People started contacting me from around the country saying, me too, me too.

Well, that was totally news to me because I had never been involved in a divorce. No one in my family had ever gone through a divorce growing up. And so that it became personal to me only because of my personal situation, because of my children. And then I saw communities and I saw people suffering who wrote to me personally.

So that's really how it all evolved. And you think divorce reform could make a difference in some of these outcomes? We have forgotten in society that we value what we protect. I mean, I think that just, you know, culture can shape the laws, but the law also shapes culture. And I think that the fact that we don't protect marriage as we should in our country and the children of marriages basically gives sort of a cue to people that we don't value it very much.

And we do know from the research that if we look at situations where couples can get help, where there are low conflict situations and couples, you know, that they can say they're not happy, but then five years later, they've gotten the help that they need and their marriage is stronger than ever. We know that it makes a difference. And we know that being married makes a difference in terms of the health of individuals, in terms of the health of their children. And then you look at communities.

Now, you know, we didn't have all this research in the beginning and it took a while for this research to develop and now it's continuing. We didn't have the ability to look at communities. Let's look at a community and see the percentage of married people in that community versus another community. where marriage is in trouble and the marriage rate is low. Those communities that have more married couples and families are healthier communities.

So it impacts all of society. Um You're listening to Family Policy Matters, a weekly radio show and podcast produced by the North Carolina Family Policy Council. This is just one of the many ways NC Family works to educate and inform citizens about issues that impact faith and family here in North Carolina. Our vision is to create a state and nation where God is honored, religious freedom flourishes, families thrive, and life is cherished. For more information about NC Family and how you can partner with us in pursuit of this vision, visit our website at ncfamily.org and be sure to sign up to receive our email updates, action alerts, and Family North Carolina magazine.

You can also follow us on social media at NC Family Policy. That's at NC Family Policy.

So you mentioned People from all over the country that had reached out to you, saying me too. Can you give us some examples of some ways that kind of divorce is not working? It affects children. I've had people reach out to me. I mean, I remember a dad very, very early on, and his children were really suffering from the divorce, and one of his children wound up committing suicide.

I've had men and women actually, because I wrote an article about this because there are increased suicide risks that are associated with divorce, particularly for children and particularly for husbands, for men. I've had people reach out to me and say, until I read your article and the things that you'd gone through and how you were able to, you know, get healthy again, I was on the edge of that. Or I've lost my kids, or I don't know how I'm going to pay my bills. You know, I mean, it's not really, I think it's very easy to understand that a family can live cheaper than two different families that are split. Two people can live cheaper than one.

It's simple math. And so a lot of those people. are struggling economically that have reached out to me.

So North Carolina, as you mentioned, is one of the very few states that maintain some more restrictive laws, alienation of affection laws being one of those. What do you think about those types of laws and should they be reconsidered as part of your divorce reform suggestions? Yeah, I remember coming across North Carolina law and thinking, wow, that is wonderful. Very few places have that. And if you look at New York, I just wrote an article about that at the beginning of the year.

New York still had adultery on the books as a crime. And they got rid of that because they said we need to be modern here.

So that was not a great thing to do. I think it's a wonderful idea, but I would say that if there's, you know, if there's little traction for divorce reform, trying to get something like that implemented is just a real non-starter. To try and you know get any traction on something like that because it's just you know it's just perceived as religious or backward or things like that. But I mean, I really think in that situation, conservatives need to start stepping up to the plate here. Conservatives are not stepping up to the plate on divorce reform, they're enacting all these laws, they're talking about all these policies, all the trouble in America.

And if they would just do things to help marriage and get on board with divorce reform, there are a few of them, they would really do that, they would make a difference because they're just not tackling the root of the problem. I think we could use laws like North Carolina has if we were to say, well, you know, we're not going to enact that law, but we're going to consider, let's say, in the property division or alimony, or we know we have rehabilitative alimony in most states now, which basically means even if the wife or the stay-at-home husband has not been working, we want to get them back to work because it's very, it's a very pro-work.

society not valuing the stay-at-home parent. But if we had that in consideration, if there's betrayal and you basically are sued by your spouse who wants to move on with wife or husband number two or three, have that part of the property division. Maybe that might make a difference. It might make people think that, well, maybe I'll get less money. I can't just go out and sue and get what I want and move on and have the money for my new wife or husband.

That could be an interesting thing to put it on the other end when property division comes up. But then you've got to make judges implement it. You can't give them discretion because they're so pro-divorce that they're just going to say, oh, that's backward. You know, betrayal is normal, infidelities become normalized.

So you can't give judges discretion. You've got to say you've got to put that into the money calculations. You mentioned several times the judges' attitudes, basic society's attitudes toward divorce. Where do we start? Are we starting with laws?

Do you think that's the place to start? Or do we need to start making some changes somehow in how people view divorce? And how would we go about doing that?

Well, you know, I've sort of taken a multi-pronged approach to this, and it has changed over time because I started out, you know, thinking no fault has got to go, and I still believe that ultimately that's the thing that needs to happen because it's unconstitutional. But you know, I formed this volunteer organization back in, you know, like 15 years ago. And our reform actually with the Coalition for Divorce Reform was a modest reform and it didn't get rid of no-fault divorce at all. It's called the Parental Divorce Reduction Act, which is basically just extending waiting periods, giving families what they need in terms of help with communication skills, financial problems that they're having.

So that they don't feel like they're hopeless because we can give them the things that they need through marriage education, educate them about the consequences of divorce. Because it was just a really non-starter to go after no-fault divorce.

So, I mean, I'm still absolutely in favor of that. We've got to do something.

So, you know, and I also write about this a lot. I write about this a lot. I try and educate people. I talk on social media.

So, I really think it's a multi-pronged approach. And that's sort of what I've taken. Just throw the kitchen sink at the whole problem. But, you know, I've been doing this for 15 years and the needle is not moving a lot.

So, I really think as a lawyer, I really think that we need to go after no-fault divorce. I just think we need to just do that now. I've sort of come around to that conclusion, along with doing all these other things at the same time.

Okay.

Well, we're just about out of time. Could you give us somewhere for our listeners to go if they want to get more information about this and your organization? Yes, well, you can go to my website, beverlywillet.com, because I have written, I can't even tell you how many articles that I've written on this subject.

So there's a lot of information there. Coalition for Divorce Reform is divorcer.us. We have a wide variety of articles there and a blog and also our reform legislation, the Parental Divorce Reduction Act. You know, I write a lot for the Institute for Family Studies, and they just have a wonderful library of articles.

So I would definitely go there as well.

Okay, sounds good. Beverly Willett, co-chairman of the Coalition for Divorce Reform, thanks so much for joining us today on Family Policy Matters. Thank you for listening to Family Policy Matters. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe to the show and leave us a review. To learn more about NC Family and the work we do to promote and preserve faith and family in North Carolina, visit our website at ncfamily.org.

That's ncfamily.org. And check us out on social media at NC Family Policy. Thanks and may God bless you and your family.

Get The Truth Mobile App and Listen to your Favorite Station Anytime