Defunding Harvard + NPR + PBS ft. Russ Vought

Welcome back, everybody, to The Charlie Kirk Show, live from the Bitcoin.com mobile studio. Russ Vote joins the program. Should we defund Harvard?

And finally, the left becomes violent. Email us as always, freedom at CharlieKirk.com. Become a member, members.CharlieKirk.com. And if you want to see me on campus, go to TPUSA.com.

That is TPUSA.com. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here. Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.

I want to thank Charlie. He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country. He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created. Turning Point USA. We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives. And we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.

That's why we are here. There's a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com. That is noblegoldinvestments.com. It's where I buy all of my gold.

Go to noblegoldinvestments.com. There's some major news and some swirling news around one of America's most powerful institutions, Harvard. Harvard University is, of course, America's most famous university.

They have an admission rate of 3.2%. But Harvard is a lot more than just a prestigious school. They are really one of the most powerful institutions in America. Harvard's endowment currently sits at $53 billion.

Its annual budget is $6.3 billion. Democrat administrators staff themselves with faculty and administrators and alumni of Harvard. Elena Kagan, the most formidable liberal Supreme Court justice, was dean of Harvard Law School. Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, is a Harvard man. Rachel Levine, remember Rachel Levine? Harvard.

So was Pete Buttigieg. Harvard has international pull. They've educated the leaders of many other nations. When Russia became capitalist in the 1990s, Harvard was brought in to oversee much of it. And the fact that it went so badly means that many people in Russia see Harvard as essentially having looted their country. So yes, our current quasi-war with Russia may have been brought to you by Harvard. Harvard has a huge amount of power to set the zeitgeist for American academia as a whole.

They are far, far more than a school, and they know it. Last week, the Trump administration sent Harvard a letter. It was a long letter with a variety of requests made of Harvard asking if it wants to keep on receiving taxpayer money. The most important of these requests was that Harvard has merit-based hiring and admissions without discriminating based on race.

Now let me just take a pause. We sent billions of dollars to Harvard. Harvard has a $50 billion endowment, which is larger than some countries. Why are we still financing Harvard? Why are we still giving taxpayer money to Harvard? We know that thanks to the 2023 Students for Fair Admission Supreme Court case, that Harvard has practiced egregious racial discrimination for decades.

They discriminated against Asians and white people, especially white people from undistinguished backgrounds. The Supreme Court told them to stop this, that it's racism and that it's illegal. In its letter, the Trump administration told Harvard to obey the court or lose taxpayer funding. Harvard delivered their reply yesterday. No, we will not obey.

Their attitude is this. We dare you to stop us. We're Harvard.

You would not dare. Well, Trump is daring it. He's already canceled $2 billion in federal grants to Harvard. Now some judge is going to try to enjoin that. President Trump should and could declare Harvard in violation of the federal civil rights law and cut off all federal funding to the school, which of course, they are in violation of federal civil rights laws.

We need that option to be on the table and ready to be used. Colleges did more than anywhere else to mainstream the idea that it was okay to racially discriminate against white people. In flagrant violation of written federal law and the text of our Constitution, they pushed the idea that this discrimination was good.

So it was okay. That good discrimination is fine, but bad discrimination, not so fun. It's time to destroy this myth utterly and completely.

And if we can blow up some of the fattened up far left institutions along the way, so much the better. Harvard University, as we know, is one of the most influential institutions on the planet. To give an idea of how far to the left it actually is, in 2021 a survey was done of faculty from Harvard University. 96% of faculty at Harvard University, 96% who gave political donations, gave to Democrat candidates. Harvard University is a $50 billion endowment.

They have a tax exempt status, they get money for research grants. Why is it as a country, which is $35 trillion in debt, we continue to finance universities that hate us. And what good actually is Harvard University going to keep on doing with our taxpayer funding. The garbage and the nonsense that is being spewed out of Harvard, out of Princeton, out of Yale, out of Brown University, out of Cornell is noticeable, and it's remarkable.

And they say, oh you know we're a place for rigorous debate and dialogue. Hey Harvard, I'm about to tweet this, I've been trying to speak at Harvard for years, constantly rejected by the administration. I'm going to be in Boston in a couple weeks, will you let me come speak at Harvard? Are you going to let me film it?

