"Kill the Boer:" What's Really Happening in South Africa

Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here live from the Bitcoin.com studio. Kill the bore. We go deeper and we talk to a South African on the front lines. What is happening in South Africa? It is shocking.

Why is the COVID shot still on the childhood vaccination schedule? We're making a push to get it removed. And finally, what if I told you AOC is the leader of the Democrat primary for the presidency? No joke.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the leader to become president of the United States for the Democrat party. Email us as always. Freedom at CharlieKirk.com. Become a member today. It's members.charliekirk.com. That is members.charliekirk.com. Get involved with America's most important organization, Turning Point USA at tpusa.com.

That is tpusa.com. Buckle up everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks. I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

That's why we are here. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com. That is noblegoldinvestments.com. It's where I buy all of my gold.

Go to noblegoldinvestments.com. Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com. We have a very special guest here. Very, very important topic here, which is the what is happening in South Africa is now impacting America.

We covered it extensively. We have a great guest here who is the author of the book Kill the Boar, and it is Ernst Roots, also the director of the Pioneer Initiative, and he comes to us live from South Africa. Ernst, great to meet you.

Thank you for taking the time. Well, Charlie, great to meet you too. And it's great to be on the show. And thank you very much for talking about this and for having me on the show.

Good to speak to you here from Pretoria, South Africa. So for our American audience that is largely uninitiated with this topic, tell us about your book Kill the Boar and tell us about what is actually happening on the ground in South Africa. So so the book is entitled Kill the Boar. It was published in twenty eighteen and the title was chosen because that is also the title of a very famous political chant in South Africa that I'm sure you've seen and your viewers have seen that is becoming increasingly popular. A chant.

It's not a song. It's a chant of which the lyrics are kill the boar, kill the farmer, shoot to kill, kill a man. And the word boar, of course, refers to the Afrikaner people.

So it's an ethnic or cultural community that is targeted. And the book is well, it took me three years to write. It's very extensively researched. And the main argument, if I can summarize, is that farm attacks, there are many problems, crime phenomena in South Africa, but the farm killings are very unique for a variety of reasons. The one is the extreme disproportionate rate at which farmers are being attacked and killed in South Africa. The second is the extreme levels of brutality. The worst tortures imaginable happening during these farm attacks.

And I can tell you about that if you want. The third is the the unique role that farmers have to play in in South Africa in terms of providing food for the nation, but also in terms of being employers and employing people and so forth. And then the fourth reason is just the fact that a crime phenomenon such as this deserves a unique counter strategy because the farmers are far away from police stations and so forth.

But on top of this, what we have is not just a disproportionate and an extremely brutal crime phenomenon. We have a crime phenomenon here that is actively encouraged and romanticized by some of the most senior and influential politicians in South Africa, chanting kill the boar from public platforms, then being protected by the Constitutional Court, which is you could say the Supreme Court in South Africa, and then being protected by the president who publicly denies that this problem is happening. And then on top of that, we have now this threat to property rights with the ruling party, the ANC, openly saying that they want to take or confiscate property that belongs to white people and redistribute it. And then they call this EWC, expropriation without compensation.

And then they would try to convince us that targeting property rights and destroying the free market would somehow be good for the economy as it would lead to what they call black empowerment, which is just, or transformation, that's the other term, which is just the South African term for DEI as we know it. Okay, I want to play that piece of tape as you mentioned. So before I play it very quickly, of them chanting kill the boar, is this chanted on a regular basis? Was this a one-off piece of tape? And is this kind of become a pseudo motto or mantra of a political party?

Before I play the tape, please answer that question. Yes, it has become a regular thing. There was a time when it wasn't chanted that often. And now it has become a new way of, you might say, targeting the boars and poking fun at the boars, rallying them and so forth. Let's play cut to 60 of a large political party in South Africa, chanting, kill the boar, play cut to 60.

