CGR MONDAY 061223 Part one

Hi, this is Pastor Greg and you're listening to Chosen Generation Radio. Get more at chosengenerationradio.com.

That's Chosen Generation Radio, where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical classes. My passion is the fight for freedom. My father fought for a World War II defending our country. Today we are no longer fighting with guns. Instead, we are fighting an ideological battle for control of our country by contributing to causes that support your constitutional rights.

I am Patriot Mobile. I thank and praise God for this borewell that God has enabled us to put in this village with the prayer and support of Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Radio Ministry. By the prayer and support of Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Ministry, we could put the borewell in this village for the community.

Before this community was drinking dirty water and that was really causing a lot of sickness. But now they are getting pure and fresh water and all the communities are so thankful for Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Ministry and all the supporters. And we pray for all of you that God would bless you and God would use you so that we can put more and more borewells in a poor and needy community, those who are really having a problem of the water.

This borewell we have put and pure and fresh water is coming and we are so thankful for all of you that we thank Pastor Greg Young and Chosen Generation Ministry that help us and support us to put the borewell. Thank you and God bless you. Thank you and God bless you. Welcome to Chosen Generation with your host Pastor Greg Young. But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a peculiar people that you should shoe forth the praises of him who has called you out of darkness into his marvelous light which in time past were not a people but are now the people of God which had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy.

And now Chosen Generation where no topic is off limits and everything is filtered through biblical glasses. And now here's your host Pastor Greg. There we go.

Click all the buttons. All right. Welcome to the program. Great to have you with me. Thanks so much for being here.

I know you have a choice of where you can listen each and every day and I thank you for keeping it tuned here to Chosen Generation Radio where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glasses. Let me check this volume situation. And yeah, it's down just a skosh and that does make a difference.

Makes you have to push your voice. That's a little too hot. How about there? Right there. Yep.

I think right there is going to be good. Okay. Well, welcome aboard. Good to have you with me.

I've got a lot on the plate today. Bottom of hour number three, Tara Lish will be with us. She was the one that founded and organized the Canadian Truckers Boycott that took place. We'll talk to her.

What did we learn about, well, about our whole situation from what happened there. So we'll get into that. Also joining us is a longtime civil rights proponent, Colonel Jim Wyatt will be with us today. And you may not have heard of the woman that we're going to spend some time talking about. But her name is Helen, Nanny Helen Burroughs. And her influence on the civil rights is quite profound. And yet, up until the colonel found her in history, her story was pretty much buried. So we'll talk a bit about that.

And how do we have a more just America? So we'll see what the colonel has to say about that. Also Joseph Ochapinte is with us today. One of the most decorated federal agents in US history, his memoir, Framed, I Never Stood a Chance, subtitled Drugs, Conspiracy and a Corrupt Justice System, really gives us an in-depth look at the corruption that is the DOJ and the FBI. And really some insight into some of the things that were spoken about by Agent O'Boyle and others in their testimony.

Dr. David Wormser is with us today as well. And we'll talk about Israel. But we're also going to get into some conversations with him about the French Revolution. Are we in a Jacobin America?

And what does that mean? And how should we maybe be interacting in accordance with all this? So lots to talk about today. But as we do each and every Monday morning, we begin by visiting with my good friend from Americans for Limited Government, Mr. Richard Manning. Rick, welcome. Good to have you. Hey, how are you? Basically, you're spanning the scope of history here today with the references you're making.

Pretty impressive. We're people's got their brains tuned in because this one's going to be a real tour de force. The goal here is to start your mind off in real serious critical think mode. And the question is, then why don't you start with me? But anyway, that's a conversation for another day. I don't know. Maybe.

All right. Well, there's a lot. Obviously, there's a lot that's going on. There's the continuing Biden crime family saga, I suppose. Wall Street Journal has a number of interesting articles up this morning.

They've got the Fed and issues with that. Also, on the front page, JP Morgan to settle Jeffrey Epstein accusers suit. Jeffrey Epstein accuser suit. There was allegations that the CEO of Morgan Stanley had been on Epstein Island, et cetera. And they moved away from the CEO and essentially said, we just need this out of our lives. And so that's not an uncommon thing for corporate America to kind of write a check and say, OK, well, I don't want to be talking about this anymore. So that's pretty simple. But obviously, both pressing issues, the whole Donald Trump indictment thing.