Are you going to let me publicize it? Because these Ivy Leagues don't, when you go do a speech at Harvard, they might let you in in a small little cubby classroom like at Brown, but you can't film it because it might embarrass the students online to show they don't actually know anything. Our favorite school, Hillsdale, has to refuse all federal dollars to carry out their mission. So why can't Harvard? If Hillsdale College, which is a great partner of this program, charlieforhillsdale.com, can be a beast without a single dollar of federal money, why does Harvard need federal money?

It's really worth asking, has Harvard just become a Democrat think tank? And if they are, why are they taxpayer funded entity? Again, their endowment is over $50 billion. They have more money than some small countries. Just you understand an endowment, that is the cash and capital and asset pile that they are sitting on. They don't need our money. They don't need tuition money if they still charge tuition. The reason being is that Harvard has become a hedge fund with a college attached. Are they doing robust research? Maybe in the medical field, maybe, but these are all the same places that stayed silent during COVID. They stayed silent during six feet to slow the spread.

They stayed silent during the mask yourself while you're alone in a car. They have a major surplus unlike our government. And if Harvard wants to go be great again, they can go raise the money from their very, very wealthy alumni. So given this ideological capture and the university's vast private wealth, we should cut all funding to Harvard, period. We should cut all funding to Columbia. We should cut off funding to all of these Ivy League schools one by one. How many unnecessary jobs does Harvard University have?

And this is the way it works. Obama is out today on Twitter defending Harvard, saying, well, Harvard is a wonderful place for rigorous debate. The only debate that is allowed at Harvard is left wing versus liberal. That is the only debate that is allowed is you could debate left wing ideas. Well, how pro choice are you? Oh, well, how pro trans are you?

Or how open borders are you? But conservative ideas are in no way welcome to Harvard University. It's the epicenter of smugness and elitism. Harvard fired its president once for simply speculating, quote, maybe there are fewer women in science because they like science less, and he got run out of the institution because of it, got run out of the institution. Harvard University is a great example of how the elites and how the experts protect themselves with a hard to reach, hard to grapple, hard to grasp credential. And that credential is largely subsidized by the American taxpayer. Their most recent president is a fraud who just plagiarized her way to the top.

Utter joke. Again, go raise the money from regular Harvard alumni. And then the tenure of the professors allow them to preach left wing Marxism with no, no blowback whatsoever.

So you put all this together. You ask yourself the question, why shouldn't Harvard have to fund itself? We are a nation far in debt. We shouldn't be funding any of these schools. And Harvard University with a $50 billion endowment, they're now trying to play the victim. Harvard says, Oh, you know, we don't, you know, we don't have the ability to continue.

How about you go sell some stock, sell some buildings out in Cambridge. No more is the US taxpayer going to fund your racket called Harvard, the protection shield of the elites that have gotten almost everything wrong over the last decade. Hey, everybody, Charlie Kirk, you remember that we vote every day with our dollar. One of the best ways to support America is by buying from local farms and ranches. Good Ranchers makes this easy by delivering 100% American meat to your door. When you shop with Good Ranchers, you're not just getting the best meat for your family, but you're also supporting American farmers and ranchers. Instead of buying imported meat, support American agriculture and our local economy. Have used Good Ranchers meat for quite some time, and they never disappoint. Whatever your choice of protein is, you'll be pleased with Good Ranchers. Use code Kirk for $25 off your order and your choice of free chicken breasts, ground beef, bacon or wild caught salmon for a year.

It's time to take a stand. Vote for American meat with Good Ranchers. Your purchase helps keep American farms thriving and ensures you get the highest quality meat for your family. Visit Good Ranchers dot com and use promo code Kirk today. That is Good Ranchers dot com promo code Kirk.

OK, email us as always. Freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. There was some breaking news yesterday with Steve Whitcoff returning from Russia. Now, I have all the faith in the world that President Trump and his team are going to be able to hopefully get as close as one can get to a peace deal.

And I don't want to overly black pill and black pill, to be perfectly honest with you, is a term that the kids use to say it's a little bit of a heavy or depressing take. But. I don't get the sense that Russia is running to the table. Russia is winning this war because of how terribly Joe Biden managed this whole calamity.