So explain to our audience what we were watching there. So that is a political rally by a party ironically called the Economic Freedom Fighters proclaiming to fight for economic freedom, when of course it's nothing but a communist movement, very much philosophically influenced by Frantz Fanon and his justification of violence. And this party is ideologically very much aligned with the ruling party in South Africa, very close to them, even though they are competing for votes. And this, what we see here is a political chant that is always or almost always, it follows on a political speech during which the politician speaking would speak about how, for example, and this is a direct quote, all white people are criminals and should be treated as such, and statements such as, if you see a beautiful piece of land, go and take it, it is yours. And statements such as, we are going to slit the throat of whiteness.

And I could just keep on mentioning examples. So it's this very provocative speech followed by the chanting of kill the boar. So then has that happened beyond the chanting, beyond the rhetoric? What has materially happened? Who has lost their life?

Who has lost their property as a result of this outrageous rallying cry and rhetoric? Well, let me firstly say the counter argument to concerns about pharma tax is always yes, but there are other crimes also in South Africa, gang related violence and so forth. And that is true. But what we have with the farmers being targeted in South Africa and killed is a complete disproportionate targeting of this section of society. Because remember, there are very few farmers, there are about 30,000 commercial farmers in South Africa, who are now being targeted, not just attacked and killed, but as I mentioned, very brutally tortured, in some cases, tortured for hours during these attacks. And what we also find in some of these attacks are the attackers chanting political slogans such as kill the boar while they torture their victims, making political statements, referencing certain politicians, making some racist commentary and so forth.

And in one of the worst cases, it was an elderly, two elderly women, a mother and her daughter who were both elderly, who were severely tortured and killed on a farm and the attackers actually went as far as taking the blood of the victims and writing the words kill the boar on a farmhouse. So it's really, really alarming. And it's particularly alarming to see the extent to which the media is trying to downplay this. So not just the media downplaying it, but this seems to be the opposite.

They're saying that this isn't happening, that this doesn't exist. For our audience that is unfamiliar with South Africa, this is your home, correct? This is where you were raised.

You're ancestrally Dutch, I imagine, if I'm not mistaken. Right. And so but they're trying to drive you out of this country saying it's not yours. What is your personal response to that contention?

Yes. So so we have been here since 1652, which is 300, almost 400 years ago. My family has been the the first roots of whom I directly descent were lived at the time of George Washington.

He was a little bit older than George Washington. And he that's when he came to South Africa from Europe. The Afrikaner people descend from the predominantly from the Dutch, the French and the Germans who came to South Africa during the 16 and 1700s. We became a people in South Africa. We have our own language, which we named after the continent Afrikaans.

We called our own. We named ourselves after the continent. We are the Afrikaners. We have a very unique, a very rich history of we have our own culture that we developed here in the southern tip of the African continent. Civilizationally speaking, you could say we are Westerners and we're very proud of our Western heritage. And we're actually the last Western outpost on the African continent. And we're very proud to to be in Africa and to have remained in Africa. And we are certainly committed to a future here in the African continent where our ancestors have faced many existential crises over the centuries. Please plug your book again for our audience. Thank you. Well, the book is Kill the Boer and it is available on Amazon. And I would encourage people to go and read it and also to talk about this. Privacy to loan debt.

So many Americans feel stuck and helpless. They are the they are the sponsor of our campus tour. They are great people. You can finally take control of your student loan situation at y refi dot com. That is y r e f y dot com. They provide you with a custom loan payment based on your ability to pay. Why refi is not a debt settlement company and they work with each borrower individually, tailoring each loan to each borrower's specific situation.

You'll not be calling a faceless call center. Why refi can reduce your monthly payment and guarantees interest rates under six percent. Why refi does not care what your credit score is. Go to y refi dot com. That is y r e f y dot com. So take a look at it right now at y refi dot com. Why refi refinances distressed and defaulted private student loans, which are different from federal loans. They offer a three minute rate check.

So I want you to think right now. Maybe you have private student loan debt. Maybe your friend does.

Maybe your neighbor. Got to check it out. Y refi dot com. Y r e f y dot com.

Can you imagine being debt free and not burdened anymore? Go to y refi dot com. May not be available in all 50 states.

