Share This Episode
The Charlie Kirk Show Charlie Kirk Logo

The Pelosi Tape That Blows Open J6

The Charlie Kirk Show / Charlie Kirk
The Truth Network Radio
June 12, 2024 7:00 pm

The Pelosi Tape That Blows Open J6

The Charlie Kirk Show / Charlie Kirk

On-Demand Podcasts NEW!

This broadcaster has 874 podcast archives available on-demand.

Broadcaster's Links

Keep up-to-date with this broadcaster on social media and their website.


June 12, 2024 7:00 pm

Who is responsible for the January 6 incident? Is it Donald Trump, like the press has claimed for years on end? Or is it Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who led the House fight to defame Trump and imprison his supporters? Now, newly-released tape shows jarring proof of just how complicit Pelosi was in that day's events. Plus, Michael Seifert of PublicSq talks about 24 Hour Fitness's embrace of Pride over American patriotism, and the signs that the peak of pride fever has finally passed.

Become a member at members.charliekirk.com!

Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/support

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Hey, everybody's on The Charlie Kirk Show. Michael Siefert joins the program from Public Square. Has pride been muted this month? What has happened with 24 Hour Fitness?

That and more. Barry Loudermilk joins the show about latest January 6 revelations. And as always, you can email us your thoughts freedom at charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast, open up your podcast application and type in Charlie Kirk show. Get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa.com.

That is tpusa.com. Start a high school or college chapter today at tpusa.com. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campuses. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com. That is noblegoldinvestments.com. It's where I buy all of my gold.

Go to noblegoldinvestments.com. They are counting on your surrender. If you give up, they win.

But what if we look back and we realize we were just inches away from victory and that's when we decided to give up. Join us and thousands of American patriots for the summer convention that all are invited to. You're going to hear how we're going to win in 2024. With the biggest speakers in the movement, these are President Donald J. Trump, Charlie Kirk, Govek Ramaswamy, Governor Kristi Noor, Dr. Ben Carson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, Laura Trump, Senator Rick Scott, Congressman Matt Dix, Benny Johnson, Jack and more.

June 14th through 16th. 2024 is our final battle in Detroit, Michigan. The great silent majority is rising like never before. Join us for the People's Convention. This is a new ballgame everybody. You send a message.

We play to win. Register now at tpaction.com slash peoples. Joining us now is Michael Seifert from Public Square. Michael, welcome to the program.

Lots to talk about here. First, I want to discuss this internal memo from 24 Hour Fitness. 24 Hour Fitness has locations all across the country. I don't know what decent person should still have a membership with 24 Hour Fitness. We should all cancel our memberships and go to a fitness or a gym, let's just say center that shares our values. Michael, what's going on here? Well, Charlie, good to see you.

Thanks for having me on. Yes, this is another concerning example of a gym, a place of fitness, which by the way should be more geared toward health and holistic living and a love for bettering yourself and improving your community and building strong people. But instead, these gyms like Planet Fitness, 24 Hour Fitness is now joining the crew. These gyms are pandering to 0.0001% of the population that value things like critical theory or gender expression.

It's nonsense. 24 Hour Fitness released an internal memo to their staff members advising that BLM and pride symbols are always at all times approved forms of freedom of expression. But the American flag and US logos or any sort of paraphernalia that screams Americana, these are only allowed to be worn on the holidays. So if you're a 24 Hour Fitness employee and you want to wear your pride pin or you want to wear your BLM headband, you feel free to do so every single day of the year. But if you dare want to have a t-shirt that's got your American flag on the arm, the nation that protects our liberties and the freedoms of expression that 24 Hour Fitness touts here, then you're not allowed only on holidays.

This is pretty remarkable, Charlie. And I don't understand what they're trying to accomplish with this, but certainly it's not more memberships. So help me understand what is the incentive here for 24 Hour Fitness to become so incredibly pro-whatever, LGBTQI2A+. By the way, we haven't done, hey Ryan, can you get the new pride flag up here for our audience? We actually haven't, we have, we're in the midst of pride month. We have an entire month dedicated to this. So I want to get this up on screen here. What is the incentive here? I can't imagine that most gym bros or people that pay money to go to the gym are on board with the grooming of children or the celebration of degeneracy.