We're in a position right now where. Russia is holding the cards and Ukraine is not and Vladimir Putin knows that Putin knows that the American appetite to fund Ukraine is nothing, as it should be, by the way. And therefore, Putin's like, well, we have an appetite to keep this war going. You have to remember that the Russian view of war, they have a normalized view of long conflict. It is part of their culture. It's part of their being. The war of attrition is a a Russian mode of existence. You raise young men and you send them to the military and they're part of the meat grinder and you do it all over again. It's brutal. It's somewhat medieval.

It's impressively patient. And we in the West view every human being made of the image of God. Russians don't really believe that. I mean, some of them are Christians, but their status, first and foremost, they are loyal to country. They're loyal to the oligarchy. They're loyal to the idea of the big Russian family, the great Soviet experiment.

Less Soviet, but more Russian. And so they just keep on feeding the meat grinder. It's not a strategy based on instant gratification. And so I'm starting to see some things in the press reports that are a little concerning that this thing might end up going on. By the way, you get that, longer than we like. You don't get that lunatic Zelensky that doesn't want peace at all. You got a problem across the board. This is Trump envoy Steve Whitcoff saying that his meeting with Vladimir Putin lasted five hours.

If President Trump is able to get this done, he and his team all deserve Nobel Peace Prizes. You got so many different layers of motivations, of revenge. You got different layers of elements of the deep state of the Russian government.

Plakut 164. This is the third meeting I've had with him. This last meeting lasted close to five hours. And it was a compelling meeting. And towards the end, we actually came up with a fine.

I'm going to say finally. But what Putin's request is to get to have a permanent peace here. So beyond the ceasefire, we got an answer to that. So let me compliment the Trump administration here.

And they deserve a ton of credit. In the last week, they did two things that were categorically verboten or forbidden based on the D.C. manual of warmongering and neoconservative geopolitics. They sat down with the Iranians and they sat down with the Russians.

Good on them. You always should talk to your adversaries, regardless of what you're going through. Always try to find out if there's a place for reconciliation, back way of channeling for prisoner swaps, whatever it might be. We finally got Putin's demands for permanent peace.

Now, if I were to conjecture or speculate what they are, again, I have no inside information at all. This is just guessing based on public reports and knowing a little bit about this conflict. Vladimir Putin is going to probably want almost all the land of eastern Ukraine buttressing up to probably near to Kiev. Putin is likely going to want a guarantee that Ukraine will never be part of NATO. He's going to want Crimea to be officially recognized as part of Russia and probably many other contentions and demands. And then it's going to be on the Ukrainians to see whether the Ukrainians are willing to actually broker peace, to come to the table. It's very much an evolving situation.

It is very, very difficult. I do not envy the Trump team at all. I do not envy the Trump team for having negotiate this.

And God bless Steve Woodcough for going into that circumstance. And both sides need to be willing to come to the table and broker peace, to cut a deal that is the better for humanity. Because we're about to enter another summer killing season. We have to have a good baseline to start negotiating, which is this. We want peace. We want the war to end. We'll see who actually believes that.

It's hard for me to say which is my personal favorite. They've recently launched a new course, Understanding Capitalism, that I've been watching. In seven lectures, you'll learn about the role of profit and loss, how human nature plays a part in our economic system, why capitalism depends on private property rights, the rule of law and above all, freedom.

And why capitalism is ultimately a system that encourages morality rather than undermines it. Right now, go to charlieforhillsdale.com to enroll. There's no cost and it's easy to get started. That is charlieforhillsdale.com. charlieforhillsdale.com. Hillsdale is America's greatest college. Take their brilliant online courses at charlieforhillsdale.com.

That is charlieforhillsdale.com. The stakes in front of us, we have to be able to find hundreds of billions of dollars of spending to cut, but there are also elements of spending that, quite honestly, have a disproportionate impact on the American body politic. It's not going to get us to a balanced budget, but it requires courage.

It requires resolve. We're going to talk to Russ Vogt about this in just a second. And put simply, it really is the Trump administration who is planning to deliver on yet another campaign promise to cancel all public spending on PBS and NPR. Now that's a billion dollars a year.