And that's kind of what people, at least from people I know, seem to be pretty focused on. And I know the Journal has a piece by Alan Dershowitz. You were telling me this. They've got a piece by Alan Dershowitz.

Yeah. Alan Dershowitz wrote a piece. Hang on.

Let me see if. A strong Trump indictment, but is it strong enough is the case. The evidence against the former president is powerful, but the jurors aren't the only ones who will need convincing. And then he goes on to compare it to the compelling case that was brought against Richard Nixon that caused him to resign. He brings in the difference between Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Mike Pence, wherein, yes, they had the documents, but as soon as they were identified as having the documents, they kind of rolled over and tried to play, oh gosh, oh gosh, and what have you.

I mean, hold on. Right at that point, I think Dershowitz completely misses the point of this whole legal case. Just to be fair, he's a brilliant guy. But he's doing an analysis and all this and kind of, but the underlying thing that underpins this is a sense that former President of the United States did not have the right to declassify these documents, did not have the right to actually have these documents, did not have the right to put these documents into public domain, which is if you show it to people who don't have classified settings, that's putting them in public domain. That is fundamentally wrong.

It's fundamentally wrong from a basic constitutional standpoint. The entire power, the entire power of classification rests in the commander in chief. There's only one person, one office that is vested with that. And that is the elected President of the United States. So when you were President of the United States, you have the absolute power to declassify anything you want to. I was actually physically at the airport at Andrews Air Force Base, when Donald Trump left office. He got on Air Force One prior to Joe Biden becoming President. Those documents were on Air Force One or were on a truck prior to Joe Biden becoming President. Hence, the declassified, the decision to do that, to take those documents to Mar-a-Lago and effectively declassify them, even was made prior to Donald Trump was President. Hence, they were declassified.

Can I interject? What people don't remember, I just need to finish this point. What people don't remember is that when Ronald Reagan met Mikhail Gorbachev in Reykjavik, Iceland, he went to the person, the country, the person who represented the country that was our number one enemy in the world. And he said, I'm going to tell you our biggest national defense secret. And that is we're developing an anti-weapon system, an anti-missile system.

And we're willing to share, I'm willing to share it with you. The people who were around Reagan were astonished. They were screaming.

They were so upset. Because that was top secret, as classified as you can get information that he gave to the enemy. But you know what they couldn't do? They couldn't charge with espionage. They couldn't charge with giving away secrets. They couldn't do any of those things because he was President of the United States, and he had a right to declassify it.

It was his decision, not theirs. He's the one who's investigating, the President was investigating. So Donald Trump engaged in an action by declassifying documents, largely documents, which the FBI doesn't want to get out because it embarrasses them about their misconduct in the Russian collusion scandal. He got, he put those documents, he took them. That was his right as President. That was his, and the charges that he put in terms of destruction.

So, Rick, I need to interject, just so you have this, because I know you haven't fully read the article so that you're, because then you're at a disadvantage in one of the things that's in here. The indictment quotes tape recorded conversations that form the basis for several charges under the Espionage Act. The critical recording is of a conversation between Mr. Trump, a writer, a publisher, and two Trump staffers who were discussing a claim that a senior military official had persuaded Mr. Trump not to order an attack on country A, which in context is surely Iran. Mr. Trump points to some papers he found and tells his guests they proved that military officials supported an attack.

This totally wins my case, he says. This is secret information. Look, look at this, Mr. Trump then says. See, as President, I could have declassified it.

Now I can't, you know, but this is still a secret. That's part of what is at issue. And I don't disagree. I mean, I look, this is all about and this is why we need to stand with President Trump in this. This is all about a weaponization of a tyrannical arm of our quasi tyrannical government going after an individual.

And they're trying to send a chill message to virtually half the country that you are all on our list and none of you are safe in this nation. That's true. But let me deal with the facts, the facts of that specific thing. Okay. First of all, there are already people who've come out and said that Jack White altered that.

Jack Smith. Okay. So that's already been, that's already been put out there. But let me just go beyond that. Okay. How, what was, there was an allegation made in a book by a general, by somebody that Donald Trump tried to order an attack in Iran or whatever, and that he brought in, that the general blocked it.

I think it was Milley, blocked it. Yeah, I believe that's correct. That's the allegation. So a, so a general can go off and make an allegation about a national security issue in a book, releasing a national security discussion in a book.