What's going on here? Oh, yep. There's the new flag. It feels like they're adding a new color. No, that's outdated.

That's outdated. We got another one here. Believe it or not, because remember the revolution never stops. Progress will consume itself.

It is the snake eating itself, but it's close. Sorry, Michael. I interrupted you. Continue.

No, you're fine. So at the end of the day, Charlie, you're asking that question because you and your audience, you think logically, you think that, hey, a gym should be in the interest of building more gym memberships, largely especially targeting the community that partakes in an increase of gym membership, the gym bros, the people that are looking to enhance their personal fitness, which by the way is apparently a right wing virtue now. Oh, there's the new pride flag. It's got umbrellas.

It's got umbrellas. You know what's interesting is that the, you know, the old gay and lesbians, they're being out shined by two spirit and from the purple circle. And so continue, Michael.

You can never be woke enough. And actually that leads to my answer to your question. You think about this logically because it makes no sense that a 24 hour fitness would ever act in such a way if their desire was to increase memberships. But the problem is the people in the boardroom of 24 hour fitness are not acting logically. These people are actually setting their sights on a completely different set of goals that have nothing to do with profits, had nothing to do with an increase in membership.

Their goal is to exercise their religion to their fullest capacity. 24 hour fitness was founded as a company that was focused on improving with 24 hours of the day, accommodating different lifestyles, your personal fitness goals, but they have morphed into a political organization. The CEO of 24 hour fitness does not run the company.

The diversity equity inclusion officer runs the company. And what they will do is pander at every given turn to the lowest common denominator, they will find the 0.001% of the population that feels oppressed. And God forbid, 24 hours fitness is deemed an oppressor. So they will actually pander and placate to the oppressed class in order to be on the right side of history. And you'll notice that none of what I just said has anything to do with business.

But that's the point. Their goal is not healthy business practices anymore. It is advancing a religious and progressive ideology that ultimately will lead to the detriment of 24 hour fitness just like it has led to the detriment of many once great companies before it. Yeah, I just I can't quite grasp the incentive structure now public square you guys have alternative options talk about some of them. Well, as I mentioned earlier, many journalists are calling the lifestyle approach toward bettering yourself and fitness and rejecting body positivity.

They're calling that a right wing pursuit. At public square, we're proud to claim that if if bettering yourself and keeping yourself healthy and going to the gym and making sure that you're working out and improving your own personal fitness for the betterment of yourself and your community is a right wing virtue. We're proud to own that a public square and we have 1000s of gyms on our platform that are very proud to own that as well, whatever you want to call it, they want to embrace personal fitness and they want to embrace truth while they do it. So you're not going to find locker rooms at the gyms on public square that have any ambiguity involved. There are men's and women's locker rooms. So the stuff you see at Planet Fitness, the nonsense at 24 hour fitness, none of those things take place on public square and the 1000s of gyms we represent. So I encourage folks if you are interested in finding a new gym, cancel your subscription to 24 hour fitness or Planet Fitness, move your money, your time and your resource to a gym that will honor the classic American principles that built this great nation and you can improve your life and get healthier while you do it. That's what we exist to do at public square.

We want to help you on that journey. You cannot keep funding your enemies. It will be the detriment of our nation if we're not careful. So my encouragement is unsubscribe from the broken, subscribe to a better future and you can use your dollars to do so. So so Mike, I want to get a general take here. It feels as if pride this month remember pride go with before the fall and pride is a sin has been a little more muted this season than in years past. After the backlash against target and Budweiser last year, do you see that as well Michael that the corporations are not embracing it the same?