Y refi dot com. Earnest Roots continues with us. So let me ask you, author of Kill the Bore, everyone should check it out. This is getting largely ignored by Western media. And I know this will sound like a silly question, but do you feel safe in your own country being a white man? Well, well, the answer to that is both both yes and no. The reason why the answer is no is because our community is very actively being being targeted by the government. We have, I mean, I can tell you the names of people I know who have been attacked on farms and even people who have been murdered.

I myself have been in an armed robbery. And on top of the violence, we have more than one hundred and forty race laws in this country aimed at targeting and discriminating against the white minority. We have the rhetoric. We have the threats to take confiscate property and all of that. The reason why the answer is is yes, that we do feel safe is because we are a very well organized community. And we and I say feel safe, perhaps in quotation marks, but but to a certain extent, the Afrikaner people have gotten used to living in Africa and to walking around wearing a firearm to defend yourself if needs be.

And, you know, it's almost like the wild west, but perhaps South Africa is the wild south. And and and but but the thing is, we love this country so much that a lot of people I know a lot of people want to leave and a lot of people would leave. But but the overwhelming sentiment here is that we really love this country. We love this place. We love our history. We love our culture. And we want to have a future. And we need we need some form of an intervention to ensure that we can remain here as our ancestors have done for hundreds of years. And so the left will say this is all because of apartheid and you white people deserve it, that you guys deserve all of this and you own too much property. This feels as if this is going to reach a simmering point, a breaking point. It's not sustainable. Your own political leadership seems to be escalating this, not trying to bring down the racial temperature. Am I correct in that diagnosis?

Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. It's it is reaching some form of a boiling point. So in in the 1990s, when they were the negotiations for a new South Africa, the president of South Africa, the current president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was the chief negotiator for the ANC. And he was asked during a private meeting by a member of one of the opposition parties, what is the ANC plan for dealing with white people in a so-called new South Africa, to which he responded that their plan for dealing with whites is like boiling a frog alive. You know, that metaphor of the frog that is put in hot water, but the water isn't boiling temperature at first.

The temperature gradually increases up until ensuring that the frog doesn't jump out up until the point where the frog eventually boils to death. And it's very alarming to see the extent to which this is actually actually what they have been doing since taking power in 1994. And so you mentioned the word unsustainable, and that's that is the correct word. And so what we need from a sort of macro political perspective is some form of an intervention in the sense that the political system in South Africa has to change. South Africa is in a certain sense a globalist project, and the solution to this is self-governance. We do not have self-governance in this country. We are dominated by a race nationalist socialist movement and they're obviously trying to convince us that these socialist ideas would make the country a better place.

They then blend it with race nationalism, not even race nationalism, just racist nationalism. And it's been so destructive to this country and this needs to stop. We need a different political system for the country altogether. Do you think that's possible? I think it's possible.

I think it's not just possible. It's highly probable that the system would change at some point because it's very clear, not just that it is failing, but that it has failed and that it continues to fail. And so that is what we are trying to do with the Pioneer Initiative is raising awareness about the fact that we do not simply have a choice between the ANC government and the apartheid system, but there are other political systems that one might consider, federalism being one, but there are others as well. And there's going to be a change.

And what we need to do is to be well organized and sure when the system changes, it changes for the better and not for the worse. Ernst, thank you so much. Again, Kill the Bore is the book we watch with horror and we are here to receive people that want to leave South Africa. But simultaneously, I have to I have to give you great compliment and admiration. The fact you want to fight for your home is of great courage and of high moral standing and amazing fortitude.

I would never flee America and I don't fault people for fleeing South Africa because I mean, look, if all of a sudden your neighbors farm and the farm down the street, all these people are murdered. I mean, it's it's a toughie. But I really respect that. And I hope that you are successful. The odds are stacked against you. The reason the odds are stacked against you is because South Africa has embraced the darkest way that you can govern, which is simply tribalistic racial politics. It is the lowest of our human impulses.