And the president of the United States cannot say that isn't true and here's the proof. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? That is a, you know, he's tied to some kind of, some kind of misguided idea that the president can't have documents, can't show documents to prove that it's a public allegation meant to defame the president and uplift a frail little general with his little suit of armor. He can't sit there. He can't defend himself. He can't use actual, actual proof to defend himself against an allegation that says he wanted to start a war.

Are you kidding me? That's the, that's the big crime he committed. He defended himself against something that was publicly in the public domain.

Why wasn't the guy who put it in the public domain, the allegations in the public domain, why wasn't he trying? Didn't he, I mean, how, what kind of world are we in where the people who sit there and tell us they have to ban us from the internet because we've got misinformation, malinformation and disinformation are now trying to put a president in jail for life because he took documents, which he legally had, by the way, because just because even though he said secret, because he doesn't always speak directly in terms of legally, the very fact he removed the documents from the white house, declassified them. That was the act of declassification. Okay.

Let's just be clear. That was the act of declassification. He has to stop. He says, here, see, this proves that he lied. That it's beyond comprehension that I understand. And, and, and, and he, you know, in, in respect to that, just because he made that statement doesn't mean that as you just said, that in fact, those documents aren't declassified predicated on the presidential records act, which again is something that, you know, they, they, they have done everything they can to try not to bring that into this case.

And obviously president Trump's defense team is going to say, wait a minute, you, you can't, you can't remove the presidential records act and, and, and it's scope from this prosecution. You, you can't just say, oh, well, it doesn't apply. How does it not apply?

He, he was the president of the United States. Of course it applies. And therefore when it says that his ability to declassify documents is understood within the act, right? I mean, isn't, isn't that what you're talking about? What's more, the entire Mar-a-Lago rate was based upon the presidential records act.

Okay. That was the underlying justification for the Mar-a-Lago rate. So if they can't, so if the underlying justification for the entire rate was, was that act, which then you cannot walk away as prosecution from the ramifications of that act. That is a, you know, you don't get to do that. You know, here's what, and this is the problem with, with, this is why some of us have come to dislike attorneys a lot. There, you can, you can turn anything into a federal case. You can say, oh, it was obstruction because the president of the United States was in a dispute with the, with the national archives over what documents should be turned over to the national archives or which documents should not be turned over to the national archives. You can have, and that dispute is obstruction of justice. If you're sitting there saying, well, the national archives were right, completely denying the president the ability to actually legally defend his position on what he felt should be in their archives and what he didn't feel should be in the archives.

And historically speaking, he showed the extent of how bad this was. This, they, they showed all the, the picture of the show was all these boxes, like all these boxes filled classified documents and they could, the ones that they claimed were classified would have fit in half a box. But they showed this picture of all these boxes. Yeah, those are the boxes that had the Time magazine covers in them and all that stuff neatly packed up. So this is all, I'd have some, I'd have some, some idea, some thought that they were, that this was honest, except for you look at the visual and the visuals shows you, oh, this is, look at all these boxes of classified documents are just being thrown around willy nilly.

And the disputed documents were essentially about five file, the other file folders sit about two and a half, three inches high. That's a, that is a visual lie. It's a deliberate distortion by the special counsel. And it has done so to try to win public opinion, to get a pay, get his picture on fricking MSNBC. I'm a little sick of these guys putting us in constitutional crisis so they can have a little check mark on their resume.

And it's a, and it's garbage. And I'm saying, I'm not going, what the lawyers in the world are going to do is they're going to sit there and want to fight about, you know, little legal nuances. I'm going to fight about the over, the underlying thing that this is the, this is the third coup. And I'm really, really, and I'm not going to let these guys get away with it. We're going to call it what it is. And you know, we're either going to have a place where we elect our leaders or we're going to have a place where unelected bureaucrats and nobody knows who they are, are determining what power, what information, what, what capacity our elected leaders have.

And if they don't like the elected leader, they deny them the capacity to be the elected leader. And I'm not, and we can't pretend anymore about what this is and we're going to fight it and we've got to fight it just without any fear whatsoever about the, about that we can't be too timid, can't be tepid. We are in dangerous times.

This is a dangerous time and you cannot go into a dangerous fight filled with fear that you're going to be overcome and start trying to nick around the edges. This is fundamental and we have to take these guys down. And that's why when you put it in the context of Joe Biden's corruption and stuff, in fact, it's done at Joe Biden's AG's office, there's no longer an excuse for the Republicans in the house of representatives to not be engaging in a full blown impeachment effort against Joe Biden and to fight fire with fire on this because Joe Biden actually has committed a feature offenses.