You know, Charlie, I would say that generally I see it as a slightly muted year for the pride month celebrations, but they're still happening. I think what people need to realize is that a company will do something publicly and be very proud of it. A company might also do something to the same degree, but be a little bit more private about bragging about it.

And that's what we're seeing quite a bit. So you're seeing companies this year focus their pride demonstrations and expressions more internally on their staff. But even target, you know, you brought up target target is the largest sponsor of a massive pride event in northern Idaho that just happened last week. We're seeing companies left and right. If you look at UGG, for example, UGG boots this week came out with a pride campaign highlighting men and makeup and talking about gender expression and fluidity.

UGG the boot company started as a very based for the outdoors surf company in Australia back in the 70s. So you have a little bit of a muted expression meaning you don't have target and Bud Light going out and publicly announcing how they are embracing pride this year. But you still have all these same companies doing the same sorts of nonsense. They're just doing it behind closed doors and they're focusing it more internally than they are externally. And that's what I think is the greatest example or evidence of the fact that these companies really haven't learned. They're still letting the fools drive the boat. And ultimately, at the end of the day, my encouragement to Americans is look very closely at the companies you're spending your money on and make sure that they're not just fooling you and pulling the wool over your eyes.

You're going to see companies or politicians do this very often. And we don't want to be the the ship of fools that follows them along. Look, for over 10 years, Patriot Mobile has been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. The only.

When I say only, trust me, they are the only one. Patriot Mobile is a proud supporter of the show, and I'm proud to partner with them. Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all three major networks, which means you get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the left. When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending a message that you support free speech, religious liberty, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, our military veterans and first responder heroes.

They're 100 percent U.S. based customer service team. Make switching quite easy. Make switching quite easy. Keep your number, keep your phone or upgrade.

Their team will help you find the best plan for your needs. Just go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash Charlie or call 972 Patriot. Get a free month when you use offer code Charlie.

Join me and make the switch today. That is Patriot Mobile dot com slash Charlie or call 972 Patriot. That is Patriot Mobile dot com slash Charlie. Patriot Mobile dot com slash Charlie or call 972 Patriot. They have all three major networks. Check it out right now.

Patriot Mobile dot com slash Charlie. There's another story I want to go here, talk about here. It's the Center for Immigration Studies. It says in the last four years, three fourths of all new jobs have gone to immigrants, illegal or otherwise. Americans are being replaced by foreigners.

Michael, tell us about it. Well, Charlie, this is a really concerning trend that is never promoted in the media. The media is never willing to admit this, but you just cited the study. This is from the Center for Immigration Studies. To be very specific about the numbers, since 2019, 971,000 more U.S. born Americans are employed than there were in 2019. But in that same timeframe, 3.2 million more immigrants are employed. And by the way, this study is actually being generous on the employment numbers to American born employees, because this is a blend of full time and part time. And if you'll notice right now, the full time jobs are actually dwindling while part time work is massively expanding for native born Americans. Just last month, 663,000 American born workers lost their jobs or retired while 414,000 foreign born born workers, which is illegal and legal, gained employment.

So Americans lost jobs, while foreigners gained jobs. This is why the border is wide open. And for anybody who says, well, gosh, how do they track illegal employment?

Guys, California, my home state, has an entire department of resources geared toward helping illegally employed illegal immigrants. So not only is it happening, and do they have the ability to track it, your taxpayer dollars, especially in blue states, are actually funding programs to assist in illegal immigrant employment. So, Charlie, what we're seeing is the death of a nation, any nation that is unwilling to protect its own borders and prioritize its own people first, it's the beginning of the end.

And Biden administration is doing this very purposely. You'll see at the border just this morning, there was a video from San Diego. It's not families seeking a better future.

It's not honest asylum speakers, seekers. There were 30 men lined up from Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, all these random countries around the world full of potential terrorist threats being let in over our southern border, taking these jobs, pricing Americans out of the market, because the market ends up catering to the lowest common denominator. And if you have a great set of skills, and are essentially overqualified for some of the jobs that used to be able to pay great as early entry jobs, you're in a really rough position here.