Just to make sure that we can make sense of this. NPR and PBS receives 1.1 billion dollars a year. Why can't NPR just go raise money from all their donors? In fact, I'm still old enough to remember when they used to do their little telethons. Remember those, Blake? The NPR telethons? Hello. Welcome to NPR. Give us three dollars. And you get to get a tote bag.

Remember the tote bag? But the point being is that so many of this, so much of the media landscape is not funded by the government. Why is it that predominantly left wing outlets receive money from the taxpayer? I've dealt with NPR. They've written a lot of stories about Turning Point USA. They are unbelievably unfair. They are wildly and comically to the left.

Let's play cut 152. Do you think the white people should pay reparations? I have never said that, sir. Yes, you did. You said it in January of 2020.

You tweeted. Yes, the North. Yes, all of us. Yes, America. Yes, our original collective sin and unpaid debt. Yes, reparations.

Yes, on this day. I don't believe that was a reference to fiscal reparations, sir. What kind of reparations was it a reference to?

I think it was just a reference to the idea that we all owe much to the people who came before us. That's a bizarre way to frame what you tweeted. That is the CEO of NPR.

And just from a more practical standpoint, the articles are super left. OK, we got Russ vote. Russ, welcome to the program. Russ, tell us about the cuts the Trump administration is recommending when it comes to NPR and PBS. Welcome to the program.

Thanks for having me, Charlie. President Trump and the White House are sending up to Congress when they get back in two weeks a proposal to cut a billion dollars for the Corporation of Public Broadcasting. That's predominantly NPR, PBS, which isn't just leftist indoctrination where, you know, you're you're not covering the Hunter Biden laptop or the fact that the the the Wuhan lab leaked the coronavirus.

But you're actually on the forefront of the cultural revolution in this country and pushing programmatic coverage to children about drag queens, dividing us, doing documentaries about white privilege and reparations. And then on the other hand, we have eight point three billion dollars in doge cuts to USAID, which is all the things that we've heard that that shocked the conscience of waste, fraud and abuse there. Everything from paying for Sesame Street in Iraq to voter I.D. in Haiti to just flat out pushing of an LGBTQ movement in all of these countries, strengthening the resilience of these movements. Programs like being gay in the Caribbean over and over when you when you scratch the surface of all of these programs, literally development assistance, economic support, all of the programs at USAID.

You found this in this funding of a leftist NGO operation that was pushing a very, very woke cultural agenda. We're sending that up to get away, to get rid of it, make these cuts permanent. They've been on hold. We want to make them permanent and we need Congress's vote in this particular set of funds to do so. So in order to make this permanent, what number is that?

The doge cuts are what? Eight point three billion dollars to make it permanent. But there's also the larger issue of rescission. Walk our audience through that, please.

Sure. And this is just the first of a series of rescission bills as we get comfortable with what's the annual amount of permanent savings that can be done. And if it's multi-year money, we're going to go ahead and send those up so long as Congress is actually going to be passing those.

That's critical. You know, we have executive tools that we can use if Congress is not going to pass these bills, but they've been demanding them. The process is is one of an exception or a procedure in the Impoundment Control Act.

And you and I know and are not big fans of the Impoundment Control Act and how it has bound the president. Correct. But there is a there is a process. It's called a fast track procedure to give an up or down vote in both the House and the Senate without concern with regard to the filibuster that will allow this to be voted on in the House and the Senate. And leadership of both parties has said, look, we're going to get this thing passed. We're going to send that up when they get back formally.

They need to be there to receive it. And then we'll start working with them to get the votes to get this thing through. The other element of this, of course, is the USAID cuts. The elements of this are rather remarkable. I mean, it's from the United States African Development Foundation to the Inter-American Foundation, which has small grants to grassroots civil society organizations in Latin America. The Democracy Fund, 83 million dollars to benefit LGBT in Caribbean. You have to wonder, and we have no evidence of this, but you have to wonder how how much of this actually ended up coming back into American affiliated politicians or their allies. It sounds very, very suspicious. However, Russ, walk us through this.

I know this is actually breaking news. Tell us more about these rescissions when it comes to the USAID and the foreign aid rescission package. Well, I think the reality of these rescissions is that, you know, I think we all think that government is too big and it has been for quite some time, decades.