He actually has abused his power. So let's, let's take a quick break and when we come back, um, why don't you recount for our audience some of the issues that you see as being, if you were, if you were going to bring the argument of impeachment, what are, what are the things that you would put in it and, and maybe what are some of the things that you would say, no, we don't need to go there because we've got this and these things are so strong. So hang on, we're going to take that ride. We'll be right back. You're listening to children generation radio, watching us at TECN TV, and you can always watch TECN TV at the children generation radio.com website where we run TECN TV 24 seven.

We'll be back with more children generation radio coming up right after this brief break. So up next we have clean slate. When you have different things like cancer and different diseases that are autoimmune related, it can really help with inflammation cause you're helping clean the bot and clean slate is a formula that's made from a natural orthosylic acid that basically is put into a formulation that's naturally occurring, that uses different processes from polarization to heating, to cooling, to different types of catalysts, which will go in the body and really help communicate to get rid of those things that don't need to be there. People don't understand why there's so many autoimmune disorders, but our environment's toxic. The land, air and water have changed. We've been exposed to nuclear war.

And the issue is if there's a nuclear bomb or there's pollution or there's war in one country, it actually affects everything up to the stratosphere. So we're all connected and we've really got to clean things out. You can pick up your clean slate today at cgrforlife.com. That's cgrforlife.com.

Pick up your clean slate today. Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow. Retailers, shopping channels, and now even banks have tried to cancel myself and MyPillow. Well, during these times, your support has meant everything to us. So my employees and I want to personally thank each and every one of you by passing this savings directly on to you. We're selling the best products ever for the best prices ever. For example, we have my standard size MyPillow regularly $69.98, now only $19.98 with your promo code. Or you can get custom fit with my premium queen size MyPillows regularly $79.98, now just $29.98. Or my king size regular $89.98, now just $34.98. So go to MyPillow.com now and use the promo code on your screen or call the 1-800 number below to receive this exclusive offer.

If you do it right now, I'm going to include a free gift with your purchase. Thank you and God bless. Hi, I'm Tim Scheff, a certified natural health practitioner of over 40 years. I went under issue to a product that changed my life. The product's called Vibe, available at cgrwellness.com. I thought I was on a good nutritional program before I discovered Vibe.

I was taking the traditional vitamin and mineral tablets, wasn't really feeling any different. So I tried Vibe. Vibe is an all-in-one vitamin and mineral supplement. It's a liquid multivitamin. It's cold-pressed, whole-food source, non-radiate, gluten-free, and has no pasteurization. Vibe is like fresh juicing without all the work.

It supports four areas of the body, cardiovascular health, immune health, anti-aging, and healthy cell replication. Vibe is available in a 32-ounce bottle for home use or a very handy one-ounce travel packet for life on the go. The first time I tried Vibe, I had more energy in about 20 minutes. I started thinking clear.

I even don't believe I slept better. Get yours today at cgrwellness.com, coupon code chosenjinradio at checkout, and receive $20 off your first order of $50 or more. That's cgrwellness.com, coupon code chosenjinradio. Get yours today. These statements have now been evaluated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Negro products do not treat, reduce, cure, or prevent disease. My passion is the fight for freedom. My father fought for a World War II defending our country. Today, we are no longer fighting with guns.

Instead, we are fighting an ideological battle for control of our country by contributing to causes that support your constitutional rights. I am Patriot Mobile. Did you know you can do your tithing and love offering right from your computer? Visit www.chosengenerationradio.com to support Chosen Generation and make a tax-deductible donation. Now, back to Chosen Generation with Pastor Greg.

Welcome back to Chosen Generation Radio, where no topic is off limits and everything filtered through biblical glasses, and my very special guest this morning is Rick Manning. Ah, I missed him. I got a gnat again, folks. We're going to try and get him. He gets right in my face.

He likes that pool of water underneath my left eye. Anyway, all right, sorry. It's not a butterfly gnat. Oh, okay. Some light humor there as we get into something pretty serious here. Joe Biden, we've seen the clip of him saying to the Ukrainians, fire the prosecutor or you're not going to get the money. That seemed to me like an American government official. I don't know if you'd call it a bribe, but it was certainly peddling an influence, and obviously the corruption that they were trying to hide, we know without question based on the laptop and other pieces of evidence, was clearly an indictment against Joe Biden's son Hunter and against Joe Biden himself, which is why they didn't want that prosecuted. I mean, that's just one piece, but go ahead.