So, Charlie, it's a disaster. This is a bad week for the world of sort of jobs reporting as well as consumer pricing index. This morning, you'll notice that the economists are saying, wow, inflation is less than we predicted.

It's because they predicted it at 3.4% year over year, and it's 3.3% year over year. So, we need to stop letting the media gaslight us about who is getting our jobs, where the growth is coming from, the actual harms of inflation, and do the research ourselves. When you do, you'll realize that we're witnessing the collapse of our economy for American-born workers right in front of our face. What are you hearing from entrepreneurs and people on the front line at Public Square, Michael, about their difficulty to make ends meet, and the hyperinflation that we're living through? 27% of Americans have to skip meals because they cannot afford the food they want to feed themselves or their children. What are you hearing from the front lines of entrepreneurs that have to navigate this?

Well, we actually just conducted a survey last month that found that 4 in 10 of our business owners couldn't make rent last month. So, you're witnessing the harmful effects of inflation not just hit the consumer's wallets, it's hitting the business's ability to actually have a positive bottom line. And if you look at over the last four years of the Biden administration, the way the prices are structured today versus the way they were four years ago before he came into office, the numbers are staggering. Gas has gone up 55% in the last three and a half years. Groceries have gone up 21%. The cost of eating out generally is over 22% increase. Baby foods up 28%.

Pet foods up 23%. Rent, and this is a big one, up 21% nationwide. And that actually is very conservative for some of the more densely populated areas around our country where a lot of our business owners live and have to maintain corporate rent or corporate leases. Electricity is up 29%.

We rarely talk about the cost of utilities and how those ultimately serve as a massive burden on a business that's just trying to make ends meet. Used cars are up 20%. So, when you talk about transportation for some of these service-based businesses, and they have to be able to buy new inventory, you're staggering your growth if you want to try to enhance your business's ability to expand their footprint. And finally, airfare.

If you're in a traveling job right now, we've certainly experienced this. Airfare is up 40% from three and a half years ago. This is unsustainable.

And here's the last number I'll give you, Charlie. Weekly wages are less than 4%. In fact, they're down 4% from three and a half years ago.

We're being charged more and making less. There is only one option, and that is a change in leadership at the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Thank you so much, Michael. Check out Public Square. Thanks so much.

Thank you, Charlie. You might have heard Mike Lindell and MyPillow no longer have the support of their box stores or shopping channels the way they used to. They've been part of this cancel culture, so they want to pass the savings directly onto you by having a $25 extravaganza. When Mike started MyPillow, it was just a one-product company. With the help of his dedicated employees, they now have hundreds of products, and some of you may not even know about it. To get the word out, I want to invite my listeners to check out their $25 extravaganza, two-pack multi-use MyPillows, just $25. MyPillow sandals, $25. Their six-pack tile set, $25. Brand new four-pack dish towels, you guessed it, just $25. For the first time ever, their premium MyPillows with the all-new Giza fabric, just $25. Orders over $75 will receive free shipping, too. This amazing offer won't last long. Go to MyPillow.com and use promo code KIRK or call 800-875-0425 today.

That is promo code KIRK at MyPillow.com, promo code KIRK. Joining us now is Congressman Barry Loudermilk to discuss a lot of different things here regarding January 6. He's on the oversight committee. He is the chairman of the oversight committee. Congressman, thank you so much for taking the time. I want to play this piece of tape here, this bombshell piece of tape. Video emerges from January 6, Pelosi admitting to not securing the Capitol before the riot. Was January 6 really at the hands of Nancy Pelosi?

Play cut 55. We have responsibility, Terry. We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have.

This is ridiculous. You're going to ask me in the middle of the thing, when they've already breached the inaugural stuff, that should we call the Capitol Police? I mean the National Guard? Why weren't the National Guard there to begin with?

They thought that they had sufficient resources. No, there's not a question about anybody. They don't know. They clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having to just prepare for more.

Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. She takes responsibility? The entire pretext and premise of the January 6 committee was that it was Donald Trump's fault.

Right. Congressman Loudermilk, tell us about the significance of this. Well, it is very significant, Charlie, and thank you for having me on and for covering this. It's a very significant one that I thought when I first saw the clip, hey, at least she's taking a good act of leadership here and taking responsibility as she should. But then she spent $20 million on this special select committee to pin the blame on Donald Trump.

But as you look at the clip, there's a lot of revealing things there. First of all, we know that Chief Sunt, who is the chief of Capitol Police, had already made numerous requests for the National Guard prior to this. Nancy Pelosi's response is, why are you handing me a note asking for the National Guard when the Capitol's already been breached? Or as she said, the inaugural stuff, the Capitol had been breached at that point.

Which tells me that this is the first that she heard that there was a request for the Capitol Police. Well, we know Chief Sunt has testified under oath to our committee that he had made numerous requests and those requests had been turned down due to optics. So my question is, if Nancy Pelosi isn't the one who turned down the request, who on her staff did? Because the Sergeant at Arms, who told the chief of police, he said, I'm going to run this up the chain.

Well, he came back and said, they don't like the optics. So we need to know who is they? If it wasn't Nancy Pelosi, was it one of her staff that just took the initiative to say, no, we don't need the National Guard?

The other thing is she's exactly right. They were unprepared and something else we're looking into. We do know that there was intelligence that the executive branch had, that there was a strong likelihood of violence on January 6th. That intelligence was given to the US Capitol Police, the intelligence division. But it was not passed on to the chief of police. We also want to know was that intelligence passed on to Democratic leadership?

Because if it wasn't, why wasn't it? Was it intentionally suppressed or was it just incompetence by the leadership? And then the third part of that whole factor is Nancy Pelosi then fired the chief of police the next day, which I think was a poor decision on her part, because even though he would inevitably resigned as a good leader would, he's the only one who could do an after action to see where was the failures of security at the US Capitol. But she fired him the next day, made him clean out his office, and promoted to acting chief the very person who was over the intelligence division that failed to pass on the intelligence that there could be violence at the Capitol.

So it just opens up even more questions that our committee is going to seek the answers for. Can you explain why Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato's transcribed testimony before the January 6th committee was suppressed and blocked from public view when he said that President Trump has suggested had suggested 10,000 National Guard troops? So Trump wanted to send 10,000 National Guard troops and Pelosi blocked it.

Help me understand. Well, from what we're seeing is it's a pattern. That's just one of the transcripts that didn't align with their preconceived narrative, which is that Trump needs to bear the blame for this. So Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, that bombshell testimony, their star witness, as she's been called, who claims that Trump tried to take the steering wheel away from a Secret Service driver, that he attacked a Secret Service agent, tried to choke them.

He threw cheeseburgers because he was so mad. All of these very outlandish, in my opinion, testimonies, that is what set the narrative of the select committee on January 6th. Any information, any evidence that was contrary to her testimony was suppressed. It was either sent to the White House for archiving, Department of Homeland Security. We have video that, well, we should have videotapes. They had videotapes of every deposition and every transcribed interview that they admit that they did not keep. They apparently destroyed.

We cannot find them. So what we've seen is a pattern, whether it's Tony Ornato, who was witnessed that, yes, Trump authorized up to 10,000 troops. We also know that on January 3rd, he ordered the National Guard to be ready to be deployed to the Capitol, which means he's already then passed the, he's delegated that authority to deploy them to the Secretary of Defense.

At that moment on January 3rd, there was no other calls that needed to be made. That information was suppressed as well. And even the driver's testimony, which ironically Cassidy Hutchinson made these claims in June, they didn't even call in the driver until November. If you remember, there was an election in November.

So it's like the select committee did not want even the American people to hear any testimony that was any different than their preconceived narrative. So I know you agree that the more exposure and the more eyeballs that we have on January 6th, that the truth will set us free. Has Speaker Johnson made good on his promise to release all of the January 6th footage and tapes?