But the when you see the fine print, when you see what the contracts are and you see what we're funding, you come away with this aha moment, this realization. Of course, these countries think worse of us and dislike us because we're funding this kind of garbage in their countries. We would not accept or we should we shouldn't be accepting. And part of the Trump administration is to push back and make sure domestically we're not funding this at the Department of Education or USDA. But then you add the fact this was our foreign policy. This is our foreign policy to fund, quote unquote, the resilience of the queer and trans sex movement in other countries. Like what on earth are we doing? And of course, that's going to have an implication as to whether these countries are listening to what our interests.

And of course, it has led to great we would be concerned if if we were their citizens with it. And so one after another, all we did, Charlie, is we took straight doge cuts, contracts, grants saved. We added them up and we sent this first tranche.

We will be sending this first tranche over. So I think the debate is very simple on the Hill. Do you stand with us against these these ridiculous items?

The president called them fraudulent and or not. Or are you going to say that there's some issue with regard to these cuts that we should actually be in the business of this? And I think it's going to be a very important debate. It's the first in a series of rescission packages that we will, in fact, send. And depending on how successful it goes, we'll send more. So let's let's close with this.

Let's talk about the work to balance the budget. By the way, that's huge news, everybody. It's major news. You heard it here first.

In closing here, Russ, what is that? What is the call to action for the audience to be able to get us closer and closer to a balanced budget? Because the spending fights are going to be enormous. There's a lot of Republicans on Capitol Hill that do not want to accommodate spending cuts. They're OK with trillion dollar deficits. They're OK with baseline budgeting. So, Russ, walk us through the call to action in the other places, the other pressure points that we are going to put Congress on notice that we demand spending cuts. Final thoughts, Russ, vote. Final thoughts is that obviously economic growth and tariffs, but spending reductions and spending restraint is an enormous part of what's necessary to balance the budget.

That's in two components, right? That's the first part is going after the woke and weaponized and wasteful bureaucracy. That is what we're doing with these doge cuts. That's what we'll be doing with rescissions.

And that will be over a 10 year period, incredible amounts of money. And and I think the most important because that's the that's the federal government that you and I interact with. That's the one that is is kind of aimed at us increasingly less so with President Trump. But we want to make sure that the bureaucracy can't reconstitute itself later in future administrations. Secondly, there are reforms to welfare and to we will call them mandatory programs that have made the social safety net a benefit hammock.

And that is keeping people out of the workforce and leading to less growth. And that's the kind of thing that we will need to tackle within the concept within the construct of reconciliation. So when we do the one big, beautiful bill, there'll be a conversation about extending the tax cuts and securing the president's new tax cut commitments from the campaign, also designed to get people to be able to work more and not be penalized for it. But we will also be pushing for mandatory savings reforms to these programs that generate a ton of money that I think will unlock the votes to be able to get to. And that's what really we're working on. Last week, we were pushing the House to pass the Senate budget resolution because we thought it was an it was an opportunity to go big.

And so we're looking forward to that beginning now once the members come back. Russ votes live from the White House. Absolutely rock star director of Office of Management Budget. Great job, Russ. Talk to you soon. Thanks so much.

Thanks, Charlie. Go to Y refi dot com. You don't have to ignore that mountain of student loan debt anymore.

It may not be available in all 50 states. If you go to Y refi, you can read the testimonials yourself from other people who've been where you are and how they've escaped. Go to Y refi dot com. Bad credit is accepted. They offer a three minute rate check without any credit impact. Go to Y refi dot com.

That is Y R E F Y dot com. On Thursday, we're going to the legendary Pullman, Washington. You know, a lot of people, when they save up for retirement, they say, I want a vacation in Pullman, Washington.

It's just like a real it's a real destination. No, not trying to make fun of Pullman, Washington. But if you've ever driven from Spokane, Washington, down to Pullman, it is objectively one of the most barren terrains in the country. It it's almost like laughably ugly because it's hills that are just like barren, dark black hills or like brown hills.

They have a name for it. What is the name of that whole sector there? And nothing against the great people of Pullman, but it's Palouse.