Lay this thing out. Why should there be an impeachment proceeding against Joe Biden? There should be an impeachment proceeding against Joe Biden because Joe Biden's administration is engaged in wholesale spying and censorship against the American people using the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, and all the other alphabet intelligence agencies. The Biden administration, they've been violating American Fourth Amendment rights on the regular.

It's part of just the normal thing they do. The Biden administration has failed to enforce the law as it relates to the border. They have a lot of wholesale invasion of our country and have promoted it.

Not only have allowed it, but they've promoted it and they're directly violating their constitutional responsibility to defend the borders of the United States as the Commander in Chief. So that's impeachable. I really think the personal corruption of Joe Biden and the Biden crime family has been laid out very directly by James Comer, not James Comey.

James Comer, Chairman of the House Government Oversight and Accountability Committee, is compelling. It shows an operation that enriches the President, sells Joe Biden, at least when his Vice President sold Joe Biden, when he was out of office, sold Joe Biden to foreign leaders around the world. We cannot have a President of the United States who's compromised, who is, in fact, serving multiple masters. The danger of the money is not the fact that he took money. The danger of the money is that the Chinese know what he took money for.

They know exactly what they were buying. They've got the receipts. And Joe Biden fears those receipts being released far more than he fears the American public, which makes him, that puts us in danger of having someone who is a controlled, a controlled asset, not an NSA spy, but a controlled asset as President of the United States. And so when we see a Chinese spy balloon go across the country and allowed to continue spying on America, going over all national security bases that are very sensitive, we have, we now have to ask the question, is that because Joe Biden did not shoot that down because he was afraid of his, of those who hold the receipts about his taking money in exchange for public influence, that he, which makes him unable to lead this country. The, now the second thing is people, some people say it's not wise to impeach him for other, for a lot of other reasons, because we don't need the trauma right now. We've got all these things that we need to come together.

Can't we all just get along? It might not be politically viable. One of the things that happened during the multiple impeachments of Donald Trump is the House of Representatives created a case law which allows him to break the attorney-client privilege between the President of the United States and his attorneys. They did that, they did that, both Mueller did it between his personal attorney and Donald Trump and Michael Cohen. And he did it with the, forcing the White House counsel to testify about internal discussions about policy, about, about what was happening. Given the scope, the number of different areas of abuse of power, failure to, failure to exercise duties of his office, is the only way you're going to get to the bottom of this is to be able to get, use that same power of, under impeachment, to go in and force his attorneys, his, the people who are more around Biden, to talk about the decision-making process, why they were doing stuff, be able to get their paperwork and do it under, under the, under the scope of going to jail a lot. Because this will allow us to see and determine, is Joe Biden competent? Is he, is he even capable of doing the job? And, but more importantly, is there a conspiracy within the Joe Biden administration to take down the United States government?

Is Joe Biden a controlled asset? Those are things which we have a national security interest in, in determining. And if, and given that, and given the criminal, it's not just policy differences, there's actually criminal activity that the FBI has chosen not to investigate for years. It is Congress's duty to conduct a full investigation.

And the evidence that's been found so far is far is enough to warrant impeachment and impeachment proceedings, at least a full impeachment investigation with the added powers that gives the House to be able to get to the bottom of what the heck's going on down there at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. You know, we, I mean, those of us that have been paying attention are, are fairly confident. As a matter of fact, there was a clip that I was watching over the weekend that Ben Shapiro put up of Barack Obama saying that he would be happy to have a third term, if he could just sit in the background, and control someone who is seated in the seat of the presidency.

And that that's his vision, his dream is that was that was, you know, that was his desire was was to do that. And those of us who are paying any attention to all of this are pretty confident that that's precisely what's going on, is that Barack Obama is is pulling the strings. So you you were just talking Rick about, you know, getting to the bottom of what's happening and who's doing what and what have you? Do you think that part of what they're protecting is Obama at the end of the day? You know, that's a great point. I don't I don't know why the republicans we try to protect Obama.