He has. We've been working diligently to get that done. When he came in, he said he wanted them all to be made public.

And so we started immediately there. It's quite a feat to get 44,000 hours of video converted from the proprietary format that they are in the security camera system for the Capitol Police into an internet friendly system. We tried doing it internally, but it was taking so much of the time of my investigative staff.

It was taking them away from looking into things like Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, the security failures at the Capitol, why it took the National Guard three and a half hours to get to the Capitol, even after they were authorized to deploy. I just went back to speaker. I was taking way too much time. Can we just contract to have someone help us to get these converted? And he responded immediately and we were able to contract it out. And we've posted even more footage today. We're on track to hopefully within the next couple months have a hundred percent of it out there. And so he is making good on that promise. That's promising.

And it's good to hear. We want every single minute and second of footage released because as you saw that the Capitol Police, some of them were giving guided tours throughout the Capitol. So Congressman, what now can be done about this? Do you have evidence that any of Pelosi or her cronies lied to the committee, that there was a coverup?

And if there was a coverup, the old adage in DC is that the coverup is worse than the crime. Can we potentially see under a potential Trump administration and a new department of justice, criminal referrals and action for covering up and lying to Congress? Well, that would be an executive branch decision because the Congress, we're a legislative branch. We don't have the power to actually adjudicate anything.

We can make recommendations. That'll be up to the Trump Department of Justice if there are criminal referrals. We will continue to bring the truth out. Yes, the coverup is always worse than the crime. And in this case, I think we are seeing that there was significant amount of coverup, but more importantly, there was a lot of disinformation that the select committee had determined what their narrative was going to be.

And they were not going to let anything stand in the way, even if it was fact and truth. That's why we spent a year just trying to recover information that the select committee obtained, but did not preserve. They did not archive.

And as I said earlier, that there's a pattern here. Anything that is exculpatory or exonerates the president or shows that any Democrat was at fault here, that information was suppressed. Some were deleted that we haven't been able to recover. There are no videos of the depositions, which are extremely important for us to get.

Fortunately, we've been able to recover, I would say about 85 to 90% of the data, either through a forensics company recovering data from hard drives to fighting with the White House and the Department of Homeland Security, get the interviews of all the secret service members, which by the way, totally contradict all of Cassidy Hutchinson's testimonies. And they were the firsthand accounts. Cassidy's testimony, if people have paid attention to, I call it the REO speed wagon testimony, heard it from a friend.

Of course. Do you think she lied to Congress? I think there's no doubt that she did lie to Congress because she gave two contradictory testimonies. Either she lied in her first three transcribed interviews or she lied in her last four or five. There's no way because her testimonies are contradictory of one another. And so whether she's held accountable for that or was she coaxed into changing her testimony, that's something we're looking into. We really want to know what caused her to change her testimony because there is no one that has corroborated a word of her outlandish claims of Donald Trump trying to attack secret service that he had pre-planned to go to the Capitol, that he wanted Mike Pence hung, he threw cheeseburgers in the White House.

No one has corroborated those testimonies and every other testimony we have contradicts hers. Congressman, thank you so much. And we are behind you in your pursuit of truth. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Well, thank you. I appreciate that.

All right. I want to read one of our emails here and we have been hitting it hard. And this is amazing. This is a great story here. I want to read this right here. Richard says, Charlie, I registered to vote today.

Thanks for the kick in the butt. Many of us need it. And he sent me proof of his new voter registration status in Texas, in Harris County. And we definitely need your vote. By the way, that is going to be a very contested Senate race. I think Ted Cruz is going to be okay.

Ted Cruz is running up against Ken Allred. I think that's actually a really good topic segue here as we prepare for our People's Convention coming up this weekend. Excited to see so many of you. We're doing a book signing. We're releasing our new book, Right Wing Revolution, this weekend. You're gonna be hearing me talk about that a lot, a lot of the themes. We're going to be walking through that. I'm doing a whole media circuit next week, Right Wing Revolution.