Thank you. Yeah, that's what it is. Yeah, that's that's where Emma's from. She said it's actually some of the most fertile soil in the country. Then why do you need phosphate? Glycophate.

Why do you need it, Emma? But not exactly. Let's just say Hawaii. So we are going to Washington State University. New story. Washington State professor has been arrested after allegedly assaulting a student with a MAGA hat.

It's pretty remarkable, actually, when you think about it. So it's a professor. This guy had to go prove his dissertation. A communist faculty member of the Washington State University faculty was arrested after allegedly assaulting a student for wearing a MAGA hat. In February, Washington State University junior Jay Sani was getting takeout in Pullman in the historic College Hill district when he was allegedly ambushed and assaulted by Patrick Mahoney and Jared.

Jared Hoff. Can you guys see why I'm making a little fun of Washington State here? As Sani was headed home with a sandwich, surveillance cameras captured the vicious beatdown in front of the Coug, a popular campus bar packed with students, an assault that left him with multiple scrapes and bruises. Thankfully, nothing worse than that. Pullman police arrested Mahoney and Hoff within hours of the assault on Colorado Street.

The pair are now facing fourth degree misdemeanor charges. Police say there was no racial or political motivation for the attack. Of course not. Right. But Sani believes the trigger was his bright red MAGA hat.

Well, Sani, let me tell you this. You are welcome to come up to the front of the line at our event in beautiful Pullman, Washington, the land of Emma and other great folks and great patriots, and we will get you a signed free MAGA hat of your choosing right there in Pullman, Washington. But understand that violence is the default tool of the political left. Violence, according to the media, they say, oh, it's a right wing phenomenon.

That is a brazen, absolute lie. President Trump has survived multiple assassination attempts. Nearly every cabinet official receives death threats. We get death threats on almost a daily basis. Luigi Maggioni is celebrated as a hero of the left.

Former Washington Post reporters say that he was a morally good man. Left wing arsonists are firebombing Tesla facilities across the country. Hundreds of thousands of dollars have flowed into. Carmelo Anthony's legal defense fund for murdering 17 year old Austin Metcalf. In fact, Carmelo Anthony with a K is now off on house arrest.

He's at home. Our Turning Point USA chapter president, University of Texas, Dallas, was just slammed in the head with a bike lock by a trans student. Antifa just destroyed another Turning Point USA tabling event with Brandon Tatum while assaulting our students at UC Davis. The Democrat Party has a paramilitary arm where they resort to violence first. If it was not for our amazing security at Boise State or at Washington State, they would come and they would try to hospitalize us and try to murder some of our kids.

That is 100 percent the truth. Absent police and absent security, the paramilitary arm of the campus left would try their best to try and do the most amount of harm against us. But CNN says that it's all right wing.

Play cut 189. While America's roots are soaked in bloodshed, violence in the country today is mostly from right wing extremism from Oklahoma City to Charlottesville to January 6th. There is simply no equivalent on the left. There's simply no equivalent on the left.

Really? How about, I don't know, everything that happened during Floyd-a-palooza and Black Lives Matter, all of the campus violence that we have catalogued. That is outright chilling Soviet propaganda. That is Mockingbird media level stuff. That is, you have to wonder, and I actually I want your opinion, freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com.

Email me freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. What is more dangerous? It was actually a debate I had with myself before I went to bed.

This is why I have to use Z-factor to get to sleep. What is more dangerous? If CNN said that and they didn't know the truth, meaning that they were lying but they didn't know it, is that more dangerous, meaning that they were naive? Or is it more dangerous that they knew they were lying and they lied anyway? What is actually more dangerous for society? Is it more dangerous for society, for a group of people, or for a person to say something even though they think they're right and they don't know any better? Or is it better for society, for somebody to know the truth, to know what they say is, oh, there's no right-wing equivalent, and then to not tell the truth? I think it's dreadfully more dangerous, infinitely more dangerous to know the truth and suppress the truth and still lie.

I think that is repulsive moral character. And that is the left. That is CNN. There's no right-wing equivalent. I could list off a hundred examples. The left resorts to violence as a primary political aim.

It has always been that way. We remain the party of free speech and dialogue. Thanks so much for listening, everybody. Email us as always. Freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. Thanks so much for listening and God bless. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.