I think it's a matter but I'm gonna use a word so let me use Yeah, I'm gonna use a word which I think is sometimes which is harsh. But it takes courage to go on and take on the take on the the powers that it takes, but listen, but I mean, let's think about, you know, the power structures and the relationships. You know, everybody talks about, you know, the the Clinton dynasty and the Democratic Party and the Clinton influence and all that and then on the scene comes the Obama's. But very few people are talking about the fact that the bushes have been influencing the Republican Party for probably the better part of 50 years. I mean, that's true that that, you know, I mean, you can go you can go back to you know, when when they burned Nixon, then they put Ford in, they allowed Carter now now, you know, even with Ronald Reagan, they were still able to maintain some control because HW Bush, the only way they were going to split the convention and and you would have had a fragmented GOP in 1980. And so they bargained to put HW Bush in as the vice president, those that were in that power structure told Reagan, you you will not get the nomination, it'll be it'll be a split party.

Or you can take our man. And HW Bush proved that he was their man, not only in in some of the sabotaging that he did of the Reagan presidency, which I think more and more of that is going to come out. But what he did in 1988, when he when he took over, and then he passed the baton to the Clintons, he paved the way for it. Well, and the same guy, George HW Bush was RNC chairman. And when the whole in 73-74, and during the in 75, yep, dealing with the, the impeachment water, like, yes, what I said, he was in the middle of he was in the middle of that as well. So yeah, you know, no, there's no doubt that there that there are influencers and also my so my so my point is, yeah, no, but differences. And, and politically, yes, there was a attempt to leverage Reagan Reagan did make him vice president.

And then George HW Bush spent the rest of his life pretending he liked Reagan. The but yeah, there, there have always been they're always powerful behind the scenes influences. I know, Jason, Jason Chaffetz has a book out that has some the behind the scenes scenes influencers in the in the Biden administration. This impeachment of Biden, though, is not an impeachment of Obama, although it could be an impeachment of because the same people will be left in place to run it.

If you impeach him, if you convict him, because those people are, are already embedded, the Susan Rises of the world. Yep. So you're not really going to change that with an impeachment.

Yep. What you do with an impeachment is we have we have a very real enemy in the world. This isn't this isn't a time where you know, we're the we're the sole superpower in the world.

We have an emerging superpower in China, who is attempting actively attempting to destroy America. And we have reasonably that our president is entangled with them in such a way that can't make his ability to defend the interests of the United States at risk. That's not just simply taking a bribe. That's actually being someone who has to choose, am I willing to stand up and do this?

Because these people could destroy me. That is a dangerous place to be for a country. And it's one of the reasons you have an impeachment power in there.

This isn't frivolous. This is actually a national security concern for the country. So you go back and say, why wouldn't they do this? Because they don't because people in Washington, DC don't want to take risks.

And they don't want to. And as a result, unless you've got a 65 70% majority saying that, you know, he should be impeached. Congress doesn't lead they follow.

And that is and given that Ken McCarthy has a five vote majority, he doesn't have a lot of wiggle room to go off and take bold moves, unless he's got everybody on board. So if you want actually want to have Joe Biden subjected to an impeachment, so we can get to the bottom of whether or not he is a controlled asset of the Chinese, which is pretty important, we get to the bottom of why the heck they have, you know, who's been responsible for violating the US law and not enforcing the border. And what are the discussions about that, you want to get you want to get to the bottom of those things.

The only way to do it is by impeaching this guy for malfeasance for not performing the duties of the president. That is a that is within or for high crimes and misdemeanors, which is your bribery. The rest of it flows from that because once you've established bribery, you question do all policies flow from the bribery?

Are they all connected to this to this bribery cartel? Those are things that are worth describing those we have to discover. And if we're going to tear or tear down this series of attacks on the United States, yeah, we have to be able to get to the bottom of them.

Many are calling it a third. But but I and and I and I don't think there's an any argument that that's the only way that it happens through through a trial on the Senate floor. But listen to me carefully the problem that you end up having number one, you're you on the Senate floor, you're not going to be able to get a conviction. We don't have the votes in the Senate, to be able to impeach Joe Biden. We don't suppose to impeach and we may have votes to impeach in the house. We do not have the votes to convict in the Senate.

That is correct. And well, and and and Rick, I'm, I'm not 100% certain we have the the numbers, so to speak, but we don't have an overwhelming majority in the house. And we've already seen the compromise of of these individuals. We saw him compromise morally when it came to the respect for marriage act. We've seen consistent compromises by Republicans.