And I pray you guys can rise above it and actually care about people's character and their agency, not just the not just the color of their skin. Thank you so much, Ernst. Thank you for having me. So you insure your car, your phone, your home, because if something bad happens, you want to be protected. What about you? What about your income, your family's future? With Policy Genius, you can find life insurance policy starting at just two hundred seventy six dollars a year for one million dollars in coverage. It's an easy way to protect the people you love and feel good about the future. Policy Genius is amazing. I'm a big fan of life insurance. You guys can compare quotes from America's top insurers side by side for free. Their licensed support team helps you get what you need fast so you can get on with your life.

They answer questions, handle paperwork and advocate for you throughout the process. Life insurance is not a one size fits all product and Policy Genius doesn't treat it like one. They lay out all the options clearly coverage amounts, prices, terms, no guesswork, just clarity. Head to policygenius.com and click the link in the description to compare free life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much money you could save.

That is policygenius.com. Very exciting guest here. Looking forward to this conversation. Joining us now is Dr. Kat Lindley from family medicine, mother of five and school board member and senior fellowship director at the Independent Medical Alliance. Doctor, welcome to the program. Thank you for having me, Charlie.

I'm really excited to be with you. So thank you for that. And so the kind of the genesis of this conversation was this clip.

I want to play it. It was our conversation with the FDA commissioner, Dr. Marty McCary, all about the COVID shot and why is it still on the childhood vaccination schedule? Fairness, Trump has only been president for 100 plus days. You've got to weigh things.

You've got to measure them. But I think it's time for us to launch and push for this to be removed. Let's play cut 347, please. Look, I'd love to see the evidence to show that giving young healthy children another COVID shot, you know, a sixth COVID booster would help them. But that evidence does not exist. And so we're not just going to rubber stamp things at the FDA. And I don't think you're going to see a push at the CDC to be pushing COVID shots in young healthy children. That is something that's being discussed right now.

I think you're going to see some announcement on that in the coming weeks. But I know they are trying to review all of the scientific data and there's no good randomized control data that the current version, the latest formulation of the COVID shot is necessary for young healthy children. Other countries have already recommended against it. Other leading countries in Europe have recommended against it for young healthy children. Doctor, expand on that, please, and make the case that the COVID shot should not be on the childhood vaccination schedule.

Dr. Makar is correct. There's really no evidence to have these COVID shots on children vaccine schedule. He said the current formulation, I would actually postulate that there never was a case to give it to children because children did really well during COVID. Also, so far, we had nine and a half million children aged six months to 17 years who have received this COVID mRNA shot. But what we've seen is 620% increase in myocarditis among young men post vaccination. We're also seeing increased miscarriage rates, even according to Pfizer safety reports.

And one study showed that there was a 33% drop in successful conception among vaccinated women. So really, this campaign arose because we felt very strongly while the administration is contemplating these things, the ACIP, which is the Vaccine Advisory Committee, is going to meet next week. We actually urge them to do it now. And parents have been silenced for too long. They've been intimidated when they go to pediatrician's offices and told that our children have to get these shots. In the meantime, we're seeing many injuries and many new illnesses that we shouldn't be seeing in children.

So our ask is really simple. We're asking HHS and CDC to remove them from the children vaccine schedule, but also pregnant women because child starts in a womb. And we know that these lipid nanoparticles that are transferring the material travel through placenta and we don't want our children to have it. So, so doctor, let make the case, though, why the vaccination schedule matters because the counter argument be like, well, if you don't want it, just don't take it. But the vaccination schedule involves immunity protections and also is a standard for some public school admissions, for some summer camps, for college admissions. They use the vaccination schedule as you are not allowed to enter or participate unless you have every one of these shots. It's not just a suggestion. It actually is a criteria.

Please explain. Many experts have said that when the vaccine goes on the vaccination schedule that's recommended by CDC, the vaccine manufacturer gets indemnity so they cannot be sued. The other point is there are still some states, in particular states like California, where they don't accept any kind of exemptions for vaccinations. And you could have a family where the doctor pressures them to have a child vaccinated even for COVID. But then also we think mandates are over.