You guys can get your copy. But let's kind of go around the horn a little bit. On the Senate races. First and foremost, Ted Cruz in Texas. Ted is up against Ken Allred, who is a very popular former NFL player represented the Dallas Highland Park area running for the US Senate. We feel confident that Ted is going to win that race, but he's going to have to spend some money and have to work the state. Rick Scott is going to have a tough race in Florida, but we think that Rick Scott will win by five to seven points, which for him is a blowout usually wins by like five to 7000 votes. We're going to flip West Virginia, which is amazing, which makes the Senate 50-50, makes the Senate 50-50 when Jim Justice is going to flip that race because Joe Manchin is done. And so that gets us to 50-50 at the minimum. So with no other states, if Donald Trump wins the presidency, that means we control the Senate because we'll have the tiebreaker of whoever his VP is. Hopefully his vice president will be J.D.

Vance. Then let's look at Montana. Montana is the toughest race for Democrats to defend the cycle by far.

We have a great, great candidate, Tim Sheehy, running up against Jon Tester, who is a left-wing Marxist Democrat in Montana. If anyone is in Montana, email us right now, FreedomAtCharlieKirk.com. I want to tell you guys what you are doing in Montana is so important to register voters to chase ballots. Montana will determine the future of the U.S. Senate.

So what is going on in Montana is incredibly important. We feel confident that Jon Tester will lose because Donald Trump is going to run up the score significantly in Montana. And then let's go to Ohio. Ohio is going to be tight. A new poll shows Bernie Moreno down five points in Ohio to Sherrod Brown. With Donald Trump, I think that we can still win that Ohio Senate race. We're 100 percent behind Bernie Moreno, and that Ohio race matters a lot. Then we also have Larry Hogan as well in Maryland. Potentially he could win that race. He's very moderate, kind of a rhino type, but that would still be an extra vote for Republicans.

Kerry Lake could potentially win in Arizona. We're doing everything we possibly can to try to help with that. And some breaking news out of the House. We can keep on going around the horn on the Senate races. The House has just voted 208 to 207 to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress. This is how screwed up our system is. You know where those contempt charges go? It's Merrick Garland.

Click out 102. On this vote, the yeas are 208, the nays are 207, the resolution is adopted. Without objection, the motion reconsiders laid upon the table. So Merrick Garland has now been held in contempt of Congress, where he was able to then prosecute Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro. Now, all of that is just symbolic until you have the White House. We held Holder in contempt too, and nothing happened. However, if Donald Trump wins in January and gets a new Attorney General, I would love to see Merrick Garland face federal charges for being in contempt of Congress. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

You put Steve Bannon in federal prison, Merrick Garland, you might have to spend four months in federal prison. That just might have to be the way it is. That is the equal option. The equal application of justice. Those are the rules.

We didn't make them. You decided to go put Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro in federal prison. When you win in January, we're going to press charges. The precedent is set.

And Merrick Garland, you might have to serve four months, because that's the new precedent. You've been the one that has been—you've been spying on Catholics in the middle of Latin Mass. You've been spying on moms and dads at school board meetings. You have been supporting the advancement of critical race theory. You wrote this ridiculous new Wall Street Washington Post op-ed, where you said the attacks on the Department of Justice are unprecedented and have never been heard before.

This Washington Post article op-ed. So if we win in January, Merrick Garland, based on this decision, the Trump Attorney General might have to pursue charges and might have to put you in federal prison for contempt of Congress. They know that, by the way. That is why they are going to be acting so desperate, so frenetic these next couple months. A surprise is coming. The true surprise, though, is not going to be the lobster flu or a grid attack. It's going to be how many low-propensity voters we register. Send our message. Do the work. See you in Detroit.
Whisper: medium.en / 2024-06-12 20:14:38 / 2024-06-12 20:28:49 / 14

Get The Truth Mobile App and Listen to your Favorite Station Anytime