So you know, although although I think McCarthy, I would say that McCarthy has, for the most part, you know, lived up to the promises that he made to Matt Gaetz and and the conservatives when they said, okay, we'll, we'll give you our support so long as and they have not yet had to invoke that that nuclear plan, so to speak. But he's, he's not able to corral all to get all the cats in the in the cage. I mean, he's just not let me go back, right? You do not to have the power to to go and break the attorney client privilege that the demo Nancy Pelosi did with the six vote majority in the house, right? You don't have to have him convicted. You don't have to have the vote on the House floor to do that. Okay, that's already done. You have is a legitimate investigation into impeachment, a real inquiry.

Yep. And is through you should not have truthfully should not have going into this vote, you know, a majority of people say yeah, we majority of people saying we have to impeach him and having their minds made up. This should be a legitimate inquiry. And even though they never gave Donald Trump any of that, the Republicans should not fall into the box of saying, we're gonna impeach him no matter what we're all of our minds are made up. They need to have a legitimate inquiry because they have to have people asking the questions that the public's going to be asking. Do what about this?

What about this? And by the way, impeachment is so serious. If you don't treat it seriously by making a legitimate inquiry and instead making a witch hunt as the Democrats have done over the last five years.

If you don't treat it seriously, then you're doing abuse, then you're abusing the Constitution and you're putting us in a place where impeachment, you know, impeachment becomes commonplace. Hasn't that already happened? It kind of has. I mean, to a degree, isn't that? Put that back in the bottle, though.

The only way you put that genie back in the bottle is by doing a by having an honest and honest, serious inquiry that is not just, you know, basically thrown around mud saying, we're so outraged because Donald Trump, which is what the Democrats did. So that's important. And the end goal is important. Because I pray that he's not a controlled asset of the Chinese government. There's that's a that's such a essential disaster. I pray that, you know, there, he said, 50 years of bad decision making and policy bad decision making is well renowned for making the wrong decision every turn. And even his own advisors say that even Obama said that it's a so given that I you know, hopefully this is just him being an incompetent boob. But that is a but it's reasonable to ask the question given the financial entanglements of whether or not he is in fact, a controlled asset of the Chinese government. And we have a responsibility to our nation to find that out. And the only way to do that is through an impeachment process.

Well, we'll we'll have to see Rick whether or not there's a will within the republican controlled house to take that kind of a step. And and I don't know, I don't know if right now there is a there's enough of a will to do it there there there's a lot of bluster. And and they certainly are, you know, it seems taking some shots at it.

But it seems like a very long road. And we'll have to see whether or not they Yeah, I'll leave you up with this. And that is politicians are not courageous. Politicians do not lead by and large politicians do what they're told to do by the people eventually, if they believe that there's that their constituents are just said demanding something occur, they typically will follow. And as a result, this is a decision, you know, and the republicans in the house are no different in that regard.

If they're hearing from people demanding that impeachment occur, they're going to, they're going to have a serious impeachment inquiry, if they're hearing, but the people they'll hear from overall, there's two things they're going to hear, they say, but Kamala will hear, but Kamala recognize, same people be running the show, they'll just be Kamala in the front. And second one is, you know, while this is politically the Wall Street, the case for people, this is politically risky, you know, we we want to do tax cuts and stuff, we don't want to spend our time doing this. And, and actually, the third thing is, well, we've got an election, let the election decide. Well, the answer to all three of those is, we cannot allow somebody who may be a controlled asset of the Chinese government, whose every action comes into that comes into that question and that light, we have to get to the bottom of whether or not he is or isn't. And that is a and that is the one responsibility, Rick, and so we have to move forward.

I follow you. But you know, when you bring the Kamala question in, her husband is is as deep into the CCP issue as Biden, if not deeper, quite frankly. And so the influence of the CCP, I mean, quite if you're the if you're the Chinese Communist Party, you almost hope that they will get rid of Biden and put Kamala Harris in charge. So the question is, goes back to your point about the Biden doesn't get removed from office, unless the Senate has six or seven votes in the Senate convict, right. So this exercise doesn't remove Biden from office. No, it gets to the bottom of the controls point, the strings in the Biden administration, maybe then allows allows us to fight effectively against that, as opposed to flailing around and trying to make rational arguments there. Congress does have power. They have various powers that are important. And it will hopefully embolden Congress to start using those powers to actually try to save this country. That's that's the critical piece of this. You were 100% correct. Kamala Harris's husband, as an attorney, his job was doing the business deals with China, arranging business deals with the Chinese government for US corporations.