They're not. Mandates are still well in the health industry. So we have nursing students, we have medical students that have to do rotations where these mandates are still there. And some places are still recommending COVID-19 vaccine and they go back to CDC schedule and it says CDC recommends that you have it, so you need to have it.

So, but doctor, I find it really hard to believe. Are there really parents that still, I guess so, willingly want to inoculate their kid against COVID with an experimental shot? Why are they worried about their kid getting COVID in the first place? Do you remember the story that recently came that there were two children that were still locked down in their home because the parents were afraid of what was happening during COVID and they didn't want them to go out in the public? So I would say just based on that story that you can imagine there are still parents who believe that this is an issue and there are still pediatricians and doctors out there who are recommending them.

I just, I mean, it's just like that is so mass propaganda. And is it fair to say, doctor, that we do not know all of the multi-decade now health problems that some of these kids might carry for no reason whatsoever? You know what was the biggest problem with this whole vaccine issue when it was even rolled out? The lie that's safe and effective. How can anyone truthfully tell us that something is safe and effective when we don't have long-term studies? Even when they came out with the, I understand why people got the vaccine in the first place because there was lots of fear.

Everyone felt they're doing the right thing for whatever reason it was. But the fact that Pfizer and our government, CDC came out and kept on saying they're safe and effective was always a scientific lie. When you don't have long-term safety data, you cannot say that.

You can say we think it is, we hope it is, but you cannot say it is. So that's where we are right now. And what we are seeing, even according to where's data, we're seeing many injuries. We're seeing many complications.

Some of us are treating patients with cardiac issues, with neurologic issues, with clotting issues, with many, many issues. And what is new that's on the market is this mRNA vaccine. So we are starting the campaign asking for the mRNA COVID shot.

But as far as I'm concerned, I'm going to push even further. I believe that the whole platform needs to be looked at. And I love that Dr. Makary is at the FDA.

I love that Dr. Jay Bhattacharyya is at the NIH. I'm hoping that they will give us true studies that will give us long-term safety data. And if it's safe and effective, let's have a conversation. But let's stop lying.

Without a doubt. And just as a level deeper, again, I've come from a very simple first principle argument. Why do you have to vaccinate against something that is not a serious threat to your child?

It's a wrong premise. I mean, look, pneumococcal pneumonia, I get it, okay? But if we're inoculating at something that is not even a threat, then the entire argument of why the vaccine is even offered is not a problem, right? With proper vitamin D supplementation, vitamin A supplementation, movement, unless the kid has serious underlying health conditions, kids are not en masse dying of COVID. In fact, I looked at the data. Kids actually are dying more of the flu than of COVID this last season.

You could look at the data. Kids of just the seasonal flu kills kids every single winter. We know that after two mRNA shots, your immune system gets suppressed. Is it fair to say that we might see other kids, unfortunately, suffer with other non-related COVID sicknesses and ailments because their immune system would be suppressed because the mRNA shot?

Absolutely. This season in particular, even just strep flu, it was very virulent because the general state of immunity around the country is low. So we are seeing many of these viruses and even bacteria lasting longer, needing more treatment and more kind of support because of the fact that our overall immunity as a nation is probably down from what has been happening.

And you're right. If you just give your child proper nutrition, good sleep, exercise, vitamins, their immune system can handle a lot more than ours can. And the idea that we just vaccinate our way through life, it's almost like living in a bubble. And that's not the way that we need to allow our kids to live because we are going to push them towards living in fear. And that's not what children need. They need love. They need support and they need us to be parents. They need us to be their voice. Tell us about your advocacy that you are doing, the petition that you would like moms to sign.

Please take a minute and a half to build that out. Yes. So the campaign is really something that every parent understands, protecting your child. We're, you know, we're kind of done waiting on the sidelines for the, like I said, I love what Dr. Makary is doing. They keep on saying, we're contemplating, we're considering.

We're just saying, just go ahead and do it. There's really no scientific data to support vaccinating our children against COVID-19. So we have a campaign, Smart Moms Ask.

It's at www.imahhealth.org backslash Smart Moms Ask. And this is a campaign to really empower moms, dads, parents, when they go to their physician offices to ask questions, to get truly informed consent and say, why does my child need this at this time? We're really going to push this beyond COVID-19 because we want parents to be able to feel that they are in the driver's seat when it comes to their children's health. I don't know if you know about this, but there are some states that are saying that parents are not going to have access to their children's charts when they start like 12 or 13 years old.

That's ludicrous because parents are the guardians of our children, the guardians of their health or their mental status or their happiness. We need to be able to work with our doctors, with our teachers, and more importantly, we need to be the voice for our kids always. Dr. Lindley, thank you for your time. Everyone check it out right there. Thank you so much.

Thank you. I got some great news this morning for you, everybody. It's phenomenal news, and part of it actually should be taken somewhat seriously.

But this is a guarantee that our campus tours, Turning Point USA, and the Charlie Kirk Show are going to stay very relevant and very popular, God willing. It is the new Democrat presidential poll for 2028. Drum roll. In third place is Jasmine Crockett. Very impressive young woman from Texas. In second place, Bernard Sanders. And crushing the rest of the Democrat field as the leader of the Democrat Party is Alexandria, Ocasio-Cortez. And if you add Bernie Sanders plus AOC, that's nearly 38% of the primary vote in the Democrat Party. And my podcast partner, I have to say, I've done a great job here. I take fractional credit for this.

A little bit. Gavin Newsom at 2%. My podcast partner is not doing very well. You see, if you want to win a Democrat primary, not a great idea to talk to me. If you want to win a general election or try to, at 2%. Cory Booker, Spartacus at 4%. Hakeem the Dream, Jeffries at 5%.

Pete Buttigieg at 5%. And this is the most shocking thing. Kamala Harris, the former nominee, former vice president at 6%. You see, Gavin Newsom thought they wanted a same candidate that could even question the men in female sports.

Now, we have to be very clear. AOC, she could build a big movement of some young women. But bringing what we've built on campuses, we will go up against AOC on campus and we'll do very well.

We will get young men and I would say young women who want to marry normal men in major numbers. And yes, AOC will kind of get the permanent government dependent class. But the Achilles' heel, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is number one, she's terrible on the trans stuff. Number two, immigration.

Remember 353 when she went and cried at the ICE detention center at the border. She is an open borders zealot. The country increasingly does not want mass migration.

The last election was a referendum on that and the Democrats severely lost. So AOC being the potential Democrat candidate, don't discount her. It will be a battle. It will be a war. But I would much rather run up against AOC for the presidency versus, I mean, Gavin would be probably harder, but none of these people scare me. Bernie Sanders is probably going to hand off the torch to AOC.

They'll be like a big thing. I, Bernie, give the torch to Cortez. This is AOC on the Newark, New Jersey, the future Democrat nominee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, play cut 169. If anyone's breaking the law in this situation, it's not members of Congress. It's the Department of Homeland Security. It's people like Tom Homan and Secretary Kristi Noem. You lay a finger on someone on Representative Bonnie Watson Coleman, on representative or any of the representatives that were there. We are going to have a problem. You want to know why young men are becoming more conservative? They don't want to take orders from AOC.

Like that whole thing, that whole vibe, the whole thing is whatever that is, I don't want you to be in any sort of power over my life. Like we're not doing that. Beyond, let's just say, whiny and irritating. So just to recap, AOC is in first place. Bernie Sanders in second place, which means that AOC and Bernie could be well near 40%. Wow. Kamala Harris not doing well.

Jasmine Crockett, who's also a radical. Hakeem the Dream at 5%. This is a very weak bench for those guys that are going up against J.D.

Vance. We are fortifying our base. We are delivering results. Maybe Hilldog will run again. Hillary will come back into the arena. But this is a real 2028 Democrat primary poll. AOC, the huge double digit leader running for the presidency of the United States. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us, as always, freedom at CharlieKirk.com. Thanks so much for listening and God bless.