So what do you get? So, you know, you want to talk about something with ties in the Chinese government, they're deep and deep and wide and established. And we never in somehow during the presidential campaign in 2020, we never got to talk about that. We never vetted that, by the way, by the way, his his, his CV curriculum vitae got changed pretty dramatically.

got midway through the process. He went from bragging about all the deals he was getting with the Chinese government to Oh, I barely know any China hardly hardly hardly know those guys. Well, let me let me just close out this this fortunate by just saying, you know, what you're suggesting is, is that Congress is going to get the evidence for a public relations push by conservatives and and that would have within it then the actual documented evidence of who's doing what and who's pulling what strings because that would come out in the hearings for impeachment that would be conducted in the house. Knowing Yes, no evidence which that's information that will not come out otherwise. Right.

I understand that going back full circle. Look at what they how desperately the Department of Justice and is going to try to put back in the put back into secret hiding documents that about Russia collusion. Well, and so and also let's cover this stuff up. Well, and also we can look at, you know, the the three brave individuals, the whistleblowers that came forward and spoke, and you know, and and their testimony about what has happened to them in an effort to crush them.

And and one of my guests that I'm going to have on here in just a little while this morning, Joseph Ochabente, who was a federal agent, one of the most decorated federal agents in US history, who was framed by by the tyrannical government. And and, you know, again, I mean, it is also so I it's going to be, you know, it would be it'll be questionable, even even with an impeachment proceeding, Rick, you I mean, there are so many things that have to go right the there. The documents look what's happening with the FBI right now. They're stonewalling. They're stonewalling on presenting documents.

Well, of course they are. But here's here's the difference. And the worst thing that happens out of this, the absolute worst thing that happens is the courts rule that the treatment that Donald Trump received during the impeachment was inappropriate. And the attorney client privilege actually exists because and that there were Trump rules and that there were rules for everybody else. If we get the courts to actually take down the precedents that were said about how about the president being able to have conversations about different options that can be pursued without being attempt to convict, you know, get him thrown out of office for pursuing different options is only allowed. If we can just accomplish that, we will have accomplished a great deal of service for the country because and if they sit there and they are forced to argue that there are Trump rules and there's rules for us, that sort of has a bigger problem, a bigger.

I'd love for the government to be arguing that in one court while they're arguing in another court that Donald Trump is not above the law. I'd love to have that. OK, I understand. Yeah, I hear what you're saying. Right.

But here's the problem. The problem is, is that about PR, this is about getting the information. It is it's but it's about public opinion. Rick, it's going to be about public opinion as well. And it's going to be about what the media how the media is going to frame it and whether or not we can get truth out to enough of the populace for it to make a difference because that that.

So so I hear what you're saying. But right now they continue to paint Donald John Trump as enemy number one. He he's he is being assaulted and attacked because they see him as the tip of the spear when it comes to the conservative or the grassroots element of the country. They've lumped everybody together. And and so they see him as that and they believe that if they can take him down and they can and they can quell him. And and here's the other thing we better be understanding.

They don't care if if indicting him and and and trying to lock him up causes some kind of civil uprising. They're ready for that. They want that. So they're they're looking at this as as a no lose situation from their perspective of what they're trying to do. Heck, they'll put agents within the crowd to provoke it.

Absolutely. They won't, but they've already done it. That's exactly right.

We they've already done it. So seen the trial runs. Yep.

So my so smart. And so my point is, I'm not saying, folks, this is not a hopeless situation. But we better put on a broader scope.

And really, at the end of the day, and I and it all comes, it really comes down to this. This is why I was arguing about Prager's statement that, well, there's decent people and not decent people. And somehow being a sodomite, you can still be a decent person. You can't, because you're morally bankrupt.

And here's the problem. Our country is morally bankrupt right now. And unless we get back to that God foundation, and to a biblical understanding of truth, and truly understand that our rights are going to come from God, period, end of story. Until we can get back to that place. That's the place we've got to fight to get back to Rick. We have to agree. We absolutely have to. And we've run out of time.

Rick, this is great. Good stuff this morning, folks. I really hope I mean, we've we have really tried to unpack this for you in a way to really cause you to think about the significance of these issues that are at play.

And what I would say to you is this we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers and rulers of wickedness in high places. You need to be on your knees and you need to be praying and then you need to be on the phone the switchboard number is up on the screen 202-224-3121, 202-224-3121. Call your congressman today and say I want an impeachment proceeding. Joe Biden and the Democrats need to be brought to justice. I'll be back. Our number two is coming up with David Wormser right after this brief break.